Issue 41, 2016

A comparison of the experimental and theoretical charge density distributions in two polymorphic modifications of piroxicam

Abstract

Experimental charge density distribution studies of two polymorphic forms of piroxicam, β-piroxicam (1) and piroxicam monohydrate (2), were carried out via high-resolution single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments and multipole refinement. The asymmetric unit of (2) consists of two discrete piroxicam molecules, (2a) and (2b), and two water molecules. Geometry differs between (1) and (2) due to the zwitterionic nature of (2) which results in the rotation of the pyridine ring around the C(10)–N(2) bond by approximately 180°. Consequently, the pyridine and amide are no longer co-planar and (2) forms two exclusive, strong hydrogen bonds, H(3)⋯O(4) and H(2)⋯O(3), with bond energies of 66.14 kJ mol−1 and 112.82 kJ mol−1 for (2a), and 58.35 kJ mol−1 and 159.51 kJ mol−1 for (2b), respectively. Proton transfer between O(3) and N(3) in (2) results in significant differences in surface electrostatic potentials. This is clarified by the calculation of atomic charges in the zwitterion that shows the formally positive charge of the pyridyl nitrogen which is redistributed over the whole of the pyridine ring instead of concentrating at N–H. Similarly, the negative charge of the oxygen is distributed across the benzothiazine carboxamide moiety. The multipole derived lattice energy for (1) is −304 kJ mol−1 and that for (2) is −571 kJ mol−1, which is in agreement with the experimentally determined observations of higher solubility and dissolution rates of (1) compared to (2).

Graphical abstract: A comparison of the experimental and theoretical charge density distributions in two polymorphic modifications of piroxicam

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
22 Apr 2016
Accepted
09 Sep 2016
First published
10 Oct 2016

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016,18, 28802-28818

Author version available

A comparison of the experimental and theoretical charge density distributions in two polymorphic modifications of piroxicam

F. Lai, J. J. Du, P. A. Williams, L. Váradi, D. Baker, P. W. Groundwater, J. Overgaard, J. A. Platts and D. E. Hibbs, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 28802 DOI: 10.1039/C6CP02690G

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements