Steric and electronic effects on arylthiolate coordination in the pseudotetrahedral complexes [(TpPh,Me)Ni–SAr] (TpPh,Me = hydrotris{3-phenyl-5-methyl-1-pyrazolyl}borate)†
Abstract
Synthesis and characterization of several new pseudotetrahedral arylthiolate complexes [(TpPh,Me)Ni–SAr] (TpPh,Me = hydrotris{3-phenyl-5-methyl-1-pyrazolyl}borate; Ar = Ph, 2,4,6-iPr3C6H2, C6H4-4-Cl, C6H4-4-Me, C6H4-4-OMe) are reported, including X-ray crystal structures of the first two complexes. With prior results, two series of complexes are spanned, [(TpPh,Me)Ni–S–2,4,6-R′′3C6H2] (R′′ = H, Me, iPr) plus the xylyl analogue [(TpPh,Me)Ni–S–2,6-Me2C6H3], as well as [(TpPh,Me)Ni–S–C6H4–4-Y] (Y = Cl, H, Me, OMe), intended to elucidate steric and/or electronic effects on arylthiolate coordination. In contrast to [(TpMe,Me)Ni–SAr] analogues that adopt a sawhorse conformation, the ortho-disubstituted complexes show enhanced trigonal and Ni–S–Ar bending, reflecting the size of the 3-pyrazole substituents. Moreover, weakened scorpionate ligation is implied by spectroscopic data. Little spectroscopic effect is observed in the series of para-substituted complexes, suggesting the observed effects are primarily steric in origin. The relatively electron-rich and encumbered complex [(TpPh,Me)Ni–S–2,4,6-iPr3C6H2] behaves uniquely when dissolved in CH3CN, forming a square planar solvent adduct with a bidentate scorpionate ligand, [(κ2-TpPh,Me)Ni(NCMe)(S–2,4,6-iPr3C6H2)]. This adduct was isolated and characterized by X-ray crystallography. Single-point DFT and TD-DFT calculations on a simplified [(κ2-Tp)Ni(NCMe)(SPh)] model were used to clarify the electronic spectrum of the adduct, and to elucidate differences between Ni–SAr bonding and spectroscopy between pseudotetrahedral and square planar geometries.
Please wait while we load your content...