Development of Polar Order and Tilt in Lamellar Liquid Crystalline Phases of a Bent-core Mesogen †

A new bent-core mesogen combining a 4-cyanoresorcinol unit with two terephthalate based rod-like wings and terminated by two long alkyl chains, was synthesized and investigated by DSC, XRD, optical, electrooptical and dielectric methods. A series of liquid crystalline phases in the unique sequence SmA– SmA (P) –SmCP R –(M 1 /SmCP a)–SmC s P A –SmC 0 a P A –SmC a P A , mainly distinguished by the degree and mode of correlation of tilt and polar order, was observed. The development of polar order is associated with the emergence of a small tilt (<10). With decreasing temperature the tilt changes from random (SmA) via synclinic to anticlinic, while the coherence length of the polar domains grows. This small tilt gives rise to an only weak layer coupling which is in competition with the polar coupling and this leads to new modes of self assembly in lamellar phases of bent-core mesogens, among them the SmCP R and the SmCP a phases. The SmCP R phase is an only slightly tilted biaxial smectic phase with randomized polar order and the SmCP a phase is a slightly tilted and antiferroelectric switching, but uniaxial smectic phase. For this phase a regular change of the in-plane polarization vector between the layers by an angle between >0 and <90 is proposed.


Introduction
Liquid crystalline (LC) materials with a bent molecular shape (banana-molecules) represent a fascinating area in so matter science, providing new supramolecular structures, phenomena and properties, unknown for other materials. 1Among them there is spontaneous mirror symmetry breaking 2,3 and the formation of series of polar (ferroelectric, antiferroelectric) switching LC phases which are of interest for electrooptical and nonlinear optical devices. 4Most of the polar switching smectic phases are tilted and the tilt induces layer chirality. 5This in turn leads to quite complex phase structures and switching behaviour.Smectic phases with an orthogonal organization of the molecules (SmA type) are rare and represent promising applicants for fast switching electrooptical devices. 6Presently, there are three types of polar orthogonal smectic phases, the antiferroelectric SmAP A phase, [7][8][9] the ferroelectric SmAP F phase 10 and the SmAP R phase with randomly distributed polar clusters, which are sufficiently large to be aligned under an electric eld. 11A class of compounds for which such polar SmA phases has been reported represent 4-cyanoresorcinol bisbenzoates, with terephthalate based wings 1/n and 2/n (see Scheme 1), for which two homologues with the alkoxy chains R ¼ OC 8 H 17 (1/8) and R ¼ OC 12 H 25 (1/12) have rst been reported by Weissog et al. 9 A typical feature reported for these compounds is the formation of SmAP A phases.We have previously reported a series of orthogonal smectic phases, including SmAP A and SmAP R phases for compounds 2/n with alkyl instead of alkoxy chains (R ¼ C n H 2n+1 ). 613a Here we report the mesomorphic properties of a new 4-cyanoresorcinol compound 1/14 with terephthalate based wing groups, having two terminal tetradecyloxy chains (R ¼ OC 14 H 29 ) instead of the alkyl chains with the same number of carbon atoms (R ¼ C 14 H 29 ) in compound 2/14.It turned out that the phase behaviour of this particular compound is distinct from the related alkyl substituted compound 2/14 and also much more complex than previously reported for the shorter homologues 1/n with OC 8 H 17 (1/8) and OC 12 H 25 chains (1/12). 9The new compound 1/14 with longer alkoxy chains exhibits the unique sequence of eight liquid crystalline phases, shown in Scheme 1.Moreover, formation of tilted smectic phases was observed instead of the orthogonal phases of the previously reported homologues 1/n (n ¼ 8, 12).This new compound allows the investigation of the development of polar order and tilt in the smectic phases of bentcore mesogens.It seems that the emergence of polar order is in this case coupled with the emergence of tilt.The tilt is relatively small, which provides an only weak layer coupling and this weak coupling gives rise to new phase structures, namely a weakly tilted biaxial smectic phase with randomized polar order (SmCP R ) and a SmC phase with a unique combination of antiferroelectric switching and optical uniaxiality, most probably representing a SmCP a phase where the in-plane polarization direction rotates from layer to layer by a xed angle uniformly between adjacent layers.Overall, the unprecedented sequence of a total of eight different LC phase structures, SmA-SmA (P) -SmCP R -(M 1 /SmCP a )-SmC s P A -SmC 0 a P A -SmC a P A , results from the competition between polar coupling and tilt coupling between the layers.Moreover, the competition between the biaxiality caused by the tilt and by the restricted rotation around the long axis lead to an inversion of birefringence, which is reported here for the rst time in a mesophase formed by bentcore molecules.Thus, the present work provides new insights in the complex mechanisms involved in the transition from nonpolar to polar smectic phases.Because of the large number of slightly different mesophase structures and the relatively complex relations between them, the phase assignment shown and explained in Scheme 1 is used throughout the manuscript right from the beginning.In Sections 3.1-3.6 the investigation by the different methods is described rst and in Section 3.7 the different LC phase structures will be analyzed and discussed step-by-step in more detail, explaining and conrming the proposed structures based on combined interpretation of various results given in Sections 3.1-3.6.

Synthesis
The synthetic procedures leading to the target compound are outlined in Scheme S1 in the ESI.† In this procedure 4-cyanoresorcinol was acylated with 4-(4-n-tetradecyloxyphenoxycarbonylbenzoyloxy)benzoic acid, which was obtained by esterication of 4-formylbenzoic acid with 4-tetradecyloxyphenol followed by oxidation of CHO to COOH (for details see ESI †). 14

Investigation methods
Investigation of the mesomorphic properties is based on polarizing microscopy (PM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X-ray diffraction (XRD) of surface aligned samples as well as on electrooptical and dielectric experiments.
The mesophase behaviour and transition temperatures of the prepared bent-core molecule was measured using a Mettler FP-82 HT hot stage and control unit in conjunction with a Nikon Optiphot-2 polarizing microscope.The associated enthalpies were obtained from DSC-thermograms which were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer DSC-7, heating and cooling rate: 10 K min À1 .The electro-optical switching characteristics were examined with the triangular-wave method using a home-made set-up in polyimide coated ITO cells of thickness 6 mm, EHC Japan.
X-ray diffraction patterns were recorded with a 2D detector (Vantec 500, Bruker).Ni ltered and pin hole collimated CuK a radiation was used.The exposure time was 30 min and the sample to detector distance was 8.95 cm and 26.7 cm for wide and small angle XRD experiments, respectively.Uniform orientation was achieved by alignment at the air-sample interface on top of a small droplet.The samples were held on a temperature-controlled heating stage.
The dielectric spectra (3 0 t , 3 00 t ) were measured on home-made planar aligned cells of cell thickness 10 mm with Nissan Chemicals RN1175 alignment layer and antiparallel rubbing in a frequency range between 1 Hz and 10 MHz using Novocontrol Scheme 1 Structure of compound 1/14 under investigation herein, its phase sequences on heating and cooling (data were obtained from DSC peak temperatures, see Fig. 1, combined with optical investigations of homeotropic aligned samples between non-treated glass surfaces and electrooptical investigations) and comparison with previously reported structurally related 4-cyanoresorcinols with terephthalate wings (1/8, 1/12 (ref.9) and 2/14 (ref.13)), their phases and phase transitions (T/ C, DH/kJ mol À1 , values in square brackets) and abbreviations of the phase assignments used herein.
alpha dielectric analyser.The sample was cooled at a rate of 0.1 K min À1 from the isotropic phase and measured in the temperature range in between 193 C and 50 C.In order of the increasing frequency of their appearance we refer to these relaxations as P1, P2 and P3, and analyse the measured 3 0 t and 3 00 t spectra as a sum of these relaxations and the contribution from s dc to 3 00 t , by using the relation for the complex permittivity, 15 3 * t ðuÞ ¼ where u ¼ 2pf is the angular frequency and 3 0 is the permittivity of free space.The subscript i denotes the i th relaxation process.
Ni is the dielectric relaxation strength of this process, s HNi is the Havriliak-Negami dielectric relaxation time for the i th process (i ¼ 1 to 3); a i and b i are respectively the symmetric and asymmetric broadening parameters also for the i th process.The term Àjs dc 3 0 u takes account of the s dc contribution to 3 00 , and 3 N is the sum of the permittivity contributions from vibrational, ionic and electronic polarisations.The imaginary part of eqn (1) is tted to the loss spectra using the WinFit dielectric tting program purchased from Novocontrol.For the collective mode designated here P 2 , a 2 is varied from 1.0 to 0.94 and b 2 is xed at 1.0.

DSC investigations
The mesophases and transition temperatures of compound 1/14 are given in Scheme 1. Fig. 1 shows the DSC heating and cooling scans.In the DSC scans three distinct peaks in the heating and cooling curves can be assigned to rst order phase transitions (Fig. 1a), a sharp transition with relatively high enthalpy (DH ¼ 9.7 kJ mol À1 ) for the transition between the isotropic liquid and the liquid crystalline state occurring around 192 C on heating and 190 C on cooling, a phase transition with much lower enthalpy (DH ¼ 1.7 kJ mol À1 ) taking place at 136 C on heating and at 133 C on cooling in the LC range and the melting/crystallization occurring at T ¼ 104 C and T ¼ 65 C, respectively (all transitions at rates of 10 K min À1 ).The phase transition at 136/133 C with relatively low enthalpy shows a signicant tailing over a temperature range of about 20 K, especially in the cooling runs (Fig. 1b and c).Besides these rst order phase transitions there are additional continuous transitions taking place in the LC range without distinct DSC peaks (Fig. 1a), but recognized by changes of the textures, switching behaviour and dielectric response.These transitions occur at T ¼ 145 C between a uniaxial and a biaxial smectic phase and additional continuous transitions take place at T ¼ 110 C and 75 C on further cooling.In addition, different phases coexist in the range of the tailing (T ¼ 133-115 C) of the transition at T ¼ 133 C.

Optical investigations
In planar cells a fan-like texture, as typical for smectic phases is observed on cooling the isotropic liquid to 190 C. In the fan texture the dark extinction crosses are parallel to the directions of polarizer and analyzer, indicating the absence of a uniform tilt in this smectic phase (SmA) (Fig. 2a).The birefringence increases on cooling, especially in the temperature range between 190 and 160 C (see Fig. S2a-d †).
In homeotropically aligned samples, the SmA phase exhibits a uniform dark texture with some typical oily streak defects and Maltese crosses (Fig. 2b).At 145 C a weakly birefringent schlieren texture develops in the dark homeotropic aligned samples, as shown in Fig. 2c, indicating a transition to an optical biaxial smectic phase (assigned as SmCP R ).This transition is not associated with any enthalpy change in the DSC traces.On further cooling the birefringence nearly disappears with a minimum around 130-132 C (Fig. 2e) and then increases again (Fig. 2g).This minimum, occurring slightly below the maximum of the DSC peak of the SmCP R -SmC s P A transition, but still located in the range of the tailing of this transition (Fig. 1b and c), is associated with an inversion in the sign of the birefringence.This is conrmed by investigation with a l-retarder plate, where the positions of the blue shied and yellow shied areas exchange their positions at this temperature (compare Fig. 2d and h), indicating a change of the major direction of the intramolecular p-conjugation pathway at that temperature.
Remarkably, however, the birefringence never goes through zero at the inversion point (Fig. 2e) which might be due to a thin birefringent surface layer formed by a surface stabilized birefringent phase (M 1 , see below) coexisting with the SmC s P A phase in this temperature region.Indeed, in the temperature range of the SmC s P A phase between 133 and 115 C, corresponding to the tailing in the DSC traces of the phase transition at T ¼ 133 C on cooling (Fig. 1c), there is a coexistence and competition of the evolving SmC s P A phase with two other phase structures (M 1 and SmCP a , see Scheme 1).
The phase assigned as M 1 can most clearly be observed under strong homeotropic alignment conditions as achieved by pretreatment of the glass substrates with AL60702 (JSR, Korea, obtained through Samsung Co. Korea).Upon cooling, in these strongly homeotropic aligning cells, a highly viscous and birefringent phase with a mosaic-like texture (M 1 ) appears at T ¼ 133 C (Fig. 3a).At 130-131 C completely dark areas slowly appear and partly replace this birefringent phase (Fig. 3b).The formation of these dark areas (SmCP a ) can be triggered by application of an in-plane eld, but it is never complete and both phases M 1 and SmCP a always coexist and replace the SmC s P A phase under these conditions.In contrast to the birefringent M 1 phase the SmCP a phase is uid and behaves like a homeotropic aligned uniaxial smectic phase, i.e. the optically isotropic texture is retained on shearing and defect lines similar to oily streaks are formed.Hence, this phase is optical uniaxial with a high tendency for homeotropic alignment.It should be pointed out that the optical uniaxial texture of the SmCP a phase is not related to the inversion of birefringence taking place in a small range of temperature (T ¼ 130-132 C) in the homeotropic aligned SmC s P A phase.Upon further cooling there is a slow transformation of the M 1 phase to the schlieren texture of the SmC s P A phase (Fig. 2g), taking place in the temperature range between 125 and 115 C.
On slow cooling the homeotropic sample between ordinary microscopy glass plates without alignment layer (weak anchoring conditions) the optical uniaxial phase can be formed instead of the SmC s P A phase at $133 C. Once formed, it completely replaces the SmC s P A phase, in this case without a coexisting M 1 phase.The SmCP a phase is retained down to T ¼ $115 C when it transforms to the SmC s P A phase.On re-heating with medium rates of temperature (5-10 K min À1 ) the SmC s P A phase is retained up to the phase transition to the SmCP R phase at 136 C without formation of SmCP a .However, by using slower heating rates the optical isotropic SmCP a phase can develop at T $ 125 C on heating, too.So the phase behavior in this temperature range is very complex, associated with strong hysteresis effects, phase coexistence regions, and furthermore, being very sensitive to slight changes in experimental conditions and the sample history (see Scheme 1).In planar cells the SmCP a and SmC s P A phases appear with fan-textures, having their extinction crosses either parallel or slightly inclined to the directions of the polarizers, respectively (see Fig. 6e and Fig. S2e-j †).The M 1 phase could not be clearly identied.Due to this condition-dependent coexistence of different structures the investigations of the phases in the temperature range between 115 and 133 C and the proper interpretation of the results are difficult. 16Nevertheless, combined results from the different methods, together with the analysis of the development of the distinct structures depending on temperature allows us to discuss some general conclusions (see Sections 3.7.8 and 4).
On further cooling the birefringence of the schlieren texture of the SmC s P A increases, associated with distinct textural changes at $110 C (transition to SmC 0 a P A ) and $75 C at the transition to the SmC a P A phase (see Fig. 2i and j).These transitions are continuous and not associated with any change in enthalpy (see Fig. 1).

Polarization current curves
Switching experiments under a triangular wave voltage were carried out in 6 mm coated ITO cells under an applied triangular wave AC voltage with a frequency of 10 Hz and under a peak to peak voltage of 160 V, corresponding to AE26.7 V mm À1 .There is no polarization current peak in the isotropic liquid at T ¼ 196 C (Fig. 4a) and a single peak in each half period of the applied eld emerges shortly below the phase transition from the isotropic liquid at approximately 184 C in the temperature range of the uniaxial SmA phase and increases in intensity on further cooling (peak A in Fig. 4b).However, there is no recognizable eld induced birefringence, as obtained in a homeotropic cell under an applied in-plane eld in the whole temperature range of this phase and therefore this SmA phase is considered as paraelectric SmA phase (SmA (P) ).
In the SmA (P) range the polarization peak is slightly shied to lower voltage, becomes relatively sharp by further decreasing the temperature (Fig. 4c) and reaches a value of 150 nC cm À2 before the transition to the next phase (Fig. 5).At 145 C, at the transition to the SmCP R phase, a second polarization peak (B) emerges which grows and at rst coexists with the peak A, which  continuously decreases in intensity (Fig. 4d).Peak B completely replaces peak A at T ¼ 136 C (Fig. 4e).This peak B appears at a lower voltage and is sharper than peak A in the SmA (P) phase, indicating a signicantly increased size of the polar domains, which retain a ferroelectric correlation in the domains; the polarization values increase further to 270 nC cm À2 in the SmCP R phase before the transition to the next phases (SmCP a and SmC s P A ) takes place (Fig. 5). 17t T ¼ 135 C two diffuse peaks start developing (C), one at lower voltage and a second one overlapping with the single peak B (Fig. 4f).With decreasing temperature these two peaks rapidly become sharper, increase in size (Fig. 4g) and replace the single peak B. In the temperature range between 133 C and 129 C peaks B and C still coexist and at T ¼ 129 C peak B has nearly completely disappeared.Below this temperature the two polarization peaks become sharper, come closer together and further increase in size (Fig. 4h), reaching polarization values between 600 and 760 nC cm À2 in this SmC 0 a P A phase region (Fig. 5).On further cooling, in the SmC a P A range, the polarization does not change, but the peaks merge to only one, possibly due to the increased viscosity (Fig. S5b †).The increased viscosity is in line with dielectric investigations, see Section 3.5 and Fig. S6 and S7 †.

Planar textures and electrooptical investigations
Fig. 6 shows a comparison of textures of planar cells before (le side) and aer applying an electric eld (right side).Without applied eld the extinction crosses in the SmA/SmA (P) phase region coincide with the directions of the polarizers (Fig. 6a), conrming non-tilted phases.There is no change if an electric eld is applied (Fig. 6b).Also in the region between 145 and 133 C, assigned as SmCP R , the extinction crosses are still parallel to polarizer and analyzer, though a nonspecic grainy texture develops under the applied eld over the whole texture (see Fig. 6c and d).This grainy texture is strongly uctuating and appears to be the result of electro-convections or uctuations of biaxial/polar domains in the SmCP R phase.Below 133 C, in the SmC s P A phase range, this feature disappears and the extinction crosses become inclined with respect to the polarizers by an angle of about 10 (Fig. 6e).Under the eld the tilt is retained, only the birefringence is slightly increased, indicating a switching around the long axis (Fig. 6f), which might be favoured by the relatively small tilt of the molecules in this temperature range.In the case that the SmCP a phase is formed, the extinction crosses remain parallel to the polarizers and switching takes place by rotation on a cone, leading to synclinic eld induced SmC s P F states.(see Fig. S2h-j

†).
A major change is observed at $110 C when the birefringence of the sample at 0 V drops signicantly as indicated by the birefringence colour change from purple/blue to red (Fig. 6e  and g).This is associated with a change of the position of the extinctions from being inclined with the polarizers to parallel to the polarizers in the SmC s P A phase, indicating a transition from synclinic to anticlinic tilt correlation (SmC s P A -SmC 0 a P A transition).Under an applied eld the extinctions become inclined again (Fig. 6h) and the birefringence is considerably enhanced (red to green), which can be explained by a switching process taking place by rotation on a cone, giving rise to a eld induced anticlinic to synclinic transition. 18Probably, the denser packing in the SmC 0 a P A phase favours this mode of switching though the tilt is still small.Within the temperature range of the SmC 0 a P A phase the birefringence of the 0 V textures rises with decreasing temperature (colour change from red to pink, see Fig. 6g and i) due to denser packing and increased polar order of the molecules (increase of polarization values, P s , see Fig. 5).Also under the applied eld the extinction crosses retain a position coinciding with the polarizers (Fig. 6j).However, in the eld induced states the birefringence decreases more strongly with decreasing temperature (color change from green to blue), and the extinction crosses align more and more parallel to the polarizers (Fig. 6h and j).This can be explained by a change of the switching process from a rotation on a cone, preferentially occurring at higher temperature (eld induced SmC 0 a P A to SmC s P F transition) and inducing a synclinic tilt, to a collective rotation around the long axis at lower temperature, (eld induced SmC 0 a P A to SmC 0 a P F transition) retaining the anticlinic tilt.This change in switching mechanism is most likely due to the increase in viscosity of the sample. 19The coexistence of two distinct switching mechanisms not only explains the change of the direction of the extinctions in the eld induced textures depending on temperature, it could also be the reason for the splitting of the polarization peaks occurring in the low temperature range of the SmC 0 a P A phase region (Fig. S5a †).Below 75 C, in the range of the SmC a P A phase, the switching seems to take place exclusively around the long axis which leads to nearly identical birefringence and unchanged orientation of the extinctions for the states with and without eld (Fig. 6k and l).This is mainly attributed to the increased viscosity in this temperature range.

Dielectric investigations
Dielectric spectroscopy was performed in a planar cell of 10 mm thickness in a frequency range between 1 Hz and 10 MHz on cooling from the isotropic phase and at temperatures in between 193 C and 50 C.The frequency dependence of the imaginary part of the dielectric permittivity (3 00 t ) for selected temperatures is shown in Fig. 7a.(A complete set of the same data is given in Fig. S6.†) Three relaxation processes, P1, P2 and P3 were observed in the measured frequency range.The low frequency process P1 is attributed to conductivity and the high frequency relaxation process P3 can be observed in the frequency window only below 100 C and this is assigned to rotation around the short axis, its frequency decreases and the relaxation strength increases with a reduction in temperature; the relaxation frequency follows 2S + 1 dependence, S being the orientational order parameter.The dielectric strength d3 3 and the relaxation frequency f R,3 of P3 are given in Fig. S7.† P2 (the medium frequency relaxation process) appears in the measured frequency range below $186 C and exists down to 50 C.The peak is assigned to the polar switching mechanism.The dielectric strength (d3 2 ) and the relaxation frequency (f R,2 ) of P2 were obtained by tting the relaxation spectra to the Havriliak-Negami equation. 15ig. 7b shows the temperature dependence of d3 2 and f R,2 for the process P2. f R,2 decreases with decreasing temperature with small steps at 146 C and around 130 C. d3 2 increases and reaches a value of $7 in the temperature range of the SmA (P) phase close to the transition to SmCP R .This conrms the presence of polar clusters already in the SmA (P) phase.In the range of the SmCP R phase the slope of the curve becomes very steep until d3 2 ¼ 38 is reached at T $ 130 C, indicating a strong increase of the size of the polar domain.Aer a short plateau d3 2 further rises in the temperature range of the SmCP a and SmC s P A phases and reaches a maximum (d3 2 ¼ 48) at T ¼ 110 C, corresponding to the SmC s P A -SmC 0 a P A transition temperature.This indicates that even in the SmC s P A range polar domains with limited size are present and a set of uniformly polar layers is not yet achieved.It is therefore likely that this phase consists of SmC s P F domains with relatively large sizes.Below T ¼ 110 C, in the SmC 0 a P A phase range, d3 2 decreases, which indicates that the coherence length of the polar domains further grows.Also the polarization values increase to a range as typical for B 2 phases (P s ¼ 600-760 nC cm À2 , see Fig. 5).The steep decrease in d3 2 and f R,2 below T ¼ 80 C indicates that uniformly polar layers with antipolar correlation form the SmC a P A phase, similar to the classical B 2 phases of the usual bent-core mesogens.
A major increase in d3 2 , and hence, major growth in the size of the polar domains takes place in the temperature range in between 136 C and $130 C, i.e. starting at the inection point of the phase transition with a maximum at 133 C and covering a part of its tailing (Fig. 1c).In this temperature range the transition between SmCP R and SmC s P A and the inversion of birefringence take place and the additional mesophases M 1 (viscous birefringent phase) and SmCP a (optical uniaxial polar smectic phase) appear under certain conditions.The small plateau between 127 and 130 C could possibly be due to the formation of the M 1 phase, either coexisting with the SmC s P A / SmCP a phases or replacing them in this temperature region.

X-ray scattering
The XRD patterns of a surface aligned sample in the temperature range between 100 and 160 C, covering all LC phases with exception of the SmC a P A phase at lowest temperature, show a diffuse scattering in the wide angle region and only one sharp Bragg reection in the small angle region at d ¼ 5.1-5.3nm (Fig. 8a and b).The d-value is a bit smaller than the molecular length (L mol ¼ 6.0-6.6 nm depending on the assumed molecular conformation, see Fig. S1 †) conrming the presence of smectic phases in the whole investigated temperature range.Based on the d/L mol ratio of $0.80-0.88 the presence of a tilt is in principle possible.There is only a very weak second order harmonics of the layer reection indicating rather diffuse interlayer interfaces.The slight shi of the outer diffuse scattering maxima from d ¼ 0.47 nm (160 C) to d ¼ 0.45 nm (100 C) indicates an increasing packing density of the molecules in the layers at reduced temperature, especially in the SmC 0 a P A phase.Nevertheless, the scattering remains completely diffuse, indicating uid smectic phases without in-plane order in all investigated phases.The position of the small angle scattering is 90 AE 5 with respect to the maxima of the wide angle scattering.The distribution of the wide angle scattering is relatively broad for a smectic phase though there is no clear indication of a splitting or inclination of the small angle or wide angle scatterings.Hence, a tilted organization of the molecules with relatively small tilt angle, as conrmed by optical investigations (see Sections 3.3 and 3.5), would be in agreement with the XRD data, though the XRD patterns of aligned samples cannot provide any additional proof for the tilted organization.
However, the precise measurement of the d-value of the layer reection depending on temperature (shown in Fig. 8c, obtained by slow cooling) indicates a temperature dependence of the d-value which is distinct in the different phase regions.For non-tilted smectic phases the d-values usually grow with decreasing temperature due to the growing packing density, associated with a stretching of the alkyl chains.This growth of the d-value can be observed in the SmA/SmA (P) and SmCP R phase regions (region a in Fig. 8c).However, this growth decreases at $133 C and stops around $130 C and then the dvalues decrease in region b.The decrease continues down to $124 C and indicates the onset or the substantial increase of a tilt at this temperature.Aer the minimum around 124 C the slope of the d ¼ f(T) curve increases again and then remains constant below $110 C in the measured temperature range of the SmC 0 a P A phase (region c in Fig. 8c).At the SmA (P) -SmCP R transition temperature at T ¼ 145 C, when phase biaxiality sets in, no visible change of the slope of the d ¼ f(T) curve can be identied (see line a in Fig. 8c).If the onset of biaxiality would be only due to restricted rotation of the molecules around the long axis the increased packing density should give rise to an increase of d ¼ f(T) at this temperature.On the other hand, if biaxiality would be due to the onset of a tilt, then d ¼ f(T) should decrease.Both are not the case, and this could be explained by the onset of a small tilt, coupled with a restricted rotation of the aromatic cores in this SmCP R phase.Though this coupling of tilt and molecular biaxiality is inherent to SmC phases, the bent molecular shape leads to a signicant molecular biaxiality.Hence the inuence of molecular biaxiality on the properties is more pronounced than in usual SmC phases and appears to be also responsible for the observed inversion of birefringence.
In the temperature range between $133 and 115 C up to three mesophases could coexist (SmC s P A , M 1 and SmCP a ).Therefore, the scattering in this region cannot unambiguously be assigned to a specic phase structure, but the fact that no additional reections can be identied in the XRD patterns in this temperature region suggests that the fundamental structures of these three optically very different phases should not be very different and fundamentally based on a lamellar organization.

Discussion of the phase structures
In this section the results from XRD, optical, dielectric and electrooptical investigations obtained with compound 1/14 will be combined in an attempt to understand the observed sequence SmA-SmA (P) -SmCP R -(M 1 /SmCP a )-SmC s P A -SmC 0 a P A -SmC a P A (see Scheme 1 and Fig. 1).
3.7.1 SmA phase.As indicated by dielectric (Fig. 7) and switching experiments (Fig. 4 and 5) only above $184 C the SmA phase behaves as an ordinary nonpolar SmA phase, but already at $184 C local polar order develops (Fig. 4b and c and  7b) and the correlation length of the polar domain grows as the packing density of the molecules increases with decreasing temperature (see increase of the d-values in Fig. 8c).As under an applied in-plane eld no birefringence could be induced, the coherence length of the polar domains is still relatively small and hence this region of the SmA phase between $184 and 145 C is assigned as paraelectric SmA (SmA (P) ).
3.7.2SmCP R phase.At the second order phase transition at $145 C to the phase assigned as SmCP R the slope of the dielectric strength d3 2 starts rising more steeply (Fig. 7b), a relatively sharp single peak occurs in the polarization curves (Fig. 4d and e) and optical phase biaxiality emerges (Fig. 2c).Though there is macroscopic biaxiality the polar order is still local as indicated by the single peak which is sharper than in the SmA (P) phase and similar to polarization peaks usually observed in SmAP R phases, 11 but still relatively broad compared to typical SmAP F and SmCP F phases. 10,20The presence of polar domains with relatively long coherence length is in line with dielectric studies indicating a high dielectric strength in this temperature range (Fig. 7b).Phase biaxiality is thought to arise from a tilt of the molecules (Dn t ), coupled with a restricted rotation around the long axis (Dn b ) (Fig. 9).Also the textures are in line with a tilted organization.The schlieren texture observed in the homeotropic aligned samples of this phase is distinct from those typically observed for orthogonal SmA b phases, which are characterized by a stripe pattern typically occurring in the homeotropic samples; 21 such a stripe pattern is absent for 1/ 14.Also the presence of stable (not vanishing) four brush disclinations in the schlieren textures (see Fig. S4 †) is not in line with a non-tilted SmA b -like structure. 7,22This conrms the presence of a molecular tilt, though in planar textures the extinction crosses remain parallel to the polarizers (Fig. 6c).This might be caused by a not exclusively synclinic, but also anticlinic coupling of the tilt in adjacent layers, caused by the only weak layer coupling in this weakly tilted smectic phase.
3.7.3SmC s P A phase.Major changes take place in the temperature range between 133 C and 110 C on cooling.XRD indicates a decrease of d which is a clear indication of a more signicant increase of the tilt (Fig. 8c, region b) which according to optical investigations (Fig. 6e) become uniformly synclinic in the SmC s P A phase.Dielectric investigations show a further noncontinuous strong rise of the dielectric strength up to $48 (Fig. 7b).There is a jump in polarization values and two polarization current peaks indicate antiferroelectric switching (Fig. 4g).This conrms a synclinic tilted polar SmC phase (SmC s P A ) with only $10 optical tilt and even smaller XRD tilt (probably <5 ).Even in this phase the observed tilt is unusually small for a bent-core molecule and provides an only weak layer coupling, giving rise to a series of very unusual properties of this SmC s P A phase, especially in the vicinity of the SmCP R -SmC s P A phase transition where tilt and polar coherence length are the smallest and hence the layer coupling is the weakest (tailing between 133 and 115 C, see Fig. 1).Firstly, in homeotropically aligned samples of the SmC s P A phase an inversion of birefringence (Fig. 2c-h) occurs at $130-132 C, i.e. immediately below the SmCP R -SmC s P A transition.
The inversion of birefringence in homeotropic samples is likely to be due to a competition between optical biaxiality caused by tilt (Dn t ) and biaxiality caused by the increasing restriction of the rotation of the molecules around their long axes (Dn b ).As in bent-core molecules the polar axis is perpendicular to the tilt direction of the molecular bending plane, these two contributions to phase biaxiality have opposite sign and at the crossover can extinguish each other (Fig. 9).This is believed to be the origin of the inversion of birefringence.As phase biaxiality due to tilt (Dn t ) is assumed to dominate in the SmCP R phase it is thought that the increasing polar coupling further restricts the rotation around the long axis, leading to a growing importance of Dn b .Because the tilt is extremely small in the SmCP R phase the birefringence in this phase is also very small (see Fig. 2c).As the tilt remains relatively small, the growing Dn b can become larger than Dn t aer the inversion point with Dn b ¼ Dn t .The absolute value rDnr further increases aer the inversion point and below a certain temperature rDnr can become larger than in the SmCP R phase (Fig. 2g).
The weak layer coupling is also responsible for the easy formation of other mesophases (M 1 and SmCP a ), competing with the SmC s P A phase.The tendency for formation of these phases is the highest immediately below the SmCP R phase.With decreasing temperature, i.e. with growing domain size and increasing layer coupling, the SmC s P A structure becomes more dominating and is exclusively found in the temperature range between 110 and 115 C. On heating the preformed SmC s P A phase can be retained up to 125 C. Above this temperature it becomes metastable and is replaced by the SmCP a phase if sufficiently slow heating rates are used.
The observation that the dielectric strength d3 2 further increases in the SmC s P A temperature range until the phase transition SmC s P A -SmC 0 a P A is reached at 110 C indicates that in the SmC s P A phase region no uniformly polar layers are formed.It seems that also the SmC s P A phase is composed of polar SmC s P F domains.Though the coherence length of these domains is much larger than in the SmCP R phase, such domains are still present and the further growth of the SmC s P F domains in the SmC s P A region is indicated by the growth of d3 2 (Fig. 7b).So, the SmC s P A phase appears to be not the classical type with a strictly antipolar organization between the individual layers, rather there appears to be SmC s P F domains which adopt an on average synclinic and antipolar correlation (Fig. 10c).This structure can be described as (SmC s P F ) s P A .
3.7.4SmCP a phase.The most interesting phase is probably the optically uniaxial smectic phase, showing antiferroelectric switching with relatively sharp polarization peaks, occurring below the SmCP R phase and competing with the SmC s P A phase.Uniaxiality of polar smectic phases would only be possible if the correlation between the layers is randomized (P R phases), or helical (P a ).Lamellar structures with uniform polar direction in the layers, but random polar correlation between the layers or with a regular change of polar direction distinct from 0 and 180 were theoretically predicted for orthogonal smectic phases. 13,23This type of smectic phases involves distinct structures (SmAP R , SmAP 2 and SmAP a ) representing new types of smectic A phases.In these phases the change of the direction of the inplane polarization vectors in adjacent layers has the same sign in SmAP a , has opposite sign in SmAP 2 and is randomized in SmAP R .Only the phases SmAP a and SmAP R are uniaxial whereas SmAP 2 is biaxial.A SmAP a type of these phases was recently suggested for the related alkyl substituted compound 2/ 14 (Scheme 1). 13It is likely that a similar phase structure can also be formed by weakly tilted and hence weakly coupled polar SmC phases of bent-core mesogens.Hence, the layer correlation could be random (P R ) or P a -like in this uniaxial polar SmC phase of 1/14.Between 133 and 130 C there is a coexistence of a broad single polarization current peak with a double peak (Fig. 4g).In this temperature range the P R structure, showing only one relatively broad polarization peak, could probably coexist with the antiferroelectric switching uniaxial SmC phase (SmCP a ).However, the switching is exclusively antiferroelectric in the temperature range between 115 and 130 C (Fig. 4h).Hence, the structure of this polar smectic phase is most probably SmCP a , a tilted version of the SmAP a phase and related to the SmC* a phase occurring at the SmC*-SmA* transition of chiral rod-like molecules with small tilt. 24In this phase the in-plane polarization direction rotates uniformly from layer to layer by a xed angle (Fig. 10d).In contrast to the previously reported SmAP a phase of compound 2/14 (ref.13) no uniaxial state could be induced in the homeotropically aligned SmCP a phase of 1/14 under an in-plane electric eld (up to 10 V mm À1 ).It is possible that the angle of the polar vector in adjacent layers of the SmCP a phase is smaller than 90 in the ground state.In this case increasing the applied eld leads directly to the eld induced SmC s P F state without crossing an optically isotropic 90 twisted state.
3.7.5 M 1 -phase.The structure of the birefringent M 1 phase, competing with the uniaxial SmCP a phase is not clear.Its high birefringence, viscosity and the mosaic-like appearance of the texture (Fig. 3) are indications of the presence of additional order.This could be caused by a correlation and coupling of the layers or polar domains either by register on a 2D or 3D lattice or it could be the consequence of layer modulations resulting from the growing coherence length of the synpolar (ferroelectric) domains.That no indications for additional order can be found in the XRD patterns might be due to a large wave length of these modulations, a not well developed long range correlation or due to the coexistence with other phases, so that under the conditions of these investigations the SmC s P A or SmCP a phases dominate.
3.7.6SmC 0 a P A phase.In this phase, occurring at a continuous phase transition at T ¼ 110 C the polar order is almost long range.The tilt is still relatively small and the packing density increases on further cooling as indicated by XRD (dvalues of the layer reection increases, see Fig. 8c, region c), the polarization further rises in this temperature range and the layer correlation appears to be anticlinic (Fig. 6g and i).The dielectric strength decreases, but is still large (d3 2 ¼ 35-48, see Fig. 7b), in line with a long range polar correlation, which however, is still not completely uniform throughout the layers.Close to 110 C the switching takes place on a cone as typical for polar smectic phases of bent core molecules and it changes to a rotation around the long axis with further decreasing temperature (Fig. 6g-j).
There is no enthalpy associated with the SmC s P A -SmC 0 a P A transition.Hence, it is continuous and therefore it is likely that this transition is not associated with an abrupt change from the synclinic to anticlinic interlayer correlation between adjacent layers.In the SmC s P A range the polar domain structure in the layers allows uctuations between the layers which entropically favor the synclinic layer correlation.As the polar domains become long range at the SmC s P A -SmC 0 a P A transition the interlayer interfaces become sharper and these uctuations are reduced and then also some anticlinic correlation can appear.The number of emerging anticlinic interfaces might be relatively small, but as soon as the thickness of the uniform synclinic layer stacks falls below a length smaller than the wave length of light, this structure appears optically like an anticlinic tilted smectic phase with extinction crosses parallel to the polarizers.The overall phase structure could thus be descried as (SmC s P F ) a P A , a slightly tilted polar smectic phase composed of SmC s P F domains or layer stacks having an antipolar and anticlinic correlation (Fig. 10b), the prime in the phase assignment SmC 0 a P A is used here to indicates this type of structure.Due to the small tilt, which is difficult to indicate by XRD and the synclinic structure with anticlinic defects, leading to a texture with extinction crosses parallel to the polarizers (Fig. 6g and i) this weakly tilted SmC 0 a P A phase is extremely difficult to distinguish from the nontilted SmAP A phases, especially if the switching takes place by rotation around the long axis, which does not change the position of the extinctions, as also expected for the switching of SmAP A phases.This leads to the conclusion that at least some of the previously reported SmAP A phases could in fact represent such weakly tilted and weakly correlated (SmC s P F ) a P A phases.Further conrmation of the proposed molecular organization could possibly be gained by investigation of freely suspended lms, though for these weakly correlated smectic phases the kind of interfaces might have a signicant impact on the phase structure, so that it is not clear if these lms would be identical with the bulk structures.
3.7.7 SmC a P A phase.This low temperature phase occurs below $75 C at a continuous transition (Fig. 1) which is indicated by further textural changes (Fig. 2i and j).There is a rapid decrease of the dielectric strength d3 2 at this temperature (Fig. 7c) as typical for the transition to B 2 -like polar smectic phases with uniform polarity in the individual layers.The polarization peaks are merged to only one (Fig. S5 †), presumably due to the relatively high viscosity, which also explains that exclusively switching around the long axis is observed in this phase (Fig. 6k and l).This phase appears to be more similar to the classical B 2 -type SmC a P A phase characterized by a high density of anticlinic and antipolar interfaces, most probably formed by single layers with alternating polar vector (Fig. 10a).
3.7.8Overall phase sequence.The majority of transition enthalpy in the LC range (see Fig. 1) is found for the Iso-SmA transition (9.3 kJ mol À1 ) which is in line with the presence of polar order already in the SmA phase, but the polar domains have a short coherence length which grows on cooling, leading to a transition from a short ordinary SmA region close to the clearing temperature to a broad paraelectric SmA (P) region, where the correlation length of the polar domains continuously increases.Above a certain domain size tilt and phase biaxiality emerge (SmCP R phase) though polar order is still randomized between the domains.In this SmCP R phase an exponential growth of the polar domains takes place, which leads to the next rst order phase transition at $133 C (1.7 kJ mol À1 ).This phase transition is associated with a signicant growth of the coherence length of the polar domains, though uniformly polar layers are not achieved at this transition.In the SmC s P A range the polar domain grow further in size and this gives rise to a strengthening of the layer correlation with decreasing temperature.Directly below the phase transition, when layer coupling is still very weak, additional phases (M 1 , SmCP a ) could occur, which are removed at lower temperature when layer coupling becomes stronger.The polar domains become nearly long range at the SmC s P A -SmC 0 a P A transition and anticlinic interlayer interfaces emerge.The number of anticlinic interfaces increases in the SmC 0 a P A phase range and polar order becomes macroscopic, with anticlinic interlayer correlation in the phase assigned as SmC a P A .A sketch of this phase sequence is shown in Fig. 10.
According to dielectric results all phases with exception of SmC a P A at lowest temperature appear to be formed by ferroelectric domains (Fig. 7b).The polar domains are thought to have SmC s P F structure with relatively small tilt.With decreasing temperature the transition from local to macroscopic polar order is coupled with the emergence of a macroscopic tilt above a certain threshold of the polar coherence length.Paraelectricantiferroelectric transitions have previously been studies by Gorecka et al. 25 and Eremin et al. 26 for other bent-core materials with SmA-SmAP A -SmC s P A , SmA-SmC-SmC s P A and SmA-SmAP A phase sequences.These investigations indicated weak layer coupling and strong critical uctuations of polarization and tilt at the paraelectric-antiferroelectric transition.In our case, due to the smaller tilt, the layer coupling appears to be even weaker, so that additional phases (SmCP R , M 1 , SmCP a ) were observed at this transition.The coupling between polarization and tilt in the LC phases formed by achiral bent-core molecules, 25,26 i.e. the induction of tilt by polar order appears to be the main driving force for the development of a small tilt in the smectic phases of compound 1/14.
It is in principle possible, that the local SmC s P F domain structure is already present in the SmA (P) range where it is completely randomized, similar to de Vries-like SmA phases (Fig. 10f).The tilted organization in the polar domains would improve the core packing and could strengthen the local polar order.The presence of only a small tilt is favourable for a complete randomization of the SmC s P F domains in the temperature range of the SmAP (P) phase.The relatively broad diffuse XRD wide angle scattering (see Fig. 8) supports this possibility, also the relatively large difference between d and L mol as well as the rather small decrease of d (Dd ¼ 0.03 nm) during the SmA (P) -SmCP R -SmC s P A transitions would be in line with such a model.The SmC s P F domains continuously grow with decreasing temperature and at the transition to the SmCP R phase the local SmC s P F domains registers in a biaxial mode but with still randomized polar direction, i.e. the polar directions are preferably parallel/antiparallel with relatively low orientational order parameter of the polar vector (Fig. 10e).In the SmCP a phase there appears to be a competition between tilt correlation and polar correlation, and hence, next-nearestneighbour interactions, favoring a nonparallel P a -like alignment of the polar vectors, become dominating (Fig. 10d).Tilt becomes uniform and correlation of the domains becomes antipolar at the transition to the SmC s P A phase (Fig. 10c).Further increase of the polar coherence length leads, as described above, to the SmC 0 a P A and SmC a P A phases with increasing number of anticlinic correlations (Fig. 10a and b).
3.7.9Comparison with related bent-core mesogens.As pointed out above, the special mode of development of polar order is likely to be related to the unusual small tilt of 1/14 in its mesophases, compared to other bent-core molecules.In contrast to the terephthalate 1/14, related phenylbenzoates, like 3/14 (ref.9 and 27) with two reversed ester groups and also similar compounds with azobenzene wings, like 4/14 (ref.28) form exclusively tilted phases with strong tilt (Scheme 2).For the azobenzene compound 4/14, for example, the tilt is much larger ($30 XRD tilt) and in this case layer correlation is much stronger.For compound 4/14 a uniform synclinic tilt correlation is already achieved in the phase region of the paraelectric SmC [*] (P) phase. 28At the transition from the paraelectric SmC [*] (P) phase to the SmC s P [*] R phase local polar order develops in synclinic SmC s P F -domains with overall randomized polar direction.In contrast to the SmCP R phase reported here, the strongly tilted SmC [*] (P) and SmC s P [*] R phases of 4/14 are capable of forming surface stabilized conglomerates of chiral domains (therefore [*]).28b The absence of such macroscopic chiral domains in the SmCP R phase of 1/14 is in line with a much smaller tilt and the resulting weak layer coupling.Due to the strong tilt also the uniaxial polar smectic phase (SmCP a ) is missing for compound 4/14 with azobenzene wings, but a highly viscous phase, similar to M 1 , is also found for this compound.Similar to 1/14 a synclinic polar smectic phase is formed below the randomized polar phase of the azobenzene 4/14, which in this case reveals ferroelectric order in free standing lms (therefore it was assigned as SmC s P F in this case); 28b this phase shows antiferroelectric switching in ITO cells, similar to the SmC s P A phase of compound 1/14.This further supports the proposed SmC s P F domains structure (Fig. 10c) of the SmC s P A phase of compound 1/14 reported here.
It appears that for compounds like 3/14 and 4/14, as for most other known bent-core mesogens, the strong tilt is inherent, i.e. it is due to the molecular structure, inherently preferring a tilted organization, whereas for the terephthalate 1/14 the small tilt is polarity induced, as a tilted organization allows a denser core packing which is favorable for polar order.
Comparison with the related alkyl substituted compound 2/ 14 (Scheme 1), forming the non-tilted SmAP a phase instead of the SmCP a phase and the uniaxial SmAP R phase above the P a phase, indicates that an increased tendency for tilted organization is provided by replacing the alkyl chains by alkoxy chains.Nevertheless, there is the possibility that also the SmAP A phase of 2/14 might be a slightly tilted phase, which requires further investigation of this series of compounds.
The key feature of compound 1/14 is the weak layer coupling, arising from an unusual small tilt.For strongly tilted phases of bent-core mesogens layer decoupling could be alternatively be achieved by nano-segregation of exible silyl end groups.For such compounds the smectic phases show ferroelectric switching aer surface stabilization. 20,29,30

Conclusions and summary
Compound 1/14 forms a wide variety of different smectic phases (see Scheme 1 and Fig. 1) which allows a unique study of the combined development of tilt correlation and polar correlation depending on temperature.Based on XRD studies and optical investigations it was shown that all smectic phases occurring below 146 C represent weakly tilted smectic phases.This is in contrast to previous reports of the homologue 1/12 (ref.9) and related alkyl substituted compounds 2/n 13 for which exclusively nontilted smectic phases (SmA, SmAP R , SmAP A and SmAP a ) were considered (see Scheme 1).However, based on the investigations reported in this paper the possibility of formation of weakly tilted phases must also be taken into consideration in the discussion of the LC phases of these compounds, especially for compounds with relatively long alkyl chains.Thus, the tilted SmC 0 a P A and SmC a P A phases must be considered as possible alternative structures for some of the previously reported SmAP A phases.
It is hypothesized that tilt in these smectic phases is not preliminary due to the molecular structure, rather it is a result of the polar packing.It appears to be only local in the paraelectric smectic phases with local polar order and becomes long range as the coherence length of the polar domains grows.This combination of emerging tilt and growing coherence length of polar domains leads to a weak layer coupling and a competition between polar and tilt couplings, and this provides a source of new LC phases, namely a weakly tilted biaxial smectic phase with randomized polar order (SmCP R ) and a SmC phase with a unique combination of antiferroelectric switching and optical uniaxiality, most probably representing a SmCP a phase with helical superstructure due to a regular change of the in-plane polarization vector between the layers by an angle between >0 and <90 .Overall, the unprecedented sequence of a total of eight different LC structures SmA-SmA (P) -SmCP R -(M 1 /SmCP a )-SmC s P A -SmC 0 a P A -SmC a P A in a single compound results from growing polar domains and tilt coupling.The coupling of polar order and tilt also suggests a possible de Vries-like structure of the paraelectric SmA (P) phases and polarization randomized SmAP R phases.
The SmCP R phase can be considered as a new member of the series of "randomized" polar smectic phases, representing smectic phases with polar domains with appreciable size and sometimes occurring between the paraelectric and the macroscopic polar smectic phases of bent-core mesogens.Thus, the SmCP R phase might represent a link between the nontilted SmAP R phases and the recently reported strongly tilted SmC s P [*] R phases. 28oreover, the pronounced molecular biaxiality of bent-core mesogens and the resulting competition between the biaxiality caused by the tilt and by the restricted rotation around the long axis (molecular biaxiality), having orthogonal directions, can be considered as the reason for the observed inversion in the direction of birefringence.To the best of our knowledge, this is the rst example being ported for such an inversion in birefringence of a mesophase formed by bent-core molecules.
It appears that for these weakly tilted and hence weakly coupled smectic phases the development of polar order is a complex process, involving competing interactions and frustration, thus providing the conditions for the formation of new phase structures. 31The models suggested for the phase sequence represent a likely possibility which ts with the presented investigations and the present state of knowledge in this eld, though further studies, especially of the M 1 and SmCP a phases and the development of the distinct phase structures depending on the alkyl chain length, are required to arrive at a nal conclusion.Nevertheless, this work provides a signicant step forwards in the understanding of the modes of development of polar order in so matter systems.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Optical photomicrographs showing the textures of compound 1/14 between crossed polarizers: (a) SmA (P) phase at T ¼ 150 C with planar alignment; (b) same phase after shearing, leading to predominately homeotropic alignment; (c)-(e) and (g)-(j) were obtained with homeotropically aligned samples; (c) SmCP R phase as observed at T ¼ 135 C; (d) same region with additional l-plate; (e) SmC s P A phase at T ¼ 132 C, (f) shows the orientation of the indicatrix of the l-retarder plate; (g) SmC s P A phase at T ¼ 128 C after inversion of birefringence, (h) same region with additional l-plate; the exchange of bluish/orange areas indicates the inversion of birefringence; see also Fig. S3 † for enlarged images of (c), (d) and (g), (h); (i) SmC 0 a P A phase at T ¼ 109 C and (j) SmC a P A phase at T ¼ 70 C; photos (c)-(e) and (g)-(j) show the same region.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (a) SmCP R to M 1 transition at T ¼ 133 C and (b) M 1 to SmCP a transition at T ¼ 130.5 C as observed on cooling in a homeotropic 8 mm cell.

Fig. 4 Fig. 5
Fig. 4 Switching current response curves of compound 1/14 recorded by applying a triangular wave voltage (160 V pp , 10 Hz, 5 kU) to a 6 mm coated ITO cell with planar alignment layer at the indicated temperatures in the distinct phases: (a) isotropic liquid phase; (b) and (c) SmA (P) phase region, (d) and (e) SmCP R phase; (f) SmCP R -SmC s P A transition; (g) and (h) SmC s P A phase; for additional polarization current curves in the SmC 0 a P A and SmC a P A phases, see Fig. S5.†

Fig. 6
Fig.6Textures of compound 1/14 as observed in PI-coated ITO-cells (6 mm) under an electric field (sinusoidal wave field, f ¼ 10 Hz, alternating between 0 and +160 V, right column) and after switching off the applied field at 0 V (left column) in the distinct phases at the indicated temperatures; additional textures are shown in Fig.S2†.

Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Dielectric investigation of compound 1/14: (a) temperature dependence of 3 00 t on temperature as observed in a 10 mm planar cell in the frequency range from 1 to 10 6 Hz in the temperature range between 193 and 50 C (selected curves, for the full data set, see Fig. S6 †); (b) temperature dependence of the dielectric strength (d3 2 ) and the relaxation frequency (f R,2 ) for P2; dielectric strength and relaxation frequency for P3 are given in Fig. S7 †.

Fig. 8
Fig. 8 XRD patterns of a surface aligned sample of compound 1/14: (a) in the SmA (P) phase at 160 C; (b) in the SmC s P A phase at 120 C; the insets show the small angle scatterings; (c) temperature dependence of the layer reflection; (d) c-scans over the wide and small angle scattering at different temperatures.

Fig. 9
Fig. 9 Illustration of the contributions of tilt (Dn t ) and restricted molecular rotation (Dn b ) to birefringence; (a) shows the case of a smectic phase formed by molecules which are rotationally disordered around the long axis; here birefringence is determined by Dn t , which increases with growing tilt b; (b) shows the situation for a molecule with restricted rotation around the long axis; in this case Dn t competes with Dn b and if the tilt b is small, then Dn b can dominate (Dn b > Dn t ).

Fig. 10
Fig. 10 Illustration of molecular arrangements assumed for the local and long range polar smectic phases observed for 1/14 upon changing temperature; (a)-(f) side views on the layers; different gray scales indicates distinct polar directions (those in black/white are more or less perpendicular to the projection plane, those in gray are inclined by different angles); side views on the layers are shown at the top and at the bottom the polar directions in adjacent domains/layers is schematically shown as top views, each cycle represents a subsequent layer; arrows in the cycles indicate the polar direction in the layers.

Scheme 2 4 -
Scheme 2 4-Cyanoresorcinol based bent-core mesogen related to 1/14, but with reversed ester groups in the wings (3/14) and with ester groups replaced by azo groups (4/14), their mesophases and transition temperatures (T/ C); abbreviations: SmC ¼ nonpolar tilted smectic phase; SmCP A ¼ antiferroelectric SmC phase; SmCP 0 A , SmCP 00 A ¼ SmCP A phase subtypes with non-specified structure; SmC[*]   (P) ¼ paraelectric SmC phase; SmC s P [*] R ¼ synclinic tilted SmC phase with randomized polar order, [*] indicates that these phases form a conglomerate of chiral domains after homeotropic alignment; SmC s P F ¼ synclinic tilted polar SmC phase showing ferroelectric switching in free standing films; N CybC ¼ cybotactic nematic phase composed of small clusters of a SmC phase; for other abbreviation, see Scheme 1.