Issue 46, 2017

NEXAFS spectroscopy of ionic liquids: experiments versus calculations

Abstract

Experimental near edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectra are reported for 12 ionic liquids (ILs) encompassing a range of chemical structures for both the sulfur 1s and nitrogen 1s edges and compared with time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculations. The energy scales for the experimental data were carefully calibrated against literature data. Gas phase calculations were performed on lone ions, ion pairs and ion pair dimers, with a wide range of ion pair conformers considered. For the first time, it is demonstrated that TD-DFT is a suitable method for simulating NEXAFS spectra of ILs, although the number of ions included in the calculations and their conformations are important considerations. For most of the ILs studied, calculations on lone ions in the gas phase were sufficient to successfully reproduce the experimental NEXAFS spectra. However, for certain ILs – for example, those containing a protic ammonium cation – calculations on ion pairs were required to obtain a good agreement with experimental spectra. Furthermore, significant conformational dependence was observed for the protic ammonium ILs, providing insight into the predominant liquid phase cation–anion interactions. Among the 12 investigated ILs, we find that four have an excited state that is delocalised across both the cation and the anion, which has implications for any process that depends on the excited state, for example, radiolysis. Considering the collective experimental and theoretical data, we recommend that ion pairs should be the minimum number of ions used for the calculation of NEXAFS spectra of ILs.

Graphical abstract: NEXAFS spectroscopy of ionic liquids: experiments versus calculations

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
16 May 2017
Accepted
05 Nov 2017
First published
06 Nov 2017

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017,19, 31156-31167

NEXAFS spectroscopy of ionic liquids: experiments versus calculations

R. M. Fogarty, R. P. Matthews, M. T. Clough, C. R. Ashworth, A. Brandt-Talbot, P. J. Corbett, R. G. Palgrave, R. A. Bourne, T. W. Chamberlain, T. Vander Hoogerstraete, P. B. J. Thompson, P. A. Hunt, N. A. Besley and K. R. J. Lovelock, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 31156 DOI: 10.1039/C7CP07143D

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements