Issue 44, 2019

Energetics of proton configurations in water polyhedra and hydrate frameworks: topology vs. geometry

Abstract

The water frameworks of clathrate hydrates are characterized by a small deviation from tetrahedral geometry. The faces of the hydrate cages are most often pentagonal because the square and hexagonal faces produce appreciable strains on the hydrogen bonds. However, taking into account the specific arrangement of hydrogen atoms (protons) in the hydrogen bonds complicates the picture. The pentagonal rings are inferior to square and hexagonal rings in the number of stronger types of bonds corresponding to energetically more favorable mutual orientations of H-bonded molecules. The proton configurations with a large number of energetically preferable bonds can be computed during combinatorial optimization on the base of simplified topological models. A more accurate topological model for polyhedral water clusters allows us to find a class of proton configurations that are optimal in the number of energetically favorable H-bonds, taking into account the interaction between the second and third neighbors in the network. These topological models give preference to water polyhedra and clathrate hydrate structures without pentagonal faces. We show that the geometric stability factor (tetrahedrality) is decisive for proton-disordered systems. At that time, the topological factor (maximum number of preferred H-bond types) is often dominant when searching for the lowest-energy proton configurations. The energy minimization is carried out using different molecular interaction potentials and the Tinker molecular modeling package.

Graphical abstract: Energetics of proton configurations in water polyhedra and hydrate frameworks: topology vs. geometry

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
23 Jul 2019
Accepted
27 Oct 2019
First published
28 Oct 2019

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019,21, 24709-24715

Energetics of proton configurations in water polyhedra and hydrate frameworks: topology vs. geometry

S. V. Gudkovskikh and M. V. Kirov, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 24709 DOI: 10.1039/C9CP04107A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements