Issue 10, 2010

Evaluation of automated streamwater sampling during storm events for total mercury analysis

Abstract

Understanding the processes by which mercury is mobilized from soil to stream is currently limited by a lack of observations during high-flow events, when the majority of this transport occurs. An automated technique to collect stream water for unfiltered total mercury (HgT) analysis was systematically evaluated in a series of laboratory experiments. Potential sources of error investigated were 1) carry-over effects associated with sequential sampling, 2) deposition of HgT into empty bottles prior to sampling, and 3) deposition to or evasion from samples prior to retrieval. Contamination from carry-over effects was minimal (<2%) and HgT deposition to open bottles was negligible. Potentially greater errors are associated with evasive losses of HgT from uncapped samples, with higher temperatures leading to greater evasion. These evasive losses were found to take place primarily within the first eight hours. HgT associated with particulate material is much less prone to evasion than HgT in dissolved form. A field test conducted during a high-flow event confirmed unfiltered HgT concentrations sampled with an automated system were comparable to those taken manually, as the mean absolute difference between automated and manual samples (10%) was similar to the mean difference between duplicate grab samples (9%). Results from this study have demonstrated that a standard automated sampler, retrofitted with appropriately cleaned fluoropolymer tubing and glass bottles, can effectively be used for collection of streamwater during high-flow events for low-level mercury analysis.

Graphical abstract: Evaluation of automated streamwater sampling during storm events for total mercury analysis

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
21 Apr 2010
Accepted
17 Aug 2010
First published
16 Sep 2010

J. Environ. Monit., 2010,12, 1833-1839

Evaluation of automated streamwater sampling during storm events for total mercury analysis

A. L. Riscassi, A. D. Converse, K. J. Hokanson and T. M. Scanlon, J. Environ. Monit., 2010, 12, 1833 DOI: 10.1039/C0EM00129E

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements