Issue 25, 2025, Issue in Progress

Discrepancies in qPCR-based gene quantification and their dependencies on soil properties, inhibitor presence, and DNA extraction kit types

Abstract

The complexity and heterogeneity of soil samples necessitate the inclusion of extensive purification steps prior to genomic assays, such as quantitative PCR (qPCR). Although conventional DNA extraction kits have notably enhanced the convenience of the process, those designed for soil vary considerably in terms of reagents, time, and equipment. Therefore, purified gDNA quality varies depending on the DNA extraction kits used, which leads to discrepancies in gene quantification using qPCR. This issue can be amplified considerably when more complicated (or contaminated) soils are analyzed, even if extensive DNA extraction is employed. Here, we evaluated the influences of the DNA extraction method to the gene quantification using qPCR across soil types. Further Mg2+ ion spiking experiments were performed to observe multiple inhibitory effects on qPCR analysis performance. The results suggest that discrepancies in gene quantification are evident in the presence of qPCR inhibitors in soil samples. Furthermore, discrepancies in quantification results are exacerbated by gDNA template quality, which is attributed to DNA extraction. The observed multiple inhibitory effects underscore the importance of careful consideration of both DNA template quality and soil type to ensure more accurate gene quantification in soils.

Graphical abstract: Discrepancies in qPCR-based gene quantification and their dependencies on soil properties, inhibitor presence, and DNA extraction kit types

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
17 Apr 2025
Accepted
28 May 2025
First published
11 Jun 2025
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY-NC license

RSC Adv., 2025,15, 19656-19664

Discrepancies in qPCR-based gene quantification and their dependencies on soil properties, inhibitor presence, and DNA extraction kit types

E. Lee, H. J. Lim and A. Son, RSC Adv., 2025, 15, 19656 DOI: 10.1039/D5RA02689J

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications, without requesting further permission from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given and it is not used for commercial purposes.

To request permission to reproduce material from this article in a commercial publication, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party commercial publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements