Jump to main content
Jump to site search
Access to RSC content Close the message box

Continue to access RSC content when you are not at your institution. Follow our step-by-step guide.


Volume 211, 2018
Previous Article Next Article

What is the best or most relevant global minimum for nanoclusters? Predicting, comparing and recycling cluster structures with WASP@N

Author affiliations

Abstract

To address the question posed in the title, we have created, and now report details of, an open-access database of cluster structures with a web-assisted interface and toolkit as part of the WASP@N project. The database establishes a map of connectivities within each structure, the information about which is coded and kept as individual labels, called hashkeys, for the nanoclusters. These hashkeys are the basis for structure comparison within the database, and for establishing a map of connectivities between similar structures (topologies). The database is successfully used as a key element in a data-mining study of (MX)12 clusters of three binary compounds (LiI, SrO and GaAs) of which the database has no prior knowledge. The structures are assessed on the energy landscapes determined by the corresponding bulk interatomic potentials. Global optimisation, using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm, is used to search for low lying minima on the same energy landscape to confirm that the data-mined structures form a representative sample of the landscapes, with only very few structures missing from the close energy neighbourhood of the respective global minima.

Graphical abstract: What is the best or most relevant global minimum for nanoclusters? Predicting, comparing and recycling cluster structures with WASP@N

Back to tab navigation

Associated articles

Supplementary files

Article information


Submitted
07 Mar 2018
Accepted
13 Apr 2018
First published
01 Aug 2018

This article is Open Access

Faraday Discuss., 2018,211, 593-611
Article type
Paper

What is the best or most relevant global minimum for nanoclusters? Predicting, comparing and recycling cluster structures with WASP@N

Scott M. Woodley, T. Lazauskas, M. Illingworth, A. C. Carter and A. A. Sokol, Faraday Discuss., 2018, 211, 593
DOI: 10.1039/C8FD00060C

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. Material from this article can be used in other publications provided that the correct acknowledgement is given with the reproduced material.

Reproduced material should be attributed as follows:

  • For reproduction of material from NJC:
    [Original citation] - Published by The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) on behalf of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and the RSC.
  • For reproduction of material from PCCP:
    [Original citation] - Published by the PCCP Owner Societies.
  • For reproduction of material from PPS:
    [Original citation] - Published by The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) on behalf of the European Society for Photobiology, the European Photochemistry Association, and RSC.
  • For reproduction of material from all other RSC journals:
    [Original citation] - Published by The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Information about reproducing material from RSC articles with different licences is available on our Permission Requests page.


Social activity

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements