Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Electronic structures and magnetic properties of the rare-earth-free permanent magnet α″-Fe16N2: first-principles calculations

Peirun Duan , Qingming Ping , Douqiang Sun , Qihang Luo , Haojie Li , Haoyu Xu , Xian Liu , Xiaohui Shi * and Lulu Du *
School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Linyi University, Linyi 276000, China. E-mail: shixiaohui@lyu.edu.cn; dululu@lyu.edu.cn

Received 27th January 2026 , Accepted 27th January 2026

First published on 3rd February 2026


Abstract

Correction for ‘Electronic structures and magnetic properties of the rare-earth-free permanent magnet α″-Fe16N2: first-principles calculations’ by Peirun Duan et al., J. Mater. Chem. C, 2025, 13, 6728–6735, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TC04934A.


The authors regret that an incorrect version of Fig. 6 was included in the published article. The corrected Fig. 6 is shown in this notice.
image file: d6tc90016j-f6.tif
Fig. 1 Temperature-dependent magnetization curves for α″-Fe16N2.

The statistical analysis reported in the Results and discussion section should be updated accordingly: following eqn (2), the text “The estimated Curie temperature of the α″-Fe16N2 is 1369 K … Therefore, the Curie temperature obtained in this work may be closer to the true Curie temperature of α″-Fe16N2.” should be replaced with: “The estimated Curie temperature of α″-Fe16N2 in this work is 684 K, which is lower than the value of 813 K reported by Sugita et al.1 This discrepancy may stem from the fact that Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations often target idealized bulk materials or perfect crystals, overlooking structural disorders, nitrogen atom ordering effects, and interface coupling phenomena inherent in real thin films. For reference, Bhattacharjee et al.2 and Khan et al.3 also obtained Curie temperatures of α″-Fe16N2via the MC method, yielding 765 K and 820 K, respectively. Notably, the calculation of Curie temperature in MC simulations is highly sensitive to the input parameters of exchange integrals. Thus, the Curie temperature data presented in this work can serve as a valuable reference for the selection of exchange constants when calculating the Curie temperature of α″-Fe16N2 using the MC method.”

Consequently, the statements in the Abstract, Introduction and Conclusions section that the Curie temperature of α″-Fe16N2 is 1369 K, which is larger than that of pure bcc-Fe (1023 K), should be replaced with “The estimated Curie temperature of α″-Fe16N2 in this work is 684 K, which is much higher than the Curie temperature of the rare-earth permanent magnets NdFeB (585K).4

The authors apologize to the readers and the scientific community for these errors and any confusion they may have caused.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.

References

  1. Y. Sugita, K. Mitsuoka, M. Komuro, H. Hoshiya, Y. Kozono and M. Hanazono, J. Appl. Phys., 1991, 70, 5977 CrossRef CAS.
  2. S. Bhattacharjee and S. C. Lee, Sci. Rep., 2019, 9, 8381 CrossRef PubMed.
  3. I. Khan, S. Park and J. Hong, IEEE Trans. Magn., 2019, 55, 2102005 CAS.
  4. M. Sagawa, S. Fujimura, H. Yamamoto and Y. Matsuura, IEEE Trans. Magn., 1984, 20, 1584–1589 Search PubMed.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2026
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.