Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 9, 2020
Previous Article Next Article

UV/chlorine vs. UV/H2O2 for water reuse at Orange County Water District, CA: a pilot study

Author affiliations

Abstract

On-site demonstration tests evaluated 1,4-dioxane removal in reverse osmosis permeate (RO permeate) at the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Advanced Water Purification Facility (AWPF). The study used a pilot-scale ultraviolet (UV) reactor to compare efficacy of UV/chloramine, UV/chloramine/H2O2 and UV/chloramine/HOCl advanced oxidation processes (AOPs). The UV/chloramine process did not achieve the targeted 0.5 log removal of 1,4-dioxane even at a high UV fluence of 4400 mJ cm−2 and the 1,4-dioxane decay did not follow pseudo-first order kinetics. Oxidant concentrations as low as 2.6 mg L−1 H2O2 or ∼1.0 mg L−1 free Cl2 (HOCl) in the RO permeate at ambient quality parameters, e.g. 2.2–2.4 mg L−1 monochloramine (as Cl2), 1.2–1.4 mg L−1 dichloramine (as Cl2), ≤0.08 mg L−1 NO2 (UV/H2O2 AOP), ∼97.0% T, resulted in 0.56 and ≥0.51 log reduction of 1,4-dioxane with the UV/chloramine/H2O2 and UV/chloramine/HOCl process, respectively, while simultaneously achieving ∼2.0 log reduction of NDMA. Overall, the UV/chloramine/HOCl process showed higher removal efficiency of 1,4-dioxane than UV/chloramine/H2O2 for the same mass-based oxidant concentrations and process conditions. Nitrite ions present in the RO permeate and/or generated from monochloramine photolysis during the UV/AOP impacted significantly the process performance. It was confirmed through these pilot-scale tests that the removal of 1,4-dioxane in the UV/chloramine/H2O2 and UV/chloramine/HOCl processes can be predicted accurately with a comprehensive mechanistic kinetic model that accounts for the molecular and radical reactions that occur in the RO permeate in the UV reactor.

Graphical abstract: UV/chlorine vs. UV/H2O2 for water reuse at Orange County Water District, CA: a pilot study

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Article information


Submitted
06 Apr 2020
Accepted
16 Jul 2020
First published
17 Jul 2020

Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2020,6, 2416-2431
Article type
Paper

UV/chlorine vs. UV/H2O2 for water reuse at Orange County Water District, CA: a pilot study

M. Kwon, A. Royce, Y. Gong, K. P. Ishida and M. I. Stefan, Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2020, 6, 2416 DOI: 10.1039/D0EW00316F

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.


Social activity

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements