The effect of nanoparticle size on calendar and cycle lifetimes of silicon anode lithium-ion batteries

Abstract

Next-generation rechargeable lithium-ion battery anodes must have high energy densities, low costs, and excellent cycle and calendar lifetimes to replace graphite as the incumbent chemistry. Silicon is well positioned to meet these requirements but face two obstacles before reaching commercialization: silicon's large volume expansion during charge cycling causes significant mechanical degradation, and the silicon surface is highly reactive, causing rapid irreversible capacity loss both during cycling and at rest. One strategy to address the mechanical degradation is to use silicon nanoparticles that are small enough to withstand the volume changes without mechanical pulverization. However, even small nanoparticles that won't fracture will still transmit strain across the electrode during battery cycling. Moreover, conventional wisdom says decreasing the particle size will accelerate parasitic chemistry to reduce the calendar life as the total surface area increases. In this work, we show that smaller silicon nanoparticles (∼6 nm) have higher cycle lifetimes than larger nanoparticles (∼27 nm) because there is less mechanical damage to the electrode. Moreover, we show that no significant difference in calendar lifetimes between nanoparticle sizes exists, due to the very dense electrode structure that is formed, which limits the surface area that is exposed to electrolyte. These results provide important information for accurately assessing the role of particle size in silicon-based LIB anodes.

Graphical abstract: The effect of nanoparticle size on calendar and cycle lifetimes of silicon anode lithium-ion batteries

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
21 Oct 2024
Accepted
28 Jan 2025
First published
11 Feb 2025
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

EES Batter., 2025, Advance Article

The effect of nanoparticle size on calendar and cycle lifetimes of silicon anode lithium-ion batteries

J. I. Preimesberger, F. L. E. Usseglio-Viretta, A. Verma, A. Singh, A. M. Colclasure, P. Walker, G. Teeter, G. F. Pach, J. Westgard, F. Urias-Cordero, N. R. Neale, J. E. Coyle and G. M. Carroll, EES Batter., 2025, Advance Article , DOI: 10.1039/D4EB00020J

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements