Issue 1, 2013

Exploring conceptual frameworks of models of atomic structures and periodic variations, chemical bonding, and molecular shape and polarity: a comparison of undergraduate general chemistry students with high and low levels of content knowledge

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to explore students’ conceptual frameworks of models of atomic structure and periodic variations, chemical bonding, and molecular shape and polarity, and how these conceptual frameworks influence their quality of explanations and ability to shift among chemical representations. This study employed a purposeful sampling technique and used three diagnostic instruments for conceptual understanding to determine the students’ level of content knowledge of the related concepts. Six student interviews were analyzed to portray students’ conceptual frameworks in high and low content knowledge (HCK and LCK, respectively) groups. The study’s major findings revealed that moving from a high toward a low level of content knowledge, the quality of students’ explanations declined, as did their ability to reconcile new information to their existing knowledge frameworks. Three essential concepts – models of atomic structure, effective core charge and principles of electrostatic force, and quantum mechanics descriptions – were identified that may explain students’ failure to learn the necessary aspects of molecular geometry and polarity. This study provides empirical evidence of how students’ content knowledge influences their understanding about molecular polarity. The findings have implications for college chemistry education with respect to teaching concepts about molecular polarity.

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
24 Aug 2012
Accepted
13 Dec 2012
First published
03 Jan 2013

Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2013,14, 130-146

Exploring conceptual frameworks of models of atomic structures and periodic variations, chemical bonding, and molecular shape and polarity: a comparison of undergraduate general chemistry students with high and low levels of content knowledge

C. Wang and L. H. Barrow, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2013, 14, 130 DOI: 10.1039/C2RP20116J

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements