Open Access Article
Andrés Gonzalez-Oñate
a,
Diego Chaparroa,
Rodolfo Quevedo
a,
Jorge Alí-Torres
*a and
Areli Flores-Gaspar
*b
aDepartamento de Química, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá, Av. Cra. 30 No. 45-03, Bogotá, Colombia. E-mail: jialit@unal.edu.co
bDepartamento de Química, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Cajicá 250240, Colombia. E-mail: areli.flores@unimilitar.edu.co
First published on 4th March 2026
Isatin reacts with primary amines to yield mixtures of E and Z imine stereoisomers. This study provides a detailed structural analysis of selected isatin-derived imines using 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, complemented by computational methods. The E/Z ratio in solution is shown to depend strongly on stabilization by solvent interactions and substituents attached to the imine nitrogen. Predominant isomer structures are typically stabilized by π-stacking between aromatic rings, highlighting the key role of non-covalent interactions in determining stereochemical products.
Isatin derivatives, including imines, hydrazones, and semicarbazones, can adopt two stereoisomeric forms (E and Z) due to the restricted rotation around the C
N double bond.8–12 The E/Z stereoisomerism in isatin hydrazones and semicarbazones has been attributed to the formation of intramolecular hydrogen bonds (Schemes 1A and 1B).11,12 Noncovalent interactions preferentially stabilize one isomer, enabling their distinction by UV-Vis or NMR spectroscopy.
In isatin imines, intermolecular hydrogen bonding does not occur; however, both E- and Z-stereoisomers are still observed (Scheme 1c).8–10 Previous studies have suggested that these stereoisomers exist in equilibrium, with the E-isomer considered the kinetic product and the Z-isomer the thermodynamic product. Nevertheless, a detailed structural explanation for this phenomenon in isatin imines has not yet been fully established.7,8 Building on our previous investigations into the reactivity and structural properties of isatin derivatives,10,13 this study explores the influence of the solvent, ring substituents on isatin, and amine nitrogen substituents on the E/Z isomerism and structure of isatin imines, using computational calculations and NMR spectroscopy.
3-[(2-Phenylethyl)imino]-1,3-dihydro-2H-indol-2-one (3a) (C16H14N2O). Yellow solid, yield: 77.4%, m.p. 134–136 °C. E-isomer (E-3a): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3,32 (2H,t,J = 7.7 Hz), 4.28 (2H,t,J = 7.7 Hz), 6.97 (1H,d,J = 7.8 Hz), 7.02 (1H,t,J = 7.6 Hz), 7.33–7.29 (5H,m), 7.36 (1H,t,J = 7.6 Hz), 7.61 (1H,d,J = 7.5 Hz), 9.75 (N–H). Z-isomer (Z-3a): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.12 (2H,t,J = 7.7 Hz), 4.64 (2H,t,J = 7.7 Hz), 6.84 (1H,d,J = 7.8 Hz), 7.06 (1H,t,J = 7.6 Hz), 7.33–7.29 (overlapped), 7.36 (overlapped), 7.62(overlapped) 8.70 (N–H) (Fig. S1). 13C-NMR E-isomer and Z-isomer (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 37.4, 37.7, 54.0, 56.3, 110.6, 111.9, 117.3, 122.4, 123.1, 126.2, 126.5, 127.1, 128.4, 128.7, 128.9, 129.1, 132.8, 133.7, 139.7, 140.0, 145.1, 155.0, 161.3, 165.7, 182.5, 184.9 (Fig. S2). E-isomer (E-3a): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 3.15 (2H,t,J = 7.3 Hz), 4.22 (2H,t,J = 7.3 Hz), 6.90 (1H,d,J = 7.8 Hz), 7.23–7.17 (1H,m), 7.44–7.25 (overlapped), 7.69 (1H,d,J = 7.1 Hz), 10.88 (N–H). Z-isomer (Z-3a): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 3.01(2H,t,J = 7.6 Hz), 4.52 (2H,t,J = 7.6 Hz), 6.85 (1H,d,J = 7.7 Hz), 7.05–6.98 (1H,m), 7.44–7.25 (overlapped), 7.47 (1H,d,J = 7.2 Hz), 10.81 (N–H) (Fig. S3). 13C-NMR E-isomer and Z-isomer (100 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 36.7, 37.1, 52.8, 54.9, 110.5, 111.0, 116.6, 121.5, 121.6, 122.1, 122.2, 126.0, 126.1, 127.1, 128.2, 128.3, 128.7, 128.8, 132.9, 133.4, 140.0, 144.4, 145.8, 153.8, 154.7, 159.6, 163.6 (Fig. S5). ESI-MS (m/z): [M + H]+ = 251.1196 (Calc. 251.1179) (Fig. S7).
5-Chloro-3-[(2-phenylethyl)imino]-1,3-dihydro-2H-indol-2-one (3b) (C16H13N2OCl). Yellow solid, yield: 93.0%, m.p. 170–172 °C. E-isomer (E-3b): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 3.15 (2H,t,J = 7.3 Hz), 4.22 (2H,t,J = 7.3 Hz), 6.90 (1H,d,J = 7.8 Hz), 7.23–7.17 (1H,m), 7.44–7.25 (overlapped), 7.69 (1H,d,J = 7.1 Hz), 10.88 (N–H). Z-isomer (Z-3b): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 3.01(2H,t,J = 7.6 Hz), 4.52 (2H,t,J = 7.6 Hz), 6.85 (1H,d,J = 7.7 Hz), 7.05–6.98 (1H,m), 7.44–7.25 (overlapped), 7.47 (1H,d,J = 7.2 Hz), 10.81 (N–H) (Fig. S8). 13C-NMR E-isomer and Z-isomer (100 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 36.9, 53.0, 112.2, 117.6, 121.1, 123.0, 123.9, 125.9, 126.0, 126.4, 128.2, 128.2, 128.4, 128.8, 128.9, 129.4, 139.9, 143.1, 153.0, 153.7, 159.2, 163.3 (Fig. S9). ESI-MS (m/z): [M + H]+ = Not found (Calc. 285.0789). Precursors were found 1b [M + H]+ = 182.0001 (Calc. 182.0003), 2a [M + H]+ = 122.0964 (Calc. 122.0964) (Fig. S10).
5-Nitro-3-[(2-phenylethyl)imino]-1,3-dihydro-2H-indol-2-one (3c) (C16H13N3O3). Yellow solid, yield: 95.4%, m.p. 150 °C decomp. E-isomer (E-3c): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 3.04 (2H,t,J = 7.6 Hz), 4.54 (2H,t,J = 7.6 Hz), 7.06 (1H,d,J = 8.8 Hz), 7.38–7.15 (overlapped), 8.9 (1H,dd,J = 8.8,2.5 Hz), 8.38 (1H,d,J = 2.5), 11.56 (N–H). Z-isomer (Z-3c): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 3.17 (2H,t,J = 7.1 Hz), 4.33 (2H,t,J = 7.2 Hz), 7.03 (1H,d,J = 8.8 Hz), 7.38–7.15 (overlapped), 8.13 (1H,d,J = 2.5 Hz), 8.30 (1H,dd,J = 8.8,2.5 Hz), 11.56 (N–H). Phenylethylamine (2a): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 2.28 (2H,t,J = 7.0 Hz), 3.50 (2H,t,J = 7.0 Hz), 7.38–7.15 (overlapped). 5-Nitroisatin (1c): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO): 6.93 (1H,d,J = 9.0 Hz), 8.34–8.30 (overlapped), 8.61 (1H,d,J = 2.8 Hz) (Fig. S11)·13C-NMR E-isomer, Z-isomer, phenylethylamine and 5-nitroisatin (100 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 34.7, 36.5, 36.9, 53.4, 55.2, 110.8, 111.0, 111.3, 116.1, 116.6, 117.6, 121.9, 122.4, 126.1, 128.3, 128.4, 128.3, 128.7, 128.8, 129.0, 129.0, 129.7, 131.1, 135.0, 139.0, 139.8, 142.0, 142.6, 149.8, 151.4, 152.3, 152.9, 156.5, 159.6, 163.7, 164.7, 191.0 (Fig. S12). ESI-MS (m/z): [M + H]+ = Not found (Calc. 296.1030). Precursor was found 2a [M + H]+ = 122.0965 (Calc. 122.0964) (Fig. S13).
3-[(p-Methoxyphenyl)imino]-1,3-dihydro-2H-indol-2-one (4a) (C15H12N2O2). Orange solid, yield: 90.8%, m.p. 234–236 °C. E-isomer (E-4a): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 3.80 (3H,s), 6.65 (1H,d,J = 7.8 Hz), 6.76 (1H,t,J = 7.7 Hz), 6.89 (1H,d,J = 7.8 Hz), 6.98 (2H,d,J = 9.0 Hz), 7.04 (2H,d,J = 9.0 Hz), 7.34 (1H,t,J = 7.7 Hz), 10.94 (N–H). Z-isomer (Z-4a): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 3.77 (3H,s), 6.84 (1H,d,J = 7.7 Hz), 7.18 (2H,d,J = 8.9 Hz), 7.41 (1H,t,J = 7.7 Hz), 7.55 (1H,t,J = 7.6 Hz), 10.94 (N–H) (Fig. S14). 13C-NMR E-isomer and Z-isomer (100 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 55.2, 55.3, 111.4, 113.4, 114.7, 115.8, 119.5, 121.7, 122.2, 122.8, 125.0, 134.2, 141.1, 143.1, 145.0, 146.8, 154.5, 157.1, 157.6, 163.6, 184.5 (Fig. S15). ESI-MS (m/z): [M + H]+ = 253.0974 (Calc. 253.0972) (Fig. S16).
5-Chloro-3-[(p-methoxyphenyl)imino]-1,3-dihydro-2H-indol-2-one (4b) (C15H11N2O2Cl). Orange solid, yield: 72.7%, m.p. 216 °C decomp. E-isomer (E-4b): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 3.81 (3H,s), 6.92 (1H,d,J = 8.4 Hz), 7.02 (1H,d,J = 9.0 Hz), 7.07 (1H,d,J = 9.0 Hz), 7.55 (1H,d,J = 2.3 Hz), 7.61 (1H,dd,J = 8.4,2.3 Hz), 11.13 (N–H). Z-isomer (Z-4b): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 3.79 (3H,s), 6.58 (1H,d,J = 2.3 Hz), 6.92 (1H,d,J = 8.4 Hz), 7.27 (2H,d,J = 8.8 Hz), 7.40 (1H,dd,J = 8.4,2.3 Hz), 11.09 (N–H) (Fig. S17). 13C-NMR E-isomer and Z-isomer (100 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 55.3, 55.4, 113.1, 113.4, 113.8, 114.8, 117.0, 119.1, 119.6, 121.8, 123.6, 125.2, 126.3, 126.8, 133.5, 137.3, 140.5, 142.6, 143.6, 145.6, 149.2, 153.5, 157.5, 158.1, 158.5, 159.2, 163.4, 183.3 (Fig. S18). ESI-MS (m/z): [M + H]+ = 287.0585 (Calc. 287.0582) (Fig. S19).
5-Nitro-3-[(p-methoxyphenyl)imino]-1,3-dihydro-2H-indol-2-one (4c) (C15H11N3O4). Orange solid, yield: 88.6%, m.p. 233–235 °C. E-isomer (E-4c): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 3.83 (3H,s), 7.06–7.12 (overlapped), 7.56 (1H,d,J = 2.3 Hz), 8.26 (1H,dd,J = 8.8,2.3 Hz), 11.65 (N–H). Z-isomer (Z-4c): 1H-NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 3.80 (3H,s), 6.95 (2H,d,J = 8.9 Hz), 7.04 (1H,d,J = 8.5 Hz), 7.40 (2H,t,J = 8.9 Hz), 8.33 (1H,dd,J = 8.5,2.3 Hz), 11.54 (N–H) (Fig. S20). 13C-NMR E-isomer and Z-isomer (100 MHz, d6-DMSO): δ 55.4, 55.5, 111.7, 113.5, 114.9, 115.7, 117.1, 112.0, 120.1, 123.0, 124.4, 129.1, 129.9, 140.0, 141.5, 142.2, 142.5, 149.2, 150.0, 152.1, 152.5, 157.9, 158.7, 159.1, 164.0 (Fig. S21). ESI-MS (m/z): [M + H]+ = 298.0822 (Calc. 298.0822) (Fig. S22).
| ΔGgpIsomE→Z = GgpZ-isomer − GgpE-isomer | (1) |
| ΔG≠gpE→TS = GgpTS − GgpE-isomer | (2) |
![]() | ||
| Scheme 4 Planar inversion isomerization mechanism of isatin imines with theta (θ) angle close to 180°. | ||
To include solvent effects, we calculated the free energy of isomerization (ΔGsolIsom) and the free energy barrier (ΔG≠sol) in DMSO and chloroform (Fig. 1). These solvents were selected due to the solubility of the imines studied. These parameters were determined using eqn (3) and (4):
| ΔGsolIsomE→Z = ΔGgpIsomE→Z − ΔGsolvE-isomer + ΔGsolvZ-isomer + ΔnRT ln(24.46) | (3) |
| ΔG≠solE→TS = ΔG≠gpE→TS − ΔGsolvE-isomer + ΔGsolvTS + ΔnRT ln(24.46) | (4) |
According to Fig. 2, solvation effects are crucial for the isomerization of isatin imines. In the gas phase and non-polar solvents, isomerization of E- to Z- isomer is spontaneous, whereas in polar solvents, the equilibrium shifts toward the E-isomer. The ΔGIsom values are comparable to typical non-covalent interaction energies, indicating that both isomers coexist at equilibrium with similar concentrations. The E-isomer is stabilized in polar solvents because the nitrogen and oxygen atoms are more accessible for solvent interactions, which reduces the possibility of aromatic π-stacking between phenylethylamine and isatin. Conversely, the Z-isomer is favored in non-polar solvents, as its structure enables intramolecular π-stacking between aromatic rings. Consequently, a higher proportion of the E-isomer is expected in polar solvents, while the Z-isomer predominates in non-polar environments.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 2 Reaction profile for isomerization process (E → Z) of 3a in the gas phase (blue), chloroform (green), and DMSO (red). | ||
Optimized structures were correlated with NMR spectra to predict the predominant isomer in solution; positive ΔGsolisomE–Z values indicate a higher proportion of E-isomer, while negative values signal a greater proportion of Z-isomer. This prediction aligns with Fig. 2, where integrals of each isomer's NMR signals reflect similar concentrations. Solvation effects impart only a minor influence on transition state stability, yet the activation energy barrier tends to increase with solvent polarity.
To assign signals to each isomer, 1H-NMR and NOESY spectra were recorded in DMSO-d6. An NOE correlation was expected only for the E-isomer; this correlation was observed between the aromatic proton ortho to the imino group of isatin at 7.69 ppm and the protons on the aliphatic carbon adjacent to the nitrogen at 4.22 ppm (Fig. 3A). COSY signals facilitated the assignment of signals at 3.15 and 4.22 ppm to the E-isomer and at 3.01 and 4.52 ppm to the Z-isomer (Fig. 4A).
The chemical shift difference between the aliphatic protons of each isomer is about 0.30 ppm, mainly due to their distinct geometries. The carbonyl group's anisotropy unshields protons in its plane, while those above or below are shielded. In the Z-isomer, the aliphatic chain's proximity to the carbonyl protects the methylene adjacent to the aromatic ring and deshields the methylene next to nitrogen, an effect absent in the E-isomer (see Fig. 3).27,28
EXSY spectra does not show any exchange peaks, however variable time NMR spectra of 3a show the isomerization process occur and is too slow to present exchange peaks (Fig. S4). The equilibrium is archived approximately 24 h after dissolving the compound. (Fig. S23–S25).
To evaluate the effect of the solvent on chemical shift, 1H-NMR spectra were also recorded in chloroform (CDCl3) (Fig. 4B). All aliphatic signals showed a shift toward a lower field compared to the DMSO-d6 spectra (Table 1), a trend attributed to shielding by the S
O bond anisotropy in DMSO, as aliphatic protons are close to the solvent's interaction sites with imine heteroatoms.29
| Proton signal | δ(CHCl3) | δ(DMSO) | Δδ(DMSO–CHCl3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| N–H (E) | 9.75 | 10.88 | 1.13 |
| N–H (Z) | 8.70 | 10.81 | 2.11 |
| C4–H (E) | 7.62 | 7.69 | 0.07 |
| C4–H (Z) | 7.62 | 7.47 | −0.15 |
| C7–H (E) | 6.97 | 6.90 | −0.07 |
| C7–H (Z) | 6.84 | 6.85 | 0.01 |
| C9–H (Z) | 4.64 | 4.52 | −0.12 |
| C9–H (E) | 4.28 | 4.22 | −0.06 |
| C10–H (E) | 3.32 | 3.15 | −0.17 |
| C10–H (Z) | 3.12 | 3.01 | −0.11 |
The aromatic region (6.70–7.70 ppm) shows numerous signals, reflecting pronounced solvent effects on chemical shifts. In DMSO, doublets at 7.69 and 7.47 ppm correspond to the aromatic proton ortho to the imino group in the E- and Z-isomers, respectively. In chloroform, these signals overlap as a multiplet at 7.62 ppm. In contrast, the protons at 6.90 and 6.85 ppm in DMSO showed a greater difference in chloroform (6.97 and 6.84 ppm). These findings point out that solvent–solute interactions and anisotropic solvent effects play a key role in shielding or deshielding proton environments (Table 1).29
Amide (N–H) protons appear downfield in DMSO at 10.88 ppm (E-isomer) and 10.81 ppm (Z-isomer), with the Z-isomer showing additional shielding from the phenylethylamine aromatic ring. In CDCl3, N–H signals shift upfield to 9.75 ppm (E) and 8.70 ppm (Z), with greater separation between isomers. Hydrogen bonding between DMSO (acceptor) and N–H (donor) diminishes proton shielding and reduces chemical shift differences, an interaction absent in chloroform (Table 1 and Fig. 4).29,30
The 1H-NMR spectrum of the imine derived from isatin and p-anisidine (4a) also showed the formation of the E- and Z-isomers (Fig. 5A). The methoxyl signals were observed at very close chemical shifts (3.80 and 3.77 ppm for E- and Z-, respectively). The aromatic proton signals appear between 6.60 and 7.60 ppm. The isatin aromatic proton near the imino group appears at 6.65 ppm for the E-isomer and at 6.84 ppm for the Z-isomer, while protons meta to the methoxy group are observed at 7.04 and 7.18 ppm. Greater anisotropic effects are detected in E-4a than in Z-4a, linked to the closer proximity of the p-substituted ring to the isatin moiety (Fig. 5B and C). Due to the isomer's geometry, anisotropic effects do not influence the isatin N–H proton, resulting in a single signal at 10.90 ppm for both isomers.
Computational calculations addressing E/Z isomerism in isatin-derived imines were carried out in DMSO, matching the solvent used for NMR measurements. Consequently, only the E to Z isomerization was considered since it is an exergonic process in DMSO. To evaluate the effect of the imine substituent on the isomerization, the free energy of isomerization (ΔGDMSOIsomZ→E) and the free energy barrier (ΔG≠solZ→TS) were calculated, as explained before in eqn (3) and (4).
As shown in Fig. 6, the substituents on the imine nitrogen greatly affect isomerization. Imine 4a exhibits lower ΔG≠ values and is more exergonic ΔGDMSOIsomZ→E than imine 3a, reflecting distinctive molecular geometries. In imine 3a, π-stacking interactions stabilized both isomers (Z-3a and E-3a), resulting in a small energy gap between isomers. In contrast, imine 4a lacks equivalent stabilization for both isomers; the Z-4a structure avoids the formation of non-covalent interactions to improve steric hindrance, and E-4a can form non-covalent interactions between aromatic subunits. Those differences cause the energy difference between the two isomers to be higher than imine 3a. Furthermore, reaching TS molecule 3a requires breaking stabilizing π-stacking interactions and reorganizing its structure (conformers), which implies a higher energy cost and slow isomerization. For 4a, weaker and more easily disrupted non-covalent interactions and minimal geometric rearrangement lower the energy barrier to isomerization.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 6 Reaction profile for the isomerization (Z → E) in DMSO for 3a (blue) and 4a (orange) molecules. | ||
To correlate the calculated ΔGDMSOIsomZ→E with the NMR spectra, the isomerization constant in DMSO (KDMSOIsomZ→E) was determined using the following equation:
![]() | (5) |
NMR isomer ratios estimation were also determined using the integrals of aliphatic signals for equivalent protons in each isomer. Lower KDMSOIsomZ→E values correspond to a greater proportion of Z-isomer in solution.
As shown in Table 2, increasing KDMSOIsomZ→E raises the solution proportion of the E-isomer. This behavior was observed in NMR spectra, where 3a has similar proportions of both isomers, in contrast to 4a, where the E-isomer predominates. Phenylethyl groups stabilize both isomers through π-stacking, yielding nearly equal populations, whereas p-methoxyphenyl substitution preferentially stabilizes the E-isomer and increases its proportion.
| Imine | �GDMSOIsomZ→E(kcal mol−1) | KDMSOIsomZ→E | NMR isomer proportion estimation (E : Z) |
|---|---|---|---|
| a Proportion estimation was calculated with the integral of aliphatic proton signals. | |||
| 3a (–H) | −1.2 | 7.7 | 47 : 53 |
| 3b (–Cl) | −1.5 | 13.2 | 56 : 44 |
| 3c (–NO2) | −1.6 | 14.5 | 37 : 63 |
| 4a (–H) | −2.0 | 29.9 | 80 : 20 |
| 4b (–Cl) | −1.7 | 18.7 | 75 : 25 |
| 4c (–NO2) | −1.5 | 13.1 | 71 : 29 |
According to Table 2, the effect of isatin substituents on isomerization depends on the imine's nitrogen substituent. For the N-phenylethyl substituent, an increase in electron-withdrawing effect caused by the substituent on the isatin ring slightly increases the proportion of the E-isomer. π-stacking interaction between the isatin aromatic ring and the phenylethylamine ring in the E-isomer is favored with electron-withdrawing groups. A high stabilizing effect of π-stacking interactions was achieved between electron-rich and electron-poor aromatic rings.32,33 However, for imine 3c, this trend is absent, likely due to partial hydrolysis in DMSO. For N-p-methoxyphenyl imines, electron-withdrawing groups favor the Z-isomer by destabilizing E-isomer noncovalent interactions. Overall, isatin substituents generally have only a minor impact on isomerization equilibria.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2026 |