Issue 11, 2016

A comparative study of the photophysics of phenyl, thienyl, and chalcogen substituted rhodamine dyes

Abstract

Although rhodamine dyes have been extensively studied for a variety of applications, many details of their photophysics are not yet fully understood, including the possible presence of a charge separated electronic state lying near the optically active excited singlet state and the role of twisting substituent groups in excited-state quenching. To address this, a large library of rhodamine dyes was studied in which the chalcogen is varied from O, to S and Se and the aryl group is either absent (in the pyronin series) or is a phenyl or thienyl substituent. Through an analysis of steady-state absorption spectroscopy, electrochemistry, X-ray crystallography, and quantum mechanical calculations, we show that the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy decreases in the O → S → Se series and when a phenyl or thienyl substituent is added. The reduction of the LUMO energy is larger for thienyl species in which the aromatic group has increased torsional flexibility. Excited state lifetimes and fluorescence quantum yields of these dyes in a high and low polarity solvent reveal dramatically different photophysics between chromophores with phenyl and thienyl substituents, due to a combination of torsional and inductive effects. In the pyronin and phenyl-substituted species, non-radiative decay can occur through an amine-to-xanthylium core charge separated state that is stabilized in a highly polar environment. In the thienyl derivatives, a lower energy excited state, which we term S′1, is accessed from S1via rotation of the aryl group and the excited state population rapidly equilibrates between S1 and S′1 in 6–30 ps. Preliminary photochemical hydrogen production data display the potential application of the thienyl derivatives for conversion of solar energy.

Graphical abstract: A comparative study of the photophysics of phenyl, thienyl, and chalcogen substituted rhodamine dyes

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
30 Jun 2016
Accepted
03 Oct 2016
First published
03 Oct 2016

Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2016,15, 1417-1432

A comparative study of the photophysics of phenyl, thienyl, and chalcogen substituted rhodamine dyes

R. P. Sabatini, M. F. Mark, D. J. Mark, M. W. Kryman, J. E. Hill, W. W. Brennessel, M. R. Detty, R. Eisenberg and D. W. McCamant, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2016, 15, 1417 DOI: 10.1039/C6PP00233A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements