Issue 45, 2025

Uncertainty evaluation of Cd concentration in sphalerite by ICP-OES: a comparative study between GUM and Monte Carlo methods

Abstract

Accurate determination of cadmium (Cd) in sphalerite using ICP-OES is challenged by the absence of robust calibration models and standardized quality assessment methodologies. This study employs weighted least squares (WLS) linear regression to optimize the calibration of instrumental responses and carries out a systematic comparison between the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) and the Monte Carlo method (MCM). An original method for evaluating the uncertainty of Cd concentration in sphalerite is established by integrating MCM-based uncertainty evaluation with WLS. The results indicate that the expanded uncertainty from the GUM deviates by up to 57.43% compared to the MCM, based on the WLS calibration. The MCM offers a more realistic approximation of the measurement distribution by incorporating large-scale random sampling and nonlinear coupling effects. In addition, WLS is recommended for signal calibration during the measurement, resulting in a standard deviation 62.84% lower than that of the ordinary least squares (OLS). Overall, integration of WLS calibration and MCM uncertainty evaluation is beneficial for improving the accuracy and reliability of Cd quantification in sphalerite by ICP-OES.

Graphical abstract: Uncertainty evaluation of Cd concentration in sphalerite by ICP-OES: a comparative study between GUM and Monte Carlo methods

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
08 Sep 2025
Accepted
27 Oct 2025
First published
12 Nov 2025

Anal. Methods, 2025,17, 9234-9243

Uncertainty evaluation of Cd concentration in sphalerite by ICP-OES: a comparative study between GUM and Monte Carlo methods

C. Li, L. Xu, P. Wang, D. Tang, J. Xu, H. Wang, Y. Wang, S. Wang and W. Lu, Anal. Methods, 2025, 17, 9234 DOI: 10.1039/D5AY01492A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements