Issue 34, 2017

Forensic discrimination between authentic and counterfeit perfumes using paper spray mass spectrometry and multivariate supervised classification

Abstract

Perfumes are cosmetic products with high added value and worldwide consumption, which make them a potential target for counterfeiting. A novel, simple and rapid method was developed for the differentiation of samples of authentic and counterfeit perfumes by employing paper spray mass spectrometry (PS-MS) combined with multivariate supervised classification models: Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) and Soft Independent Modelling of Class Analogies (SIMCA). Samples of authentic (n = 29, consisting of 10 different brands from several batches and from the same producer) and seized counterfeit (n = 31) perfumes were analysed by PS-MS in the positive ionization mode and within a mass range of m/z 150–1000. An initial unsupervised exploratory model (Principal Component Analysis – PCA) provided a rough visual separation between the two classes. In contrast, PLS-DA and SIMCA provided good predictions, with low false positive and false negative rates for both models. The interpretation of informative vectors, i.e. regression coefficients and Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) scores obtained from the PLS-DA model allowed the detection of diagnostic ions for authentic and counterfeit samples. Some of the most discriminant ions for counterfeit perfumes were suggested to be attributed to compounds with allergenic properties.

Graphical abstract: Forensic discrimination between authentic and counterfeit perfumes using paper spray mass spectrometry and multivariate supervised classification

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
22 May 2017
Accepted
28 May 2017
First published
29 May 2017

Anal. Methods, 2017,9, 4979-4987

Forensic discrimination between authentic and counterfeit perfumes using paper spray mass spectrometry and multivariate supervised classification

J. A. R. Teodoro, H. V. Pereira, D. N. Correia, M. M. Sena, E. Piccin and R. Augusti, Anal. Methods, 2017, 9, 4979 DOI: 10.1039/C7AY01295K

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements