Photoredox-catalyzed three-component radical coupling of potassium alkyltrifluoroborates, DABSO and polyfluoroarenes

Yunliang Guo ab, Jiuli Xia b, Kaixuan Chen a, Kehan Jiao a, Ying Dong a, Guangfan Zheng *b, Jiao Qu a, Jiaqiong Sun *ab, Tao Xiong b and Qian Zhang bc
aSchool of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130117, China. E-mail: sunjq295@nenu.edu.cn
bKey Laboratory of Functional Organic Molecule Design & Synthesis of Jilin Province, Department of Chemistry, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin 130024, China. E-mail: zhenggf265@nenu.edu.cn
cState Key Laboratory of Organometallic Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China

Received 14th August 2025 , Accepted 14th October 2025

First published on 23rd October 2025


Abstract

Polyfluoroarylsulfones not only exhibit distinctive biological and pharmacological activities but also serve as versatile building blocks in organic synthesis, functional materials, polymer photosensitizers, etc. The direct incorporation of the polyfluoroaryl sulfonyl moiety into organic compounds remains an unexplored yet intriguing challenge. In this study, we present a visible light-driven three-component coupling of RBF4K, DABSO reagent, and polyfluoroarenes through radical–polar crossover mechanisms. Interestingly, this methodology achieves direct C(sp2)–F bond cleavage of polyfluoroarenes under mild conditions, establishing DABSO/polyfluoroarenes as unprecedented polyfluoroarylsulfonation reagents. The synergistic integration of the high reactivity of radical species with the precise regioselectivity of SNAr processes constitutes the foundation of this innovative strategy. This approach provides a modular platform for synthesis of polyfluoroarylsulfones.


Introduction

The polyfluoroaryl sulfonyl skeleton, as a distinctive class of aryl sulfonyl compounds, exhibits unique biological and pharmacological activities,1–3 thereby holding significant potential for applications in pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry (Scheme 1A). For example: (i) ciprofloxacin modified with the pentafluoropyridine sulfone derivative A exhibits strong bacteriostatic properties;1 (ii) polyfluorobenzenesulfonamides B demonstrate inhibitory activity against carbonic anhydrases (CA);2 (iii) pentafluorobenzenesulfonamide derivatives C show broad-spectrum cytotoxicity against tumor cells.3 Furthermore, polyfluoroarylsulfones serve as versatile synthons in organic synthesis,4 functional materials,5 and polymer-based photosensitizers.6 However, the scarcity of robust synthetic methodologies has severely hindered their practical utilization. Conventional approaches involve two distinct pathways: (i) oxidation-mediated routes comprising polyfluoroaryl thiophenol oxidation to sulfonyl bromides followed by subsequent transformations7 (Scheme 1Ba, upper); (ii) multistep SNAr sequences requiring thiol coupling with polyfluoroarenes and subsequent oxidation4 (Scheme 1Ba, lower). These methods are frequently compromised by harsh reaction conditions and limited functional group tolerance. While sulfinate salt-based SNAr reactions8 provide direct access to polyfluoroarylsulfones (Scheme 1Bb, upper), their dependence on pre-synthesized sodium sulfinate salts diminishes synthetic efficiency. The direct polyfluoroarylsulfonation of alkyl radicals (Scheme 1Bb, lower) employing readily accessible precursors constitutes a promising and conceptually distinct strategy for the precise assembly of polyfluoroarylsulfone scaffolds; however, this approach remains underexplored.
image file: d5qo01163a-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Motivation for developing PC-catalysed three-component radical coupling for polyfluoroarylsulfones.

On the other hand, direct integration of the sulfonyl group into organic molecules represents a promising avenue for sulfonyl-containing motifs.9–11 Sulfur dioxide (SO2) emerges as an ideal candidate; however, its toxicity and cumbersome operation restrict its further applications. For this purpose, DABSO10 was employed as a convenient and stable SO2 surrogate to participate in multicomponent coupling reactions. Visible light catalysis12 has become a powerful tool in radical SO2 chemistry, as it promotes cascade sulfonation under extremely mild conditions.11,13 Inspired by these results, we designed a three-component coupling of reductive alkyl radical sources, DABSO, and polyfluoroarenes14 under photoredox conditions (Scheme 1C). According to our proposed reaction scenario, photooxidatively generated alkyl radicals can be efficiently trapped by SO2, followed by photoreductive conversion into sulfonyl anions that undergo polar SN2 substitution to yield the target products. However, alkyl radicals may also engage in direct addition to polyfluoroarenes,15 necessitating precise kinetic control throughout the reaction process. Building upon our ongoing research in visible-light photoredox catalysis16 and C–F bond activation,17 we herein report a photoredox-catalyzed radical–polar crossover18 involving RBF4K, DABSO, and polyfluoroarenes under redox-neutral conditions, enabling direct assembly of otherwise challenging-to-access polyfluoroarylsulfones.

Results and discussion

We attempted the coupling of potassium tert-butyl fluoroborate (3a, 0.3 mmol), DABSO (2a, 0.3 mmol) and methyl pentafluorobenzoate (1a, 0.2 mmol) employing 4-CzIPN (1.5 mol%) as a photocatalyst and K3PO4 (1.0 eq.) as a base under blue LED irradiation for 24 h in DMSO (2.0 mL), and the desired polyfluoroarylsulfone 4aa was isolated in 12% yield. To our delight, the reaction could proceed without the base, resulting in an improved yield of 4aa. Based on the solvent screening, it appears that the reaction can only be carried out in polar aprotic solvents such as DMSO, DMF, or DMAc. DCM, CH3CN, or THF failed to produce the expected products. Next, different photocatalysts were tested, and the reactivity seemed sensitive to the oxidation ability of the photocatalyst. PC-5 and PC-6 provided excellent results, while for PC-2 to PC-4, nearly no 4aa was formed. Thus, PC-6 was chosen as the optimized PC for further reaction parameter screening. The coupling could not be carried out without a PC or light irradiation, or under an air atmosphere. Evaluation of alternative sulfur dioxide sources revealed that most could successfully generate the desired polyfluoroarylsulfones. Sodium hydrogen sulfite (NaHSO3) proved to be the most effective among them, affording the product in 67% yield, albeit lower than the yield obtained with DABSO. We further investigated the effect of the reactant ratio on the yield. Reducing the amount of 2a to 1.0 equivalent had no impact on yield, while reducing it to 0.5 equivalents resulted in a significant decline in yield. Reducing the amount of 3a to 1.0 equivalent resulted in 68% yield for 4aa. Thus, the conditions shown in the equation in Table 1 were identified as the standard conditions for further exploration of the substrate scope.
Table 1 Optimization of the reaction conditionsa
a Unless otherwise noted, all the reactions were carried out with 1a (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.3 mmol, 1.5 eq.), 3a (0.3 mmol, 1.5 eq.), and PC (1.5 mol%), anhydrous solvent (2 mL) at room temperature, 40 W blue LEDs, 24 h in nitrogen. Yield of the isolated product based on 1a. b K3PO4 (1.0 equiv.) was added. c w/o a PC.
image file: d5qo01163a-u1.tif


With the optimized conditions in hand, we next evaluated the range of substrates applicable in the three-component coupling system, and the results are summarised in Scheme 2. As demonstrated in Scheme 2A, a wide range of polyfluoroarenes could undergo a defluorination cross-coupling reaction with DABSO (2a) and potassium tert-butyl fluoroborate (3a), resulting in the formation of polyfluoroarylsulfones 4aa–4qa in moderate to excellent yields. Polyfluorobenzoates derived from primary (4aa and 4ea), secondary (4ba, 4fa, and 4ga), and tertiary (4ca) alcohols or phenol (4da) were employed in this radical–polar cascade, producing the corresponding defluorination/sulfonylation products in high yields (up to 99% in most cases). Other electron-withdrawing groups, such as cyano (4ia), trifluoromethyl (4ja), carbonyl (4ka), and polyfluoroaryl-substituted perfluoroarenes (4la), have been proven to be effective starting materials, providing the corresponding sulfones in 63–82% yields. Perfluoropyridine was also found to be well tolerated, resulting in the generation of 4ma with a yield of 68%. Moreover, 3-chloro-tetrafluoropyridine could deliver 4na in 52% yield. Excellent chemoselectivity was demonstrated by using radical-sensitive benzyloxy (4ea and 4fa) or internal alkyne (4ha) groups in the coupling. This strategy can be used to functionalize polyfluorobenzoates derived from natural products like menthol (4oa, 99%), diacetonefructose (4pa, 98%), or vanillylacetone (4qa, 99%). Excellent site selectivity was demonstrated, as the defluorination coupling occurred specifically at the para-position of the electron-withdrawing groups in all cases.


image file: d5qo01163a-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Substrate scope of the three-component coupling system. Reaction conditions: unless otherwise noted, all the reactions were carried out with 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol, 1.0 eq.), 3 (0.3 mmol, 1.5 eq.), and PC-6 (1.5 mol%) in DMSO (2 mL) at room temperature, with irradiation with a blue LED (40 W) for 24 h under a nitrogen atmosphere. Isolated yield. a[thin space (1/6-em)]3a (3.0 equiv.), 96 h.

Next, the scope of potassium alkyltrifluoroborates was tested by coupling with DABSO and 1a. The reaction was compatible with a range of potassium alkyltrifluoroborates, including both secondary (4ab and 4ae–4ag) and primary (4ac, 4ad, 4ah, and 4ai–4am) alkyl chains, delivering the corresponding products in moderate to high yields. Simple primary alkyltrifluoroborates demonstrated lower reactivity, affording products 4ac, 4ad, 4ah, and 4am in only moderate yields even with prolonged reaction times. This is likely due to the inherent challenge in generating primary alkyl radicals and their subsequent instability. In contrast, potassium benzyltrifluoroborate exhibited high reactivity, delivering products 4ai–4ak in 79–83% yields. However, the yield of 4al was significantly diminished (40%) despite modified conditions, an outcome we attribute to steric hindrance from the adjacent substituents. Cyclic alkyl potassium trifluoroborates were suitable for this transformation, delivering targets 4ae–4ag in 81–94% yields. However, attempts to employ aryl or vinyl analogues were unsuccessful.

Interestingly, pentafluorobenzoate (1r) derived from 3-methylbut-2-en-1-ol could undergo chemodivergent transformations with DABSO (2a) and potassium tert-butyl fluoroborate (3a), delivering the defluorination/sulfonylation product 4 or the further de-esterification product 4′. When the reaction was quenched in 24 hours, conventional cascade products 4ra, 4rb and 4re were isolated in 72–82% yields, while when extending the reaction time to 96 hours, tetrafluoroarylsulfones 4ra′ (90%), 4rb′ (76%), and 4re′ (70%) were generated as sole products. This methodology provides direct synthesis of otherwise difficult-to-access tetrafluoroarylsulfone derivatives.

Large-scale synthesis and late-stage functionalization were carried out to prove the synthetic value of the cascade defluorination/sulfonylation system. The 1 mmol scale synthesis of 4ka and 4ma provides targets in 75% and 53% yields, respectively (Scheme 3A). By employing sodium borohydride, 4ka can be reduced to 5a in 90% yield (Scheme 3B, left). 4ma could undergo cascade defluorinative cyclization with N1,N2-dimethylethane-1,2-diamine, generating the tetrahydropyrido[2,3-b]pyrazine scaffold 5b in 86% yield (Scheme 3B, right).


image file: d5qo01163a-s3.tif
Scheme 3 Large-scale synthesis and late-stage functionalization reactions.

We conducted preliminary mechanistic investigations to gain an understanding of the probable reaction pathways. Control experiments indicated that visible light irradiation and a photoredox catalyst were indispensable for the formation of 4aa (Scheme 4A). The addition of TEMPO (3.0 eq.) as a radical inhibitor prevented the formation of product 4ai. Additionally, the coupling product 6a can be detected in 19% yield, which suggests the possibility of formation of an alkyl radical species in the coupling system. The addition of 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene has nearly no effect on the yield, which contradicts the involvement of multifluoroaryl radicals.19 Fluorescence quenching experiments were carried out, and the excited state of PC* was preferably quenched by 3a rather than 1a; thus, the oxidative quenching mechanism seems unlikely. A reductive quenching mechanism seems preferred in combination with the reductive potential of PC* and the oxidative potential of potassium tert-butyl fluoroborate. The aforementioned conclusion is in line with the results obtained during the screening of photocatalysts provided in Table 1. Furthermore, we conducted a two-step experiment to evaluate the possibility of the formation of an intermediate. As shown in Scheme 4D, 3a and 2a were reacted under blue LED irradiation employing PC-6 as the photocatalyst for 24 h; then, 1a was added to the mixture and reacted for an additional 24 h in the absence of light. Interestingly, 4aa was isolated in 83% yield, indicating the possibility of formation of a sulfonate intermediate. Consequently, we obtained the 1H NMR spectra of the reaction mixture at different stages as shown in Scheme 4D: the initial state (0 h), after 24 h of LED irradiation, and after a subsequent 24 h following the addition of polyfluoroarene 1a. 1H NMR monitoring of the reaction mixture clearly showed the generation of the potential sulfinate intermediate 7, followed by its transformation into product 4aa by the addition of 1a.


image file: d5qo01163a-s4.tif
Scheme 4 Preliminary mechanistic investigation.

Based on previous reports and mechanistic experiments, a plausible catalytic cycle for the three-component defluorination/sulfonylation system is proposed in Scheme 5. Under LED irradiation, the generated PC* undergoes reductive quenching with 3a, generating alkyl radical species I, which is rapidly trapped by DABSO, delivering sulfonyl radical II, PCn−1 and DABCO. The reduced state PCn−1 undergoes single-electron-transfer with II, delivering the sulfonate intermediate III and regenerating ground-state PC, completing the photocatalysis cycle. Sulfonate III undergoes SNAr with polyfluoroarenes via cleavage of C–F bonds, delivering the polyfluoroarylsulfones.


image file: d5qo01163a-s5.tif
Scheme 5 Proposed catalytic cycle.

Conclusions

In summary, we have achieved the three-component synthesis of polyfluoroarylsulfones through the utilization of DABSO as a sulfonyl source under visible-light photoredox catalysis. This protocol employs RBF4K as an alkyl radical precursor and polyfluoroarenes as arylation reagents via C–F bond activation, enabling the efficient construction of value-added polyfluoroarylsulfones with broad functional group compatibility. Mechanistic studies indicate that the transformation proceeds through a cascade sequence involving photooxidative generation of alkyl radicals, SO2 trapping, SET reduction, and nucleophilic aromatic substitution (SNAr). The synergy between the high reactivity of radical intermediates and the excellent chemoselectivity of the SNAr reaction constitutes the key to the success of this radical–polar crossover strategy. This methodology enables direct C(sp2)–F bond cleavage of polyfluoroarenes under mild conditions, establishing the combination of DABSO and polyfluoroarenes as a novel, formal radical-type polyfluoroarylsulfonation surrogate that participates in the reaction, and potentially provides a modular platform for the synthesis of polyfluoroarylsulfones and their derivatives. Further application of this defluorination/sulfonylation system is ongoing in our laboratory.

Author contributions

J. S. and G. Z. conceived and designed the experiments. Y. G., J. X., K. C., K. J., Y. D., T. X., and G. Z. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. J. S., J. Q., and Q. Z. co-wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the discussions.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Data availability

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the supplementary information (SI). Supplementary information is available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5qo01163a.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (20230101047JC), the National Key R&D Program of China (2024YFA1509704), the NSFC (22471034, 22201033, 22193012, and 21831002) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities for generous financial support.

References

  1. A. Darehkordi, M. Ramezani, F. Rahmani and M. Ramezani, Design, Synthesis and Evaluation of Antibacterial Effects of a New Class of Piperazinylquinolone Derivatives, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 2015, 53, 89–94 CrossRef .
  2. V. Dudutiene, A. Zubriene, A. Smirnov, J. Gylyte, D. Timm, E. Manakova, S. Grazulis and D. Matulis, 4-Substituted-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzenesulfonamides as inhibitors of carbonic anhydrases I, II, VII, XII, and XIII, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2013, 21, 2093–2106 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  3. (a) A. Scozzafava, A. Mastrolorenzo and C. T. Supuran, Arylsulfonyl-N,N-diethyl-dithiocarbamates: a novel class of antitumor agents, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2000, 10, 1887–1891 CrossRef CAS ; (b) J. C. Medina, B. Shan, H. Beckmann, R. P. Farrell, D. L. Clark, R. M. Learned, D. Roche, A. Li, V. Baichwal, C. Case, P. A. Baeuerle, T. Rosen and J. C. Jaen, Novel antineoplastic agents with efficacy against multidrug resistant tumor cells, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1998, 8, 2653–2656 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (c) B. Shan, J. C. Medina, E. Santha, W. P. Frankmoelle, T.-C. Chou, R. M. Learned, M. R. Narbut, D. Stott, P. Wu, J. C. Jaen, T. Rosen, P. B. M. W. M. Timmermans and H. Beckmann, Selective, covalent modification of β-tubulin residue Cys-239 by T138067, an antitumor agent with in vivo efficacy against multidrug-resistant tumors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1999, 96, 5686–5691 CrossRef CAS .
  4. (a) C. A. Hargreaves, G. Sandford, R. Slater, D. S. Yufit, J. A. K. Howard and A. Vong, Synthesis of tetrahydropyrido[2,3-b]pyrazine scaffolds from 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine derivatives, Tetrahedron, 2007, 63, 5204–5211 CrossRef CAS ; (b) L. Politanskaya and E. Tretyakov, Directed synthesis of fluorine containing 2,3-dihydrobenzo[b,][1,4]oxathiine derivatives from polyfluoroarenes, J. Fluorine Chem., 2020, 236, 109592 CrossRef CAS ; (c) V. V. Litvak, A. S. Kondrat'ev and V. D. Shteimgarts, Synthesis of β-functionalized ethyl polyfluoroaryl sulfides, sulfoxides, and sulfones underlain by pentafluorobenzoic acid, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2009, 45, 1637–1643 CrossRef CAS .
  5. N. Du, G. P. Robertson, J. Song, I. Pinnau, S. Thomas and M. D. Guiver, Polymers of Intrinsic Microporosity Containing Trifluoromethyl and Phenylsulfone Groups as Materials for Membrane Gas Separation, Macromolecules, 2008, 41, 9656–9662 CrossRef CAS .
  6. J. D. Smith, A. M. Jamhawi, J. B. Jasinski, F. Gallou, J. Ge, R. Advincula, J. Liu and S. Handa, Organopolymer with dual chromophores and fast charge-transfer properties for sustainable photocatalysis, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 1837 CrossRef PubMed .
  7. (a) R. A. Bredikhin, A. M. Maksimov and V. E. Platonov, Reaction of polyfluoroarenesulfonyl bromides with allyl bromide. Synthesis of allyl polyfluoroaryl sulfones, Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2011, 47, 374–378 CrossRef CAS ; (b) R. A. Bredikhin, D. O. Usatenko, A. M. Maksimov and V. E. Platonov, Pentafluorobenzenesulfonyl Bromide: Synthesis and Reactions with Alkenes, Procedia Chem., 2015, 15, 265–271 CrossRef CAS ; (c) V. E. Platonov, R. A. Bredikhin, A. M. Maksimov and V. V. Kireenkov, A novel and efficient method for the synthesis of polyfluoroarenesulfonyl bromides from polyfluoroarenethiols, J. Fluorine Chem., 2010, 131, 13–16 CrossRef CAS .
  8. (a) H. Amii and K. Uneyama, C-F bond activation in organic synthesis, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 2119–2183 CrossRef CAS ; (b) A. Baron, G. Sandford, R. Slater, D. S. Yufit, J. A. Howard and A. Vong, Polyfunctional tetrahydropyrido[2,3-b]pyrazine scaffolds from 4-phenylsulfonyl tetrafluoropyridine, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 9377–9381 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (c) J. D. Smith, T. N. Ansari, M. P. Andersson, D. Yadagiri, F. Ibrahim, S. Liang, G. B. Hammond, F. Gallou and S. Handa, Micelle-enabled clean and selective sulfonylation of polyfluoroarenes in water under mild conditions, Green Chem., 2018, 20, 1784–1790 RSC .
  9. (a) P. Bisseret and N. Blanchard, Taming sulfur dioxide: a breakthrough for its wide utilization in chemistry and biology, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 5393–5398 RSC ; (b) E. J. Emmett and M. C. Willis, The Development and Application of Sulfur Dioxide Surrogates in Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Asian J. Org. Chem., 2015, 4, 602–611 CrossRef CAS ; (c) G. Qiu, K. Zhou, L. Gao and J. Wu, Insertion of sulfur dioxide via a radical process: an efficient route to sulfonyl compounds, Org. Chem. Front., 2018, 5, 691–705 RSC ; (d) G. Qiu, K. Zhou and J. Wu, Recent advances in the sulfonylation of C-H bonds with the insertion of sulfur dioxide, Chem. Commun., 2018, 54, 12561–12569 RSC ; (e) S. Ye, G. Qiu and J. Wu, Inorganic sulfites as the sulfur dioxide surrogates in sulfonylation reactions, Chem. Commun., 2019, 55, 1013–1019 RSC ; (f) S. Liang, K. Hofman, M. Friedrich and G. Manolikakes, Recent Advances in the Synthesis and Direct Application of Sulfinate Salts, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2020, 4664–4676 CrossRef CAS ; (g) S. Ye, M. Yang and J. Wu, Recent advances in sulfonylation reactions using potassium/sodium metabisulfite, Chem. Commun., 2020, 56, 4145–4155 RSC ; (h) D. Joseph, M. A. Idris, J. Chen and S. Lee, Recent Advances in the Catalytic Synthesis of Arylsulfonyl Compounds, ACS Catal., 2021, 11, 4169–4204 CrossRef CAS ; (i) Q. Tang, X. Yin, R. R. Kuchukulla and Q. Zeng, Recent Advances in Multicomponent Reactions with Organic and Inorganic Sulfur Compounds, Chem. Rec., 2021, 21, 893–905 CrossRef CAS ; (j) G. Chen and Z. Lian, Multicomponent Reactions Based on SO2 Surrogates: Recent Advances, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2023, e202300217 CrossRef CAS .
  10. (a) M. S. Hashtroudi, V. F. Vavsari and S. Balalaie, DABSO as a SO2 gas surrogate in the synthesis of organic structures, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2022, 20, 2149–2163 RSC ; (b) M. C. Willis and J. A. Andrews, DABSO – A Reagent to Revolutionize Organosulfur Chemistry, Synthesis, 2022, 1695–1707 CrossRef .
  11. (a) J. Zhu, W. C. Yang, X. D. Wang and L. Wu, Photoredox Catalysis in C-S Bond Construction: Recent Progress in Photo–Catalyzed Formation of Sulfones and Sulfoxides, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2017, 360, 386–400 CrossRef ; (b) S. Ye, X. Li, W. Xie and J. Wu, Photoinduced Sulfonylation Reactions through the Insertion of Sulfur Dioxide, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2019, 1274–1287 Search PubMed .
  12. (a) K. P. S. Cheung, S. Sarkar and V. Gevorgyan, Visible Light-Induced Transition Metal Catalysis, Chem. Rev., 2022, 122, 1543–1625 CrossRef PubMed ; (b) L. Capaldo, D. Ravelli and M. Fagnoni, Direct Photocatalyzed Hydrogen Atom Transfer (HAT) for Aliphatic C-H Bonds Elaboration, Chem. Rev., 2022, 122, 1875–1924 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (c) T. P. Yoon, M. A. Ischay and J. Du, Visible light photocatalysis as a greener approach to photochemical synthesis, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 527–532 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (d) C. K. Prier, D. A. Rankic and D. W. MacMillan, Visible light photoredox catalysis with transition metal complexes: applications in organic synthesis, Chem. Rev., 2013, 113, 5322–5363 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (e) R. Francke and R. D. Little, Redox catalysis in organic electrosynthesis: basic principles and recent developments, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 2492–2521 RSC ; (f) N. A. Romero and D. A. Nicewicz, Organic Photoredox Catalysis, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 10075–10166 CrossRef CAS ; (g) K. L. Skubi, T. R. Blum and T. P. Yoon, Dual Catalysis Strategies in Photochemical Synthesis, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 10035–10074 CrossRef CAS ; (h) K. Kwon, R. T. Simons, M. Nandakumar and J. L. Roizen, Strategies to Generate Nitrogen-centered Radicals That May Rely on Photoredox Catalysis: Development in Reaction Methodology and Applications in Organic Synthesis, Chem. Rev., 2022, 122, 2353–2428 CrossRef CAS ; (i) P. Melchiorre, Introduction: Photochemical Catalytic Processes, Chem. Rev., 2022, 122, 1483–1484 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (j) J. Beaudelot, S. Oger, S. Perusko, T. A. Phan, T. Teunens, C. Moucheron and G. Evano, Photoactive Copper Complexes: Properties and Applications, Chem. Rev., 2022, 122, 16365–16609 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (k) A. Y. Chan, I. B. Perry, N. B. Bissonnette, B. F. Buksh, G. A. Edwards, L. I. Frye, O. L. Garry, M. N. Lavagnino, B. X. Li, Y. Liang, E. Mao, A. Millet, J. V. Oakley, N. L. Reed, H. A. Sakai, C. P. Seath and D. W. C. MacMillan, Metallaphotoredox: The Merger of Photoredox and Transition Metal Catalysis, Chem. Rev., 2022, 122, 1485–1542 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (l) N. H. Douglas and D. A. Nicewicz, Photoredox-Catalyzed C-H Functionalization Reactions, Chem. Rev., 2022, 122, 1925–2016 CrossRef ; (m) N. L. Reed and T. P. Yoon, Oxidase reactions in photoredox catalysis, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2021, 50, 2954–2967 RSC ; (n) J. Xuan, X. K. He and W. J. Xiao, Visible light-promoted ring-opening functionalization of three-membered carbo- and heterocycles, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2020, 49, 2546–2556 RSC ; (o) S. Dutta, J. E. Erchinger, F. S. Kalthoff, R. Kleinmans and F. Glorius, Energy transfer photocatalysis: exciting modes of reactivity, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2024, 53, 1068–1089 RSC ; (p) F. S. Kalthoff, M. J. James, M. Teders, L. Pitzer and F. Glorius, Energy transfer catalysis mediated by visible light: principles, applications, directions, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, 47, 7190–7202 RSC .
  13. (a) T. Liu, Y. Ding, X. Fan and J. Wu, Photoinduced synthesis of (E)-vinyl sulfones through the insertion of sulfur dioxide, Org. Chem. Front., 2018, 5, 3153–3157 RSC ; (b) X. Wang, M. Yang, W. Xie, X. Fan and J. Wu, Photoredox-catalyzed hydrosulfonylation reaction of electron-deficient alkenes with substituted Hantzsch esters and sulfur dioxide, Chem. Commun., 2019, 55, 6010–6013 RSC ; (c) S. Tanaka, Y. Nakayama, Y. Konishi, T. Koike and M. Akita, Fluoroalkanesulfinate Salts as Dual Fluoroalkyl and SO2 Sources: Atom-Economical Fluoroalkyl-Sulfonylation of Alkenes and Alkynes by Photoredox Catalysis, Org. Lett., 2020, 22, 2801–2805 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (d) H. Wang, P. Bellotti, X. Zhang, T. O. Paulisch and F. Glorius, A base-controlled switch of SO2 reincorporation in photocatalyzed radical difunctionalization of alkenes, Chem, 2021, 7, 3412–3424 CrossRef CAS ; (e) V. T. Nguyen, G. C. Haug, V. D. Nguyen, N. T. H. Vuong, G. B. Karki, H. D. Arman and O. V. Larionov, Functional group divergence and the structural basis of acridine photocatalysis revealed by direct decarboxysulfonylation, Chem. Sci., 2022, 13, 4170–4179 RSC ; (f) H. Li, Y. Zhang, X. Yang, Z. Deng, Z. Zhu, P. Zhou, X. Ouyang, Y. Yuan, X. Chen, L. Yang, M. Liu and C. Shu, Synthesis of Multifluoromethylated gamma-Sultines by a Photoinduced Radical Addition-Polar Cyclization, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202300159 CrossRef CAS ; (g) S. Senapati, S. K. Parida, S. S. Karandikar and S. Murarka, Organophotoredox-Catalyzed Arylation and Aryl Sulfonylation of Morita-Baylis-Hillman Acetates with Diaryliodonium Reagents, Org. Lett., 2023, 25, 7900–7905 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (h) C. P. Yuan, Y. Zheng, Z. Z. Xie, K. Y. Deng, H. B. Chen, H. Y. Xiang, K. Chen and H. Yang, Photosensitized Vicinal Sulfonylamination of Alkenes with Oxime Ester and DABCO·(SO2)2, Org. Lett., 2023, 25, 1782–1786 CrossRef CAS ; (i) X. Yuan, J. Liu, H. Lv, L. Z. Qin, X. Duan, J. Wang, M. Y. Wu, B. Chen, J. K. Qiu and K. Guo, Visible-light-induced selective alkylsulfonylation of unactivated alkenes via remote heteroaryl migrations, Green Synth. Catal., 2023, 5, 126–130 Search PubMed ; (j) J. Huang, F. Liu, L. H. Zeng, S. Li, Z. Chen and J. Wu, Accessing chiral sulfones bearing quaternary carbon stereocenters via photoinduced radical sulfur dioxide insertion and Truce-Smiles rearrangement, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 7081 CrossRef CAS ; (k) H. Li, Y. Zhang, X. Zou, X. Yang, P. Zhou, X. Ma, S. Lu, Q. Sun and C. Shu, Photoinduced Regioselective Sulfonylsulfination of Alkenes, ACS Catal., 2024, 14, 3664–3674 CrossRef CAS ; (l) M. Chen, W. Sun, J. Yang, L. Yuan, J. Q. Chen and J. Wu, Metal-free photosensitized aminosulfonylation of alkenes: a practical approach to β-amido sulfones, Green Chem., 2023, 25, 3857–3863 RSC ; (m) J. E. Erchinger, R. Hoogesteger, R. Laskar, S. Dutta, C. Humpel, D. Rana, C. G. Daniliuc and F. Glorius, EnT-Mediated N-S Bond Homolysis of a Bifunctional Reagent Leading to Aliphatic Sulfonyl Fluorides, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2023, 145, 2364–2374 CrossRef CAS ; (n) V. D. Nguyen, R. Trevino, S. G. Greco, H. D. Arman and O. V. Larionov, Tricomponent Decarboxysulfonylative Cross-Coupling Facilitates Direct Construction of Aryl Sulfones and Reveals a Mechanistic Dualism in the Acridine/Copper Photocatalytic System, ACS Catal., 2022, 12, 8729–8739 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (o) C. A. Vincent, M. I. Chiriac, L. T. Gautier and U. K. Tambar, Photocatalytic Sulfonyl Fluorination of Alkyl Organoboron Substrates, ACS Catal., 2023, 13, 3668–3675 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (p) Y. Dong, N. Xiong, Z. Rong and R. Zeng, Decarboxylative Sulfonylation of Carboxylic Acids under Mild Photomediated Iron Catalysis, Org. Lett., 2024, 26, 2381–2386 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (q) W. Xiao, J. Chen and J. Wu, Radical sulfonylation with sulfur dioxide surrogates, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2025, 54, 6832–6926 RSC ; (r) F. Zhou, X. He, M. Zhou, N. Li, Q. Wang, X. Zhang and Z. Lian, Generation of perthiyl radicals for the synthesis of unsymmetric disulfides, Nat. Commun., 2025, 16, 23 CrossRef ; (s) Z. Chang, X. Zhang, H. Lv, H. Sun and Z. Lian, Three-Component Radical Cross-Coupling: Asymmetric Vicinal Sulfonyl-Esterification of Alkenes Involving Sulfur Dioxide, Adv. Sci., 2024, 2309069 CrossRef CAS .
  14. M. O. Zubkov and A. D. Dilman, Radical reactions enabled by polyfluoroaryl fragments: photocatalysis and beyond, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2024, 53, 4741–4785 RSC .
  15. (a) J. Xie, M. Rudolph, F. Rominger and A. S. K. Hashmi, Photoredox-Controlled Mono- and Di-Multifluoroarylation of C(sp3)-H Bonds with Aryl Fluorides, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 7266–7270 CrossRef CAS ; (b) A. Singh, C. J. Fennell and J. D. Weaver, Photocatalyst size controls electron and energy transfer: selectable E/Z isomer synthesis via C-F alkenylation, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, 6796–6802 RSC ; (c) Y. Yuan, M. Zhang, X. Tang, J. L. Piper, Z. H. Peng, J. A. Ma, J. Wu and F. G. Zhang, Photoinduced Defluorinative Branch-Selective Olefination of Multifluoro (Hetero)arenes, Org. Lett., 2023, 25, 883–888 CrossRef CAS ; (d) X. Sun and T. Ritter, Decarboxylative Polyfluoroarylation of Alkylcarboxylic Acids, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 10557–10562 CrossRef CAS .
  16. (a) T. Liang, Y. Wu, J. Sun, M. Li, H. Zhao, J. Zhang, G. Zheng and Q. Zhang, Visible Light–Mediated Cobalt and Photoredox Dual–Catalyzed Asymmetric Reductive Coupling for Axially Chiral Secondary Alcohols, Chin. J. Chem., 2023, 41, 3253–3260 CrossRef CAS ; (b) J. Xia, R. Ma, L. Wang, J. Sun, G. Zheng and Q. Zhang, NHC and photoredox catalysis dual-catalyzed 1,4-mono-/di-fluoromethylative acylation of 1,3-enynes, Org. Chem. Front., 2024, 11, 3089–3099 RSC ; (c) J. Xia, Y. Guo, Z. Lv, J. Sun, G. Zheng and Q. Zhang, Visible Light-Mediated Monofluoromethylation /Acylation of Olefins by Dual Organo-Catalysis, Molecules, 2024, 29, 790 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (d) J. Sun, L. Wang, G. Zheng and Q. Zhang, Recent advances in three-component radical acylative difunctionalization of unsaturated carbon–carbon bonds, Org. Chem. Front., 2023, 10, 4488–4515 RSC ; (e) L. Wang, J. Sun, J. Xia, R. Ma, G. Zheng and Q. Zhang, Visible light-mediated NHC and photoredox co-catalyzed 1,2-sulfonylacylation of allenesviaacyl and allyl radical cross-coupling, Org. Chem. Front., 2023, 10, 1047–1055 RSC ; (f) L. Wang, J. Sun, J. Xia, M. Li, L. Zhang, R. Ma, G. Zheng and Q. Zhang, Visible light-mediated NHCs and photoredox co-catalyzed radical 1,2-dicarbonylation of alkenes for 1,4-diketones, Sci. China: Chem., 2022, 65, 1938–1944 CrossRef CAS ; (g) L. Wang, R. Ma, J. Sun, G. Zheng and Q. Zhang, NHC and visible light-mediated photoredox co-catalyzed 1,4-sulfonylacylation of 1,3-enynes for tetrasubstituted allenyl ketones, Chem. Sci., 2022, 13, 3169–3175 RSC ; (h) M. Li, Y. Wu, X. Song, J. Sun, Z. Zhang, G. Zheng and Q. Zhang, Visible light-mediated organocatalyzed 1,3-aminoacylation of cyclopropane employing N-benzoyl saccharin as bifunctional reagent, Nat. Commun., 2024, 15, 8930 CrossRef CAS ; (i) M. Li, X. Song, X. Lu, J. Xia, G. Zheng and Q. Zhang, Visible light-mediated 1,3-acylative chlorination of cyclopropanes employing benzoyl chloride as bifunctional reagents in NHC catalysis, Sci. China: Chem., 2025, 68, 3628–3635 CrossRef CAS .
  17. (a) X. Li, B. Fu, Q. Zhang, X. Yuan, Q. Zhang, T. Xiong and Q. Zhang, Copper-Catalyzed Defluorinative Hydroarylation of Alkenes with Polyfluoroarenes, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 23056–23060 CrossRef CAS ; (b) Y. Zhao, B. Fu, S. Wang, Y. Li, X. Yuan, J. Yin, T. Xiong and Q. Zhang, Copper-Catalyzed Defluorinative Boroarylation of Alkenes with Polyfluoroarenes, Org. Lett., 2023, 25, 2492–2497 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  18. (a) M. Liu, X. Ouyang, C. Xuan and C. Shu, Advances in photoinduced radical–polar crossover cyclization (RPCC) of bifunctional alkenes, Org. Chem. Front., 2024, 11, 895–915 RSC ; (b) R. J. Wiles and G. A. Molander, Photoredox-Mediated Net-Neutral Radical/Polar Crossover Reactions, Isr. J. Chem., 2020, 60, 281–293 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (c) S. Sharma, J. Singh and A. Sharma, Visible Light Assisted Radical–Polar/Polar–Radical Crossover Reactions in Organic Synthesis, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2021, 363, 3146–3169 CrossRef CAS ; (d) X. Hou, H. Liu and H. Huang, Iron-catalyzed fluoroalkylative alkylsulfonylation of alkenes via radical-anion relay, Nat. Commun., 2024, 15, 1480 CrossRef CAS .
  19. (a) S. Senaweera and J. D. Weaver, Dual C-F, C-H Functionalization via Photocatalysis: Access to Multifluorinated Biaryls, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 2520–2523 CrossRef CAS PubMed ; (b) A. Singh, J. J. Kubik and J. D. Weaver, Photocatalytic C-F alkylation; facile access to multifluorinated arenes, Chem. Sci., 2015, 6, 7206–7212 RSC ; (c) F. Xue, H. Deng, C. Xue, D. K. B. Mohamed, K. Y. Tang and J. Wu, Reaction discovery using acetylene gas as the chemical feedstock accelerated by the “stop-flow” micro-tubing reactor system, Chem. Sci., 2017, 8, 3623–3627 RSC ; (d) A. U. Meyer, T. Slanina, C. J. Yao and B. König, Metal-Free Perfluoroarylation by Visible Light Photoredox Catalysis, ACS Catal., 2015, 6, 369–375 CrossRef ; (e) Y. J. Chen, W. H. Deng, J. D. Guo, R. N. Ci, C. Zhou, B. Chen, X. B. Li, X. N. Guo, R. Z. Liao, C. H. Tung and L. Z. Wu, Transition-Metal-Free, Site-Selective C-F Arylation of Polyfluoroarenes via Electrophotocatalysis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 17261–17268 CrossRef CAS .

This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2026
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.