Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 6, 2019
Previous Article Next Article

Comparison of breath sampling methods: a post hoc analysis from observational cohort studies

Author affiliations

Abstract

In this report, we present a post hoc analysis from two observational cohorts, comparing the global breath volatile profile captured when using polymer sampling bags (mixed breath) versus Bio-VOC™ (alveolar breath). The cohorts were originally designed to characterize the breath volatile profiles of Malawian children with and without uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Children aged 3–15 years were recruited from ambulatory pediatric centers in Lilongwe, Malawi. Breath sampling was carried out two months apart (one study using a Bio-VOC™ and the second using sampling bags), and all samples were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The efficacy of breath collection was assessed by quantifying levels of two high prevalence breath compounds, acetone and isoprene, as well as determining the overall number of breath compounds collected and their abundance. We found that the mean number of volatiles detected using sampling bags was substantially higher than when using the Bio-VOC™ (137 vs. 47). Breath collection by Bio-VOC™ also yielded reduced levels of endogenous breath volatiles, isoprene and acetone, even after breath volume correction. This suggests that the Bio-VOC™ dilutes the volatiles and introduces dead air or ambient air. Our results suggest that sampling bags are better suited for biomarker discovery and untargeted search of volatiles in pediatric populations, as evidenced by superior breath volatile detection.

Graphical abstract: Comparison of breath sampling methods: a post hoc analysis from observational cohort studies

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 20 Sep 2018, accepted on 23 Jan 2019 and first published on 28 Jan 2019


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C8AN01823E
Citation: Analyst, 2019,144, 2026-2033

  •   Request permissions

    Comparison of breath sampling methods: a post hoc analysis from observational cohort studies

    A. Z. Berna, C. L. Schaber, L. B. Bollinger, M. Mwale, R. Mlotha-Mitole, I. Trehan and A. R. Odom John, Analyst, 2019, 144, 2026
    DOI: 10.1039/C8AN01823E

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements