Synergetic effect in water treatment with mesoporous TiO2/BDD hybrid electrode

Boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrodes have a wide potential window and can produce ozone by water electrolysis at high voltage. Though ozone has strong oxidative power (standard oxidation potential: 2.07 V vs. NHE), it cannot decompose certain types of recalcitrant organic matter completely. We developed an advanced oxidation process (AOP), in which hydroxy radicals with stronger oxidative power (standard oxidation potential: 2.85 V vs. NHE) are formed using a combination of ozone, photocatalyst, and UV. In this study, we fabricated a mesoporous TiO2/BDD hybrid electrode and examined its potential for AOPs. A synergetic effect between electrochemical water treatment and photocatalytic water treatment was observed with the hybrid electrode that did not occur with the BDD electrode.


Introduction
Boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrodes have a wide potential window, and low background current, and physical/chemical stability. 1 The wide potential window allows BDD to be used for the production of ozone (O 3 ) by the electrolysis of water at high voltage. Because ozone is a strong oxidizing agent (standard oxidation potential: 2.07 V vs. Normal Hydrogen Electrode (NHE)) 2 that decomposes to form harmless oxygen (O 2 ), ozonation has attracted great interest as an environmentally benign water purication technique. However, the oxidative power of O 3 is sometimes insufficient to decompose recalcitrant organic compounds that are widely used as agricultural chemicals, medicines, dyes, and industrial products.
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), in which UV light, photocatalysts, and O 3 are used together, have been studied as methods to more effectively treat contaminated water. These processes aim to efficiently produce hydroxy radicals (OHc), which have greater oxidative power (standard oxidation potential: 2.80 V vs. NHE) 2 than oxidants such as O 3 and H 2 O 2 (standard oxidation potential: 1.77 V vs. NHE). 2 Ochiai et al. proposed an AOP system in which O 3 gas was introduced into a reactor containing a titanium mesh impregnated photocatalyst (TMiP) and an ultraviolet light source. 3 Their study found that using the photocatalyst and O 3 in combination resulted in greater degradation of phenol in water than using either the photocatalyst or ozone individually. Water treatment using O 3 produced by a water electrolysis unit composed of a BDD anode and a Pt cathode was found to deactivate waterborne pathogens. 4 This water electrolysis unit used in combination with a photocatalyst was also found to effectively decompose toxic chemicals (peruorooctanoic acid, C 7 F 15 COOH). 5 The system used in this study was large because the electrochemical and photocatalytic units were separate, but simpler and more compact AOP systems are preferable for a wide variety of uses.
A BDD photocatalyst combined with water electrolysis to produce O 3 under illumination results in a simpler AOP system because the photocatalytic and electrochemical treatment of water treatment can be performed simultaneously. Previous studies of nanostructured composite n-type metal oxides (TiO 2 , ZnO) and BDD found that their photocatalytic performance was enhanced because of photocarrier separation at the heterointerface. 6 However, no voltage was applied to these composites, and electrochemical effects were not studied. Recently, Zhao et al. synthesized a TiO 2 /Sb-doped SnO 2 /BDD hybrid electrode with a double-layer three-dimensional macro-mesoporous structure. This hybrid electrode showed superior water treatment performance when it was used as a photoanode because of the accumulation of photogenerated holes on the surface under a strong positive potential. 7 However, the voltage applied to this hybrid electrode was not high enough to produce O 3 by water electrolysis. Therefore, it seems that the potential of this hybrid electrode has not been fully explored.
In our previous study, we fabricated a mesoporous TiO 2 layer on BDD and found that its photocatalytic efficiency was enhanced by deep-UV illumination. 8 In this paper, we used this hybrid electrode to electrolyze water to produce O 3 and other reactive oxygen species (ROS). In addition, we conducted water treatment tests with the electrochemically-created ROS under UV light irradiation and demonstrated the capability of the system for an AOP.

Electrochemical analysis for mesoporous TiO 2 /BDD hybrid electrode
Mesoporous TiO 2 /BDD hybrid electrodes were synthesized as described in our previous study. 8 Cyclic voltammograms were measured using a VersaSTAT 4 (AMETEK, Berwyn, PA, USA), while the relationship between applied voltage and current was examined using a HABF5001-B10 potentiostat/galvanostat (HOKUTO DENKO, Tokyo, Japan). A BDD electrode (without the TiO 2 layer) was used as a reference. A 0.25 M phosphate aqueous buffer solution (pH ¼ 6.8) was used as the electrolyte.

Detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS)
To prevent reduction by hydrogen gas resulting from the electrolysis of water, an H-type cell consisting of two separate glass half-cells was used and the mesoporous TiO 2 /BDD hybrid electrode (working electrode) and Pt (counter electrode) were placed in different half-cells. The half-cells were connected by a Naon® NRE-212 membrane (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 50 mL of 0.25 M phosphate aqueous buffer solution (pH ¼ 6.8) was added to each one to increase the conductivity of the water in the half-cells and maintain its pH during the experiment.
Ozone gas was detected using a Kitagawa gas detector tube system consisting of an air sampling pump and a precision gas detector tube. Prior to the measurement, the 0.25 M phosphate aqueous buffer solution in the half-cells with BDD or hybrid electrodes was purged with N 2 gas for 30 min to remove dissolved oxygen. A constant current (50 mA, 75 mA, or 100 mA) was then applied to the electrodes (hybrid electrode or BDD) for 3 min while N 2 gas was bubbled through the solution at a constant ow rate of 0.15 L min À1 . The gas ow rate was maintained using an RK-1650 ow meter (KOFLOC, Kyotanabe, Japan). The outlet gas was collected in 2L Tedlar® bags and passed through a 182U O 3 detector tube (KOMYO RIKAGAKU KOGYO K.K., Kawasaki, Japan) to determine how much O 3 gas was produced. A schematic illustration of this experimental setup is shown in Fig. S1(a). † The quantity of H 2 O 2 formed by the application of current to the electrodes (either hybrid or BDD) for 10 min was determined using the coloring reaction. 9 To detect H 2 O 2 , 500 mL of an aqueous solution of 1 g of NaOH, 33 g of KI, and 0.1 g of (NH 4 ) 6 Mo 7 O 24 $4H 2 O (Solution A) and 500 mL of an aqueous solution of 10 g of C 6 H 4 (COOK)(COOH) (Solution B) were rst separately prepared. Treated water, Solution A, and Solution B were then mixed in a 1 : 1 : 1 ratio. If H 2 O 2 exists in the treated water, I 3 À (which has an absorption maximum at approximately 350 nm) is formed by the following reactions: The concentration of H 2 O 2 was estimated from the peak intensity (at around 350 nm) of the optical absorption spectrum measured by a V-670 UV-VIS spectrometer (JASCO, Hachioji, Japan).

Water treatment test
The efficacy of water treatment was evaluated based on the decomposition of methylene blue (MB). The glass half-cell containing the mesoporous TiO 2 /BDD hybrid electrode was lled with 50 mL of a solution of MB (20 mM) dissolved in 0.25 M phosphate aqueous buffer solution, while the other half-cell (i.e., the Pt electrode side) was lled with the same amount of pure phosphate aqueous buffer solution (0.25 M). The hybrid electrode was placed horizontally in the dark until adsorption equilibrium was reached. It was then irradiated with 1.2 mW cm À2 of 222 nm UV light from an excimer lamp (ORC Manufacturing Co., Ltd, Machida, Japan) in a quartz sample tube. A schematic illustration is shown in Fig. S1(b). † The glass cup was capped with a Teon cap to prevent evaporation during the test, and samples of the MB solution were taken by opening the cap. The absorption spectrum of the MB solution was measured using a V-670 UV-VIS spectrometer (JASCO, Hachioji, Japan). During the test, the MB solution was constantly stirred. Fig. 1(a) summarizes the cyclic voltammograms. Wide potential windows, which are typical of BDD electrodes, were clearly observed and were retained even aer modication with mesoporous TiO 2 . In the hybrid electrode, current density decreased dramatically because most of the BDD surface was covered with TiO 2 , although some BDD remained exposed through mesopores and/or cracks (Fig. S2 †).

Results and discussion
Water oxidation typically produces O 2 at the anode by the following reaction: When BDD is used as an anode, the voltage required to electrolyze water becomes higher than the theoretical value (1.23 V) due to its wide potential window. This leads to other reactions such as O 3 production by water electrolysis: Fig. 1(b) shows that at high voltage, the current ow increased linearly with applied voltage in both electrodes and that the mesoporous TiO 2 layer had little inuence on the current ow. Fig. 2 shows the quantities of reactive oxygen species detected. The quantity of O 3 gas produced by the electrolysis of water (eqn (4)) increased linearly with the applied current ( Fig. 2(a)). The mesoporous TiO 2 /BDD hybrid electrode produced less O 3 gas than the BDD electrode because it had less exposed BDD. Indeed, no O 3 gas was detected when a current of 50 mA was applied to the hybrid electrode.
If O 3 is dissolved in the treated water, an absorption peak at around 260 nm occurs in the UV-VIS spectrum. 10 However, no such peak was detected in the treated water (not shown). Hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) was, however, detected in the treated water in quantities that increased linearly with the current applied to the electrodes (Fig. 2(b)). Because high voltage was applied to electrodes, not only O 3 but also other highly oxidative species (H 2 O 2 and OHc) were produced by the electrolysis of water: Therefore, substantial direct production of H 2 O 2 by water electrolysis (eqn (5)) and annihilation of the OHc produced by water electrolysis (eqn (7)) were observed.
Because the hybrid electrode produced less O 3 gas, the H 2 O 2 concentration in the treated water was also lower. However, when a current of 100 mA was applied, the H 2 O 2 concentration in the treated water became almost the same as when the BDD electrode was used. This probably occurred because the TiO 2 layer peeled off.
We decided to apply a 75 mA current to the electrodes for further studies by following reasons. Lower current (50 mA) will lead to the formation of OHc in BDD. However, because O 3 gas was not detected from the hybrid electrode, while it was formed from BDD, an experimental condition becomes different. At higher current (100 mA), if TiO 2 layer in the hybrid electrode was truly peeled off, there are no difference between the hybrid electrode we made and the BDD electrode. Even if not, once BDD electrode is at a relatively high potential, the OHc will easily to take further reaction to form other oxidative species, which reduces the water treatment ability in BDD. Therefore, a comparative experiment between these two electrode is difficult at lower and higher current.
The effectiveness of the hybrid electrode for water treatment was evaluated based on the decomposition of methylene blue (MB). Photocatalytic water treatment was conducted under deep-UV light (l ¼ 222 nm) in order to photoexcite not only TiO 2 but also BDD, which has a band gap of 5.5 eV (l ¼ 225 nm). Fig. 3 shows the relationship between MB concentration and photoirradiation time. When the hybrid electrode was used with deep-UV irradiation (Fig. 3(a)), the total amount of MB decomposed was greater than the sum of the amounts decomposed photocatalytically and electrochemically. This synergetic effect was not observed when the BDD electrode was used ( Fig. 3(b)). The synergetic effect therefore originated from the To clarify the mechanism of the photocatalytic reaction, formic acid was added to react sacricially with holes. 7 As shown in Fig. 4, when formic acid was added, the photocatalytic activity decreased dramatically, and the initial MB concentration change was almost identical to that caused by photolysis alone. This means that oxidation induced by holes in the VB was the main factor, and electrons in the CB were not used sufficiently to decompose MB in the hybrid electrode. This is because the oxidative power of O À 2 is much lower than those of h vb + and OHc. 14 Under electrochemical conditions (i.e., with current applied to the electrode), as mentioned above, H 2 O 2 was produced in the treated water. This is probably because the reduction potential of the H 2 O 2 /OHc couple is more positive (E ¼ +0.87 V vs. NHE) 15 Electrons in the conduction band therefore played a signicant role in decomposing MB by creating more OHc and thus promoting the advanced oxidation process. Such H 2 O 2 -assisted photocatalytic reactions have been reported previously. 17

Conclusions
Mesoporous TiO 2 /BDD hybrid electrodes were prepared using a surfactant-assisted sol-gel method. By applying a current, O 3 gas was produced by the electrolysis of water, and dissolved O 3 gas formed H 2 O 2 through a chain reaction. Under UV irradiation, electrochemically-formed H 2 O 2 was reduced by photoexcited electrons in the CB of TiO 2 to form OHc, which promotes MB decomposition because of its strong oxidative power. A synergetic effect occurred, demonstrating that the hybrid electrode is effective in promoting AOPs. This simple water treatment system can be applied to decompose recalcitrant organic compounds in wastewater, and further studies of this process are currently underway.

Conflicts of interest
There are no conicts to declare.