Teaching old compounds new tricks : e ffi cient N 2 fi xation by simple Fe ( N 2 ) ( diphosphine ) 2 complexes †

Homogeneous catalysts capable of fixing N2 to NH3 under mild conditions have been researched for over 50 years. Fe, which catalyses the industrial Haber–Bosch process (as Fe metal), is also considered to perform a crucial role in biological N2 fixation, performed at the Fe–Mo cofactor of the most abundant nitrogenase enzyme and mediated by successive proton-coupled electron transfers. Whilst the active site for N2 binding and reduction at the Fe–Mo cofactor is contested, less common nitrogenases with closely related Fe–V and Fe-only cofactors implicate the importance of Fe, and a mechanism for Fe-mediated N2 fixation has been proposed. 4 The first major breakthrough in N2 fixation by a homogeneous Fe complex was reported in 1991 by Leigh et al., utilising chelating Me2PCH2CH2PMe2 (dmpe) as an ancillary ligand. In the eponymous reaction cycle, the Fe(II) complex [trans-Fe(H)(N2)(dmpe)2][BPh4] was reductively deprotonated to form the Fe(0) intermediate Fe(N2)(dmpe)2 (1) which, upon in situ acidification of the reaction mixture using various strong proton sources, was documented to produce NH3 (isolated as NH4 + via a base distillation onto fresh acid and quantified using the spectrophotometric indophenol method); the highest yields were obtained using HCl. Since Fe was recovered as Fe(II), the yields of NH3 (up to 20%) were calculated based on each Fe providing a maximum of 2 electrons (out of a total of 6) to reduce N2; accordingly Fe(0) must be consumed as the sacrificial reductant. Analogous deprotonation/ reprotonation experiments performed on related phosphine complexes – [trans-Fe(H)(N2)(depe)2] + (depe = Et2PCH2CH2PEt2), 8 [cis-Fe(H)(N2){E(CH2CH2PPh2)3}] + (E = N, P), and [trans-Fe(H)(N2)(DMeOPrPE)2] + (DMeOPrPE = [(MeOCH2CH2CH2)2PCH2]2) 10 – have also been shown to generate similar yields of NH3 and/or N2H4. However, in all of these experiments the Fe(0) species were not isolated; in the case of the archetypal dmpe system, 1 was reported to be unstable with respect to dissociation of N2 in vacuo, leading to its decomposition. In contrast with these findings, Komiya et al. successfully synthesised pure Fe(N2)(depe)2 (2) 11 using an alternative route and discovered that only N2 and H2 were produced upon treatment with HCl; this result cast uncertainty on the candidacy of Fe(N2)L4 (L = 2 electron donor) complexes being the active NH3 producing species in Leigh-type experiments (Fig. 1). Furthermore, Field et al. recently showed that the positive detection of NH3 (as NH4 ) using the indophenol method can arise from interference caused by free phosphine ligands, which may contaminate the analyte during the base distillation step; this was corroborated by the absence of resonances for NH4 + in the H and N{H} NMR spectra of the analyte from the Leigh reaction of [trans-Fe(H)(N2)(dmpe)2] . Clearly, the isolation of pure samples of such species, and their subsequent reaction

Homogeneous catalysts capable of fixing N 2 to NH 3 under mild conditions have been researched for over 50 years. 1Fe, which catalyses the industrial Haber-Bosch process (as Fe metal), is also considered to perform a crucial role in biological N 2 fixation, performed at the Fe-Mo cofactor of the most abundant nitrogenase enzyme and mediated by successive proton-coupled electron transfers. 2Whilst the active site for N 2 binding and reduction at the Fe-Mo cofactor is contested, less common nitrogenases with closely related Fe-V and Fe-only cofactors implicate the importance of Fe, 3 and a mechanism for Fe-mediated N 2 fixation has been proposed. 4he first major breakthrough in N 2 fixation by a homogeneous Fe complex was reported in 1991 by Leigh et al., utilising chelating Me 2 PCH 2 CH 2 PMe 2 (dmpe) as an ancillary ligand. 5In the eponymous reaction cycle, the Fe(II) complex [trans-Fe(H)(N 2 )(dmpe) 2 ][BPh 4 ] was reductively deprotonated to form the Fe(0) intermediate Fe(N 2 )(dmpe) 2 (1) which, upon in situ acidification of the reaction mixture using various strong proton sources, was documented to produce NH 3 (isolated as NH 4  + via a base distillation onto fresh acid and quantified using the spectrophotometric indophenol method); 6 the highest yields were obtained using HCl. 5,7,8Since Fe was recovered as Fe(II), the yields of NH 3 (up to 20%) were calculated based on each Fe providing a maximum of 2 electrons (out of a total of 6) to reduce N 2 ; accordingly Fe(0) must be consumed as the sacrificial reductant.Analogous deprotonation/ reprotonation experiments performed on related phosphine complexes -[trans-Fe(H)(N 2 )(depe) 2 ] + (depe = Et 2 PCH 2 CH 2- PEt 2 ), 8 [cis-Fe(H)(N 2 ){E(CH 2 CH 2 PPh 2 ) 3 }] + (E = N, P), 8,9 and 10 have also been shown to generate similar yields of NH 3 and/or N 2 H 4 .However, in all of these experiments the Fe(0) species were not isolated; in the case of the archetypal dmpe system, 1 was reported to be unstable with respect to dissociation of N 2 in vacuo, leading to its decomposition. 5,8n contrast with these findings, Komiya et al. successfully synthesised pure Fe(N 2 )(depe) 2 (2) 11 using an alternative route and discovered that only N 2 and H 2 were produced upon treatment with HCl; this result cast uncertainty on the candidacy of Fe(N 2 )L 4 (L = 2 electron donor) complexes being the active NH 3 producing species in Leigh-type experiments (Fig. 1).Furthermore, Field et al. recently showed that the positive detection of NH 3 (as NH 4 + ) using the indophenol method can arise from interference caused by free phosphine ligands, which may contaminate the analyte during the base distillation step; 12 this was corroborated by the absence of resonances for NH 4 + in the 1 H and 14 N{ 1 H} NMR spectra of the analyte from the Leigh reaction of [trans-Fe(H)(N 2 )(dmpe) 2 ] + .Clearly, the isolation of pure samples of such species, and their subsequent reaction with acids to assess their capability of producing reduced forms of N 2 , is crucial to clarifying this long-standing conundrum.
Recently we reported convenient multi-gram syntheses of dmpe and depe, 13 and sought to reinvestigate the historically curious N 2 -fixation chemistry mediated by their Fe(N 2 ) complexes.Herein we report the synthesis and characterisation of the Fe(0) species, [Fe(dmpe) 2 ] 2 (μ-N 2 ) (3), which reacts with N 2 cleanly to produce 1.Alongside 2, ‡ these isolated compounds react with TfOH (CF 3 SO 3 H) to produce N 2 H 4 and/or NH 3 , thus unambiguously confirming that these complexes are active for the fixation of N 2 , for the first time.
KC 8 reduction of trans-Fe(Cl) 2 (dmpe) 2 under a 15 N 2 atmosphere in hexane (Scheme 1), as previously described by Field et al., 14 2.However, another broader singlet was also observed downfield in the 31 P{ 1 H} NMR spectrum [δ ( ppm) = 66.0 ppm, fwhm = 14 Hz], in addition to an upfield singlet (−54.9 ppm) in the 15 N{ 1 H} NMR spectrum of this solution.To assess the reported instability of 1 in the absence of N 2 , the solvent was removed in vacuo and the remaining oily solid dried for several hours at ca. 10 −3 mbar pressure.Unexpectedly, subsequent dissolution of this solid in hexane under Ar revealed 1 to still be present by 31 P{ 1 H} NMR spectroscopy, albeit in a lower ratio relative to the unassigned res-onances.Curiously, the amount of 4 remained almost unchanged.Gratifyingly, slow evaporation of the solvent (Ar atmosphere) yielded large, deep red crystals whose solutionphase 31 P{ 1 H} and 15 N{ 1 H} NMR spectra corresponded to the aforementioned unidentified resonances, and which were solved by single crystal X-ray diffraction as the new compound [Fe(dmpe) 2 ] 2 (μ-N 2 ) (3, Fig. 3).
The solid-state structure shows the independent [Fe(dmpe) 2 N] fragments in 3 both adopt near ideal trigonal bipyramidal coordination, with the two equatorial Fe(1)P( 4) P( 14) and Fe(2)P( 24)P(34) best planes bisecting one another almost perpendicularly [82.08(4)°].The bridging N 2 ligand is approximately linear, exhibiting typical bond lengths for both the single Fe-N and triple N-N bonds; the latter is comparable with the previously reported structure of 2 [1.139( 13) Å] 15 and indicates weak activation of the N 2 unit in both complexes.The bond lengths and angles seen in 3 are in close agreement with the geometry optimised structure reported by Tyler et al. in their theoretical study of N 2 fixation mediated by various Fe(dmpe) 2 intermediates, in which dimerisation of 1 (with concomitant loss of N 2 ) to form 3 was calculated to be unfavourable by 20 kcal mol −1 . 16Furthermore, a low energy barrier of only 6 kcal mol −1 was calculated for the dissociation of 3 to 1 and [Fe(dmpe) 2 ].Despite this, it has been possible to prepare 3 on a multi-gram scale (using 14 N 2 ; see ESI † for further details): after generating a crude solution of 1, the hexane solvent was mostly removed in vacuo until a slurry of solid (mixture of 1 and 3) in a small volume of solvent remained, after which this suspension was stirred for several days under Ar.Using this protocol, less soluble 3 selectively crystallises as N 2 is slowly depleted upon condensation of 1, and residual 1 and 4 are subsequently removed by rinsing with additional cold hexane.The resulting sample was then rapidly recrystallised (redissolved in hexane, filtered and cooled to −35 °C) yielding a microcrystalline solid of ≥98% purity ( 31 P NMR spectroscopy) that provided satisfactory elemental (CHN) analysis.Crystalline 3 is thermally unstable and is best Fig. 2 (i) 31 P{ 1 H} and (ii) 15 N{ 1 H} NMR spectra of the reduction of trans-Fe(Cl) 2 (dmpe) 2 under 15 N 2 with KC 8 (4 eq.) in hexane.
stored under Ar at ≤−30 °C; under these conditions decomposition (to a mixture of 1, 4, and Fe metal) appears to be minimal after several months.Solutions of 3 prepared under an Ar atmosphere decompose to 4 17 and Fe metal; 7 this occurs relatively slowly in non-polar alkane solvents ( pentane, t 1/2 = 13 d) yet more readily in donor solvents (THF, t 1/2 ≈ 1.5 d; ε r = 7.52).Dissolution of 3 in N 2saturated solvents quantitatively generates 1, which proceeds more slowly in aliphatics than ethereal donor solvents (THF, 0.25 M, 2 d), whilst in the highly polar non-donor organic solvent 1,2-difluorobenzene (ε r = 13.8), 18conversion to 1 is almost instantaneous.Thus, it would appear that a large solvent polarity facilitates dissociation, rather than the donor ability of the solvent.
is notable for being the first synthetic Fe complex able to catalyse the fixation of N 2 to NH 3 from proton and electron equivalents, demonstrating the feasibility of a single Fe site to perform this fundamental transformation; 20 here, a very strong reductant (KC 8 ) and a powerful acid [H(OEt 2 ) 2 (BArF 24 ); BArF 24 = B(3,5-(CF 3 ) 2 C 6 H 3 ) 4 ] were used in excess.In contrast, for Leigh-type chemistry, electron equivalents for the N 2 reduction are ultimately supplied by Fe(0) species, generated via reductive deprotonation of a Fe-H bond in the Fe(II) precursor.Thus, to assess the reducing power of such Fe(0)N 2 -phosphine complexes, cyclic voltammetry measurements were performed on 1 (generated from 3/N 2 ), 2, and 3 (2 mM in Et 2 O; [ n Bu 4 N][BArF 24 ] electrolyte; Cp 2 Fe +/0 reference).For both compounds 2 and 3 a reversible one-electron oxidation was observed at various scan rates which can be assigned to the [Fe(0)/Fe(I)] redox couple (centred at −2.03 V and −2.23 V, for 2 ↔ [2] + and 3 ↔ [3] + respectively; see ESI †).Conversely, the cyclic voltammogram of 1 revealed a single irreversible oxidation at ca. −2.0 V [Fe(0) → Fe(I)], and three smaller unassigned reduction processes between ca.−2.0 and −2.4 V. Accordingly it appears that [1] + is unstable under these conditions, and the additional reduction processes may involve highly reactive [Fe(dmpe) 2 ] + (via N 2 dissociation from [1] + ), or an Et 2 O adduct, or solvent-activation product(s) thereof.Nonetheless, the neutral Fe(0) compounds 1-3 are notably powerful reducing agents, and considerably stronger than the commonly employed CoCp 2 and CoCp* 2 (−1.33 and −1.84 V vs. Cp 2 Fe +/0 in 1,2-dimethoxyethane), 21 which have been used as external reductants in catalytic N 2 fixation by Mo complexes. 22,23n the knowledge that 1-3 are potent reductants, we sought to establish conclusively whether they are able to convert N 2 to the reduced forms N 2 H 4 and NH 3 in the presence of protons, and furthermore in the absence of any potential contaminants (synthetic by-products/decomposites) from Leigh-type deprotonation reactions.Our protocol (see ESI †) for the quantitative assay of NH 3 used the relative integration of the NH 4 + resonance in the 1 H spectrum § against a calibrated insert.Quantitative analysis of N 2 H 4 employed a spectrophotometric method which relies on reaction with acidic para-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde indicator solution; 24 12 Identical results were also obtained for pure 2 and 3 which confirms that, under this acidification protocol (whether formed under Leigh-type conditions or using isolated pure samples), neither of these dmpe/depe complexes can produce the yields of NH 3 previously reported.Tyler et al. reported a marked difference in the yields of NH 3 upon acidification of their Leigh-type prepared Fe(N 2 ) (DMeOPrPE) 2 complex with the following acids: HCl (4%), HBF 4 (7%), and TfOH (up to 15%); in the latter case they showed, using a phenanthroline spectrophotometric test, that after acidification all Fe species are present as Fe(II), thus verifying the hypothesis that each Fe(0) can only supply a maximum of two electrons for the reduction of N 2 (or H + to H 2 ).These yields were suggested to reflect increasing favourability of NH 3 formation with decreasing coordination/ionpairing of the anion of the acid.It should be noted that whilst NH 3 was quantified either by NMR spectroscopy 10 or the indophenol test, 25 the DMeOPrPE ligand is expected to be far less volatile than dmpe/depe and thus unlikely to interfere with the latter method.To our delight, when using TfOH to acidify 1-3, we were able to detect significant amounts of N 2 H 4 and/or NH 3 , which showed a marked dependence on solvent and/or temperature; these data are reported in Table 1, alongside other reported Fe(N 2 )L 4 Leigh-type experiments for comparison.Historically, yields of NH 3 from Leigh-type experiments are quoted per Fe centre, however since we have mixtures of N 2 H 4 /NH 3 products we have also included two other measures in order to resolve the efficiency of the ability of Fe(N 2 )L 4 species to produce these azanes: (1) a combined fixed-N electron yield was calculated on the basis that reduction of N 2 to N 2 H 4 /NH 3 requires four/three electrons ( per mol of product), which takes into account that each Fe provides a maximum of two electrons; 5,25 (2) a fixed-N atom yield, calculated by the fraction of N atoms from the starting material that end up as N 2 H 4 or NH 3 .Clearly the yields for these reactions may be interpreted in several ways, and all may be worth considering in the absence of greater mechanistic understanding of these rapid, and complex, transformations.
Using TfOH, the highest electron yields were obtained for 2 (entries 5-9; ≤55%), followed by 1 (entries 1-4; ≤18%) and 3 (entries 10-11; ≤11%); these yields, in particular for 2, are amongst the highest reported for complexes of Fe, and high-light the delicate dependence on the acidification conditions, which is typical for N 2 fixation chemistry. 20,23,26In these reactions initial protonation of the N 2 ligand is a critical step, thereby triggering subsequent electron transfer; the efficacy of this process will presumably depend primarily on the strength of the H + source employed.Previous calculations have shown that protonation at Fe is more thermodynamically favourable than at the terminal N atom in Fe(N 2 )(dmpe) 2 by some 40 kcal mol −1 , and it is expected that the latter process would result from kinetic factors, such as the use of a strong and sterically bulky acid source. 16The effect of solvent on the yields obtained for 2 is conspicuous, which generally decrease in the order: pentane > Et 2 O > THF.Whilst TfOH is insoluble in pentane and mass transfer effects may explain the high yields obtained from this medium, in both Et 2 O and THF [pK a (H 2 O) = −3.59 and −2.08, respectively] 27 it is expected that acidity of TfOH [pK a (H 2 O) ≈ −12], 28 will be levelled to the donor solvent, hence the protonating power of TfOH in the solvents used is expected to follow the same order, correlating with a greater efficiency of H + attack on N 2 .Another factor may be the aggregation of TfOH due to strong intermolecular H-bonding, 29 with a bulkier proton source favouring protonation at the exposed N 2 ligand over the Fe centre.
Curiously, when H(OEt 2 ) 2 (BArF 24 ) in Et 2 O is employed as the acid source, only trace amounts of N 2 H 4 and NH 3 are observed; since TfOH and HCl [pK a (H 2 O) = −8] are expected to be levelled to protonated Et 2 O, taken together these experiments provide a situation where the solution pH can be viewed as approximately constant, and hence the effect of the anion on these reactions can be resolved.It is envisaged that strongly coordinating anions may bind/ion-pair more favourably to protonated intermediates along the N 2 -fixation pathway, which could sequester their reactivity and hence inhibit the formation of N 2 H 4 or NH 3 ; is it is therefore surprising that both HCl and H(OEt 2 ) 2 (BArF 24 ) are ineffective, since the coordinating ability of the counteranions follows the order Cl − ≫ TfO − > [BArF 24 ] − . 30This trend has been previously observed in the catalytic reduction of N 2 to NH 3 by Mo PNP-pincer complexes, where proton sources incorporating TfO − as the counteranion were privileged in their activity in comparison with either Cl − or [BArF 24 ] − . 23In our study, it is possible that the intermediate coordinating ability of TfO − strikes the best balance of lability properties to facilitate proton-coupled electron transfer events during N 2 fixation mediated at the Fe centre.We have also probed the use of the weaker acid 2,6-dimethylpyridinium (lutidinium) triflate [pK a (H 2 O) = −6.77] 31with our most efficient compound 2; in this case no azanes were produced, and instead protonation at the metal centre resulted in clean conversion to the Fe(II) compound trans-[(H)Fe(N 2 )(depe) 2 ] + , 8 as ascertained by 31 P{ 1 H} NMR (δ = 81.4ppm) and 1 H NMR (hydride signal at δ = −18.20 ppm; 2 J HP = 49 Hz) spectroscopy.Thus it appears that if too weak an acid source is used, formation of the thermodynamic Fe-H product is strongly favoured.
The increased yields of N 2 fixation products for 2 relative to 1 may be attributed to the augmented steric bulk around the Fe centre conferred by the depe ligand, which also protects the metal centre from non-productive direct H + attack.Despite a greater degree of N 2 activation and a more negative reduction potential for 3, the conversion yields are lower than for 1.However, since the reduction of H + to H 2 competes with N 2 fixation, the more potently reducing 3 may lead to poorer discrimination between the processes, translating to lower yields of N 2 H 4 and NH 3 vs.H 2 formation.
In conclusion, we have finally verified that simple Fe 0 (N 2 ) (dmpe/depe) 2 complexes, previously synthesised in situ from Leigh-type deprotonations, are capable of producing appreciable amounts of N 2 H 4 and NH 3 using TfOH as the acid source.In the case of the Fe 0 (N 2 )(depe) 2 the reaction is particularly efficient based on the number of electrons available, and represents one of the highest conversions (55%) to date.The significant proportion of N 2 H 4 produced in these reactions suggests that NH 3 formation may proceed via N 2 H 4 intermediates; 32 further reduction may occur on Fe and/or via an outer sphere pathway.Mechanistic investigations into understanding this reactivity are currently underway.We wish to thank the EPSRC for PhD studentship funding (LRD and PJH), the ERC (Starting Grant no.307061, PiHOMER; GGW) and the Royal Society for University Research Fellowships (AA and GGW).
Notes and references ‡ We do not see any solution-phase spectroscopic evidence ( 31 P, 15 N, 1 H NMR spectroscopy) for the formation of the depe analogue of 3, and we believe that the increased steric impact of replacing Me with Et in the ligand backbone is sufficient to preclude the formation of a dimeric species [Fe(depe

Table 1
Selected yields of N 2 H 4 and NH 3 from the acidification of 1-3, and related complexes, with acid All reactions performed at 25 °C using TfOH, unless stated otherwise.a Yields per mol Fe. b Yield assuming each Fe supplies a max. of two electrons.c Performed at −78 °C.d This work.e Performed under Ar.f From deprotonation of [trans-Fe(H)(N 2 )(DMeOPrPE) 2 ] + .g [H(OEt 2 ) 2 ][BArF 24 ] used.h 2,6-Dimethylpyridinium (lutidinium) triflate used.NR = not reported.Yields are averaged over all runs (see ESI for more details). d