Issue 14, 2025

Decarbonization approaches for ethylene production: comparative techno-economic and life-cycle analysis

Abstract

Ethylene, a building block of the chemical industry, significantly contributes to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, prompting interest in decarbonization approaches to align with recent carbon neutrality initiatives. This paper presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle analysis (LCA) of GHG emissions, comparing conventional ethane-based ethylene plants with three decarbonization approaches. The study was conducted within the context of the U.S. average, with sensitivity analysis to identify key drivers affecting well-to-gate (WTG) GHG emissions and the levelized cost of ethylene (LCOE). The conventional plant exhibited a GHG emission of 869 kgCO2e per tonne-ethylene and a LCOE of $746 per tonne-ethylene. Substituting external natural gas fuels with grid or renewable electricity decreased the emissions to 806 and 717 kgCO2e per tonne-ethylene, respectively. The emissions of the grid-powered or renewable-powered electrically heated cracker that exports co-produced hydrogen to substitute conventional gray hydrogen were 1031 and −163 kgCO2e per tonne-ethylene, respectively. The application of CCS to purge gas showed 703 and 514 kgCO2e per tonne-ethylene emissions, respectively. The electric cracker showed lower emissions than the conventional plant below 380 kgCO2e per MW h electricity upstream, and at 60 kgCO2e per MW h, it achieved carbon neutrality. Regarding LCOE, when using a grid electricity source, no external natural gas, electric cracker, and adding CCS to purge gas showed $743, 833, and 771 per tonne-ethylene, respectively. When these plants adopt renewable electricity, their LCOEs will be $737, 746 and 757 per tonne-ethylene. Below $41.1 per MW h electricity price, the electric cracker had the lowest value among all cases. With hydrogen prices of $0.5–3.0 per kg-H2, the electric cracker's LCOE ranged from −$45(cost)–128(saving) per tonne-ethylene compared to the conventional concept.

Graphical abstract: Decarbonization approaches for ethylene production: comparative techno-economic and life-cycle analysis

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
10 Sep 2024
Accepted
03 Feb 2025
First published
18 Feb 2025
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY-NC license

Green Chem., 2025,27, 3655-3675

Decarbonization approaches for ethylene production: comparative techno-economic and life-cycle analysis

W. Shin, B. Lin, H. Lai, G. Ibrahim and G. Zang, Green Chem., 2025, 27, 3655 DOI: 10.1039/D4GC04538F

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications, without requesting further permission from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given and it is not used for commercial purposes.

To request permission to reproduce material from this article in a commercial publication, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party commercial publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements