Issue 12, 2018
From the journal:

Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences

Correction: Are current guidelines for sun protection optimal for health? Exploring the evidence

Robyn M. Lucas,*a   Rachel E. Neale,b   Sasha Madronichc  and  Richard L. McKenzied  

* Corresponding authors

a National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
E-mail: robyn.lucas@anu.edu.au

b QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia

c National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA

d National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, NIWA Lauder, Central Otago, New Zealand

Abstract

Correction for ‘Are current guidelines for sun protection optimal for health? Exploring the evidence’ by Robyn M. Lucas et al., Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2018, DOI: 10.1039/c7pp00374a.

About
Cited by
Related
Download options Please wait...

Associated articles

Article information

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/C8PP90034E
Article type
Correction
Submitted
04 Jul 2018
Accepted
04 Jul 2018
First published
17 Jul 2018
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2018,17, 1964-1964

Permissions

Request permissions

Correction: Are current guidelines for sun protection optimal for health? Exploring the evidence

R. M. Lucas, R. E. Neale, S. Madronich and R. L. McKenzie, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2018, 17, 1964 DOI: 10.1039/C8PP90034E

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements