Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 24, 2016
Previous Article Next Article

Ligand K-edge XAS, DFT, and TDDFT analysis of pincer linker variations in Rh(I) PNP complexes: reactivity insights from electronic structure

Author affiliations

Abstract

Here we report P K-edge, Cl K-edge, and Rh L3-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) data for Rh[C5H3N-2,6-(XPtBu2)2]Cl, where X = O (tBuPONOP; 1) or CH2 (tBuPNP; 2). Solid-state XAS data for 1 and 2 were compared to density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) calculations to identify how changing the PNP pincer linker from O to CH2 affected electronic structure and bonding at Rh(I). Pronounced differences in XAS peak intensities and energies were observed. The P K-edge XAS data revealed a large increase in Rh 4dx2y2 and P 3p orbital-mixing (Rh–P σ*) in 1 compared to 2, and pronounced transition energy variations reflected marked differences in orbital energies and compositions. By comparison, the Cl K-edge XAS data revealed only subtle differences in Rh–Cl covalency, although larger splitting between the Rh–Cl π* and σ* transitions was observed in 2. Analysis of the occupied MOs from DFT (HOMO, HOMO−1, HOMO−2, and HOMO−3) and comparison to the unoccupied MOs involved in XAS revealed a relatively uniform energy increase (ca. 0.3–0.5 eV) for all five 4d-derived molecular orbitals in Rh(tBuPNP)Cl (2) compared to Rh(tBuPONOP)Cl (1). The energy shift was relatively invariant with respect to differences in orbital symmetry, bonding type (σ or π), and orbital mixing, which suggested that the increase could be attributed to electrostatic effects. The change in d-orbital energies are consistent with known reactivity differences of Rh(tBuPONOP)+ and Rh(tBuPNP)+ towards CO, H2, and CH2Cl2, and are explained here by considering how d-orbital energies affect covalent L → M σ bonding and M → L π backbonding.

Graphical abstract: Ligand K-edge XAS, DFT, and TDDFT analysis of pincer linker variations in Rh(i) PNP complexes: reactivity insights from electronic structure

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 15 Jan 2016, accepted on 16 May 2016 and first published on 24 May 2016


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C6DT00200E
Citation: Dalton Trans., 2016,45, 9774-9785
  •   Request permissions

    Ligand K-edge XAS, DFT, and TDDFT analysis of pincer linker variations in Rh(I) PNP complexes: reactivity insights from electronic structure

    K. Lee, H. Wei, A. V. Blake, C. M. Donahue, J. M. Keith and S. R. Daly, Dalton Trans., 2016, 45, 9774
    DOI: 10.1039/C6DT00200E

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements