Issue 30, 2025, Issue in Progress

Mechanical performance analysis of a 3D printing-based transtibial prosthetic socket against the gait cycle using the finite element method

Abstract

In order to restore near-normal gait patterns and increase patients' mobility post-amputation, prosthetic sockets are crucial. Currently, few 3D-printed prosthetic sockets are available, and little research has been conducted on their mechanical performance. Thus, the purpose of this study is to assess and characterize the performance of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polycarbonate (PC), and polyamide 6/Nylon 6 (PA6) materials in prosthetic sockets fabricated via 3D printing. The heel-strike phase was determined to be the most critical condition in this study, and finite element technique simulations were used to consider the loads caused during the gait cycle. Findings demonstrated the superior strength and durability of the PC material, with the highest safety factor of 1.697 and a maximum Von-Mises stress of 36.49 MPa. The PET material provides the finest balance between strength and cost-effectiveness, while the PA6 material delivers the best strength and flexibility with a total deformation of 16.01 mm. This study offers suggestions for choosing materials to improve the ultimate functionality of prosthetic sockets made using 3D printing technology in clinical applications.

Graphical abstract: Mechanical performance analysis of a 3D printing-based transtibial prosthetic socket against the gait cycle using the finite element method

Transparent peer review

To support increased transparency, we offer authors the option to publish the peer review history alongside their article.

View this article’s peer review history

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
04 May 2025
Accepted
26 Jun 2025
First published
10 Jul 2025
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY-NC license

RSC Adv., 2025,15, 24150-24166

Mechanical performance analysis of a 3D printing-based transtibial prosthetic socket against the gait cycle using the finite element method

D. F. Fitriyana, S. Palanisamy, Y. S. Wicaksana, S. Anis, J. P. Siregar, T. Cionita, K. Sureshkumar, A. Alagarsamy, N. Ayrilmis, M. Abbas, S. Kalathil and M. Z. Rahman, RSC Adv., 2025, 15, 24150 DOI: 10.1039/D5RA03155A

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications, without requesting further permission from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given and it is not used for commercial purposes.

To request permission to reproduce material from this article in a commercial publication, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party commercial publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements