Open Access Article
Appanapalli N. V. Satyanarayana and
Tanmay Chatterjee
*
Department of Chemistry, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (BITS Pilani), Hyderabad Campus, Jawahar Nagar, Kapra Mandal, Medchal District, Telangana 500078, India. E-mail: tanmay@hyderabad.bits-pilani.ac.in
First published on 13th January 2026
Diversity-oriented synthesis (DOS) enables synthetic organic chemists to fabricate structurally diverse classes of molecules, which is highly desirable in the context of medicinal chemistry, thus leading to drug discovery. Herein, we report the H-bonding network-mediated DOS of five structurally diverse classes of molecules, such as acetimidamides, ketene N,N-acetals, α-arylenamides, some heterocycles, such as quinolines, and 3,4-dihydroquinolin-4-ols, starting from readily available ynamides and anilines in the presence of HFIP as the only reagent/solvent. 2-Amidoindoles were also synthesized via a one-pot, two-step process starting from ynamides and primary anilines using CuCl2. The significant benefits of this protocol compared with the previously established synthetic methods are the following: (a) a cost-effective, straightforward, and unified approach for diversity-oriented, green synthesis of various classes of valuable molecules from ynamides and all types of aromatic amines (1°, 2°, and 3°); (b) a metal-free, environmentally friendly, and scalable protocol; (c) mild reaction conditions; (d) 100% atom-economic transformations; (e) HFIP being the sole reagent necessary for the transformations; (f) the dual functionality of HFIP as both a Brønsted acid and a solvent; (g) the regeneration of HFIP post-reaction and its straightforward and effective recovery from the reaction mixture through distillation; (h) the reusability and efficient recyclability of HFIP without compromising the subsequent reaction's results; and (i) the ability to obtain pure products under various conditions without the need for column chromatography (green synthesis).
Sustainability spotlightWe developed a diversity-oriented, versatile synthetic method to access five different classes of valuable organic molecules from readily available ynamides and all types of aromatic amines (1°, 2°, and 3°) with excellent yield and regio- and stereo-selectivity using only HFIP, which was efficiently recovered after the reaction, reused and recycled (five runs) without any compromise on the reaction outcome. Most of the reactions are 100% atom-economic, and pure products were obtained without the need for work-up and column chromatography, resulting in minimal waste generation. Thus, the generality, practicality, cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and circular economy of this protocol were found to be significantly better than those of all existing protocols. This protocol is highly environmentally benign and greener. |
Despite the notable advancements, the developed strategies suffered from several serious limitations, including the requirements of highly expensive and hazardous transition metal complexes and ligands, or strong acids (TfOH), and harsh reaction conditions, poor stereoselectivity in some cases, and the generation of metal-based and/or organic wastes. Moreover, no synthetic strategy has been developed to date for the diversity-oriented, versatile synthesis of valuable products involving ynamides and all types of aromatic amines (1°, 2°, and 3°) under metal-free and sustainable conditions, which is highly desirable in the context of green and sustainable chemistry. HFIP is an excellent alternative to the noble metals mentioned above and also eliminates the need for harsh reaction conditions.17 Herein, we report a H-bond network-mediated hydroamination or hydroarylation of ynamides with (hetero)aromatic amines (1°, 2°, and 3°) and also cascade hydroamination followed by intramolecular cyclization strategies for the DOS of various useful classes of molecules such as acetimidamides, α-aminoenamides, α-arylenamides, and various bioactive heteroaromatics, such as 2-quinolines and hydroxyquinolines, and indoles, just by using HFIP at room temperature (Scheme 1C). This strategy offers several advantages and overcomes the limitations of the previously developed synthetic methods.
| Entry | Bronsted acid | Solvent (conc.) | Yieldb (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| a Reactions are conducted on a 0.1 mmol scale.b The NMR yield is reported.c Starting materials are recovered. | |||
| 1 | HFIP | HFIP 0.6 M | 95% |
| 2 | TFE | TFE (0.6 M) | NDc |
| 3 | 1 equiv. TFA | Toluene (0.6 M) | 61% |
| 4 | 1 equiv. CH3COOH | Toluene (0.6 M) | 22% |
| 5 | 1 equiv. TfOH | Toluene (0.6 M) | 13% |
| 6 | 2 equiv. HFIP | Toluene (0.6 M) | NDc |
| 7 | 2 equiv. HFIP | TFE (0.6 M) | NDc |
With the optimized conditions in hand, we explored the scope of the reaction (Table 2). The reaction of N-benzyl-N-(phenylethynyl)benzenesulfonamide (1a) with aniline (2a) on a 0.3 mmol scale produced 3aa without any loss in its yield (95%).
We then explored the scope of various ynamides for the hydroamination reaction with aniline. N-Benzyl-N-(arylethynyl)benzenesulfonamides bearing various substituents, such as 4-Me, 4-OMe, 4-Br, 4-F, and 4-CN, in the aryl ring were initially examined, and all reactions proceeded well, irrespective of the electronic nature of the substituents, producing the desired acetimidamides 3ba–3fa in good to excellent yields (85–93%, average yield ∼90%) and also in pure form without the requirement of any workup and column chromatography. The structure and the stereochemistry of 3ea were confirmed by X-ray crystal structure determination (Fig. S1 and Table S1, SI). It is noteworthy that a heteroaromatic (thiophene)-substituted ynamide participated in the reaction, delivering the corresponding product 3ga in 86% yield. Different EWG-substituted (–Ts, and –SO2Me) ynamides (1h, 1i) participated in the reaction, furnishing the desired products 3ha and 3ia in excellent yields of 96% and 79%, respectively. Aliphatic ynamide (1j) reacted with commercially available aniline (2a) to furnish 3aj in 84% yield. Notably, both electron-donating (–Et, –tBu, and –OMe) and electron-withdrawing (–I, –Br, –F, –CN, and –CO2Me), group-substituted anilines 2 smoothly participated in the reaction with 1a, and a series of desired N-arylimines (3ab–3al) was formed in excellent yield, ranging from 81% to 96%. Neither the electronic effect of the substituents nor their positional variations (ortho, meta, and para) impacted the outcome of the reaction. Sterically crowded, 2,6-dibromoaniline also participated in the hydroamination reaction with cyclohexyl-substituted ynamide (1i) without any difficulties and furnished the desired product, 3im, in 88% yield. Naphthalen-2-amine (2n) reacted smoothly with 1a to afford the desired product 3an in 92% yield. Furthermore, the extension of this hydroamination reaction to heteroaryl amines, such as pyridin-2-amine 2o (a poor nucleophile) with 1b, was successful, yielding the desired product 3bo with a 75% yield.
Interestingly, when naphthalene-1,5-diamine (2p) was reacted with 1a (2 equiv.), the bis-functionalization of 2p occurred with 1a, achieving the desired novel product 3ap in a very high yield of 94%. Significantly, most of the reactions were highly efficient and clean, leading to the formation of pure products in yields ranging from very high to excellent, which were then obtained in pure form through a simple washing of the crude product with a small amount (2 × 2 mL) of cold ethanol.
Subsequently, we examined the scope and limitations of the hydroamination of secondary amines with ynamides (Table 3). Interestingly, we observed that unlike primary amines, secondary amines underwent a highly regio-and stereoselective anti-hydroamination with ynamides under the same optimized conditions. Initially, N-methylaniline 4a was reacted with 1a under optimized conditions, resulting in the formation of (E)-N-benzyl-N-(1-(methyl(phenyl)amino)-2-phenylvinyl)benzenesulfonamide (5aa) with a yield of 84% and an excellent E/Z ratio of >99
:
01 (exclusively E-stereoselectivity). The structure of 5aa was confirmed by X-ray crystal structure determination (Fig. S2 and Table S1, SI). Various substituted ynamides (both aryl and alkyl ynamides), i.e., 1b, 1h, and 1j, smoothly participated in the reaction with N-methyl aniline (4a), resulting in the desired products (5ba, 5ha, 5ja) with good to excellent yields ranging from 83% to 93% and good to excellent E-stereoselectivity (E/Z = 80
:
20 to >99
:
1). Diphenylamine (4b) also successfully participated in the reaction with 1a, producing the desired product (5ab) in 88% yield, and exclusive E-stereoselectivity (E/Z > 99
:
01). Notably, most of the reactions of ynamides with secondary amines were clean, and pure products were obtained by the simple cold ethanol washing of the crude product. In our efforts to broaden the substrate scope of the hydroamination of ynamides, we employed tertiary amines to react with ynamides under the optimized conditions, and the results are presented in Table 4. N,N-Dimethylaniline (6a) underwent syn-selective hydroarylation at its para position with ynamide 1a, leading to the formation of the target compound, (Z)-N-benzyl-N-(1-(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)-2-phenylvinyl)benzenesulfonamide (7aa), with a 79% yield and excellent Z-stereoselectivity (Z/E = 95
:
05). Both aromatic (1h) and aliphatic ynamides (1j) smoothly underwent the hydroarylation reaction with 6a to afford the desired products 7ha and 7ja in good yields (72–80%) and excellent stereoselectivity (Z/E > 99
:
1).
The structure of 7aj was confirmed by X-ray crystal structure determination (Fig. S3 and Table S1, SI).
Under the optimized conditions, 2-aminocarbonyls 8 underwent cycloaddition reaction rather than a hydroamination reaction. We then examined the scope of ynamides 1 for the cycloaddition reactions (Table 5). Ynesulfonamide 1a smoothly underwent the cycloaddition reaction with 1-(2-aminophenyl)ethan-1-one (8a) to furnish the desired product N-benzyl-N-(4-hydroxy-4-methyl-3-phenyl-3,4-dihydroquinolin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide 9aa in an excellent yield, 93%. The mild electron-withdrawing (–Br) group-substituted aryl-ynesulfonamides (1d) also reacted with 8a without any difficulties to furnish the desired product 9da in 87% yield. Upon substituting electron-withdrawing groups (EWG) such as –Ts and –Ms in ynesulfonamides, the reaction proceeded efficiently, yielding the desired products (9ha–9ka) with excellent yields ranging from 81% to 94%.
The synthesis of highly functionalized heterocycles in a single step is always challenging and has drawn significant interest from synthetic organic chemists. Ynamide chemistry is an excellent platform to construct different kinds of heterocycles in a single step.18 Among all heterocycles, 2-aminoquinolines represent a significant class of heterocycles, known for their valuable medicinal properties.19 The synthesis of 2-aminoquinolines in a single step through a sustainable approach is highly desirable. When 2-aminobenzaldehyde was reacted with ynamide 1 under the optimized conditions, we unexpectedly obtained an aromatized cyclic product, specifically, a substituted 2-aminoquinoline (Table 6). Phenyl-substituted ynesulfonamide, i.e., N-benzyl-N-((4-bromophenyl)ethynyl)benzenesulfonamide 1d, reacted with 1-(2-aminophenyl)ethan-1-one 8a to furnish N-benzyl-N-(4-methyl-3-phenylquinolin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide 11da in 88% yield. Under optimized conditions, the reaction of 1-(2-aminophenyl)ethan-1-one (8a) with ynamide (1a) initially yielded a non-aromatized product. Upon heating the reaction mixture at 80 °C for 5 hours, the final desired product, N-benzyl-N-(4-methyl-3-phenylquinolin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (11aa), was obtained in an 89% yield. The structure of 11aa was confirmed by X-ray crystal structure determination (Fig. S4 and Table S1, SI). Upon substituting electron-withdrawing groups (EWG) such as –Ts and –Ms in ynesulfonamides, the reaction proceeded efficiently, affording the desired products (11ha–11ka) with excellent yields ranging from 85% to 86%. (2-Aminophenyl)(phenyl)methanone (8c) also underwent the reaction with ynamide (1a) and produced the desired product, N-benzyl-N-(3,4-diphenylquinolin-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide (11ac), in good yield (75%).
We then explored the feasibility of the cycloaddition reaction of ynamides 1 with ortho-aminobenzoic acid esters for the potential synthesis of 2-amidoquinolin-4(3H)-one. When ynesulfonamide 1h was treated with methyl 2-aminobenzoate (2q), the reaction did not proceed as anticipated, and we observed the formation of the hydroamination product only, 3hq, in 94% yield without the formation of the expected cycloaddition product, suggesting that HFIP could not effectively activate the ester carbonyl group, which is required for cyclization (Scheme 2).
To demonstrate the potential application of our green synthetic protocol, we developed a one-pot, direct synthetic strategy to access highly substituted 2-amidoindoles, a highly potent and biologically active class of molecules, starting from easily accessible ynamides and anilines (Table 7). In the presence of HFIP, 1a and aniline furnished the desired product 3aa in almost quantitative yield. After the evaporation of HFIP, CuCl2 and THF were added to the same pot, and the reaction mixture was heated at 100 °C, which furnished the desired highly substituted 2-amidoindole, i.e., N-benzyl-N-(3-phenyl-1H-indol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamide 12aa in 76% yield. The one-pot direct synthesis of indole from ynamides and aniline was found to be efficient, and the electronic effect of ynamides and substituted anilines did not affect the outcome, resulting in various 2-amidoindoles 12aa–12aj in good to excellent yields (76–86%). The structure of 12aj was confirmed by X-ray crystal structure determination (Fig. S5 and Table S1, SI).
To demonstrate the practicality of our developed protocol, we conducted the model reaction between 1a and 2a on a gram scale (2 mmol scale), successfully obtaining the desired final product without sacrificing yield (Scheme 3A). Upon completion of the reaction, the solvent was recovered via distillation at 50 °C under 400 mbar pressure. The recovery process was efficient, yielding 2.8 mL of HFIP (82% recovery). To demonstrate the reusability of the recovered HFIP, we conducted the reaction between 1a and 2f with the recovered HFIP, and the desired product, (E)-N-benzyl-N′-(2-cyanophenyl)-2-phenyl-N-(phenylsulfonyl)acetimidamide (3af), was obtained with reproducible yields of 87% (Scheme 3B). We also assessed the recyclability of HFIP by conducting a reaction between 1a and 2a on a 3 mmol scale using 5 mL of HFIP (Scheme 3C). After the completion of the reaction, we could recover 4.25 mL of HFIP (85% recovery) and reused it for the second cycle reaction (2.5 mmol scale reaction), which afforded 3aa in 96% yield. After completing the second cycle, we recovered 3.44 mL of HFIP (81% recovery) and reused it for the third cycle reaction (2.06 mmol scale reaction), which afforded 3aa in 96% yield. After completing the third cycle, we recovered 2.82 mL of HFIP (82% recovery) and reused it for the fourth cycle reaction (1.69 mmol scale reaction), which afforded 3aa in 95% yield. After completing the fourth cycle, we recovered 2.42 mL of HFIP (86% recovery) and reused it for the fifth cycle reaction (1.45 mmol scale), which afforded 3aa in 93% yield. After completing the fifth cycle, we recovered 2 mL of HFIP (85% recovery).
![]() | ||
| Scheme 3 (A) Scale-up batch reaction and recovery of HFIP. (B) Reusability of HFIP. (C) Recyclability of HFIP. | ||
Notably, the recyclability of HFIP was found to be effective and efficient, as 4.52 g of 3aa was synthesized in a total of five cycles with a reproducible yield of 3aa in each cycle (average yield = 95%). These outcomes demonstrate the high sustainability, circular economy, practicality and cost-effectiveness of our protocol.
Based on previous literature reports on ynamide chemistry,4b,d the plausible mechanisms for this HFIP-mediated hydroamination and cycloaddition reaction are shown in Scheme 4. The H-bond network in HFIP, by increasing its acidity (pKa = 9), enables the activation of an ynamide via regioselective protonation at its β-carbon, generating the reactive keteniminium ion intermediate A. For the HFIP-mediated hydroamination of ynamides with primary aromatic amines (path A), the in situ-generated A was subsequently trapped by the nitrogen atom of aromatic amines to afford B. Further deprotonation of B yielded C, which ultimately tautomerized to furnish the final product 3. Similarly, for the hydroamination of ynamides with secondary aromatic amines, the keteniminium ion A was trapped by the nitrogen atom of the secondary aromatic amine 4 from the less hindered side of A to give D (path B). Subsequent deprotonation of species D produced Z-5, which is thermodynamically disfavored in most cases, and under the reaction conditions, it was easily converted to the thermodynamically stable product E-5 via the intermediate F and G. Likewise, in the HFIP-mediated hydroarylation of ynamides with tertiary aromatic amines (path c), the resulting keteniminium ion A was trapped by the regioselective para-attack of the aromatic amines to yield intermediate H, followed by deprotonation to afford Z-7. Analogously, during the HFIP-mediated cycloaddition of ynamides with 2-amino aryl carbonyls (path d), the keteniminium ion is trapped by the amino nitrogen in 2-aminoaryl carbonyl 8 to produce I, which is then deprotonated to give J. At the same time, the carbonyl group is activated by HFIP, increasing the electrophilicity of carbon. Due to tautomerism, the electron density on the β-carbon increases, which favours intramolecular cyclization, yielding the cyclized product 9, which is subsequently dehydrated to give 10.
To have a better understanding of the overall sustainability of our developed protocol with respect to the previously reported ones, we enlisted a detailed comparison of various parameters in Table 8, such as the requirement of the starting material being in excess, catalyst, and/or reagents, solvent, reaction temperature, scope of amines, synthesis of products, yield, E-factor, feasibility of the recovery of catalyst or reagent, cost of the catalyst or reagent (cost-effectiveness), and circular economy. This analysis revealed that our protocol is simpler, and more general, cost-effective, practical, sustainable, and environmentally benign, with a broader substrate scope, and has a significantly higher circular economy compared to previously reported protocols. Moreover, the stereoselectivity of this protocol was found to be superior to that of a few previously reported ones.
| Research work | Starting material (required in excess) | Catalyst or reagent | Solvent | Temp. (°C) | Scope of amines | Synthesis of products | Yield (avg. Yield) | E-factor (g waste/g product)a,b | Catalyst or reagent recovery | Circular economy | Cost of the catalyst or reagent (1 g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a For the E-factor calculation, the reaction which furnished the highest yield of product was considered.b solvent was considered for the E-factor calculation. | |||||||||||
| Ref. 7 (Skrydstrup) | — | (PPh3)AuNTf2 | DCM | rt | Only 1°-anilines | Acetimidamides | 89–98% (94%) | 5.69 | Difficult | Low | $ 284.2 |
| Ref. 8 (Cai) | Aniline (1.1 eq.) | Ph2P-MCM-41-AuCl, AgNTf2 | DCM | rt | Only 1°-anilines | Acetimidamides | 87–97% (92%) | 3.56 | Effective | High | $ 340.7 |
| Ref. 9 (Wei) | Ynamide (1.5 eq.) | Zn(OTf)2 | Toluene | 80 | Only 1°-anilines | Acetimidamides | 50–93% (68%) | 25.1 | Difficult | Low | $ 9.3 |
| Ref. 10 (Wu) | Aniline (2 eq.) | Yb(OTf)3 | DCE | 85 | Only 1°-anilines | Acetimidamides | 39–89% (75%) | 21.3 | Difficult | Low | $ 27.1 |
| Ref. 11 (Chang) | Aniline (1.2 eq.) | TfOH | DCE | rt | Only 1°- and 2°-anilines | Acetimidamides and 2ketene N,N-acetals | 65–99% (88%) | 6.56 | Difficult | Low | $ 19.4 |
| Ref. 12 (Lin) | Ynamide (1.5 eq.) | Ni(OTf)2 | Toluene | 80 | Only 2°-amines | Ketene N,N-acetals | 54–92% (72%) | 10.7 | Difficult | Low | $ 24.8 |
| Ref. 13 (Lin) | Ynamide (2.0 eq.) | AgNTf2 | CHCl3 | 60–70 | Only 3°-anilines | α-Aryl enamides | 52–90% (72%) | 19.9 | Difficult | Low | $ 147.7 |
| Ref. 14 (Dubovtsev) | — | PPh3AuCl/AgNTf2 (extra 10 mol% MsOH required for ketones) | DCE | 60 | Only ortho carbonyl anilines | Quinolines | 54–98% (77%) | 13.1 | Difficult | Low | PPh3AuCl ($ 316) AgNTf2 ($ 148) |
| Ref. 18a (Youn) | Ynamide (1.2 eq.) | ZnBr2 | Toluene | 140 | Only ortho carbonyl anilines and phenols | Quinolines and coumarins | 84–95% (89%) | 24.1 | Difficult | Low | $ 9.5 |
| This work | — | HFIP | HFIP | rt | 1°, 2°, 3°-Anilines, 1°-hetero aromatic amines, ortho amino benzaldehydes, and ketones | Acetimidamides, ketene N,N-acetals, α-aryl enamides, quinolines,and 4-hydroxy-3,4-dihydroquinolines | 72%-96% (89%) | 0.98–1.27 | Easy and effective | High | $ 0.5 |
The data underlying this study are available in the published article, and its experimental and spectroscopic details are included as a part of the online supplementary information (SI). Supplementary information: experimental procedures, X-ray data, analytical data of the synthesized molecules, and 1H, 13C, NOE spectra of the synthesized compounds. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5su00899a.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2026 |