Issue 47, 2017

What factors determine the stability of a weak protein–protein interaction in a charged aqueous droplet?

Abstract

Maintaining the interface of a weak transient protein complex transferred from bulk solution to the gaseous state via evaporating droplets is a critical question in the detection of the complex association (dissociation) constant by using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). Here we explore the factors that may affect the stability of a protein–protein interaction (PPI) using atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) modelling of a complex of ubiquitin (Ub) and the ubiquitin-associated domain (UbA) (RCSB PDB code 2MRO) and a non-covalent complex of diubiquitin (RCSB PDB code 2PEA) in aqueous droplets. A general method is presented to determine the protonation states of the complexes we investigate in particular, and that of a protein in general, under various pH conditions that an evaporating droplet acquires due to its change in size. We find that the combination of high temperature and high charge states of the protein complexes may destabilize the interface by creating new interfaces instead of a direct rupture of the initial stable interface. We provide evidence that highly charged protein complexes are found in droplets that form conical extrusions of the solvent on the surface due to charge-induced instability. This distinct droplet morphology leads to a higher solvent evaporation rate that assists in transferring the complex in the gaseous state without dissociation. The conical solvent protrusions expose on the droplet surface certain amino acids that otherwise would be solvated in a droplet with the protein complex of low charge states. The new vapor-protein interface does not have a direct effect on the stability of the PPI. A common way in experiments to stabilize the protein complexes in droplets is to reduce the protonation state of the proteins. Here we find that weakly bound protein complexes even at high protonation states can be stabilized by the presence of a small number of counterions, without affecting the protonation state of the protein. Our findings may provide guiding principles in ESI-MS experiments to stabilize weak transient PPIs.

Graphical abstract: What factors determine the stability of a weak protein–protein interaction in a charged aqueous droplet?

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
25 Jul 2017
Accepted
07 Nov 2017
First published
08 Nov 2017

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017,19, 31965-31981

What factors determine the stability of a weak protein–protein interaction in a charged aqueous droplet?

M. I. Oh and S. Consta, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 31965 DOI: 10.1039/C7CP05043G

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements