Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Selective 1,2-addition of acetonitrile/acetone to α,β-unsaturated aldehydes at room temperature: access to cinnamyl alcohol derivatives with potential protective effects against exercise-induced skeletal muscle injury

Shibo Maa, Yanlin Zhang*b and Yonghui He*b
aCollege of Physical Education, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming, 650500, China
bSchool of Ethnic Medicine, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming, 650500, China. E-mail: heyonghui@ymu.edu.cn

Received 11th February 2026 , Accepted 19th May 2026

First published on 1st June 2026


Abstract

In this work, we developed an electrocatalytic selective 1,2-addition of acetonitrile/acetone to α,β-unsaturated aldehydes at room temperature to give 38 cinnamyl alcohol derivatives in mild reaction conditions. Kinetic isotope effect (KIE) experiments and DFT calculations have been performed to shine light on the transformation mechanism. Further molecular docking results suggest that the obtained products containing the nitrile group give potential protective effects against exercise-induced skeletal muscle injury.


Eccentric training, such as downhill running or slow-descent squats, is a critically important training method, as it can effectively enhance the dynamic and static stability of muscle and tendon tissue. However, acute eccentric contractions are known to induce skeletal muscle damage that causes infiltration of neutrophils to the site of injury within several hours.1–4 Methyl cinnamate, as a natural ester compound found in peppercorn, has been shown to have a protective effect on exercise-induced skeletal muscle damage by activating the AMPK pathway. Thus, the synthesis of cinnamic acid derivatives holds great significance for the development of drugs aimed at protecting skeletal muscle damage.

The nitrile is an essential functional group for drug activity, and versatile transformations.5–8 For example, it can be easily converted into an amide or carboxylic acid by hydrolysis reaction under different conditions. An attractive method for the incorporation of the nitrile group is based on direct transformations of α C(sp3)–H bonds of simple alkyl nitriles (such as acetonitrile) into C–C bonds, which generally saves them from prefunctionalization,9–16 while showing higher atom/step-economy.17–24

Due to their poor acidity, high bond energy, and unreactive molecular orbital profile, the activation of α-C(sp3)–H bond adjacent to the nitrile group remains rather rudimentary, and peroxide and strong base reagents are usually used, which cannot avoid causing undesired side reactions and environmental pollution.25,26 To address these issues, Lewis acidic transition metals with the ligand are used to improve the acidity of α-C(sp3)–H bonds, such as Rh or Ni complexes (Scheme 1a).17,18,24,27–29 At the same time, Rossi and coworkers reported an electrochemical activation of α-C(sp3)–H bond by electrogenerated base under galvanostatic control in a divided cell equipped with Pt electrodes at 0 °C (Scheme 1a).30 This electrogenerated cyanomethyl anion reacted with carbonyl compounds by nucleophilic addition.


image file: d6ra01217e-s1.tif
Scheme 1 The activation strategy of the α-C–H bond.

To date, most of these reactions can only use aldehydes as the other aldol reaction partners, and α,β-unsaturated aldehydes have been barely explored. Recently, Zhang and coworkers have reported the Cu2O-catalyzed activation of the α-C(sp3)–H bond of alkyl nitriles to obtain the α-cyano carbanion, and a large number of δ,γ-unsaturated-β-hydroxyl nitriles are obtained in good to high yields (Scheme 1b).31 However, the strong base KOtBu and transition metal Cu2O are needed for this transformation. Thus, developing mild and green tactics that consist of activating the α-C(sp3)–H bond, especially avoiding extra transition-metal catalysts and strong base reagents, is still in demand.

Using electrons as mass-free reagents, organic electro-synthesis is emerging as a uniquely attractive method for the activation of relatively inert chemical bonds due to their environmentally friendly nature, sustainability, and mild reaction conditions.32–38 In the past few years, many applications of the electrochemical activation of α-C(sp3)–H bond toward the construction of C–X (X = C, heteroatom) have been reported.39–51 An electrochemical activation of the α-C(sp3)–H bond adjacent to the nitrile group used for the electrogeneration of cyanomethyl anion, which reacted with carbonyl compounds by nucleophilic addition.30 However, the selective 1,2-addition of acetonitrile to α,β-unsaturated aldehydes via electrocatalytic α-C(sp3)–H bond activation has not been reported to date. In continuation of our research interest for developing the eco-friendly synthetic strategies.52–55 Herein, we report the successful discovery of the selective 1,2-addition of acetonitrile/acetone to α,β-unsaturated aldehydes via an electrochemical activation of the α-C(sp3)–H bond, to provide a series of δ,γ-unsaturated-β-hydroxyl nitriles without transition metal catalysis and base (Scheme 1c).

We began this study by using the cinnamaldehyde 1a as the model substrate, nBu4NBF4 as the supporting electrolyte, and a mixture of these compounds in 10 mL CH3CN was then electrized in an undivided cell (a three-necked round-bottomed flask) equipped with a Zn plate anode and a magnesium rod cathode, at room temperature (Table 1). To our great joy, the electrochemical process performed very well under the original electrized conditions, to give the desired product 2a with a 90% yield in 1.5 hours (entry 1). Changing the supporting electrolyte from nBu4NBF4 to nBu4NI, nBu4NPF6, or nBu4NBr provided a lower yield (entries 2–4). When using DMF or DMSO as the solvent, the transformation performed poorly (entries 5 and 6). Changing the electrolytic time or current can't afford the higher product yield (entries 7–10). Replacing the electrode with others led to poor reaction efficiency (entries 11–15). As for the reaction temperature, neither a higher nor a lower value improved the reactivity (entries 16 and 17). The N2 atmosphere was proven not to be needed (entry 18). Finally, the control experiment suggested that electricity was essential for the electrochemical reaction (entry 19). The scalability of this electrochemical transformation was confirmed by the facile manufacture of 0.39 g of product 2a (entry 20). Thus, this electrochemical protocol could serve as a practical method to prepare δ,γ-unsaturated-β-hydroxyl nitriles.

Table 1 Optimization of the reaction conditionsa

image file: d6ra01217e-u1.tif

Entry Variation from the standard conditions Yield (%)
a Reaction conditions: Zn plate anode (10 mm × 10 mm × 0.2 mm), magnesium rod cathode (Φ 5 mm), constant current = 9 mA, 1a (0.3 mmol), nBu4NBF4 (1 mmol), MeCN (10 mL), 1.5 h, air, room temperature, undivided cell.b MeCN (1 mL), DMF, or DMSO (9 mL).c Reaction conditions: Zn plate anode (10 mm × 10 mm × 0.2 mm), magnesium rod cathode (Φ 5 mm), constant current = 9 mA, 1a (3 mmol), MeCN (50 mL), 10 h, air, room temperature, undivided cell. Isolated yields are shown.
1 None 90
2 nBu4NI instead of nBu4NBF4 73
3 nBu4NPF6 instead of nBu4NBF4 75
4 nBu4NBr instead of nBu4NBF4 70
5 DMF as solventb 76
6 DMSO as solventb 65
7 1 h instead of 1.5 h 73
8 2 h instead of 1.5 h 64
9 6 mA instead of 9 mA 85
10 12 mA instead of 9 mA 88
11 Graphite instead of Mg as the cathode 60
12 Pt instead of Mg as the cathode 65
13 Graphite instead of Zn as the anode Trace
14 Pt instead of Zn as the anode Trace
15 Mg instead of Zn as the anode 34
16 60 °C instead of rt 84
17 0 °C instead of rt 80
18 N2 instead of air 88
19 No current n.d.
20c Large-scale reaction 76


With the optimum conditions in hand, we researched the scope of the electrolytic selective 1,2-addition protocol regarding the scope of the α,β-unsaturated aldehydes starting material (Table 2). Firstly, a variety of β-aryl-substituted α,β-unsaturated aldehydes were used to demonstrate the reaction's generality. Electron-donating (–Me, –OMe, and –NMe2) substituent groups at the para-, meta-, or ortho-positions of the β-aryl group of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes showed good tolerance, yielding the desired products (2b–2h) in 74–80% yields. Enals possessing electron-withdrawing groups (F, Cl, Br) at the para-, meta-, or ortho-positions were also well tolerated, affording the corresponding products 2i–2n in good yields, except the yield for the F at para-position (2o) was not high. Thus, these substituents facilitate additional modification at the halogenated positions. Multi-substituted α,β-unsaturated aldehydes at the β-phenyl ring were also compatible with the reaction (2p).

Table 2 Scope of enals (1) used in the reactiona
a Reaction conditions: Zn plate anode (10 mm × 10 mm × 0.2 mm), magnesium rod cathode (Φ 5 mm), constant current = 9 mA, 1a (0.3 mmol), nBu4NBF4 (1 mmol), MeCN (10 mL), 1.5 h, air, room temperature, undivided cell. Isolated yields are shown.
image file: d6ra01217e-u2.tif


Meanwhile, trifluoromethyl substitution on the β-phenyl ring was tolerated (2q and 2r). The β-phenyl ring could be replaced with another aromatic group, such as furyl (2s). Moreover, α-branched enals with a methyl group and β-branched enals with a phenyl group could afford the corresponding product in acceptable yield (2t and 2u). Interestingly, furan-2-carbaldehyde, thiophene-2-carbaldehyde, benzofuran-2-carbaldehyde, and benzo[b]thiophene-2-carbaldehyde were well tolerated due to the unsaturated compounds' properties of these heterocycles (2v–2y).

To highlight the utility of this electrochemical activation of α-C(sp3)–H bond, acetone was subjected to the standard reaction conditions (Table 3). The corresponding product 3a was obtained in good yield (88%). Then, we use a variety of β-aryl substituted α,β-unsaturated aldehydes to react with acetone. Electron-donating (Me, OMe) substituent groups at the para-, meta-, or ortho-positions of the β-aryl group of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes showed good tolerance, yielding the desired products (3b–3d) in excellent yields. Enals possessing electron-withdrawing groups (F, Cl, Br, or CF3) were also well tolerated (3e–3k). Moreover, α-branched enals with a methyl group and β-branched enals with a phenyl group could afford the corresponding product in acceptable yield (3l and 3m). Benzofuran-2-carbaldehyde, and benzo[b]thiophene-2-carbaldehyde were well tolerated (3n and 3o).

Table 3 Scope of enals (1) used in the reactiona
a Reaction conditions: Zn plate anode (10 mm × 10 mm × 0.2 mm), magnesium rod cathode (Φ 5 mm), constant current = 6 mA, 1a (0.3 mmol), nBu4NBF4 (1 mmol), CH3COCH3 (10 mL), 1.5 h, air, room temperature, undivided cell. Isolated yields are shown.
image file: d6ra01217e-u3.tif


To shed light on the reaction mechanism, several intermolecular competing kinetic isotope effect (KIE) experiments were conducted, as shown in Scheme 2. The transformations with CH3CN and CD3CN (99.8% D) disclosed a KH/KD of 2.9 under the classic reaction conditions (Scheme 2). This value concurred with the result (KH/KD of 3.0) from the treatment with the mixture of CH3CN and CD3CN at the ratio 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1. This result implied that the cleavage of the C–H bond of CH3CN could be related to the rate-limiting step. Of note, no deuterium was detected in the hydroxyl group of 2a′, indicating that the proton of the hydroxyl group in the corresponding product might originate from H2O contained in the used solvent.


image file: d6ra01217e-s2.tif
Scheme 2 The KIE experiments.

Based on the above findings, DFT calculations (shown in SI) and the relevant reports,30 a plausible reaction mechanism was proposed and shown in Scheme 3. Initially, a tetraalkylammonium cation R4N+ accepts one electron from the cathode to give a neutral radical R4N˙, which undergoes rupture of a C–N bond to form an alkyl radical R˙. The alkyl radical R˙ quickly accepts another electron to yield an alkyl carbanion R, which undergoes protonation by CH3CN to afford a cyanomethyl anion A. Subsequently, the substrate 1a was activated by the Zn2+ to give the intermediate B, which captured the intermediate A to give C, which undergoes a protonation and subsequent Zn2+ abstraction to give the final product 2a. Meanwhile, Zn was oxidized at the anode to form Zn2+, which reacts with H2O to release a proton.


image file: d6ra01217e-s3.tif
Scheme 3 Plausible mechanism for the reaction.

Due to the good biological activity of cinnamyl alcohols, we have performed binding constant research of the synthetic products in this work. Among the synthetic cinnamyl alcohols, 10 compounds containing the nitrile group exhibit high binding affinity like that of cinnamaldehyde methyl ester with AMP-activated protein kinase (Table S1). This result suggests that the nitrile group is important in the binding model. This method offers a novel approach for developing a drug to treat skeletal muscle injury.

In summary, we have successfully developed an efficient electrochemical selective 1,2-addition reaction of acetonitrile/acetone to cinnamaldehydes used for the synthesis of cinnamyl alcohol derivatives. Our electrochemical synthetic strategy is compatible with a wide range of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes. Notably, the obtained products exhibit potential protective effects against skeletal muscle injury.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

Data availability

The data supporting this article are provided within the main article and supplementary information (SI). Supplementary information is available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d6ra01217e.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for financial support from the Applied Basic Research Project of Yunnan (202101AT070079), Jin-Heng Li Expert Workstation of Yunnan Province (202405AF140113), and “Xingdian” Talent Support Program of Yunnan Province.

References

  1. H. Mengsa, X. Kun, L. Pei and L. Jun, Chin. J. Nat. Med., 2022, 20, 937–947 Search PubMed.
  2. J. Chiang, Y. C. Shen, Y. H. Wang, Y. C. Hou, C. C. Chen, J. F. Liao, M. C. Yu, C. W. Juan and K. T. Liou, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 2009, 610, 119–127 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. Y. Gui, L. Chen, S. Duan, G. Li, J. Tang and A. Li, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 2018, 833, 183–189 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. Z. Zhang, J. Liu, P. Shen, Y. Cao, X. Lu, X. Gao, Y. Fu, B. Liu and N. Zhang, Int. Immunopharmacol., 2016, 41, 127–135 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. T. A. Farghaly, N. A. A. Hafez, E. A. Ragab, H. M. Awad and M. M. Abdalla, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2010, 45, 492–500 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. S. Lee, T. Kim, B. H. Lee, S. E. Yoo, K. Lee and K. Y. Yi, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2007, 17, 1291–1295 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. S. Kamila, D. Zhu, E. R. Biehl and L. Hua, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 4429–4431 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. E. J. Corey and Y. J. Wu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 8871–8872 CrossRef CAS.
  9. Y. M. Zhang, X. Du and B. An, J. Chem. Res., 2014, 73–75 CrossRef.
  10. T. Jinzaki, M. Arakawa, H. Kinoshita, J. Ichikawa and K. Miura, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 3750–3753 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. Y. C. Fan, G. F. Du, W. F. Sun, W. Kang and L. He, Tetrahedron Lett., 2012, 53, 2231–2233 CrossRef CAS.
  12. K. Wadhwa and J. G. Verkade, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 5683–5686 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. S. Matsukawa and E. Kitazaki, Tetrahedron Lett., 2008, 49, 2982–2984 CrossRef CAS.
  14. Y. Suto, N. Kumagai, S. Matsunaga, M. Kanai and M. Shibasaki, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 3147–3150 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. P. P. Sun and B. C. Shi, J. Chem. Res., Synop., 1999, 318–319 CAS.
  16. X. L. Zhang, Y. Han, W. T. Tao and Y. Z. Huang, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1995, 189–191 RSC.
  17. X. W. Zhang, S. Wang and C. J. Xi, J. Org. Chem., 2019, 84, 9744–9749 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. Y. Suto, R. Tsuji, M. Kanai and M. Shibasaki, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 3757–3760 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. N. Kumagai, S. Matsunaga and M. Shibasaki, Chem. Commun., 2005, 3600–3602 RSC.
  20. K. Motokura, D. Nishimura, K. Mori, T. Mizugaki, K. Ebitani and K. Kaneda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 5662–5663 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. N. Kumagai, S. Matsunaga and M. Shibasaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 13632–13633 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. H. Takaya, S. Kojima and S. I. Murahashi, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 421–424 Search PubMed.
  23. T. Naota, A. Tannna and S. Murahashi, Chem. Commun., 2001, 63–64 Search PubMed.
  24. H. Takaya, T. Naota and S. Murahashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 4244–4245 CrossRef CAS.
  25. Y. He, Y. Wang, J. Gao, L. Zeng, S. Li, W. Wang, X. Zheng, S. Zhang, L. Gu and G. Li, Chem. Commun., 2018, 54, 7499–7502 RSC.
  26. Y. Li, B. Liu, H.-B. Li, Q. Wang and J.-H. Li, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 1024–1026 RSC.
  27. V. U. B. Rao, K. Kumar, T. Das, K. Vanka and R. P. Singh, J. Org. Chem., 2017, 82, 4489–4496 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  28. S. Chakraborty, Y. J. Patel, J. A. Krause and H. R. Guan, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 7523–7526 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  29. P. Kisanga, D. McLeod, B. D'Sa and J. Verkade, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 3090–3094 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. G. Bianchi, M. Feroci and L. Rossi, Eur. J. Org Chem., 2009, 3863–3866 Search PubMed.
  31. F. Che, M. Wang, C. Yu, X. Sun, D. Xie, Z. Wang and Y. Zhang, Org. Chem. Front., 2020, 7, 868–872 RSC.
  32. L. Ackermann, Acc. Chem. Res., 2020, 53, 84–104 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. Q. Jing and K. D. Moeller, Acc. Chem. Res., 2020, 53, 135–143 Search PubMed.
  34. K. D. Moeller, Chem. Rev., 2018, 118, 4817–4833 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  35. J. C. Siu, N. Fu and S. Lin, Acc. Chem. Res., 2020, 53, 547–560 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  36. P. Xiong and H.-C. Xu, Acc. Chem. Res., 2019, 52, 3339–3350 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  37. M. Yan, Y. Kawamata and P. S. Baran, Chem. Rev., 2017, 117, 13230–13319 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  38. Y. Yuan and A. Lei, Acc. Chem. Res., 2019, 52, 3309–3324 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  39. R. Barhdadi, J. Gal, M. Heintz, M. Troupel and J. Périchon, Tetrahedron, 1993, 49, 5091–5098 CrossRef CAS.
  40. X. Gao, P. Wang, L. Zeng, S. Tang and A. Lei, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 4195–4199 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. F. Ke, Y. Xu, S. Zhu, X. Lin, C. Lin, S. Zhou and H. Su, Green Chem., 2019, 21, 4329–4333 RSC.
  42. U. Dhawa, C. Tian, T. Wdowik, J. C. A. Oliveira, J. Hao and L. Ackermann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 13451–13457 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  43. S.-K. Zhang, J. Struwe, L. Hu and L. Ackermann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 3178–3183 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  44. Y. Wu, J.-Y. Chen, J. Ning, X. Jiang, J. Deng, Y. Deng, R. Xu and W.-M. He, Green Chem., 2021, 23, 3950–3954 RSC.
  45. M. Chen, Z.-J. Wu, J. Song and H.-C. Xu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202115954 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  46. H. Long, T.-S. Chen, J. Song, S. Zhu and H.-C. Xu, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 3945 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  47. Y. Li, L. Wen and W. Guo, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2023, 52, 1168–1188 RSC.
  48. Y.-H. Lu, S.-Y. Mu, H.-X. Li, J. Jiang, C. Wu, M.-H. Zhou, W.-T. Ouyang and W.-M. He, Green Chem., 2023, 25, 5539–5542 RSC.
  49. L. Qian and M. Shi, Chem. Commun., 2023, 59, 3487–3506 RSC.
  50. X.-Q. Zhou, H.-T. Tang, F.-H. Cui, Y. Liang, S.-H. Li and Y.-M. Pan, Green Chem., 2023, 25, 5024–5029 RSC.
  51. W.-J. Wei, X.-Y. Wang, H.-T. Tang, F.-H. Cui, Y.-Q. Wu and Y.-M. Pan, Sci. China: Chem., 2024, 67, 3382–3388 CrossRef CAS.
  52. L. Zeng, J. Li, J. Gao, X. Huang, W. Wang, X. Zheng, L. Gu, G. Li, S. Zhang and Y. He, Green Chem., 2020, 22, 3416–3420 RSC.
  53. Y. Gao, M. Wang, J. Sun, X.-J. Zhao and Y. He, Chem. Commun., 2024, 60, 5050–5053 RSC.
  54. M. Wang, Y. Gao, X.-J. Zhao, L. Gao and Y. He, Chem. Commun., 2024, 60, 2677–2680 RSC.
  55. Z.-M. Zong, L. Zhang, G.-P. Li, W. Wang, X.-J. Zhao and Y. He, Org. Lett., 2024, 26, 1271–1276 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2026
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.