Jump to main content
Jump to site search
Access to RSC content Close the message box

Continue to access RSC content when you are not at your institution. Follow our step-by-step guide.


Issue 16, 2020
Previous Article Next Article

What is “many-body” dispersion and should I worry about it?

Author affiliations

Abstract

Inclusion of dispersion effects in density-functional calculations is now standard practice in computational chemistry. In many dispersion models, the dispersion energy is written as a sum of pairwise atomic interactions consisting of a damped asymptotic expansion from perturbation theory. There has been much recent attention drawn to the importance of “many-body” dispersion effects, which by their name imply limitations with a pairwise atomic expansion. In this perspective, we clarify what is meant by many-body dispersion, as this term has previously referred to two very different physical phenomena, here classified as electronic and atomic many-body effects. Atomic many-body effects refer to the terms in the perturbation-theory expansion of the dispersion energy involving more than two atoms, the leading contribution being the Axilrod–Teller–Muto three-body term. Conversely, electronic many-body effects refer to changes in the dispersion coefficients of the pairwise terms induced by the atomic environment. Regardless of their nature, many-body effects cause pairwise non-additivity in the dispersion energy, such that the dispersion energy of a system does not equal the sum of the dispersion energies of its atomic pairs taken in isolation. A series of examples using the exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) method are presented to assess the relative importance of electronic and atomic many-body effects on the dispersion energy. Electronic many-body effects can result in variation in the leading-order C6 dispersion coefficients by as much as 50%; hence, their inclusion is critical for good performance of a pairwise asymptotic dispersion correction. Conversely, atomic many-body effects represent less than 1% of the total dispersion energy and are much less significant than higher-order (C8 and C10) pairwise terms. Their importance has been previously overestimated through empirical fitting, where they can offset underlying errors stemming either from neglect of higher-order pairwise terms or from the base density functional.

Graphical abstract: What is “many-body” dispersion and should I worry about it?

Back to tab navigation

Article information


Submitted
03 Mar 2020
Accepted
06 Apr 2020
First published
06 Apr 2020

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020,22, 8266-8276
Article type
Perspective

What is “many-body” dispersion and should I worry about it?

A. Otero-de-la-Roza, L. M. LeBlanc and E. R. Johnson, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 8266
DOI: 10.1039/D0CP01213K

Social activity

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements