Issue 28, 2019

Yb,Nd,Er-doped upconversion nanoparticles: 980 nm versus 808 nm excitation

Abstract

Yb,Nd,Er-doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) have attracted considerable interest as luminescent reporters for bioimaging, sensing, energy conversion/shaping, and anticounterfeiting due to their capability to convert multiple near-infrared (NIR) photons into shorter wavelength ultraviolet, visible or NIR luminescence by successive absorption of two or more NIR photons. This enables optical measurements in complex media with very little background and high penetration depths for bioimaging. The use of Nd3+ as substitute for the commonly employed sensitizer Yb3+ or in combination with Yb3+ shifts the excitation wavelength from about 980 nm, where the absorption of water can weaken upconversion luminescence, to about 800 nm, and laser-induced local overheating effects in cells, tissue, and live animal studies can be minimized. To systematically investigate the potential of Nd3+ doping, we assessed the performance of a set of similarly sized Yb3+,Nd3+,Er3+-doped core- and core–shell UCNPs of different particle architecture in water at broadly varied excitation power densities (P) with steady state and time-resolved fluorometry for excitation at 980 nm and 808 nm. As a measure for UCNPs performance, the P-dependent upconversion quantum yield (ΦUC) and its saturation behavior were used as well as particle brightness (BUC). Based upon spectroscopic measurements at both excitation wavelengths in water and in a lipid phantom and BUC-based calculations of signal size at different penetration depths, conditions under which excitation at 808 nm is advantageous are derived and parameters for the further optimization of triple-doped UCNPs are given.

Graphical abstract: Yb,Nd,Er-doped upconversion nanoparticles: 980 nm versus 808 nm excitation

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
11 Apr 2019
Accepted
01 Jul 2019
First published
01 Jul 2019

Nanoscale, 2019,11, 13440-13449

Yb,Nd,Er-doped upconversion nanoparticles: 980 nm versus 808 nm excitation

L. M. Wiesholler, F. Frenzel, B. Grauel, C. Würth, U. Resch-Genger and T. Hirsch, Nanoscale, 2019, 11, 13440 DOI: 10.1039/C9NR03127H

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements