Issue 4, 2025

Glivec to generic imatinib switch: in vitro comparative dissolution assessment, bioequivalence, safety, and tolerability of 400 mg imatinib tablets in healthy volunteers

Abstract

Imatinib is currently considered the “gold standard” pharmacotherapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) at all stages and is most commonly used in the form of tablets taken orally. The aim of the present study was to perform a quality assessment, bioequivalence study, and safety and tolerability assessment of an investigational test product, imatinib tablets (400 mg), and its comparability with a reference product (Glivec tablets, 400 mg). In vitro dissolution studies of the test and reference products were conducted in three different buffer media (pH 1.2, pH 4.5, and pH 6.8) using Apparatus II (paddle), and the results were compared. The similarity (f2) factor was calculated to assess in vitro bioequivalence requirements. An open-label, balanced, randomized, two-treatment, two-sequence, two-period, single oral dose, crossover, bioequivalence study was conducted in normal, healthy, adult human subjects under fed conditions. The pharmacokinetic parameters Tmax, Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞ were calculated through a non-compartmental model using Phoenix WinNonlin Version 8.3 (Certara L.P.) software. Statistical evaluation and comparison of the two formulations were carried out using PROC GLM in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., USA). The safety profile of the investigational product was monitored during the study by applying a clinical process for recording observed untoward effects post-administration of the investigational product. The investigational test product met USP and BP pharmacopoeial quality standards for in vitro dissolution. Very rapid dissolution (>85% release in 15 minutes) was obtained for the reference and test products in all three buffered dissolution media (pH 1.2, pH 4.5, and pH 6.8) in in vitro dissolution studies. The dissolution profile of the investigational test product (imatinib tablets, 400 mg) was comparable to that of the reference product (Glivec tablets, 400 mg). Furthermore, pharmacokinetic values (Cmax, Tmax, and AUC) of the test and reference forms of imatinib were similar. Geometric mean ratios (test/reference) for the AUC0–∞, AUC0–t, and Cmax were 95.2, 0.95.2, and 98.4, respectively. Confidence limits for each of these parameters were in the interval (80.00, 125.00), as were the unadjusted confidence limits. The test and reference formulations of imatinib met the criteria for bioequivalence based on the rate and extent of absorption. Based on the findings of this study, it can be concluded that the test product is bioequivalent and safe, thus suggesting the clinical application of the test product as an alternative to Glivec 400 mg film-coated tablets.

Graphical abstract: Glivec to generic imatinib switch: in vitro comparative dissolution assessment, bioequivalence, safety, and tolerability of 400 mg imatinib tablets in healthy volunteers

Transparent peer review

To support increased transparency, we offer authors the option to publish the peer review history alongside their article.

View this article’s peer review history

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
10 Apr 2025
Accepted
13 May 2025
First published
30 May 2025
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY-NC license

RSC Pharm., 2025,2, 807-813

Glivec to generic imatinib switch: in vitro comparative dissolution assessment, bioequivalence, safety, and tolerability of 400 mg imatinib tablets in healthy volunteers

S. Das, S. Sarkar, R. Sahu, T. K. Dua, P. Paul and G. Nandi, RSC Pharm., 2025, 2, 807 DOI: 10.1039/D5PM00099H

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications, without requesting further permission from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given and it is not used for commercial purposes.

To request permission to reproduce material from this article in a commercial publication, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party commercial publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements