Jump to main content
Jump to site search
Access to RSC content Close the message box

Continue to access RSC content when you are not at your institution. Follow our step-by-step guide.


Issue 24, 2020
Previous Article Next Article

Modelling the enthalpy change and transition temperature dependence of the metal–insulator transition in pure and doped vanadium dioxide

Author affiliations

Abstract

We compare various calculation methods to determine the electronic structures and energy differences of the phases of VO2. We show that density functional methods in the form of GGA+U are able to describe the enthalpy difference (latent heat) between the rutile and M1 phases of VO2, and the effect of doping on the transition temperature and on the band gap of the M1 phase. An enthalpy difference of ΔE0 = −44.2 meV per formula unit, similar to the experimental value, is obtained if the randomly oriented spins of the paramagnetic rutile phase are treated by a non-collinear spin density functional calculation. The predicted change in the transition temperature of VO2 for Ge, Si or Mg doping is calculated and is in good agreement with the experiment data.

Graphical abstract: Modelling the enthalpy change and transition temperature dependence of the metal–insulator transition in pure and doped vanadium dioxide

Back to tab navigation

Article information


Submitted
09 Apr 2020
Accepted
02 Jun 2020
First published
05 Jun 2020

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020,22, 13474-13478
Article type
Paper

Modelling the enthalpy change and transition temperature dependence of the metal–insulator transition in pure and doped vanadium dioxide

H. Lu, S. Clark, Y. Guo and J. Robertson, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 13474
DOI: 10.1039/D0CP01929A

Social activity

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements