Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 47, 2016
Previous Article Next Article

Molecular electrometer and binding of cations to phospholipid bilayers

Author affiliations

Abstract

Despite the vast amount of experimental and theoretical studies on the binding affinity of cations – especially the biologically relevant Na+ and Ca2+ – for phospholipid bilayers, there is no consensus in the literature. Here we show that by interpreting changes in the choline headgroup order parameters according to the ‘molecular electrometer’ concept [Seelig et al., Biochemistry, 1987, 26, 7535], one can directly compare the ion binding affinities between simulations and experiments. Our findings strongly support the view that in contrast to Ca2+ and other multivalent ions, Na+ and other monovalent ions (except Li+) do not specifically bind to phosphatidylcholine lipid bilayers at sub-molar concentrations. However, the Na+ binding affinity was overestimated by several molecular dynamics simulation models, resulting in artificially positively charged bilayers and exaggerated structural effects in the lipid headgroups. While qualitatively correct headgroup order parameter response was observed with Ca2+ binding in all the tested models, no model had sufficient quantitative accuracy to interpret the Ca2+:lipid stoichiometry or the induced atomistic resolution structural changes. All scientific contributions to this open collaboration work were made publicly, using nmrlipids.blogspot.fi as the main communication platform.

Graphical abstract: Molecular electrometer and binding of cations to phospholipid bilayers

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Article information


Submitted
13 Jul 2016
Accepted
12 Nov 2016
First published
14 Nov 2016

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016,18, 32560-32569
Article type
Paper

Molecular electrometer and binding of cations to phospholipid bilayers

A. Catte, M. Girych, M. Javanainen, C. Loison, J. Melcr, M. S. Miettinen, L. Monticelli, J. Määttä, V. S. Oganesyan, O. H. S. Ollila, J. Tynkkynen and S. Vilov, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 32560
DOI: 10.1039/C6CP04883H

Social activity

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements