Issue 3, 1979

Restricted rotation. Part 3. Barrier to rotation in methyl 2-(8-quinolyl)-6-oxocyclohex-1-enylacetate: comparative study of the effective bulk of a nitrogen lone pair in quinoline and of a naphthalene hydrogen

Abstract

The rotational free energy barrier of methyl 2-(8-quinolyl)-6-oxocyclohex-1-enylacetate (2) about the aryl–cyclohexenone bond is found to be 75.7 kJ mol–1 by dynamic n.m.r. The value is lower than that (95.4 kJ mol–1) for the corresponding 1-naphthyl derivative (1) indicating that the effective bulk of the nitrogen lone pair in quinoline is less than that of a naphthalene hydrogen. A similar study with methyl 2-(1-naphthyl)-5-oxocyclopent-1-enylacetate (4) shows that the energy barrier in this case is lower than 37.0 kJ mol–1.

Article information

Article type
Paper

J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1979, 269-271

Restricted rotation. Part 3. Barrier to rotation in methyl 2-(8-quinolyl)-6-oxocyclohex-1-enylacetate: comparative study of the effective bulk of a nitrogen lone pair in quinoline and of a naphthalene hydrogen

D. Nasipuri and S. K. Konar, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1979, 269 DOI: 10.1039/P29790000269

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements