Issue 16, 2018

Comparative effects of trifluoromethyl- and methyl-group substitutions in proline


Proline is one of a kind. This amino acid exhibits a variety of unique functions in biological contexts, which continue to be discovered and developed. In addition to the reactivity of the primary functional groups, the trans–cis isomerization of the peptidyl–prolyl amide bond and its impact on the protein structure and function are of major interest. A variety of proline ring substitutions occur in nature, and more substitutions have been generated via chemical synthesis. Particularly promising is the 19F-labelling of proline, which offers a relatively new research application area. For example, it circumvents the lack of common NH-NMR reporters in peptidyl–prolyl fragments. Obtaining structural information from selectively fluorine-labelled peptides, proteins, and non-peptidic structures requires the analysis of the physicochemical features of the 19F-carrying proline analogues. To better understand and ultimately predict the potential perturbations (e.g., in protein stability and dynamics) introduced by fluorine labels, we conducted a comprehensive survey of the physicochemical effects of CF3 substitutions at each ring position by comparing the behavior of CF3-substituted residues with the CH3-substituted analogues. The parameters analyzed include the acid–base properties of the main chain functional groups, carbonyl-group interaction around the residue, and the thermodynamics and kinetics of trans–cis isomerization. The results reveal significant factors to consider with the use of CF3-substituted prolines in NMR labeling and other applications. Furthermore, lipophilicity measurements demonstrate that CF3-substituted proline shows comparable hydrophobicity to valine, suggesting the potential application of these residues for enhancing interactions at nonpolar interfaces.

Graphical abstract: Comparative effects of trifluoromethyl- and methyl-group substitutions in proline

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
28 May 2018
08 Jul 2018
First published
09 Jul 2018
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

New J. Chem., 2018,42, 13461-13470

Comparative effects of trifluoromethyl- and methyl-group substitutions in proline

V. Kubyshkin, S. Pridma and N. Budisa, New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 13461 DOI: 10.1039/C8NJ02631A

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity