Frictional force microscopic detection of frictional asymmetry and anisotropy at (10![[1 with combining macron]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_0031_0304.gif) 4) surface of calcite
4) surface of calcite                                                    
                    Abstract
Frictional asymmetry due to the tilt of ![[1 with combining macron]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_0031_0304.gif) 4) surface of
4) surface of ![[1 with combining macron]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_0031_0304.gif) ] direction. Observed asymmetry was in striking contrast with previous results for tilted S
] direction. Observed asymmetry was in striking contrast with previous results for tilted S![[double bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e001.gif) O bonds of CaSO4(100), lower friction being observed when the probe was scanned against the tilt. The difference was explained by the tilt angles of C
O bonds of CaSO4(100), lower friction being observed when the probe was scanned against the tilt. The difference was explained by the tilt angles of C![[double bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e001.gif) O and S
O and S![[double bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e001.gif) O bonds, which are described as mass-spring systems, from surface normal. More tilted C
O bonds, which are described as mass-spring systems, from surface normal. More tilted C![[double bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e001.gif) O bonds of
O bonds of ![[double bond, length as m-dash]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_e001.gif) O bonds support the load by the reaction against compression of the springs. As was expected, the asymmetry signal was strongest along the [42
O bonds support the load by the reaction against compression of the springs. As was expected, the asymmetry signal was strongest along the [42![[1 with combining macron]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_0031_0304.gif) ] direction, while no asymmetry was observed along the [010] direction. Compared to the case of CaSO4, the asymmetry signal at the
] direction, while no asymmetry was observed along the [010] direction. Compared to the case of CaSO4, the asymmetry signal at the 
 
                



 Please wait while we load your content...
                                            Please wait while we load your content...
                                         
        ![[1 with combining macron]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/h2_char_0031_0304.gif) 4) surface of
4) surface of