Drinking water contamination from the thermal degradation of plastics: implications for wildfire and structure fire response †

This study was conducted to determine if the thermal degradation of various plastic drinking water pipes ( i.e. , PEX, HDPE, PP, PVC, and CPVC) may be a source of drinking water contamination. Widespread volatile organic compound (VOC) contamination was found in water distribution systems following three wildfires in California. A potential source of this contamination was thought to be due to the degradation of plastic components in drinking water distribution systems. Eleven plastic drinking water pipes, across eight brands, were exposed to elevated temperatures (200 ° C to 400 ° C), and subsequently submerged in water or in n -hexane to observe the extent of VOC leaching. Results indicated that thermally damaged drinking water pipes can be sources of VOC leaching, with ten of the eleven materials leaching benzene, a carcinogen, into water. As exposure temperature increased, an increase in VOC leaching was observed in the polyethylene materials. Conversely, in the vinyl materials the significant mass loss associated with high exposure temperature was inversely proportional to the amount of BTEX leaching that was observed. Additional tentatively identified compounds (TICs), consisting primarily of aliphatic hydrocarbons, saturated ketones, or aromatic compounds, were found in the water (22 TICs) and n -hexane (134 TICs) leachate of burned plastics. This study has significant implications for both wildfire and structure fire recovery as plastic materials are increasingly being used in buried and building plumbing, and visual inspection is not a sufficient indicator of contamination risk.


Introduction
2][3] After recent wildfire events, volatile organic compound (VOC) contamination in U.S. drinking water systems has prompted questions about the source of these contaminants. 1,4One of these VOCs included benzene, a carcinogen, which was found at 40 000 μg L −1 and greater than 2217 μg L −1 concentrations in the water distribution systems following the Tubbs Fire (2017) and Camp Fire (2018), respectively. 1,5,6Both wildfires occurred in California, and contamination levels greatly exceeded the federal and California state long-term drinking water exposure limits by a factor of 200 to 40 000, and even short-term exposure limits by (a) the degradation of plastic materials present in the water systems, (b) back siphoning of contaminated water from damaged building plumbing, and/or (c) contaminated air and/or ash sucked into the distribution system as it depressurized. 1 During the recent 2020 CZU Lightning Complex Fire, water distribution infrastructure and building damage prompted system depressurization.VOC contamination of multiple water systems was found. 4,13ecause private well owner systems can contain plastics, they were advised to test for VOCs and SVOCs after both the Camp Fire and CZU Lightning Complex Fire. 14,157][18] The dissimilar approach to water and infrastructure testing for the same problem underscores a need to investigate the potential contamination sources.
Plastic pipes are increasingly being used for water distribution system and building plumbing because of their flexibility and low cost.In particular, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and high density polyethylene (HDPE) water distribution pipes are commonly used. 19The water mains affected by the Tubbs Fire were roughly 85% PVC, and one water system affected by the Camp Fire contained 35% PVC water mains. 20Service lines that convey water from the water main to the water meter and into the building are also commonly made from plastic material.1][22][23][24] Once drinking water enters the building, it can travel through additional plastic pipes that convey cold and/or hot water in pipes made of PEX, PVC, HDPE, and polypropylene (PP). 21,22,24,25Building water piping constitutes 5 to 10 times the length of piping as compared to the length of piping in buried water distribution systems. 26Private drinking water wells can also consist of PVC and HDPE well pipes and service lines.
It is well established that VOCs can be released into the air from burned structures, and have been found in water used to extinguish structure fires as well. 27,28Temperatures caused by wildfire and structure fires can thermally damage plastic pipes (Fig. 1), and as a result may provide a reasonable source for the observed water contamination.0][31] The temperatures that plastic components will be exposed to will vary substantially depending on the surface temperature, the depth it is buried and its location within the walls of a structure.Such factors indicate that both buried pipes and building plumbing may be subject to a variety of temperatures potentially causing differing levels of thermal degradation throughout the system.
Plastic thermal degradation is a known source of VOC contamination in the air, but its potential to cause contamination in the drinking water has not been studied extensively.Specific contaminants found in the air due to HDPE, PP, PVC, and CPVC thermal degradation include a combination of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (otherwise known as BTEX) chlorobenzene, and naphthalene, among others (Table S1 of the ESI †).3][34][35][36] A recent PVC sewer pipe thermal degradation study, in which the PVC was ignited using a torch and subsequently exposed to air or submerged in water for 7 days, indicated that the majority of compounds that leached into the water were alkanes and alkenes, followed by various aromatic compounds. 33Vinyl chloride and chlorobenzene, two contaminants discovered in the drinking water following both fires, were detected in water exposed to the damaged PVC but notably benzene was only detected in the air emissions. 33The lack of benzene found in the water exposed to damaged PVC sewer pipe underscores the need for additional information to identify the chemicals produced during plastic drinking water pipe thermal degradation.Further, there is a need to determine the degree to which a variety of degraded plastic pipes used to convey drinking water may be a source of contamination.
The goal of this study was to determine the potential contribution of thermally damaged plastic pipes to drinking water contamination after heat exposure.Here, various plastic drinking water pipes were exposed to a range of elevated temperatures (200 °C to 400 °C) and submerged in water or an organic solvent to observe organic chemical release.Relationships were also explored to link contaminant leaching across different pipe types and exposure temperatures.

Standards and reagents
A mixed standard of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, o-xylene, m-xylene, and p-xylene (200 mg L −1 in methanol (MeOH)), was purchased from Restek Corporation.n-Hexane and MeOH were purchased from Fischer Scientific.Reagent grade water (18.2MΩ cm) was produced from a Thermo Scientific Barnstead™ Nanopure™ water purification system.

Plastic pipes and characterization of thermal properties
A total of 11 different plastic pipe materials across eight brands was examined in this study (Table S2 †).These included three PEX-a and two PEX-c pipe materials along with one of each PEX-c-EVOH (ethylene vinyl alcohol), PEX-b, HDPE, PP, PVC, and CPVC pipe materials (Table S2 †).[24][25]37,38 The PEX-c-EVOH was a multi-barrier material and only approved for usage in building water systems, whereas the other PEX materials may be used as buried service lines or in building systems. 21,37DPE, PVC, and CPVC materials are often used for buried water mains, buried service lines, and in building plumbing. 22,23,37The PP pipe is only used in indoor building plumbing. 25,37The PP pipe was obtained from a manufacturer in 2015, whereas the rest of the pipes were purchased in various retail stores in the Lafayette, IN area in either July 2019 or September 2016 (Table S2 Thermal transitions of all of the pipe materials as well as the residue generated under similar heating conditions were evaluated using a TA Instruments Q100 Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TGA).The initial sample weight that was tested was 13 to 18 mg.The furnace temperature was equilibrated at 40 °C, and temperature was then ramped at 10 °C min −1 to 1000 °C.A nitrogen gas flowrate of 60 mL min −1 was applied.

Experimental procedure
To thermally age the plastics, 5 g per sample, which corresponds to 5.0 to 8.4 cm [1.9 to 3.2 in] length pipe depending on the material, was heated in a porcelain crucible for 30 min at 200, 300, or 400 °C in a muffle furnace.These temperature regimes were chosen so that a range of degradation conditions could be evaluated, much like what would be expected with water distribution system infrastructure at various distances from the fire front.After sample heating, samples were cooled for 30 min in a desiccator.Each porcelain crucible was pre-conditioned before use by heating it to 110 °C for 30 min and cooling it for 15 min.Mass loss was determined by recording the mass of the crucible and the plastic pipe before thermal degradation and after cooling.
Once cooled, each pipe sample was then drilled into spirals using a 0.48 cm [3/16 in] drill bit.This step was conducted to help equalize the surface area amongst the different materials, as the surface area of the degraded plastics varied substantially.Additionally, the spirals helped maximize the extractable surface area allowing compound desorption to occur quickly.The spirals were then placed in 40 mL amber headspace free vials with 37 mL of reagent grade water or n-hexane for 7 d at ambient temperature (25 °C).Approximately 60 min to 90 min passed between the burned samples being removed from the furnace to the beginning of the extraction.After 7 d, 5 mL of the aqueous samples were placed in 10 mL crimp cap.As a control, unburned materials were also drilled and extracted using the same method.
In the end, all 11 pipe samples were thermally degraded at 400 °C and extracted in water or n-hexane as a screening step to identify the type and magnitude of compounds present.Based on these results, five materials (HDPE, PEXc-2, PP, PVC, and CPVC) were further thermally degraded at 200 °C and 300 °C and extracted in water.All experiments in this study were performed in triplicate.

Analytical methods
Aqueous and n-hexane extracts were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) (Shimadzu GC-2010 Plus GC coupled to a Shimadzu TQ8030 triple quadrupole MS) with headspace and direct injection methods, respectively.GC separation was carried out using an Agilent HP-5 column (30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm) where helium was used as a carrier gas and set at a flow rate of 1.2 mL min −1 .The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) database of mass spectra was used in tentatively identifying chemical compounds, and only those that matched over 70% were reported. 33,39TICs were reported because the USEPA considers TIC analysis to be "a useful tool that can aid in clean-up or treatment decisions by identifying Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology Communication compounds that might otherwise by missed at the site". 40hemical identification and quantification of BTEX was conducted using a mixed standard, while chlorobenzene-d5 was used as the internal standard.
The GC/MS headspace method involved incubating the aqueous samples at 50 °C and agitating them for 10 min.After this, a 500 μL headspace sample was injected using a 10 : 1 split mode.The injection temperature was held at 280 °C.The oven program was held at 40 °C for 4 min before increasing to 121 °C at 12 °C min −1 , where it was held for another 4 min.The mass spectrometer was operated in the scan mode over a m/z range of 50 to 300 with the interface temperature set at 250 °C, and the ion source held at 200 °C.Selective ion monitoring (SIM) mode was used with m/z of 78, 91, 106, and 106 for quantification of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene, respectively.The method detection limits (MDLs) for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene were 0.57, 0.51, 0.55, and 0.89 μg L −1 respectively.Two of the three isomers of xylene eluted at the same time, and as a result, the two signals were combined, and the three isomers were treated as one compound.
The n-hexane extractions were analyzed using a direct injection method by injecting a 1 μL sample using a 10 : 1 split.The injection temperature was set at 280 °C.The oven program was held at 40 °C for 4 min, then was increased to 280 °C at 12 °C min −1 , where it was held for 4 min.The mass spectrometer was operated in scan mode over the m/z range of 50 to 400.The interface temperature was set at 250 °C, and the ion source was set at 200 °C.Because benzene eluted in the solvent front, no quantification of BTEX was performed with the direct injection samples.

Thermogravimetric characterization of plastic pipes
Results obtained from the TGA helped provide a better understanding of pipe composition, so their performance in the leaching experiments could be better interpreted.Vinyl materials (PVC and CPVC) were more susceptible to thermal degradation compared to the other materials examined (see Table 1 for key data values and Fig. S1 † for thermograms).The first major mass loss was detected for PVC and CPVC materials at 300 °C and 316 °C, respectively, whereas PP and PE (HDPE and PEX) materials did not undergo significant degradation until 463 °C (PP) and >478 °C, respectively (Table 1).For PVC and CPVC, this first stage of mass loss is associated with dehydrochlorination, and about 40% of the original sample mass remained at 400 °C.PVC and CPVC materials also underwent a second significant mass loss around 475 °C and 483 °C, respectively (Table 1). 41ehydrochlorination forms polyene chains, in which the double bonds are susceptible to chain scission, and this can lead to a second stage of substantial mass loss. 42lternatively, HDPE and PEX generally undergo random polymer chain scission, which produce radicals which may propagate additional chain scissions, form double bonds, and drive hydrogen atom abstraction. 43uring heating, plastic additives such as antioxidants and stabilizers likely affected the thermal response, and some of these compounds were found in the new plastics.Di-tertbutylphenol, a degradation product of the antioxidant Irgafos 168®, was a tentatively identified compound (TIC) in all unburned materials except for HDPE and the vinyl plastics (Table S3 †). 44,45In the unburned HDPE, di-tert butylhydroxybenzaldehyde, a degradation product of Irganox 1035®, was detected. 45Previous studies on hindered phenolic antioxidants, such as Irganox 1010® and 1035®, have shown that these compounds increase the thermal oxidative resistance in PE and PP by intercepting free radicals to prevent the formation of double bonds that are vulnerable to scission. 46,47Various heat stabilizers, such as organotins, are used for PVC and CPVC pipe production but were not targeted for analysis in the present study. 48EX and PP pipes contained little residue at 1000 °C whereas a moderate amount of residue (4.8 wt%) was found for HDPE.It is known that HDPE pipe contains >2 wt% carbon black. 24Residue remaining at 1000 °C for other materials may be associated with fillers and inorganic materials.Because nearly all pipe thermal degradation temperatures were above 400 °C and the authors desired to have some physical materials available to extract with solvents after degradation, temperatures for damaging plastics in subsequent experiments were targeted at and below 400 °C.
3.2 Aqueous phase BTEX leaching from plastic pipes at 400 °C Results showed that plastic pipe thermal exposure can generate BTEX, which can then leach from cooled plastics into water.BTEX was not found from new and non-thermally degraded plastics in water, while 10 of 11 thermally degraded plastic pipes leached at least one BTEX component (Fig. 2).
The chemical leaching differences between products is likely attributed to differences between plastic characteristics and experimental conditions.PE materials lost less mass due to isothermal heating (5 wt% to 10 wt%) compared to the PVC and CPVC samples (61 wt% and 64 wt%, respectively) (Fig. 2).A detectable, but significantly lower amount of benzene and toluene was observed for the PVC pipe, and no BTEX was found for the CPVC pipe (Fig. 2).Additionally, there was a general trend of compound concentration leaching across the plastics where benzene > toluene > ethylbenzene ≈ xylene (Fig. 2).This trend could be attributed to several factors including compound production, water solubility, air volatilization, polymer solubility parameters, and/or partitioning into the aqueous phase.Octanol-water coefficients and solubility values mirror the trend of concentrations observed (Table S4 †), indicating that benzene would most readily partition into the aqueous phase.
The discovery that BTEX was generated by thermally degraded plastic pipes is supported by prior literature focused on air testing.Benzene and toluene tend to be formed during the first stage of decomposition for vinyl material thermal degradation. 49Alkylated aromatics, such as ethylbenzene and xylene can be formed during a second degradation step due to chain scission and aromatization. 49VOC release from HDPE into air during pyrolysis (lack of oxygen) or combustion (presence of oxygen) occurs due a similar scission and aromatization mechanism, and previous studies have observed all four BTEX compounds. 50,51The results of this study suggest that BTEX may have been formed in the intact, but thermally degraded, plastics and subsequently leached into the water.The inverse relationship between BTEX in the aqueous phase and mass loss (Fig. 2) indicates that as structurally integrity becomes compromised, as was the case for the vinyl materials (Fig. S2-S5 †), the volatile compounds tend to partition into air.To the best of the authors' knowledge, there have been no prior PEX thermal degradation studies that have found BTEX compounds in the air.Primary degradation products of PEX have been reported to include linear hydrocarbons and cyclical siloxane compounds, although PEX pipe is created by crosslinking HDPE and medium density polyethylene resins. 52ittle to no BTEX was found for the PP pipe, which has a similar structure to HDPE.The onset degradation temperature of the PP pipe (416 °C) was lower than that of the HDPE and PEX materials (Table 1), and unsurprisingly, the PP had more mass loss (∼15 wt%) (Fig. 2) at the same temperature.In previous PP studies, benzene has been found in the air after pyrolysis between 300 °C to 600 °C. 53,54No prior studies were found that examined BTEX release into water from thermally damaged PP materials.

Influence of isothermal heating temperature
Different concentrations of BTEX were found in water after changing the isothermal heating temperature, such that two patterns emerged (Fig. 3).For the HDPE and PEX pipes, the amount of BTEX that leached into the water increased as the plastic degradation temperature increased from 200 °C to 400 °C (Fig. 3).Conversely, the greatest benzene concentration was found for the PVC pipe when exposed to 300 °C, with relatively less concentrations at 200 °C and 400 °C (Fig. 3).The CPVC pipe showed a similar pattern for benzene as the PVC pipe, however, at much lower concentrations (Fig. 3).This spike phenomenon for vinyl materials can potentially be explained by the lower amount of mass loss, where not all benzene produced during degradation volatilized out of the solid.The 300 °C exposure temperature was than the onset degradation temperature (Table 1) where dehydrochlorination would occur.However, the PVC pipe mass loss was only 23 wt% as opposed to 61 wt% at the 400 °C condition resulting in a more structurally intact plastic after degradation (Fig. S2 †).
Despite structural similarities for the vinyl pipes, benzene was only detected in water exposed to the CPVC pipe at a fraction of the amount it was found in water exposed to the PVC material (Fig. 3).This difference may be explained by the additional chlorine atoms present on the CPVC polymer chains resulting in a greater number of chlorine substituted aromatic products when CPVC was thermally degraded. 34A previous CPVC pyrolysis study found significantly more chlorobenzene in the air than benzene. 34Chlorobenzene was not a target of the authors' analytical method.Additionally, the chlorobenzene octanol-water coefficient is higher, and the solubility is lower than that of benzene, indicating that chlorobenzene would be less likely to partition into the water (Table S4 †).Chlorobenzene was detected at concentrations as high as 50 μg L −1 in Santa Rosa and 5 μg L −1 in Paradise, both below the federal and California drinking water maximum contaminant levels of 100 μg L −1 and 70 μg L −1 , respectively. 1,7ompared to vinyl pipes, greater BTEX concentrations were found as the degradation temperature increased for the HDPE and PEX materials (Fig. 3).The onset degradation temperature for both of these materials exceeds 430 °C (Table 1) which can explain why little to no BTEX leaching was observed at 200 °C and 300 °C.The increase in leaching between 300 °C and 400 °C can be attributed to the plastic pipes beginning to degrade and generating BTEX and other compounds.Elevated temperatures lead to the polymer chain undergoing chain scission resulting in the formation of alkenes. 32As the pipe is exposed to greater temperatures, the amount of polymer chain scission that occurs also increases.The increase in scission results in more alkene fragments that may subsequently undergo aromatization.A similar pattern was observed in a study of HDPE combustion by others, in which the benzene concentration in the air increased as the combustion temperatures increased from 500 °C to 800 °C. 51However, the increase in potential BTEX formation does not necessarily indicate that this trend of increased leaching as a function of temperature will

Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology Communication
This journal is © Royal Society of Chemistry 2021 continue. 32Both the partitioning of BTEX into the air and mass loss are also increasing with system temperature, indicating that there may be an optimal degradation temperature for observing the maximum BTEX formation much like what was observed with the PVC at 300 °C.

Leaching of non-BTEX compounds
Leaching promoted by water extraction.Both the number and intensity of the peaks observed in the water extraction chromatograms changed with the heating temperature (Fig. S6-S16 †).For the PE materials, as the exposure temperature increased, an increased number leached compounds were detected with greater magnitudes (Fig. S6-S13 †).Conversely, the PVC pipe showed the greatest magnitude of leaching at 300 °C (Fig. S15 †).Similar to what was observed with BTEX leaching, the maximum number of TICs observed in the water was highest for the PE materials, with 14 to 22 TICs being detected after degradation at 400 °C for each of the materials (Table 2 and Fig. S6-S13 †).These TICs are hypothesized to be a mixture of saturated ketones and aromatic compounds (Table S3 †).Of these TICs, propyl benzene and styrene were the only compounds (other than BTEX) that were detected in the water systems in both Santa Rosa and Paradise. 1,6Propyl benzene, observed in PEX-a2, PEX-b, PEX-c-1a, PEX-c-1b, and HDPE, (Table S6 †) while not currently regulated, is a central nervous system depressant and has a 1-day health advisory concentration of 11 mg L −1 . 7,55Styrene which was observed leaching from PVC (Table S6 †), was found at a concentration of 460 μg L −1 and 6800 μg L −1 in Santa Rosa and Paradise respectively, both well above the 100 μg L −1 federal/California long-term exposure limit, and below 1 day USEPA health advisory concentration of 20 mg L −1 . 1,6,7,9Both of these compounds could be contaminants of concern following future fire events.
Leaching promoted by hexane extraction.As expected, a greater number of peaks were observed in the n-hexane extracts (32 to 134) compared to the water extracts (3 to 22) for all plastics (see example for PEX-c-1a in Fig. 4 and all other pipe types in Fig. S17-S26 †).For the degraded PEX, HDPE, and PP pipes, between 100 to 134 unique compounds were leached into n-hexane, whereas for the degraded PVC and CPVC pipes between 30 to 41 compounds were leached (Fig. 4 and S17-S26 †).While most compounds extracted from the new pipes were either straight chain or branched alkanes of varying lengths (Table S3 †), thermal exposure led alkenes to represent the majority of compounds detected in the leachate (Table S5 †).These aliphatic hydrocarbons are products of alkane hydrocarbon chain scission and are not typical drinking water contaminants.They have low aqueous solubility, which is why they were only detected in the hexane extracts and are generally less toxic than their cyclical or aromatic counterparts. 56,57enerally, both the magnitude of the peak and the number of compounds increased after burning the materials.However, one notable exception occurred for the PEX-c pipes; one peak (retention time of 12.5 min) for the unburned pipe was significantly larger than that of any of the burned peaks (Fig. 4 and S21 †).This peak likely represented the compound, di-tert-butylbenzene, which has been shown to be an ultraviolet light or radiolysis degradation product of the antioxidant Irgafos 168®. 58,59This compound was only observed in the leachate of the PEX-c materials, in which the crosslinking occurs using beta irradiation.This may explain why the magnitude of this degradation product was so large. 60This peak decreased substantially in the burned plastic extract (Fig. 4 and S21 †), indicating it may have been thermally decomposed.

Limitations and implications
There are several limitations of this work, but results indicate that exposing commercially available plastic drinking water pipes to heat can generate detectable BTEX that remains in the cooled product, and ultimately leaches into water (Fig. 3 and Table 2).Aqueous leaching results from this study indicated that if stagnant water was present in the degraded pipes, the estimated benzene concentrations would exceed 1100 μg L −1 .These values were calculated assuming that all the benzene observed in the aqueous experiments leached into the volume of water that would fill the 5 g section of pipe that was thermally degraded.While this concentration is above short-and long-term federal and California drinking water exposure limits, it is below the maximum values observed following both the Tubbs and Camp Fires.This difference could be attributed to VOC loss into the air during thermal exposure and after heating but before leaching, meaning that the results presented here may underestimate BTEX leaching under more realistic conditions.Vapor 51,53,54 Additionally, plastic components in a wildfire impacted distribution system may be exposed to a wide range of degradation regimes.For example, a controlled burn in northern California found that ground temperatures remained above 100 °C for up to 12 hours after the fire was contained.This extended exposure could influence the amount of BTEX that is generated in the plastics. 30lastic pipes examined in this study were new, contained additives designed to help limit oxidation, and were not filled with water.In-service plastics may or may not be more susceptible to BTEX (and other TIC) formation.In-service pipes will have undergone some degradation, antioxidant loss, and can be coated with scales. 61,623][64] Water exposure can also extract antioxidants and water itself can permeate PE materials at elevated temperature. 65,66Another complicating factor is that plastic formulation may have influenced the results.For example, it was reported organotin stabilizers in PVC can substantially decrease the amount of benzene and alkylated aromatics detected in air. 67As such, the specific additives used in the various pipes being examined may significantly affect the type and magnitude of contaminants released and those that remain in the damaged plastic.These phenomena, as well as the role of temperature, should be considered in future work.
Study results indicate that exposing plastic pipes to heat pose subsequent water pipe safety concerns.No standards, testing recommendations or bank of data were found associated with water testing of damaged plastic water pipes in buildings after structure fires or wildfires.It is known that heat can radiate into and affect meter boxes, service lines, and building plumbing.68,69 VOCs/ SVOCs have been produced from the burning of structures and biomass as well. 27,70The source and relative contribution of these contaminants to water contamination should be further examined including their fate the drinking water distribution systems and plumbing.
Plastics are increasingly being used for water infrastructure applications, and evidence shows they can be a source of wildfire-caused water contamination.As of October 2020, there had been more than 47 000 U.S. wildfires across 36 states. 71In 2019 there were nearly 500 000 structure fires in the U.S. 72 Studies that examine the downstream fate of contaminants released by thermally damaged plastic to unaffected plastic infrastructure should be conducted.It is known plastics can sorb contaminants like BTEX and leach them out over time. 60,61,73,74Post-fire, chemical water testing should be conducted where drinking water infrastructure that contains plastic pipes, fittings, valves, gaskets, liners, and other components have been or may have been exposed to heat.Visual inspection of plastics would not determine whether or not the plastic will contaminate the drinking water it conveys.Additional work is needed to better understand this issue in light of the hundreds of thousands of fires occurring annually in the U.S., as it has been confirmed that water distribution networks and building plumbing infrastructure can be contaminated.

Conclusion
This work identified that plastic pipe thermal degradation can be a source of VOC and SVOC drinking water contamination, much like what was observed in the water distribution systems after the Tubbs Fire, Camp Fire, and CZU Lightning Complex Fire.Further, the implications of plastic pipe caused drinking water contamination extends beyond fire-prone regions to any structure fire where plastic pipes may have experienced elevated temperatures.In the present study, BTEX compounds were produced during thermal degradation and along with a variety of other organic compounds.Contaminants produced varied by brand of plastic pipe, type of plastic, and exposure temperature.The loss of VOCs emitted into air (which were not quantified here) and a variety of plastic additives likely influenced the results.Alternative antioxidants, stabilizers, and other plastic additives may influence the contaminants that were observed, and at what temperature they are formed.Additional work is needed to examine how various environmental, chemical, and plastic characteristics influence the formation of VOCs, SVOCs, and their subsequent leaching, rendering drinking water unsafe.VOCs are generated when plastic pipes are thermally damaged, and these contaminants can then leach from damaged plastics into drinking water prompting exceedances of health-based drinking water limits.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Images of fire-damaged water system components including (a) a HDPE plastic pipe, (b) a water meter, and (c) a water meter cover following the Camp Fire.Thermally degraded pipe samples in laboratory experiments include the (d) PEX-c pipe degraded at 300 °C, (e) HDPE pipe degraded at 300 °C, and (f) HDPE pipe degraded at 400 °C.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Mean BTEX concentration after extracting each burned material at 200 °C, 300 °C, and 400 °C in water.The error bars reflect the standard deviation of the measurements (n = 3).If no error bars are visible, it indicates they were smaller than the symbol size.ND indicates the compound was not detected.

Table 2
Comparison of BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene) and TICs (tentatively identified compound) detection for the thermally damaged pipes across all temperatures tested."✓" and "-" indicate the compound was observed or not, respectively