Jump to main content
Jump to site search
SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE Close the message box

Maintenance work is planned for Monday 16 August 2021 from 07:00 to 23:59 (BST).

Website performance may be temporarily affected and you may not be able to access some PDFs or images. If this does happen, refreshing your web browser should resolve the issue. We apologise for any inconvenience this might cause and thank you for your patience.


Issue 7, 2020

Minimizing CO2 emissions with renewable energy: a comparative study of emerging technologies in the steel industry

Author affiliations

Abstract

CO2 emissions from the steel industry are amongst the most difficult to abate, since carbon is used as a stoichiometric reducing agent in most steel mills. This carbon ends up as a CO/CO2 mixture in the steel mill gases, which are combusted to generate heat, electricity, and more CO2. Strategies to capture and store (CCS), utilize (CCU) or avoid CO2 in steel production exist, but are highly dependent on the availability of renewable electricity for the production of low-carbon H2. Steel mill gas contains energy, and can thus be re-used more easily than combustion gas or process gas from the cement industry. In this study, we evaluate several strategies to reduce CO2 emissions in the steel industry and rank them according to their renewable electricity requirement. We propose the following steps: (1) shut down the steel plant's power plant, since it produces electricity with a carbon intensity that is even higher than coal-based power plants; (2) replace steel mill gas with natural gas to generate heat within the steel mill; (3) recover the reducing gases, H2 and CO, from the steel mill gases: e.g., using pressure swing adsorption to obtain a H2-rich stream from COG, and sorption-enhanced water gas shift to obtain a H2-rich stream and a pure CO2 stream from BFG and BOFG; (4) the recovered H2 converts some of the CO2 to methanol, excess CO2 is stored. The proposed CCUS scenario can retrofit existing infrastructure, uses proven technology and reduces CO2 emissions by 70% for a marginal renewable electricity demand. Other energy-intensive alternatives have the potential to reduce CO2 emissions by 85%, but require an order-of-magnitude more renewable electricity.

Graphical abstract: Minimizing CO2 emissions with renewable energy: a comparative study of emerging technologies in the steel industry

Supplementary files

Article information


Submitted
11 Mar 2020
Accepted
26 May 2020
First published
26 May 2020

Energy Environ. Sci., 2020,13, 1923-1932
Article type
Analysis

Minimizing CO2 emissions with renewable energy: a comparative study of emerging technologies in the steel industry

M. Flores-Granobles and M. Saeys, Energy Environ. Sci., 2020, 13, 1923 DOI: 10.1039/D0EE00787K

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.


Social activity

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements