Open Access Article
Peirun
Duan
,
Qingming
Ping
,
Douqiang
Sun
,
Qihang
Luo
,
Haojie
Li
,
Haoyu
Xu
,
Xian
Liu
,
Xiaohui
Shi
* and
Lulu
Du
*
School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Linyi University, Linyi 276000, China. E-mail: shixiaohui@lyu.edu.cn; dululu@lyu.edu.cn
First published on 3rd February 2026
Correction for ‘Electronic structures and magnetic properties of the rare-earth-free permanent magnet α″-Fe16N2: first-principles calculations’ by Peirun Duan et al., J. Mater. Chem. C, 2025, 13, 6728–6735, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TC04934A.
The statistical analysis reported in the Results and discussion section should be updated accordingly: following eqn (2), the text “The estimated Curie temperature of the α″-Fe16N2 is 1369 K … Therefore, the Curie temperature obtained in this work may be closer to the true Curie temperature of α″-Fe16N2.” should be replaced with: “The estimated Curie temperature of α″-Fe16N2 in this work is 684 K, which is lower than the value of 813 K reported by Sugita et al.1 This discrepancy may stem from the fact that Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations often target idealized bulk materials or perfect crystals, overlooking structural disorders, nitrogen atom ordering effects, and interface coupling phenomena inherent in real thin films. For reference, Bhattacharjee et al.2 and Khan et al.3 also obtained Curie temperatures of α″-Fe16N2via the MC method, yielding 765 K and 820 K, respectively. Notably, the calculation of Curie temperature in MC simulations is highly sensitive to the input parameters of exchange integrals. Thus, the Curie temperature data presented in this work can serve as a valuable reference for the selection of exchange constants when calculating the Curie temperature of α″-Fe16N2 using the MC method.”
Consequently, the statements in the Abstract, Introduction and Conclusions section that the Curie temperature of α″-Fe16N2 is 1369 K, which is larger than that of pure bcc-Fe (1023 K), should be replaced with “The estimated Curie temperature of α″-Fe16N2 in this work is 684 K, which is much higher than the Curie temperature of the rare-earth permanent magnets NdFeB (585K).4”
The authors apologize to the readers and the scientific community for these errors and any confusion they may have caused.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2026 |