Jump to main content
Jump to site search


How to understand very weak Cr–Cr double bonds and negative spin populations in trinuclear Cr complexes: theoretical insight

Author affiliations

Abstract

Trinuclear Cr(II) complex [Cr3(dpa)4Cl2] 1 (Hdpa = dipyridylamine) has two Cr–Cr double bonds linked with each other. DMRG-CASPT2 calculations reproduced its symmetrical structure. The Cr–Cr effective bond order (EBO) was evaluated to be only 0.59 based on the density matrix based on localized orbitals from DMRG-CASSCF orbitals. The CASCI calculations showed a significantly large α-spin population on the terminal Cr atoms as expected but a significantly large β-spin population on the central Cr atom against expectations. The very small EBO and the presence of a large β-spin population are not consistent with the simple understanding that 1 has two Cr–Cr double bonds and a quintet ground state, which requests correct understanding of 1 from the viewpoint of chemical bond theory. Comparison of 1 with the allene molecule and allyl radical disclosed that the linked Cr–Cr bonds of 1 resembled the C–C bond of the allyl radical but completely differed from the linked C–C double bonds of allene despite the similar molecular structure. Its N3 analogue [Cr3(dpa)4(N3)2] 2 has non-symmetrical structure with shorter Cr1–Cr2 and longer Cr2–Cr3 bonds unlike 1, indicating that 2 is a valence tautomer of 1. DMRG-CASPT2 could reproduce its non-symmetrical structure but DFT/B3PW91 could not. In 2, the EBO is 0.95 for the shorter Cr1–Cr2 bond and 0.47 for the longer Cr2–Cr3 one. The terminal Cr3 has a very large α spin population, and the other terminal Cr1 has a somewhat large α spin population, but the central Cr2 has a considerably large β spin population. These results indicate that the Cr1–Cr2 bond conjugates with the Cr2–Cr3 bond, which is inconsistent with the simple understanding that 2 has a quadruple bond between Cr1 and Cr2 and no bond between Cr2 and Cr3. The symmetrical structure has a stronger Cr–X coordinate bond (X = Cl or N3) but less stable Cr3 core than does the non-symmetrical one. The relative stabilities of the symmetrical and the non-symmetrical structures are determined by the balance between stabilization energies from the Cr3 core and the Cr–X coordinate bond. All these findings show that electronic structures and Cr–Cr bonds of 1 and 2 are interesting from the viewpoint of molecular science.

Graphical abstract: How to understand very weak Cr–Cr double bonds and negative spin populations in trinuclear Cr complexes: theoretical insight

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 28 Jun 2019, accepted on 23 Sep 2019 and first published on 24 Sep 2019


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C9CP03645H
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, Advance Article

  •   Request permissions

    How to understand very weak Cr–Cr double bonds and negative spin populations in trinuclear Cr complexes: theoretical insight

    M. Nakagaki, N. Nakatani and S. Sakaki, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, Advance Article , DOI: 10.1039/C9CP03645H

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements