Open Access Article
Yue-Wen Chuang†
ab,
Atallah F. Ahmed†
cd,
Hsiao-Ling Chungab,
Yueh-Wen Liue,
Su-Ying Chienf,
Yu-Chi Lin
g,
Chia-Ching Liaw
ghijk,
Yu-Jen Wul,
Jing-Ru Weng
a,
Quoc Vu Phamm,
Jui-Hsin Su
*abn,
Jyh-Horng Sheu*ao and
Ping-Jyun Sung
*abhpqrs
aDepartment of Marine Biotechnology and Resources, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804201, Taiwan. E-mail: sheu@mail.nsysu.edu.tw
bNational Museum of Marine Biology and Aquarium, Pingtung 944401, Taiwan. E-mail: pjsung@nmmba.gov.tw; x2219@nmmba.gov.tw
cDepartment of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
dDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
eDepartment of Cosmetics and Fashion Styling, Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung 833301, Taiwan
fX-Ray Laboratory, The Institute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115201, Taiwan
gNational Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, MOHW, Taipei 112026, Taiwan
hGraduate Institute of Natural Products, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan
iDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, National Yang Ming Chian Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
jSchool of Chinese Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chian Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan
kDepartment of Biochemical Science and Technology, National Chiayi University, Chiayi 600355, Taiwan
lYu Jun Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Donggang, Pingtung 928003, Taiwan
mGraduate Institute of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
nGraduate Institute of Marine Biology, National Dong Hwa University, Pingtung 944401, Taiwan
oDepartment of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404327, Taiwan
pChinese Medicine Research and Development Center, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404327, Taiwan
qPhD Program in Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan
rDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien 974301, Taiwan
sSchool of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan
First published on 17th February 2026
Two sarsolenane-type diterpenoids, including a known compound, dihydrosarsolenone (1), and a novel metabolite, sarcoglaucone A (2), were isolated from the soft coral Sarcophyton glaucum, collected off the coast of Taiwan. The absolute configuration of dihydrosarsolenone (1) was determined by single-crystal X-ray difraction (SC-XRD) analysis for the first time in this study. The structure of sarsolenane 2 was established on the basis of spectroscopic analysis and further confirmed by SC-XRD analysis. One aspect of the stereochemistry of the known sarsolenanes 1 (dihydrosarsolenone) and methyl dihydrosarsolenoneate was revised. Sarsolenane 1 was found to exhibit activity in enhancing alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in human osteoblast-like cells (MG63).
This study reports the isolation and characterization of secondary metabolites from the soft coral Sarcophyton glaucum (Quoy & Gaimard, 1833), collected from the coastal waters of Taiwan, a marine region renowned for its exceptional biodiversity arising from the convergence of the Kuroshio Current and the South China Sea surface currents. Two sarsolenane-type diterpenoids were obtained, including the known compound dihydrosarsolenone (1)6 and a new structural analogue, designated sarcoglaucone A (2) (Fig. 1). Comprehensive spectroscopic analyses, supported by SC-XRD analysis, enabled unambiguous elucidation of their structures. In addition, the biological evaluation of these metabolites revealed potential anti-osteoporotic properties, as assessed through the enhancement of ALP activity in MG63 cells.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 1 Structures of dihydrosarsolenone and its revised structure 1; methyl dihydrosarsolenoneate and its revised structure tortuosene A; and sarcoglaucone A (2). | ||
| Position | Dihydrosarsolenonea | 1 | 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δH,b mult (J in Hz) | δC,c type | δH,b mult (J in Hz) | δC,c type | δH,b mult (J in Hz) | δC,c type | |
| a Data reported by Liang et al.6b Spectrum recorded at 400 MHz in CDCl3.c Spectrum recorded at 100 MHz in CDCl3.d Attached protons were deduced by DEPT experiment. | ||||||
| 1 | 74.9, Cd | 74.8, C | 77.0, C | |||
| 2 | 3.07 d (7.5) | 49.0, CH | 3.07 d (7.6) | 49.0, CH | 3.19 br s | 58.1, CH |
| 3 | 5.01 d (7.5) | 123.2, CH | 5.02 dd (7.6, 0.8) | 123.1, CH | 5.10 d (1.6) | 118.5, CH |
| 4 | 138.1, C | 138.0, C | 139.1, C | |||
| 5α | 3.03 td (13.1, 5.6) 1.94 m | 28.9, CH2 | 3.06 ddd (12.8, 12.8, 5.2) 1.92 m | 28.8, CH2 | 2.87 ddd (13.6, 13.6, 4.4) 1.69 m | 29.1, CH2 |
| β | ||||||
| 6α | 1.80 m | 26.5, CH2 | 1.80 m | 26.4, CH2 | 1.57 m | 28.6, CH2 |
| β | 1.96 m | 1.98 m | 1.95 m | |||
| 7 | 4.68 dd (11.5, 2.7) | 75.8, CH | 4.69 dd (11.6, 2.8) | 75.7, CH | 4.67 dd (11.2, 1.6) | 76.8, CH |
| 8 | 84.6, C | 84.5, C | 83.6, C | |||
| 9α | 1.60 m | 33.4, CH2 | 1.96 m | 33.3, CH2 | 1.98 m | 38.7, CH2 |
| β | 1.91 m | 1.62 m | 1.62 m | |||
| 10α | 2.55 dd (14.5, 7.4) | 38.1, CH2 | 2.66 ddd (15.6, 12.4, 1.2) | 38.0, CH2 | 2.06 m | 26.1, CH2 |
| β | 2.65 m | 2.56 ddd (15.6, 7.6, 1.2) | 1.74 m | |||
| 11 | 200.3, C | 200.2, C | 5.00 ddd (8.8, 5.2, 2.4) | 77.8, CH | ||
| 12 | 116.7, C | 116.6, C | 2.54 ddd (14.4, 5.2, 4.8) | 50.0, CH | ||
| 13α | 2.25 dd (18.2, 6.6) | 20.6, CH2 | 2.40 ddd (18.0, 11.6, 7.2) | 20.5, CH2 | 1.65 m | 18.0, CH2 |
| β | 2.38 ddd (18.2, 11.5, 7.2) | 2.26 ddd (18.0, 7.2, 1.2) | 2.21 m | |||
| 14α | 1.52 ddd (14.2, 11.6, 7.3) | 25.6, CH2 | 1.89 ddd (14.4, 7.2, 1.2) | 25.5, CH2 | 1.98 m | 32.2, CH2 |
| β | 1.86 m | 1.53 ddd (14.4, 11.6, 7.2) | 1.67 m | |||
| 15 | 1.73 m | 32.8, CH | 1.74 sept (6.8) | 32.7, CH | 2.08 m | 34.1, CH |
| 16 | 0.83 d (6.8) | 15.7, CH3 | 0.84 d (6.8) | 15.6, CH3 | 0.96 d (6.8) | 15.3, CH3 |
| 17 | 0.93 d (6.8) | 16.0, CH3 | 0.94 d (6.8) | 15.9, CH3 | 0.81 d (6.8) | 15.7, CH3 |
| 18 | 1.84 s | 22.9, CH3 | 1.84 d (0.8) | 22.8, CH3 | 1.80 d (1.6) | 24.0, CH3 |
| 19 | 1.41 s | 20.5, CH3 | 1.41 s | 20.3, CH3 | 1.14 s | 19.7, CH3 |
| 20 | 164.7, C | 164.5, C | 214.2, C | |||
| 7-OAc | 2.00 s | 170.0, C | 2.01 s | 169.9, C | 2.02 s | 170.1, C |
| 21.4, CH3 | 21.2, CH3 | 21.4, CH3 | ||||
Consistent with these findings, the 1H and 13C NMR data and the rotation value of the known sarsolenane derivative, methyl dihydro-sarsolenoneate ([α]D + 59),6 were found to be identical to those of the previously reported compound tortuosene A ([α]D + 59) (Fig. 1 and Table 2), a sarsolenane-type diterpenoid isolated from the formosan soft coral Sarcophyton tortuosum.7 Notably, the NMR chemical shifts of the key oxymethine CH-7 (δH 4.56/δC 75.6 for methyl dihydrosarsolenoneate; δH 4.56/δC 75.5 for tortuosene A), oxygenated quaternary carbon C-8 (δC 84.9 for methyl dihydrosarsolenoneate; δC 84.8 for tortuosene A), as well as that of the tertiary methyl Me-19 (δH 1.42/δC 20.2 for both compounds) attaching at C-8, are identical.6,7 This further confirms that methyl dihydrosarsolenoneate and tortuosene A are identical compounds and share the same configuration. Moreover, in the known compound tortuosene A, the absolute configurations at stereogenetic centers C-7 and C-8 have been established as R- and S-configurations,7 respectively, consistent with the configurations assigned to compound 1. This strong correspondence supports that both compounds methyl dihydrosarsolenoneate and tortuosene A share the same stereochemical framework. Accordingly, the acetoxy and methyl substituents at C-7 and C-8, respectively, in methyl dihydrosarsolenoneate, are assigned to the α-face, aligned with the absolute configuration established for compound 1.
| Position | Methyl dihydrosarsolenoneatea | Tortuosene Ab | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δH,c mult (J in Hz) | δC,d type | δH,c mult (J in Hz) | δC,d type | |
| a Data reported by Liang et al.6b Data reported by Lin et al.7c Spectrum recorded at 400 MHz in CDCl3.d Spectrum recorded at 100 MHz in CDCl3.e Attached protons were deduced by DEPT experiment. | ||||
| 1 | 74.7, Ce | 74.6, C | ||
| 2 | 3.24 d (8.1) | 49.6, CH | 3.24 d (8.0) | 49.5, CH |
| 3 | 6.62 d (8.2) | 138.1, CH | 6.63 d (8.0) | 138.1, CH |
| 4 | 133.2, C | 133.1, C | ||
| 5α/β | 2.96 dt (13.2, 5.3); 2.64 m | 24.5, CH2 | 2.97 td (13.2, 5.2); 2.64 m | 24.4, CH2 |
| 6α/β | 1.90 m; 2.05 m | 27.1, CH2 | 1.89 m; 2.02 m | 27.1, CH2 |
| 7 | 4.56 dd (11.5, 2.7) | 75.6, CH | 4.56 d (10.4) | 75.5, CH |
| 8 | 84.9, C | 84.8, C | ||
| 9α/β | 1.62 m; 1.94 m | 33.0, CH2 | 1.92 m; 1.60 m | 33.0, CH2 |
| 10α/β | 2.58 dd (15.2, 6.9); 2.67 m | 38.0, CH2 | 2.65 m; 2.58 m | 37.9, CH2 |
| 11 | 199.7, C | 199.7, C | ||
| 12 | 118.6, C | 118.6, C | ||
| 13α/β | 2.31 dd (18.3, 6.9); 2.44 ddd (18.3, 11.4, 7.3) | 20.5, CH2 | 2.43 m; 2.30 dd (18.0, 6.8) | 20.5, CH2 |
| 14α/β | 1.69 m; 1.98 m | 25.5, CH2 | 1.96 m; 1.62 m | 25.5, CH2 |
| 15 | 1.71 m | 33.2, CH | 1.70 m | 33.2, CH |
| 16 | 0.82 d (6.8) | 15.7, CH3 | 0.82 d (6.8) | 15.6, CH3 |
| 17 | 0.96 d (6.8) | 15.9, CH3 | 0.96 d (6.8) | 15.8, CH3 |
| 18 | 167.0, C | 166.9, C | ||
| 19 | 1.42 s | 20.2, CH3 | 1.42 s | 20.2, CH3 |
| 20 | 161.6, C | 161.6, C | ||
| 7-OAc | 1.97 s | 169.6, C | 1.97 s | 169.5, C |
| 21.1, CH3 | 21.0, CH3 | |||
| 18-OMe | 3.80 s | 52.1, CH3 | 3.80 s | 52.0, CH3 |
In this context, it is worth noting that, in a previous study, Liang et al. employed a dihydrosarsolenone structure that has since been shown in the present work to be inaccurate as a reference for quantum-chemical calculations aimed at reassessing the stereochemical assignment of another compound, sarsolenone.5,6 This observation suggests that the use of time-dependent density functional theory-electronic circular dichroism (TDDFT-ECD) calculations for determining absolute configurations may still benefit from further methodological refinement. Accordingly, the stereochemical assignment of sarsolenone may warrant further examination.5,6
Sarcoglaucone A (2) was isolated as colorless prisms and its molecular formula was determined to be C22H34O5 (6 degrees of unsaturation) by the sodium adduct peak at m/z 401.22986 (calcd for C22H34O5 + Na, 401.22985) in the (+)-HRESIMS spectrum. Comparison of the 1H NMR, HSQC, and HMBC data with the molecular formula indicated that there must be an exchangeable proton, requiring the presence of a hydroxy group, and this deduction was supported by a broad absorption in the IR spectrum at 3453 cm−1. The IR spectrum of 2 also showed strong bands at 1737 and 1717 cm−1, consistent with the presence of ester and ketonic groups. The presence of a trisubstituted olefin was deduced from the signals of an sp2 methine carbon at δC 118.5 (CH-3) and an sp2 non-protonated carbon at δC 139.1 (C-4), further supported by an olefinic proton signal at δH 5.10 (1H, d, J = 1.6 Hz, H-3). Two carbonyl resonances at δC 214.2 (C-20) and 170.1, confirmed the presence of ketonic and ester groups. An acetate methyl (δH 2.02, 3H, s) was also observed. From the above NMR data (Table 1), the remaining three degrees of unsaturation must correspond to a tricyclic framework for 2.
In addition, a tertiary methyl singlet (δH 1.14, 3H, s/δC 19.7, CH3-19), a vinyl methyl (δH 1.80, 3H, d, J = 1.6 Hz/δC 24.0, CH3-18), an isopropyl group (δH 0.96, 3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz/δC 15.3, CH3-16; δH 0.81, 3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz/δC 15.7, CH3-17; δH 2.08, 1H, m/δC 34.1, CH-15), six pairs of aliphatic methylenes (δH 2.87, 1H, ddd, J = 13.6, 13.6, 6.4 Hz; 1.69, 1H, m/δC 29.1, CH2-5; δH 1.57, 1H, m; 1.95, 1H, m/δC 28.6, CH2-6; δH 1.98, 1H, m; 1.62, 1H, m/δC 38.7, CH2-9; δH 2.06, 1H, m; 1.74, 1H, m/δC 26.1, CH2-10; δH 1.65, 1H, m; 2.21, 1H, m/δC 18.0, CH2-13; δH 1.98, 1H, m; 1.67, 1H, m/δC 32.2, CH2-14), an aliphatic methine (δH 3.19, 1H, br s/δC 58.1, CH-2), and two oxymethines (δH 4.67, 1H, dd, J = 11.2, 1.6 Hz/δC 76.8, CH-7; δH 5.00, 1H, ddd, J = 8.8, 5.2, 2.4 Hz/δC 77.8, CH-11) were observed.
The gross structure of 2 was elucidated by 2D NMR analyses. 1H–1H COSY correlations identified the fragments C2–C3, C5–C6–C7, C9–C10–C11–C12–C13–C14, and C16–C15–C17, which were assembled with the aid of HMBC correlations (Fig. 3). Key HMBC correlations between protons and non-protonated carbons, including H-3, H2-13, H-15, H3-16, H3-17/C-1; H2-5, H3-18/C-4; H2-6, H-7, H2-9, H2-10, H3-19/C-8; and H-3, H2-13/C-20, defined the major carbon framework of 2. A vinyl methyl at C-4 was confirmed by an allylic coupling between H3-18 and H-3 (J = 1.6 Hz) and by HMBC correlations of H3-18/C-3, C-4, C-5 and H-3, H2-5/C-18. The ring-junction methyl C-19 was placed at the oxygenated quaternary carbon C-8, as supported by HMBC correlations of H3-19/C-7, C-8, C-9 and H-7, H2-9/C-19. The acetoxy group at C-7 was established from an HMBC correlation of H-7 (δH 4.67) with the acetate carbonyl (δC 170.1). Although no HMBC correlations were observed for H-11, the presence of an ether linkage between C-8 and C-11 forming a tetrahydrofuran (THF) ring was inferred from the characteristic chemical shifts of the oxymethine CH-11 (δH 5.00/δC 77.8) and the oxygenated quaternary carbon C-8 (δC 83.6), which together satisfied the remaining degree of unsaturation. Among the five oxygen atoms in the molecular formula, four were assigned to the ketone, ether, and acetoxy groups, leaving a hydroxy group at C-1, supported by HMBC correlations of H-3, H2-13, H-15, H3-16, and H3-17 with C-1, an oxygenated quaternary carbon resonating at δC 77.0.
The relative stereochemistry of 2 was established from the analysis of NOESY correlations (Fig. 4) and vicinal 1H–1H coupling constants. In the NOESY spectrum, the correlation between H-12 and H-11 indicated that both protons are α-oriented. One of the C-13 methylene protons at δH 1.65, showed a correlation with H-12 and was thus assigned as H-13α, while the other (δH 2.21) was designated as H-13β. The correlation between H-13β and H-7 suggested that H-7 is β-oriented. One of the C-6 methylene protons (δH 1.57) showed a correlation with H3-19 but not with H-7. This proton exhibited a large coupling constant (J = 11.2 Hz) with H-7, indicating an anti-relationship between H-7 and this proton. Accordingly, it was assigned as H-6α, while the other methylene proton at δH 1.95 was designated as H-6β. Accordingly, the C-19 methyl group was deduced to be α-oriented. H-2 showed a correlation with H-3 but not with H-13β, and the absence of coupling between H-2 and H-3 indicated a dihedral angle close to 90°, supporting an α-orientation for H-2. The Z configuration of the Δ3 double bond was confirmed by the correlation between H-3 and H3-18. Furthermore, correlations of H-2/H3-17 and H-3/H-15 suggested that the isopropyl group attached at C-1 is β-oriented. Notably, the six-membered ring in compound 2 adopts a twist-boat conformation, on the basis of the above findings.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 Stereoview of 2 (from computer modelling) showing key NOESY correlations and selected proton distances (Å). | ||
Due to the conformational flexibility of the macrocyclic framework, the stereochemistry of the chiral centers at C-1, C-2, C-7, C-8, C-11, and C-12 of 2 was further investigated by SC-XRD analysis using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å). The X-ray structure (Fig. 5) clearly reveals the presence of an ether bridge between C-8/11 within the macrocyclic ring. In addition, the six-membered ring adopts a twist-boat conformation, which is consistent with the NOESY correlations observed for 2 (Fig. 4). Based on the X-ray diffraction analysis, the relative configurations of the stereogenic centers in 2 were assigned as 1R*,2R*,7S*,8R*,11S*, and 12R* (absolute structure parameter x = −0.4). Taken together, these results allow the structure of 2 to be unambiguously elucidated.
The absolute configuration of dihydrosarsolenone was unambiguously established by SC-XRD analysis, as shown for structure 1. On biosynthetic grounds, the newly identified sarsolenane-type diterpenoid sarcoglaucone A (2) is proposed to possess the same absolute configuration as compound 1, since both metabolites were isolated from the same organism. Furthermore, all naturally occurring sarsolenane-type diterpenoids whose absolute configurations have been unequivocally determined are known to share an R-configuration at the C-2 stereogenic center.6–8,10 Accordingly, sarcoglaucone A is assigned the absolute configuration depicted in structure 2.
The biosynthetic pathways of dihydrosarsolenone (1) and sarcoglaucone A (2) are illustrated in Scheme 1. It is proposed that both metabolites originate from cembrane-type precursors commonly found in Sarcophyton species. The proposed cembranoidal precursor could undergo oxidation at C-20 and epoxidation at the C-7/C-8 double bond to form an aldehydocembrane, which could be cyclized from C-2 to C-20 via an acid-catalyzed nucleophilic attack of the C-1/C-2 double bond to the carbonyl group to give a tortuosane intermediate. This intermediate could further afford 1 by the acid-catalyzed epoxide-cleavage and the subsequent reaction sequence as shown in route a, or 2 as shown in route b. The shown formation of a six-membered ring could further increase the diversity of molecular framework, ultimately giving rise to the distinctive architectures of compounds 1 and 2. This cascade of enzymatic transformations reflects the remarkable biosynthetic capability of Sarcophyton species in generating structurally complex and chemically diverse metabolites.
Previous studies have suggested that diterpenoids derived from Sarcophyton species may exhibit ALP-enhancing activity.16,17 In the present study, compounds 1 and 2 were evaluated in MG63 cells. Preliminary results indicated that compound 1 exhibited a tendency to increase ALP activity (Table 3).
| Compounds | ALP activity (%) | Cell viability |
|---|---|---|
| a Rutin (100 µM) was used as the positive control. Results are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 3), with one-way ANOVA used for statistics (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.001 vs. control). | ||
| Control | 100.00 ± 3.08 | 100.00 ± 1.10 |
| 1 | 120.41 ± 8.44* | 94.86 ± 0.74*** |
| 2 | 110.60 ± 5.18** | 90.63 ± 0.67*** |
| Rutina | 113.64 ± 7.09*** | 81.35 ± 5.17** |
:
1, v/v) at room temperature to give a crude extract (29.7 g). The extract was partitioned between ethyl acetate (EtOAc) and water. The EtOAc layer was concentrated under reduced pressure to yield a residue (15.9 g), which underwent Si C.C. eluting with n-hexane-EtOAc mixtures of increasing polarity, to give 11 fractions F1–F11. Fraction F4 was purified by NP-HPLC (n-hexane-EtOAc, 5
:
1) to afford 12 subfractions F4A–F4L. Subfractions F4J and F4K were further purified by NP-HPLC (n-hexane-acetone, 3
:
1, flow rate = 3.0 mL min−1), affording compounds 1 (4.0 mg, Rt = 11.0 min, ∼0.00220% of dry weight) and 2 (1.5 mg, Rt = 25.0 min, ∼0.00082% of dry weight), respectively.
724 reflections were collected in the range of 2.359 < θ < 74.644°, with 4026 independent reflections [R(int) = 0.0786], completeness to theta was 99.6%; semi-empirical from equivalents absorption correction applied; refinement method: full-matrix least-square on F2,23,24 the data/restraints/parameters were 4026/1/251; goodness-of-fit on F2 = 1.040; final R indices [I > 2 sigma (I)], R1 = 0.0405; wR2 = 0.1026; R indices (all data), R1 = 0.0431, wR2 = 0.1049, large difference peak and hole, 0.302 and −0.257 e Å−3; absolute structure parameter, x = 0.02 (11).13–15 Crystallographic data for the structure of dihydrosarsolenone (1) were submitted to the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center (CCDC) with supplementary publication number CCDC 2496063.
706 reflections were collected in the range of 3.635 < θ < 66.599°, with 3586 independent reflections [R(int) = 0.1776], completeness to theta was 99.7%; semi-empirical from equivalents absorption correction applied; refinement method: full-matrix least-square on F2,23,24 the data/restraints/parameters were 3586/0/250; goodness-of-fit on F2 = 1.042; final R indices [I > 2 sigma (I)], R1 = 0.0638; wR2 = 0.1229; R indices (all data), R1 = 0.1207, wR2 = 0.1448, large difference peak and hole, 0.162 and −0.220 e Å−3; absolute structure parameter, x = −0.4 (5). Crystallographic data for the structure of sarcoglaucone A (2) were submitted to the CCDC with supplementary publication number CCDC 2496064.
The datasets supporting this article are provided in the supplementary information (SI). Supplementary information: the SI includes HRESIMS data, 1D and 2D NMR spectra, and X-ray crystallographic data for compounds 1 and 2. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra09073c.
Footnote |
| † These authors have contributed equally to this work. |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2026 |