Jump to main content
Jump to site search
PLANNED MAINTENANCE Close the message box

There will be scheduled maintenance work beginning on Saturday 15th June 2019 at 8:30 am through to Sunday 16th June 2019 at 11:30 pm (BST).

During this time our website may be temporarily affected. We apologise for any inconvenience this might cause and thank you for your patience.

Issue 6, 1998
Previous Article Next Article

New three-phase model for micellar liquid chromatography


The amount of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) adsorbed on a reversed-phase octadecylsilica (ODS) stationary phase in micellar liquid chromatographic (MLC) separation has been measured. It was found that the weight percentage of SDS on the stationary phase (16.5%) was similar to the percentage ratio of C/Si (C/Si = 17.1%) of the original ODS stationary phase. This indicated that the octadecyl groups of the ODS packing were largely covered by adsorbed surfactants and the stationary phase in the MLC system could be considered to be the adsorbed surfactant. Accordingly, a new three-phase equilibrium model in which the adsorbed surfactant was assumed to be the stationary phase was proposed to illustrate the behaviour of analyte partitioning in MLC. The negative impact of the adsorbed surfactant on the efficiency of MLC was discussed in terms of this new model. With the three-phase model, the equilibrium constant (K3) for direct transfer of the analyte from the surfactant in the mobile phase to the surfactant on the stationary phase could be calculated. The results obtained for K3 using two model analytes showed that the mobile phase and stationary phase portions of the surfactant in MLC had similar but not identical abilities for binding the analyte. The effects and limitations of the use of organic modifiers in MLC are also discussed.

Back to tab navigation

Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/A802244E
Anal. Commun., 1998,35, 191-194

  •   Request permissions

    New three-phase model for micellar liquid chromatography

    W. Hu and P. R. Haddad, Anal. Commun., 1998, 35, 191
    DOI: 10.1039/A802244E

Search articles by author