Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 3, 2019
Previous Article Next Article

Constraints on organic chemistry students’ reasoning during IR and 1H NMR spectral interpretation

Author affiliations


Promoting students’ ability to engage in discipline-specific practices is a central goal of chemistry education. Yet if instruction is to meaningfully foster such ability, we must first understand students’ reasoning during these practices. By characterizing constraints on chemistry students’ reasoning, we can design instruction that targets this constrained reasoning and ultimately promotes more sophisticated ways of thinking. For this study, we investigated reasoning used by 18 organic chemistry students at a large university in the United States as they evaluated the success of chemical syntheses through IR and 1H NMR spectral interpretation, a common task of practicing chemists. Students completed a series of interpretation tasks while having their eye movements tracked and then participated in semi-structured, cued retrospective think-aloud (RTA) interviews about their reasoning during spectral interpretation. RTA interviews were analyzed qualitatively to characterize invalid chemical assumptions and heuristic reasoning strategies used by participants, both of which science education literature identifies as fundamental constraints to learning. The most problematic assumptions and heuristics, i.e., those used more frequently by unsuccessful participants, were then identified through statistical analysis. Findings suggest that the most problematic constraints on students’ reasoning during spectral interpretation constitute a combination of particular invalid chemical assumptions and heuristic reasoning strategies.

Back to tab navigation

Publication details

The article was received on 30 Jan 2019, accepted on 28 Mar 2019 and first published on 05 Apr 2019

Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C9RP00033J
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2019,20, 522-541

  •   Request permissions

    Constraints on organic chemistry students’ reasoning during IR and 1H NMR spectral interpretation

    M. C. Connor, S. A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn and G. V. Shultz, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2019, 20, 522
    DOI: 10.1039/C9RP00033J

Search articles by author