Issue 10, 2023

Production of propane and propene via carbon capture utilisation: comparison of its environmental and economic performance against conventional production methods

Abstract

With an unabated global petrochemical growth, more sustainable production methods for production of materials and fuels are essential in a decarbonised future. Although Carbon Capture Utilisation (CCU) is generally considered a sustainable production route, it is imperative to compare its environmental and economic performance with that of current methods. This article reviews the environmental impact and economics surrounding conventional production of propane and propene via natural gas liquid fractionation and crude oil refining for propane. In addition, fluid catalytic cracking and steam cracking were explored for propene production. A CCU process has been modelled using Aspen Plus and analysed through Life-Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis. Processes simulated include carbon capture using piperazine, dry methane reforming, direct syngas to propane and methanol to propene. The results obtained show a significant reduction in environmental impacts across multiple impact categories for both products when compared to conventional production. In addition, the price of propene from CCU was competitive with conventional. However, the price of propane was significantly higher. Sensitivity analysis of hydrogen production technology and electricity grid emission intensity identified them both as key determinants of economic and environmental performance.

Graphical abstract: Production of propane and propene via carbon capture utilisation: comparison of its environmental and economic performance against conventional production methods

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
12 Dec 2022
Accepted
21 Apr 2023
First published
03 May 2023
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY-NC license

Green Chem., 2023,25, 4029-4057

Production of propane and propene via carbon capture utilisation: comparison of its environmental and economic performance against conventional production methods

A. Payne, G. Garcia-Garcia and P. Styring, Green Chem., 2023, 25, 4029 DOI: 10.1039/D2GC04721G

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications, without requesting further permission from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given and it is not used for commercial purposes.

To request permission to reproduce material from this article in a commercial publication, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party commercial publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements