Issue 5, 2007
From the journal:

New Journal of Chemistry

Comparison of porous and nonporous materials for methane storage†‡§

Praveen K. Thallapally,*a   Karen A. Kirbyb  and  Jerry L. Atwood*b  

* Corresponding authors

a Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 902 Battelle Blvd., Richland, USA
E-mail: Praveen.Thallapally@pnl.gov
Fax: +1 509 376 5368
Tel: +1 509 376 1145

b Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, USA
E-mail: atwoodj@missouri.edu
Fax: +1 573 882 2754
Tel: +1 573 882 2730

Abstract

Sublimed, low-density p-tert-butylcalix[4]arene absorbs methane more readily at room temperature and 1 atm pressure than do either single wall carbon nanotubes (SWNT) or a comparative porous metal–organic framework (MOF-1).

Graphical abstract: Comparison of porous and nonporous materials for methane storage

About
Cited by
Related
Download options Please wait...

Supplementary files

Article information

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/B610321A
Article type
Letter
Submitted
19 Jul 2006
Accepted
06 Oct 2006
First published
20 Oct 2006

New J. Chem., 2007,31, 628-630

Permissions

Request permissions

Comparison of porous and nonporous materials for methane storage

P. K. Thallapally, K. A. Kirby and J. L. Atwood, New J. Chem., 2007, 31, 628 DOI: 10.1039/B610321A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements