Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 1, 2015
Previous Article Next Article

Fate descriptors for engineered nanoparticles: the good, the bad, and the ugly

Author affiliations

Abstract

Developments in hazard identification of engineered nanoparticles (ENP) have not been met with proper fate descriptors to calculate travel distances and the bioavailable concentration of ENP. Three possible fate descriptors for ENP in soils are compared – batch partitioning coefficients (Kd values), batch retention coefficients (Kr values) and column attachment efficiency – in view of both technical and practical aspects of environmental risk assessments of ENP. Kd values are deemed not appropriate fate descriptors for ENP because the equilibrium assumption is not valid. The kinetic interpretation of batch studies offered by Kr values bears a link to relevant ENP processes in the environment, but interpretation may be confounded by the conditions of high shear during batch tests complicating direct use in transport or bioavailability calculations. Column experiments are, to some extent, also operationally defined and require a more experimentally dedicated approach that does not necessarily lead to a widely carrying physical parameter. Future efforts should therefore be investigated in development of tests that strike a better balance between operational simplicity and technical accuracy.

Graphical abstract: Fate descriptors for engineered nanoparticles: the good, the bad, and the ugly

Back to tab navigation

Publication details

The article was received on 16 Jul 2014, accepted on 26 Sep 2014 and first published on 29 Sep 2014


Article type: Perspective
DOI: 10.1039/C4EN00122B
Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2015,2, 19-26

  •   Request permissions

    Fate descriptors for engineered nanoparticles: the good, the bad, and the ugly

    G. Cornelis, Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2015, 2, 19
    DOI: 10.1039/C4EN00122B

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements