Highly efficient removal of sulfuric acid aerosol by a combined wet electrostatic precipitator

Eliminating sulfuric acid aerosol from flue gas is of vital importance to improve air quality. In this paper, a wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) assisted with novel pre-charger was proposed to efficiently remove sulfuric acid aerosol. Parameters including residence time, gas temperature and SO3 concentration were studied to find the key factors influencing sulfuric acid aerosol removal. Results showed that the removal efficiency of sulfuric acid aerosol increased with the increasing residence time and the decreasing gas temperature. The maximum corona current was reduced from 0.79 to 0.28 mA when the SO3 concentration increased from 0 to 25 ppm, and the removal efficiency also decreased with the increasing SO3 concentration. A novel perforated pre-charger was designed to improve the WESP performance for sulfuric acid aerosol removal. With assistance of the pre-charger, the removal efficiency was improved from 90.3 to 95.8%, and the corresponding emission concentration was lower than 2 mg m . Moreover, the removal efficiency could be further improved to 97.8% with a heat exchanger, and the corresponding emission concentration could be lower than 1 mg m .


Introduction
2][3] As a consequence, emissions of sulfuric acid aerosol are required to meet extremely rigid standards in countries such as United States and Germany.In China, the local standard of Shanghai requires the emission of sulfuric acid mist <5 mg m À3 . 4n coal-red power plants, the formation of sulfuric acid aerosol comes from the combination of SO 3 with ue gas moisture.During combustion process in the boiler, a part of sulfur in fuels can be oxidized to gaseous SO 3 .The SO 3 concentration increases signicantly aer selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system because 0.25-1.25% of SO 2 can be converted to SO 3 . 1,5,6When the ue gas enters into the wet ue gas desulfurization (WFGD), the ue gas temperature can be easily quenched to below 50 C, and correspondingly saturated gas condition is established. 7,8During this process, gaseous SO 3 will combine with H 2 O molecules to form sulfuric acid aerosol.The sulfuric acid aerosol is too small to be efficiently captured by WFGD. 5 Heterogeneous vapor condensation method can be used to enlarge the aerosol size and improve the removal efficiency of WFGD.However, the removal efficiency is still less than 70% and the emission of mass concentration is more than 15 mg m À3 . 9Once sulfuric acid aerosol is discharged from the stack without further control methods, the stack is typically featured as bluish plume and human health will be endangered particularly when burning high sulfur content coal.As a possible countermeasure, WESP is installed downstream of WFGD to control ne dust particles and carryover of slurry droplets, which can simultaneously eliminate the emission of sulfuric acid aerosol. 2 WESP removes ne particles including sulfuric acid aerosols electrostatically with high removal efficiency, and the stack plume condition will be signicantly improved.Inside a WESP, ue gas is ionized by high voltage to produce ions and electrons.When sulfuric acid aerosol enters WESP, it is negatively charged as a result of eld charging and diffusion charging effects.][13][14] The removal efficiency of sulfuric acid aerosol by WESP is much higher than WFGD. 15The removal efficiency increased with the increasing of specic surface area (SCA) and electric eld intensity. 16Nevertheless, WESP may suffer with efficiency reduction when dealing with gases with high SO 3 concentrations. 5Generally, small size of sulfuric acid mist is the primary factor limiting efficient separation from ue gases.Some agglomeration technologies, i.e., acoustic agglomeration, electrical agglomeration and chemical agglomeration, [17][18][19][20] are possible solutions to improve ne particle removal efficiency by enlarging particle size.However, all these technologies are only implemented before dry ESP or before WFGD.Additionally, some researchers pointed out that separation efficiency of ne particle can be improved by electrostatic pre-treatment methods.Multi-eld WESP is an easiest way to improve the removal efficiency. 21Chang et al. proposed a bipolar charger to agglomerate particles with water droplet humidication. 20im et al. developed a novel two-stage WESP which used a carbon brush pre-charger to increase the removal performance for ultrane particles. 22Their results showed that electrostatic pre-treatment combined with WESP can be a costeffective method to improve the removal efficiency.
Enhanced methods are widely used to improve ne particle removal efficiency, while mineral work reports on the improvement of WESP performance for sulfuric acid aerosol removal.In this study, a horizontal WESP experimental system was designed to investigate the removal of sulfuric acid aerosol under simulated ue gas condition.The aerosol size distribution was measured to study the sulfuric acid aerosol formation characteristics before WESP.Inuences of residence time, gas temperature and SO 3 concentration on removal efficiency were investigated experimentally without any enhanced methods.On this basis, a novel perforated pre-charger was carefully constructed to improve removal efficiency of sulfuric acid aerosol.With the assistance of a pre-charger and a heat exchanger, various emission requirements can be satised.

Experimental setup
A schematic of the experimental system is illustrated in Fig. 1.The system consists of ve sections, namely, a SO 3 generator, a wet ue gas desulfurization (WFGD), a heat exchanger, a labscale horizontal WESP with high frequency power supply source, and a sulfuric acid aerosol sampling and analysis system.
The cross section of the WESP was rectangular (120 mm Â 300 mm), and the length of the WESP was 1200 mm.The discharge electrode was consisted of 10 wires placed with an interval of 10 mm, and the distance between discharge electrode and collection plate was 60 mm.Two Teon insulators were used to x the discharge electrodes in the center of the WESP.To ensure the insulating properties at saturation gas condition, the insulator surface was heated by an electric heater.A high frequency power supply (50 kV, 2 mA, 20 kHz, and negative DC) was connected with the discharge electrode to generate corona ions.A pre-charger was installed at the inlet of the WESP and was congured with spike-wires and two air distribution plates.Another power supply (40 kV, 2 mA, 20 kHz, and negative DC) was connected with the pre-charger to generate strong electric eld and produce high density ions.
The contaminated ue gas was simulated by introducing SO 3 into main gas stream.A fan was used to provide the main gas with maximum ow rate of 140 m 3 h À1 .An electric heater with maximum electric power of 20 kW was used to heat the air to set temperatures (90-120 C).An S-type thermal couple was installed at the exit of the electric heater to measure the gas temperature and fed back the temperature to the controller to adjust the heating power.All gas pipes were covered with thermal insulation material to reduce heat loss.The hot gas was scrubbed by a WFGD tower, resulting in signicant drop of gas temperature to about 45 C. Consequently, a saturation, or even super-saturation gas condition pre-existed before entering the WESP.
SO 3 was produced by an SO 3 generator and was completely converted to sulfuric acid aerosols by nucleation during WFGD process.The SO 3 generator worked on the principle of SO 2 oxidation catalyzed with vanadium pentoxide (V 2 O 5 ).The catalyst reactor was maintained at approximately 410 C to promote SO 3 conversion efficiency.An SO 2 gas analyzer was used to measure the SO 2 concentration, and the conversion efficiency from SO 2 to SO 3 was supposed to be as high as 100% since no residual SO 2 was detected at the exist of the generator.

Experimental approach
The removal of sulfuric acid aerosol was investigated under different parameters (i.e.applied voltage, residence time, gas temperature and SO 3 concentration).The applied voltage of the WESP varied from 12 to 36 kV by adjusting the power supply.The residence time varied from 1.1 to 2.6 s by changing the total gas ow rate.The gas temperature aer the gas heater varied from 90 to 120 C by adjusting the electric power.The SO 3 concentration varied from 5 to 25 ppm by adjusting the SO 2 mass ow controller.
Sulfuric acid aerosol is ne droplet of sulfuric acid solution.It cannot be measured with off-line weighing method by collecting it on impactors or lms.An on-line device of electrical low pressure impactor (ELPI + , Dekati Ltd., Finland) was used to measure the concentration of sulfuric acid aerosol with different diameters.It works on the principle of induced current method.The aerosol is charged to known charge level in a unipolar corona charger and then classied into different stages depending on aerosol diameters.The current on each stage is detected by sensitive electrometer, the signal of which is inverted to calculate aerosol number concentrations.The sampling gas ow rate of the ELPI + is 10 L min À1 , generated by a vacuum pump.The number concentration of sulfuric acid aerosol can be higher than 1 Â 10 8 cm À3 , and a diluter (Diluter DI-1000, Dekati Ltd., Finland) was used to dilute the gas with clean air.Reducing gas temperature can lead to the growing of sulfuric acid aerosol by condensation, thus the probe was heated to the same temperature with the ue gas to ensure the sampling accuracy.
The WESP performance for the removal of sulfuric acid aerosol was evaluated by the fractional and total removal efficiencies, which can be calculated by the following equations, respectively: where N out,on (r i ) and N out,off (r i ) denote fractional particle number concentrations (1 cm À3 ) with and without corona discharge, respectively.m out,on (r i ) and m out,off (r i ) denote fractional particle mass concentrations (mg m À3 ) with and without corona discharge, respectively.h i (%) and h total (%) are the fractional and total collection efficiencies, respectively.

Size distribution of sulfuric acid aerosol
The concentration evolution of sulfuric acid aerosol with different diameters is shown in Fig. 2a.The system operated with constant SO 3 concentration of 10 ppm.The circulating water came to spray approximately at 80 s and the concentration of sulfuric acid aerosol increased signicantly.The total number concentration increased from about 5 Â 10 7 to higher than 1 Â 10 8 cm À3 .Sulfuric acid aerosol was supposed to be removed by WFGD, whereas the number concentration increased aer WFGD.The reason can be attributed to that SO 3 was injected into the ue gas before WFGD.Only a part of gaseous SO 3 formed sulfuric acid aerosol before scrubbing.
When the WFGD came into operation, a part of sulfuric acid aerosol was removed while new sulfuric acid aerosol was formed during this process.Size distributions of sulfuric acid aerosol at the inlet and outlet of WFGD are compared in Fig. 2b.
As can be seen, diameters of sulfuric acid aerosol are mainly smaller than 0.1 mm for both two cases.The number concentration for aerosols with size larger than 0.1 mm decreased aer being scrubbed, while the number concentration for aerosols smaller than 0.1 mm increased.This indicated that the newly formed aerosols were mainly smaller than 0.1 mm and the removed aerosols were mainly larger than 0.1 mm.

Sulfuric acid aerosol removal by WESP
3.2.1 Effects of residence time.Removal efficiencies of sulfuric acid aerosol under different residence time and applied voltages are shown in Fig. 3.The residence time was adjusted by changing the gas ow rate with 140, 120, 100, 80 and 60 m 3 h À1 , respectively.As can be seen, the removal efficiency increased with the increasing residence time, dropping from 92.7 to 85.6% when the applied voltage was 32 kV.According to the Deutsch theory, 10 particle removal efficiency is positively correlated with particle migration velocity and is negatively correlated with gas ow rate under constant collection area.For given migration velocity, longer residence time leads to more particles transporting towards collection plates.4. As can be seen, the removal efficiency increased with the decreasing gas temperature.The ue gas aer WFGD is typically under saturation condition, and spontaneous phase transition could occur when supersaturated state is reached because of gas cooling.The condensable nature of sulfuric acid vapor makes it possible for the sulfuric acid aerosols to grow into larger ones by reducing gas temperature.Accumulative size distributions of sulfuric acid aerosol under different gas temperatures is shown in Fig. 5.The medium diameter (D 50 ) increased by 27.5% when the gas temperature decreased from 45.4 to 35.1 C. Additionally, the decrease of gas temperature reduced gas ow rate, and the removal efficiency increased as discussed above for this reason as well.
3.2.3Effects of SO 3 concentration.In coal-red power plants, about 1.5-3% of the sulfur content can be converted to SO 3 , and SO 3 concentration aer WFGD typically ranges from 10 to 100 mg m À3 depending on coal types and operation condition.Compared with dust, the impact of SO 3 on the WESP operation is quite different.Current-voltage is a fundamental characteristic to evaluate WESP performance.Fig. 6 presents the current-voltage characteristics of the WESP under different SO 3 concentrations.The corona current increased with the increasing voltage and SO 3 had negative effects on corona discharge.The maximum corona current decreased from 0.79   to 0.28 mA when SO 3 concentration increased from 0 to 25 ppm.Corona current is mainly formed by the electrical mobility of free ions which deposits on the collection plate. 24As mentioned above, the number concentration of sulfuric acid aerosol was measured to be higher than 1 Â 10 8 cm À3 .The density of free ions will decrease when captured by ne particles.In addition, the charged aerosols can disturb the distribution of electric eld, leading to lower ion production rates.
Dust removal efficiency usually increases as the inlet dust concentration increased, 25,26 while the removal efficiency of sulfuric acid aerosol presented completely different results with similar concentration loadings as shown in Fig. 7.The removal efficiency of sulfuric acid aerosol decreased with the increasing SO 3 concentration.As an example, when the applied voltage was 32 kV, the removal efficiency dropped from 91.0 to 87.3% with the SO 3 concentration increasing from 5 to 25 ppm.The difference can be larger for lower applied voltage, and the removal efficiency dropped from 33.6 to 7.1% when the applied voltage was 16 kV.This phenomenon can be explained by the relationship between the corona discharge and particle charging.The above-mentioned corona current decreased with the increasing SO 3 concentration, indicating the ion density in space decreased in the presence of SO 3 .Our previous numerical work 23 showed that the negative inuence on the removal of sub-micron particle was more noticeable when reducing ion current.In industrial application, some WESPs can experience very high SO 3 concentrations when dealing with high sulfur content fuels.These WESPs can be less effective, thereby some improvements were needed to improve the removal efficiency of sulfuric acid aerosol.

Sulfuric acid aerosol removal by combined WESP
As described above, the WESP performance deteriorated due to the reduction of corona current.In this paper, we proposed a novel perforated pre-charger to improve its performance for removal of sulfuric acid aerosol.A schematic conguration of the combined WESP is illustrated in Fig. 8a.Conventional precharger is merely an extension in length for the ESP, with similar wire-to-plate conguration but smaller discharge distance.In this paper, the proposed pre-charger takes full advantages of the air distribution plates at the inlet of the WESP, which consisted of spike-wires and two perforated plates as shown in Fig. 8b.The discharge electrode was connected with a high frequency power supply to generate ions for aerosol charging.The air distribution plates were used as grounded plate, and there are several benets: (a) no extra installation space, (b) less SCA increase, and (c) higher turbulence intensity.The increased SCA due to the installation of pre-charger was only 0.67 m 2 (m 3 s À1 ) À1 , which can be neglected compared with that of WESP.
Flue gas was introduced into the pre-charger and thus sulfuric acid aerosol was negatively charged before entering the WESP.The pre-charger was primarily used for aerosol charging and the WESP was primarily used for aerosol collection.In the pre-charger, the distance from pin to plate was 25 mm, which was much shorter than that in the WESP.Fig. 9 presents current-voltage characteristics of the pre-charger and the WESP.Similarly, the corona current of the pre-charger decreased signicantly in the presence of SO 3 (Fig. 9a), while the corona current of the WESP increased with the increasing pre-charger voltage (Fig. 9b).When aerosols passed through the pre-charger, they were charged and partly collected.That is, with the assistance of pre-charger, corona suppression mainly occurred in the pre-charger, and the corona discharge of WESP was signicantly improved.Compared with the WESP, the current density on the perforated plates of the pre-charger was much higher.The maximum current densities were 16.03 and View Article Online 0.45 mA m À2 respectively for the and the WESP when the SO 3 concentration was 10 ppm.
Removal efficiencies of sulfuric acid aerosol under different pre-charger voltages are shown in Fig. 10.The performance of WESP was not good under low applied voltages, but the removal efficiency was signicantly improved with the assistance of precharger.As an example, when the WESP voltage was 16 kV, the removal efficiency increased from 27.9 to 82.4% as the precharger voltage increased from 0 to 16 kV.The key reason was that the pre-charger provided sufficient ions for aerosol charging even though the WESP operated under low applied voltage.The removal efficiency can be as high as 95.8% when the pre-charger and the WESP both operated under maximum applied voltages.The WESP and combined WESP (WESP + precharger) are compared in Table 1.For the WESP only, increasing SCA can achieve the same removal efficiency with the combined WESP.Namely, the overall SCA can be reduced by using the precharger.As an example, the overall SCA was reduced from 28.80 to 22.27 m 2 (m 3 s À1 ) À1 when the pre-charger voltage was 8 kV.
Furthermore, the fractional removal efficiencies of sulfuric acid aerosol with pre-charger on and off are compared in Fig. 11.The fractional removal efficiency curves had similar tendencies for the two cases.For aerosols with diameter less than 0.03 mm, the removal efficiency decreased signicantly with the decreasing aerosol diameter.For aerosols with diameter larger than 0.03 mm, there existed a minimum removal efficiency for aerosols with diameters about 0.1 mm.This phenomenon was attributed to the size dependence of particle charging and electrical mobility.Inside an ESP, particles are charged by eld charging and diffusion charging effects.Field charging is dominant for particles larger than 1.0 mm and diffusion charging is dominant for particles smaller than 0.1 mm, respectively. 10The electrical mobility for aerosols with diameters about 0.1 mm was small because of the two charging effects, which accounts for the minimum removal efficiency in this size range.For particles smaller than 0.03 mm, some of them cannot be charged due to the partial charging effect, resulting in a decrease of collection efficiency. 27The WESP performance for removal of sulfuric acid aerosol was improved assisted with pre-charger.The improvement is more noticeable for aerosols in the range from 0.03 to 0.5 mm because the substantial increase of electrical mobility in this range.a The prediction was done with the Deutsch equation.
A heat exchanger was installed downstream the to further improve the removal efficiency of sulfuric acid aerosol since the removal efficiency was inuenced by ue gas temperature.With the application of heat exchanger, the gas temperature could be cooled down from 43.2 to 39.1 C. Removal efficiencies and emissions of sulfuric acid aerosol in three operation cases are compared in Fig. 12.The sulfuric acid aerosol was removed by WESP with an efficiency of 90.3%, and the efficiency was improved to 95.8% assisted with pre-charger.Moreover, the removal efficiency could be further improved to 97.8% assisted with pre-charger and heat exchanger at the same time.As can be seen from 12, emissions of sulfuric acid aerosol can reach different levels in different cases.In case 2, the emission concentration of sulfuric acid aerosol was lower than 2 mg m À3 , and it could be lower than 1 mg m À3 in case 3 with the assistance of pre-charger and heat exchanger.In real application, technologies can be determined based on the emission requirements of sulfuric acid aerosol.

Conclusions
In this study, a WESP assisted with novel pre-charger was proposed to efficiently remove sulfuric acid aerosol from ue gases.Parameters including residence time, gas temperature and SO 3 concentration were investigated experimentally without any enhanced methods.The number concentration of sulfuric acid aerosol aer WFGD amounted to higher than 1 Â 10 8 cm À3 with diameter smaller than 0.1 mm.Sulfuric acid aerosols can be enlarged by decreasing gas temperature.The medium diameter increased by 27.5% when the gas temperature decreased from 45.4 to 35.1 C, leading to higher removal efficiency of sulfuric acid aerosol.The corona discharge and removal efficiency were both suppressed with the increasing SO 3 concentration.The maximum corona current was reduced from 0.79 to 0.28 mA when SO 3 concentration increased from 0 to 25 ppm, and the corresponding maximum removal efficiency dropped from 91.0 to 87.3%.A novel perforated precharger was proposed to further improve the removal efficiency of sulfuric acid aerosol with less increased SCA.Both the corona discharge and removal efficiency of the WESP were improved aer application of the pre-charger.The removal efficiency could be improved to 95.8% when the WESP applied voltage was 32 kV and pre-charger voltage was 16 kV, and the emission concentration was lower than 2 mg m À3 .A heat exchanger was proposed as an option to enhance the removal efficiency.With application of the heat exchanger, the removal efficiency of the combined WESP could be further improved to 97.8%, and the corresponding emission concentration could be lower than 1 mg m À3 .

Fig. 1
Fig.1Schematic of the experimental system.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Size distribution of sulfuric acid aerosol: (a) concentration evolution and (b) fractional concentration at inlet/outlet of WFGD.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Size distribution of sulfuric acid aerosol under different gas temperatures.

Fig. 11
Fig. 11 Fractional removal efficiency of sulfuric acid aerosol with precharger on and off.

Table 1
Comparison of two WESPs under different conditions