Ligand effect of cyclometallated iridium(iii) complexes on N-alkylation of amines in hydrogen borrowing reactions

Dinuclear iridium complexes with the general formula (C^N)2Ir(μ-Cl)2Ir(C^N)2 (C^N = bidentate ligand with carbon and nitrogen donor atoms) were prepared and used in catalytic systems for N-alkylation of amines through the hydrogen borrowing pathway. Triphenylphosphine derivatives were used as auxiliary in catalytic systems to provide excellent conversion of amines to N-alkylation products in yields ranging from 57% to 100%. The catalytic ability of the catalyst depends on the structure of its coordination ligands, including bidentate ligands (C^N) and triphenylphosphine derivatives. These catalytic systems adopt an environmentally friendly and sustainable reaction process through a hydrogen self-transfer strategy, using readily available alcohols as alkylating agents without the need for bases, solvents, and other additives, showing potential in the synthetic and pharmaceutical industries.


Introduction
5][6][7][8] This reaction is generally fast but also has signicant disadvantages such as the introduction of tedious purication procedures, the use of toxic reagents that are harmful to human health, and environmentally unfriendly stoichiometric waste.
Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop efficient and environmentally friendly amine alkylation (N-alkylation) processes using harmless and readily available starting materials; in order to overcome the problems caused by halide-based N-alkylation problem, many studies have been conducted, including Buchwald-Hartwig coupling, 9 hydroamination, 10 and Ullmann reaction. 11Recently, a more robust and sustainable approach has attracted attention, employing a catalytic "hydrogen borrowing (HB)" strategy by using less toxic and more readily available alcohols as alkylating agents to form new C-N bonds.
Scheme 1 shows the general mechanism of the hydrogen borrowing strategy, 12,13 involving the following steps: (1) the two hydrogens of the alcohol are transferred to the catalyst metal, and the alcohol is converted into a more reactive and highly electrophilic carbonyl compound, (2) the carbonyl compound undergoes nucleophilic addition of amine and elimination of H 2 O to form an imine, and (3) in the nal stage catalytic hydrogenation of the imine occurs by transferring borrowed hydrogen to form an alkylated amine.This strategy has attracted widespread attention because the only byproduct of the process is water, providing a sustainable approach with high atomic efficiency. 14,15ntil now, a variety of catalysts have been discovered for the N-alkylation of amines using alcohols as alkylating agents, the most common of which are the iridium 16,17 and ruthenium 18,19 complexes, but many other metals, such as cobalt, 20,21 nickel, 22 rhodium, 23 palladium, 24,25 and rhenium, 26 complexes, have also been explored.Most of these studies report the development of a series of substrates, many of which exhibit good to excellent catalytic ability for N-alkylation, but most require the use of bases, solvents, and other additives, which limits the development of truly green processes.
Some groups, such as Shimizu et al. (2013), 27 Albrecht et al. (2017), 28 Wang et al. (2019), 29 and Özdemir et al. (2015), 30 developed base-free N-alkylation of amines via the BH reaction, but still required solvents or other additives.These reports mainly focus on the use of benzyl alcohol as an alkylating reagent for the alkylation of aniline or benzylamine.
It is worth mentioning that, in 2017, Williams and co-workers reported a method for the N-alkylation of amines using ruthenium complexes as homogeneous catalysts without requiring solvents and bases, 31 indicating that various amines have been successfully synthesized by benzyl alcohol alkylation.Under neat conditions, there are good to excellent conversions and yields, but alcohols other than benzyl alcohol are not described in this article, nor are amines other than primary amines.
Here, we report a series of catalytic systems comprising dinuclear iridium complexes as precursors and triphenylphosphine derivatives as auxiliary ligands for the N-alkylation of amines via a hydrogen borrowing process.These systems exhibit excellent N-alkylation performance for a variety of substrates under one-pot conditions without the need for bases, solvents, and other additives.The role of C^N ligands and triphenylphosphine derivatives in determining the catalytic efficiency of C-N bond formation is discussed in detail.

Initial catalytic studies
Initial study on the catalytic ability of the catalytic system.To evaluate the catalytic ability of dinuclear iridium complexes in C-N bond formation catalytic systems, we used triphenylphosphine derivatives, including triphenylphosphine (TPP), tris(4-methoxyphenyl)phosphine (TMPP) and tris(4-uorophenyl)phosphine (TFPP) as auxiliary ligands (ALs) to open the Ir 2 Cl 2 metallocycle of D1, creating the catalytic site for the N-alkylation of aniline using benzyl alcohol as the alkylating agent (Scheme 3).
When TPP, TMPP and TFPP were used as auxiliary ligands, the conversions of aniline to N-benzylaniline were 70, 82 and 80%, respectively (Fig. 2), suggesting that the nature of the auxiliary ligand affects the performance of C-N bond formation in amine N-alkylation.
The use of different ALs that results in different conversions may indicate the formation different iridium catalysts upon reactions.Catalysts of these reactions have been isolated and characterized by using single-crystal X-ray crystallography (crystal data for Cat.1-Cat.3 are listed in Table S1 †).Fig. 3 depicts the crystal structures of (pp) 2 Ir(Cl) (TPP), Cat.Therefore, TMPP was chosen to evaluate the effect of bidentate ligands (C^N) on C-N bond formation in various dinuclear iridium complexes.First, we performed a series of catalytic reactions by using different ratios of D1 and TMPP to optimize the catalytic conditions.The molar ratio of D1, aniline and benzyl alcohol are 0.015 : 1 : 2, while the molar ratio of TMPP to D1 ranges from 0 to 4. The reactants were placed in Schlenk tubes, reacted at 160 °C for 24 hours, and the composition of the reaction mixture was determined by GC-MS.Fig. 4. Shows that N-alkylated products are rarely observed under reaction conditions without TMPP.The conversion of aniline to N-benzylaniline increases with increasing the molar ratio of TMPP to D1 and reaches a maximum when the molar ratio is 2. When the molar ratio of TMPP to D1 was greater than 2, the conversion gradually decreases.This suggests that the fully equivalent auxiliary ligand TMPP is necessary to open the bridging chlorine structure, but excess auxiliary ligands are detrimental to the reaction because they inhibit the release of TMPP and reduce the density of catalytic species.
Based on optimized conditions, the dinuclear iridium complexes D1-D5 were applied to the N-alkylation of aniline.Fig. 5 shows that D2 with the C^N ligand phenylbenzoxazole has better performance in C-N bond formation than D1 with the phenylpyridyl group.However, the electron-withdrawing groups on the C^N ligand of D3, D4, and D5 greatly weakened the performance of C-N bond formation, and a cumulative effect was also observed for D4.
Catalysts of these reactions have also been isolated and characterized by X-ray crystallography (crystal data for Cat.4-Cat.7 are listed in Tables S3-S4 †).Single-crystal structures of catalysts (pbo) 2 Ir(Cl) (TMPP), Cat. 4, (cpbo) 2 Ir(Cl) (TMPP), Cat. 5, (fpbo) 2 -Ir(Cl) (TMPP), Cat. 6, and (pcbo) 2 Ir(Cl)(TMPP), Cat. 7, are represented with ORTEP diagrams in Fig. 6.All catalysts adopt twisted octahedrons, with cis-CC, trans-N-N and cis-P-Cl arrangements.Selected bond distances and angles of Cat.4-Cat.7 are listed in Table S5, † and the comparison of bond distances between iridium and coordination atoms is shown in Fig. 7. Electronegative groups (such as uorine and chlorine) bonded to the phenylbenzoxazole enhance the bonding of the catalysts, resulting in shorter bond distances between iridium and coordinating atoms.For catalysts composed of phenylbenzoxazole derivatives as C^N ligands, Cat. 4 has the longest Ir-P, Ir-N AV and Ir-C AV bond lengths, which are 2.427 (4), 2.093 (6) and 2.067(9) Å, respectively.As mentioned above, the catalytic system with D2 as precursor and TMPP as auxiliary ligand exhibited the best C-N bond formation performance in the N-alkylation of amines, indicating that the catalytic system has two favourable properties for C-N bond formation.One is that the bond strength between iridium and the phosphorus atom of TMPP is stronger than that between iridium and coordinated chlorine in chloro-bridged dimers (C^N) 2 Ir(m-Cl) 2 -Ir(C^N) 2 , so TMPP can effectively open the dimer structures, Scheme 3 The catalytic system using D1 as the precursor and triphenylphosphine as the auxiliary ligand forms C-N bonds.and for D2, the bond strength between iridium and the phosphorus of TMPP is suitable for releasing TMPP to create catalytic sites.As the bond strength between iridium and phosphorus atoms in TMPP increases, the release of TMPP becomes difficult and the catalytic activity of C-N bond formation decreases.The second effect is that the steric effect of Cat. 4 is less hinder than catalysts with electronegative groups on the phenyl or benzoxazole groups.As shown in Fig. 7, when the electronegative group is located on the he C^N ligand, the bonding strength between iridium and coordination atom is   suggesting that the steric effect of Cat. 2 is more hinder than Cat. 4. Combining of the two factors affecting catalytic activity, catalytic system using D2 as a precursor and TMPP as an auxiliary ligand showed better performance of C-N bond formation than that using D1 and TMPP.In addition, the Ir-P bond length of Cat. 5 is shorter than that of Cat. 6, but the Ir-N AV and Ir-C AV bond lengths of Cat. 5 are signicantly longer than those of Cat. 6.This again shows that even if the catalytic species is easily formed, the steric effect of the catalyst is an important factor.
To further investigate the effect of the ligand C^N on the molecular structures, calculation based on DFT (B3LYP/ LANL2DZ level) for Cat. 2 and Cat.4-Cat.7 were performed.The highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energy levels of Cat. 2 and Cat.4-Cat.7 are 1.56, 1.37, 1.01, 0.80 and 1.14 eV, respectively.The energy levels of their lowest unoccupied orbital (LUMO) are −7.56,−7.83, −8.17, −8.30 and −8.08 eV, respectively.Fig. 8 shows that the electron-withdrawing group bonded on the phenylbenzoxazole can stabilize the HOMO and LUMO of the catalyst, thereby inhibiting the release of the coordination ligand.Among them, the MO energy level of Cat. 5 having an electron-withdrawing group bonded to the phenyl group of the C^N ligand is lower than that of Cat. 7 having an electron-withdrawing group bonded to the benzoxazole group of C^N ligand.The phenyl groups of C^N ligands contribute 34.92, 29.86, 32.35, 33.02 and 27.72% to the HOMOs of Cat. 2 and Cat.4-Cat.7, respectively.The pyridyl or benzoxazole groups of C^N ligands contribute 16.86, 21.72, 24.05, 17.71 and 22.73% to the HOMO of Cat. 2 and Cat.4-Cat.7, respectively.Fig. 9 shows that the phenyl group of the C^N ligand is the main contributor to the HOMO; therefore, catalysts with electronwithdrawing groups bonded to the phenyl groups of C^N ligands have a greater impact on the energy levels of HOMOs.
Since the iridium atom is the catalytic centre of the complex, the contribution of iridium to the frontier orbitals was also investigated.The contribution of iridium to the HOMOs of Cat. 2 and Cat.4-Cat.7 are 5.19, 4.75, 4.19, 3.97 and 3.33%, respectively.The contribution of iridium to the LUMOs of Cat. 2 and Cat.4-Cat.7 are 5.19, 5.50, 5.48, 5.30 and 3.02%, respectively.Fig. 10 shows that the LUMO of Cat. 4 has the largest proportion of iridium among all catalysts, and the HOMO of Cat. 4 has the largest proportion of iridium among the phenylbenzoxazole derivatives.This is similar to the trend of C-N bond formation in the above catalytic system, implying a positive correlation between the contribution of iridium to the frontier orbitals and the activity of the catalytic species.
Based on the above information, we can infer that the stability of the bridging chlorine structures of the dinuclear iridium precursors (D1-D5) should be different from each other, which exhibit the characteristic of C-N bond formation activities that are dependent on the temperature.Fig. 11 shows that, for the catalytic system D4/TMPP, only about 20% conversion was observed at 150 °C, whereas, a moderate yield (about 55%) was observed at 160 °C, and only about 65% was reached at a rather high temperature of 170 °C.This indicates that the bridging chlorine structure of precursor D4 is quite inert and difficult to be opened by TMPP.The performance of the D3/TMPP catalytic system was better than that of D4/TMPP,  and the highest yield was 70%.The performance of the D5/ TMPP catalytic system was also signicantly temperaturedependent, but the conversion was as high as 88%.The maximum conversion rate of the D1/TMPP catalytic system (85%) was slightly lower than that of the D5/TMPP catalytic system, but at 150 °C the conversion rate of the D1/TMPP catalytic system (65%) was much higher than that of the D5/ TMPP catalytic system (42%).Importantly, the D2/TMPP catalytic system exhibited stable and excellent performance on C-N bond formation, with conversions of 92% at 150 °C, 98% at 160 °C, and 100% at 170 °C.
While the D1/TMPP and D2/TMPP catalytic systems provided moderate to excellent yields for the N-alkylation of amines at 150 °C, the yields for the other catalytic systems were all below 50%.When the reaction temperature was increased from 150 °C to 160 °C, the yields of all catalytic systems increased dramatically.When the reaction temperature increased from 160 °C to 170 °C, the productivity of each catalytic system still increased, but the increase was much smaller than when the reaction temperature increased from 150 °C to 160 °C.Also, some catalytic systems form by-products at 170 °C.Therefore, in the following study, the reaction at 160 °C was used to evaluate the performance of the catalytic systems for C-N bond formation.
A series of D1/TMPP catalytic reactions based on different catalyst loading ratios were carried out to evaluate the conversion of amines to N-alkylated products, where the molar ratio of precursor D1 to auxiliary ligand TMPP was xed at 1 : 2, the molar ratio of precursor D1 to amine is in the range of 0.0047 to 0.0373 (mmol mmol −1 ), and the molar ratio of amine to alcohol was xed at 1 : 2. Reactions were carried out in Schlenk tubes at 160 °C for 24 h, and the composition of the reaction mixture was determined by GC-MS and summarized in Fig. 12.At low catalyst loading (0.0047 mmol mmol −1 ), a low concentration of the alkylated product (N-dibenzylaniline) (45.9%) was detected.When the catalyst loading ratio increased to 0.0123 mmol mmol −1 , the conversion of amine alkylation products increased sharply (up to 76.7%).When the catalyst loading was 0.0187 mmol mmol −1 , the amine conversion increased slightly to 79.25%.When the catalyst loading was further increased, the amine conversion did not increase signicantly, even if the catalyst loading was 0.0373 mmol mmol −1 , the amine conversion only increased to 81.95.Therefore, we adopted a catalyst loading ratio of 0.015 mmol mmol −1 as a standard for evaluating other catalytic reactions.
We monitored the composition change with the reaction time when aniline and benzyl alcohol were reacted in the D1/ TMPP catalytic system, the catalyst loading ratio was xed at 0.015 mmol mmol −1 , and the composition of the reaction mixture was determined by GC-MS.Fig. 13 shows that at the beginning of the reaction (the rst 30 minutes), the aniline disappeared signicantly, the concentration of the product (Nbenzylaniline) increased rapidly, and the imine was gradually formed.Thereaer the aniline was still consumed at a moderate rate and the concentration of the product (N-benzylaniline) increased steadily but the concentration of the imine decreased gradually.It shows that at this stage, the conversion rate of imine to N-benzylaniline is faster than that of aniline to imine.Aer a reaction time of 12 hours, the decrease of aniline and imine slowed down, and the increase of N-benzylaniline also slowed down.Aer 24 hours of reaction, the concentrations of aniline, imine and N-benzylaniline did not change signicantly.Therefore, in order to compare the capabilities of the catalytic systems, the time of the catalytic reaction was set as 24 hours.Except for aniline, benzyl alcohol, imine and N-benzyl aniline, no other substances were detected in the reaction system.In addition, no benzaldehyde was detected in the reaction system containing only the catalyst and benzyl alcohol without aniline, implying that the imine should be released from an intermediate in the catalytic cycle rather than through the reaction of the amine with the aldehyde produced by the reaction of the catalyst with benzyl alcohol.
Substrate scope.Based on optimized conditions, we used three catalytic systems, D1/TMPP, D2/TMPP, and D4/TMPP, to study the substrate scope of N-alkylation of amines in the hydrogen borrowing reaction.The conversion of amines to Nalkylated products (P1-P15) is summarized in Table 1 showing that all catalytic systems have good performance in terms of C-N bond formation, for example, the conversion of aniline to N-benzylaniline using D1/TMPP, D2/TMPP and D4/TMPP catalyst systems were 85, 98 and 65% respectively.Substituted alcohols such as 4-chlorobenzyl alcohol and 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol can also alkylate aniline well to obtain the corresponding secondary amines P2 and P3, and the conversion rate is good in the D1/TMPP catalytic system (average 84%), excellent in the D2/TMPP catalytic system (average 97%), and moderate in the D4/TMPP catalytic system (average 63%).Substituted anilines, such as p-methoxyaniline, 4-chloroaniline, can also be well alkylated with benzyl alcohol or substituted alcohols to give the corresponding N-alkylated products (P4-P9).The average conversion rate of the D1/TMPP catalytic system is 76%, the average conversion rate of the D2/TMPP catalytic system is 92%, and the average conversion rate of the D4/TMPP catalytic system is 59%.Secondary alcohols are also conducive to the alkylation of amines, resulting in corresponding N-alkylated products (P10-P12).
Fig. 14 shows that in 12 C-N bond formation reactions, the D2/TMPP catalytic system exhibited excellent performance with an average conversion of about 95% and the D1/TMPP catalytic system showed good results with an average conversion of about 80%.Although the catalytic capacity of the D4/TMPP catalytic system was much lower than that of the D2/TMPP and D1/TMPP catalytic systems, it provided moderate results with an average conversion of about 55%.These indicated that all (C^N) 2 Ir(m-Cl) 2 Ir(C^N) 2 /TMPP catalytic systems proposed here have high stability and reliability in catalyzing C-N bond formation in various substrate combinations.
Properties of the catalyst.Catalysts 1-7 were separated from the catalytic system and can also be directly synthesized by reacting dinuclear iridium complexes with triphenylphosphine derivatives.All catalysts are stable in air at room temperature.As a homogeneous catalyst used at low loading rates, it is difficult to accurately recover from the reaction mixture, so its recyclability was not evaluated.The turnover number (TON) and turnover frequency (TOF) of 15 catalytic systems for the conversion of aniline to N-benzylaniline were evaluated and summarized in Table 2.The turnover frequency of the 15 catalytic systems ranges from 2.87 to 4.17, and the turnover number ranges from 100 to 180.For catalytic systems using the same dinuclear iridium complex but different triphenylphosphine derivatives, the catalytic system using D2 showed the best performance, while for catalytic systems using the same triphenylphosphine derivatives but different dinuclear iridium complex, the catalytic system with TMPP showed the best performance.
Reaction mechanism exploration.In order to gain a deeper understanding of the N-alkylation process, we performed some reactions to study the impact of the environment of the catalysts on the N-alkylation process.
In a Schlenk tube, 0.030 mmol Cat. 2 was mixed with 5 mmol toluene and heated at 120 °C for some time under nitrogen atmosphere.Aer evaporating toluene, add 1 mmol aniline and 2 mmol benzyl alcohol to the reaction tube, tighten and heat at 160 °C for 24 hours.A series of reactions based on different preheating times of Cat. 2 were carried out to evaluate the Table 1 N-Alkylation of amines in D1/TMPP, D2/TMPP and D4/TMPP catalytic systems a a Add a mixture of 1 mmol of amine with 2 mmol of alcohol, 0.015 mmol of dinuclear iridium complex and 0.03 mmol of TMPP into a Schlenk tube and react at 160 °C for 24 h. a Conversion in D1/TMPP catalytic system; b conversion in D2/TMPP catalytic system; c conversion in D4/ TMPP catalytic system.In most cases, solvents are used to facilitate chemical reactions, but sometimes, instead of promoting the reaction, they hinder it.The catalytic reaction systems mentioned above are extremely sensitive to solvents.Three solvents, o-dichlorobenzene (O-DCB), dioxane and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), were added to two catalytic systems D1/TMPP and D2/TMPP to study the effect of solvents on the performance of the catalytic system.In a Schlenk tube, 0.015 mmol of dinuclear iridium complex D1 or D2 was mixed with 0.030 mmol of TMPP, 2 mmol of solvent (O-DCB, dioxane, or DMSO), 1 mmol of aniline, and 2 mmol of benzyl alcohol.The reaction was carried out at 160 °C for 24    hours, and the composition of the reaction mixture was determined by GC-MS.The C-N bond formation activity is suppressed about 5% in O-DCB, 30-40% in dioxane, and 80∼100% in DMSO (Fig. 17), showing that aprotic solvents hinder the catalytic system.Furthermore, an aprotic solvent with a higher dipole moment (DMSO, m = 3.96) inhibits the conversion of amine alkylation more severely than an aprotic solvent with a lower dipole moment (dioxane, m = 2.55).This shows that better solvating solvents signicantly reduce the reactivity of the catalyst and that the Lewis donor suppresses the activity of the catalytic species (Scheme 5).
The above studies show that in the catalytic system, the Ir 2 Cl 2 metal ring of the iridium dimer should be opened early to form an iridium monomer catalyst.The iridium monomer can release auxiliary ligands and produce coordination unsaturated species for catalysis, but can also recombine to form dinuclear iridium complex.Imines are observed in the catalytic system and are released from an intermediate in the catalytic cycle rather than through the reaction of the amine with the aldehyde produced by the reaction of the catalyst with benzyl alcohol.The vacancies of the coordination unsaturated compound are oen coordinated with the lone pair of electrons of the oxygen atoms of dioxane and DMSO, and can also be coordinated with the lone pair of electrons of the alcohol to form an alcohol coordination intermediate.Based on the above information and preliminary mechanistic studies, [35][36][37] c).The amine attacks the carbon of the alcohol coordinated to the metal, causing the hydride to transfer from the carbon to the metal, releasing chloride ions, forming the ammonium hydride iridium complex III (step d).Hydrogen chloride is released to form iridium hydride complex IV (step e).Aer oxygen protonation, the lone pair electron of nitrogen bonds to the metal, displacing the metal-oxygen bond to form the amine hydride iridium complex V (step f).Dehydration of V to form imine hydride iridium complex VI (step g).The imine-iridium hydride complex VI undergoes two reactions.One is to release the imine in a reversible reaction to form the iridium hydride complex VII (step h); the second pathway is to transfer the hydride from the metal to the carbon of the imino group to form the amine chloride iridium complex VIII (step i).Finally, the product is released from complex VIII and regenerates the coordinated unsaturated species I (step j).Synthetic applications.N-Heterocycles are important structures in biochemical and pharmaceutical compounds, usually constructed through many complex steps.Below, we use the D2/ TMPP catalytic system to construct heterocycles in a more compact manner.
First, the D2/TMPP catalytic system can use simple cyclic amines to construct complex target molecules with high yields in the cleaning process.For example, aniline, 4-chloroaniline and 4-methoxyaniline reacted with pyrrolidine to form benzylpyrrolidine derivatives P13, P14 and P15 with yields of 91%, 87% and 85% respectively (Table 3).N-Benzylpyrrolidine derivatives have undergone extensive biological evaluation in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) for ameliorating scopolamine-induced amnesia and amyloid beta-induced cognitive dysfunction.Such derivatives are also used to reduce brain AChE activity, antioxidant potential and balance enzyme inhibition of cholinesterase.In addition, piperazine was reacted with aniline to form benzylpiperazine (BZP) P16, a recreational drug with euphoric properties, in 94% yield.Piperazine reacts with 4-chloroaniline to form p-chlorobenzylpiperazine (P17) in 93% yield, which has been explored as an inhibitor that specically binds to the 5-HT transporter (PubMed), 38 such as [3H]6-nitroquinazine. Piperazine reacted with 4-methoxyaniline to produce methoxybenzylpiperazine (P18) with a yield of 95%, and its inhibitory effect on the cholinergic system was studied.
Second, these catalytic systems can provide a cascade reaction process to construct N-heterocycles.For example, aniline and diol react through intermolecular and intramolecular reactions to form N-heterocycles, including N-phenylpyrrolidine (P19), N-phenylpiperidine (P20) and seven-membered Nheterocycle (P21).The yields were 94, 94 and 95% respectively.These nitrogen heterocycles and their derivatives are ubiquitous structural units in pharmaceuticals and ne chemicals.
Interestingly, phenylpiperazine derivatives (P22-P24) were obtained by reacting diethanolamine or N-substituted diethanolamine with aniline derivatives through a cascade reaction process of intermolecular and intramolecular reactions.The phenylpiperazine derivatives are characterized by the phenyl group attached to the piperazine ring.Many phenylpiperazine derivatives are medicines, 39 such as antrafenine, bifeprunox, ciprooxacin, dropropizine.and elopiprazole.

Conclusions
The catalytic system composed of dinuclear iridium (C^N) 2 Ir(m-Cl) 2 Ir(C^N) 2 and auxiliary ligand triphenylphosphine derivatives shows excellent catalytic ability for C-N bond formation.The catalytic ability of these catalytic systems depends on the structure of the bidentate ligand (C^N) of the metal complex, the type of auxiliary ligand, the ratio of metal complex to auxiliary ligand, and the solvent used.Catalytic system D2/ TMPP showed the best performance.Various amines such as aromatic amines, aliphatic amines, primary amines, and secondary amines react well with various alcohols such as aromatic alcohols, aliphatic alcohols, primary alcohols, secondary alcohols, and diols.In 24 C-N bond formation reactions, the D2/TMPP catalytic system showed excellent performance, with an average conversion rate of approximately 97%.N-Heterocycles, such as pyrrolidine derivatives, piperazine derivatives, and large heterocycles (higher than six-membered rings) can be constructed in high yields.These catalytic systems for synthetic strategies could inspire the development of new C-N bond forming reactions as well as pharmaceutical applications for sustainable transformations.

Materials and methods
Iridium chloride (IrCl 3 , anhydrous) was obtained from the Seedchem Co.All other chemicals including were purchased from Acros and used as received.NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker Advance-400 MHz or a Mercury 300 MHz NMR spectrometer.Elemental analyses (CHN) was obtained from an Elementar vario EL III analyzer.Mass spectrometry was performed on a Finnigan/Thermo Quest MAT 95XL instrument using electron impact ionization for organic compounds and fast atom bombardment for metal complexes.

Synthesis of benzoxazole derivative ligands (L2-L5)
Benzoxazole derivative ligands L2-L5 were prepared by Philips condensation as follows: In a ask, mix one equivalent of the Table 3 Preparation of N-heterocycles in D2/TMPP catalytic systems a a Add a mixture of 1 mmol of amine with 2 mmol of alcohol, 0.015 mmol of dinuclear iridium complex and 0.03 mmol of TMPP into a Schlenk tube and react at 160 °C for 24 h. a Conversion in D2/TMPP catalytic system; b isolated yields.benzoic acid derivatives (benzoic acid for L2 and L5, 4-chlorobenzoic acid for L3, and 3,5-diuorobenzoic acid for L4) with 1.05 equivalents of the appropriate aminophenol derivatives (aminophenol for L2, L3, and L4, and 2-amino-4-chlorophenol for L5), then polyphosphoric acid (at the ratio of 10 g polyphosphoric acid/mmol of benzoic acid derivatives) were added to this mixture.The mixture was reacted at 140 °C for 24 hours.Aer cooling to room temperature, the mixture was slowly poured into pure water and stirred thoroughly; the precipitate was collected by ltration, washed with pure water, and dried to obtain a crude product.The crude product was puried by silica gel column chromatography using hexane-dichloromethane as the eluent to obtain the corresponding ligand.Structural data for benzoxazole derivative ligands is shown in the ESI.† Synthesis of dinuclear iridium precursors (C^N)2Ir(m-Cl) 2Ir(C^N)2 (D1-D5) Synthesis of cyclometalated Ir(III) chloride-bridged dimers (D1-D5) based on previous paper. 40,41In a ask, mix the benzoxazole derivatives (L2-L5) with iridium trichloride and a mixed solvent of 2-ethoxyethanol and water (3 : 1, v/v).The ratio of reactants is 1.0 mmol iridium trichloride/2.5 mmol benzoxazole derivative/ 20 ml mixed solvent.The mixture was reacted at 110 °C for 24 hours under nitrogen.Aer cooling to room temperature, the mixture was poured into pure water, the dimer precipitate was ltered out, washed with deionized water and ethanol, and then dried in a vacuum oven at 50 °C.Structural data for dinuclear iridium precursors is shown in the ESI.†

General procedure for N-alkylation reaction
In a Schlenk tube, mix the amine with the alcohol, dinuclear iridium precursor, and auxiliary ligand.The ratio of reactants is 1.0 mmol amine/2.0mmol alcohol/0.015mmol dinuclear iridium precursor/0.03mmol auxiliary ligand.The mixture was reacted at 160 °C for 24 hours under nitrogen.The crude product is puried by column chromatography, using dichloromethane/n-hexane or methanol/dichloromethane as the eluent to obtain the pure product.The desired N-alkylation products were thoroughly characterized by 1 H, 13 C NMR and MS spectra.Structural data for N-alkylation products are shown in the ESI.† X-Ray crystal structure data, NMR and HMS data for Cat.1-Cat.7 Catalyst 1-7 was isolated from the catalytic system and crystallized by solvent dispersion using dichloromethane/n-hexane.The diffraction data of Cat.1-Cat.7 were collected on a Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer with graphitemonochromatized Mo Ka X-ray radiation (l = 0.71073 Å) at room temperature.All the calculations for the structure determination were carried out using SHELXTL package (version 5.1).Initial atomic positions were located by Patterson methods using XS, and the structures of the complexes were rened by the least-square method using SHELXL-97. 42,43Basic information pertaining to crystal parameters and structure renement are summarized in Tables S1 and S3-S4.† Selected bond distances and angles are listed in Tables S2 and S5.† Structural data including 1 H, 13 C NMR and MS spectra for Cat.1-Cat.7 are shown in the ESI.†

Fig. 2
Fig.2Conversion of aniline into N-benzylaniline in catalytic systems using D1 as precursor and TPP, TMPP or TFPP as auxiliary ligand.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Conversion of aniline into N-benzylaniline in D1/TMPP catalytic systems with different proportions of D1 and TMPP.
enhanced, shortening the bond lengths of Ir-P, Ir-N AV and Ir-C AV , leading to a centrally constricted structure and raising the barrier to C-N bond formation.The Ir-P bond length of Cat. 2 is longer than that of Cat. 4, so in principal Cat. 2 should release TMPP more easily than Cat. 4, and then Cat. 2 should have a higher catalytic activity for C-N bond formation than Cat. 4. Upon further detailed inspection, the bond lengths of Ir-N AV and Ir-C AV of Cat. 2 are signicantly shorter than those of Cat. 4,

Fig. 12 Fig. 13
Fig. 12 Conversion of aniline into N-benzylaniline in the D1/TMPP catalytic system based on different loading ratios of precursor D1 and auxiliary ligand TMPP.

Fig. 14
Fig.14Comparison of conversion of N-alkylation of amines showed in Table1.

a
Add a mixture of 1 mmol of amine with 2 mmol of alcohol, 0.005 mmol of dinuclear iridium complex and 0.01 mmol of triphenylphosphine derivatives into a Schlenk tube and react at 160 °C for 12 h.The composition of the reaction mixture was determined by GC-MS.

Fig. 15
Fig. 15 Conversion of aniline into N-benzylaniline by catalyst Cat. 2 pre-treated for different times.
a plausible mechanism for C-N bond formation in the (C^N) 2 Ir(m-Cl) 2 Ir(C^N) 2 /AL catalytic systems was proposed (Scheme 6).In the rst step of the catalytic cycle (step a), the bridge chlorine structure ((C^N)2Ir(m-Cl) 2Ir(C^N)2) of the precursor is opened by the attack of the auxiliary ligand (AL) to form a catalyst.The catalyst releases the auxiliary ligand to form coordinatively unsaturated species I (step b).The alcohol binds to the vacant coordination site of I to form the alcohol-coordinated intermediate II (step

Scheme 5 Scheme 6
Scheme 5 Inhibition of Lewis donor solvents on catalytic system performance.
1, (pp) 2 -Ir(Cl) (TMPP), Cat. 2, and (pp) 2 Ir(Cl)(TFPP), Cat. 3. The two nitrogen atoms are trans to each other while the phosphorus and chlorine atoms are cis to each other, resulting in the distorted octahedral geometries for the Ir(III) metal centers.Selected bond distances and angles for Cat.1-Cat.3 are listed in Table S2, † showing that the Ir-P bond length of Cat. 2 [2.4388(16)Å] is longer than those of Cat. 1 [2.4074(6)Å] and Cat.3 [2.419(3) Å].The steric effect of TMPP is thus stronger than those of TPP and TFPP, resulting in longer Ir-P bond in Cat. 2 and weaker bond strength between the central metal and TMPP.Cat. 2 is thus much easier to release TMPP ligands to provide active sites for the incoming reagents.

Table 2
TON and TOF of catalytic system a