Electrochemical performance of permanganate as an active material for catholyte in aqueous alkaline flow batteries†
Abstract
Iron (Fe)-based aqueous flow batteries (FBs) have become increasingly popular as large-scale and long-duration energy storage devices due to their advantages in safety and cost. Particularly, Fe 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-2,2′,2′-nitrilotriethanol complex (Fe(BIS–TRIS)) belonging to Fe-atrane complexes is recognized as an appropriate active material for the anolyte in alkaline FBs. In contrast to the active material for anolytes, ferrocyanide ([Fe(CN)6]4−) is still widely used for catholytes despite its drawbacks in solubility, stability, and cell voltage. This study therefore explores the feasibility of permanganate ([MnO4]−) as an alternative to [Fe(CN)6]4−, and the performance of Fe–Mn FBs using Fe(BIS–TRIS) and [MnO4]−-based electrolytes is evaluated. Electrochemical investigations show that [MnO4]− exhibits better redox potential and reaction kinetics than [Fe(CN)6]4−. Fe–Mn FB was tested using 0.5 M electrolytes, and the voltage efficiency was 92.5% at 40 mA cm−2. Furthermore, compared to FBs using Fe(BIS–TRIS) and [Fe(CN)6]4−-based electrolytes, the cell voltage was improved by 11% and energy efficiency was increased by 14% (61.0% to 69.6%) at 200 mA cm−2, with a 113% increase in the maximum discharge power density (275.4 to 590.1 mW cm−2). This proves that [MnO4]− is a proper alternative to [Fe(CN)6]4− in alkaline FBs. Eventually, this study also suggests future research goals of Fe–Mn FBs, such as enhancement in membrane performance and optimization in electrolytes.