Layers and phase identification of h- and m-GaTe via second harmonic generation

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) GaTe is a recently synthesized III–VI semiconductor that can crystallize in either a hexagonal (h) phase or a monoclinic (m) phase, and these two phases show clearly different electronic and optical anisotropies. For reliable device fabrication it is very useful to have a fast, non-destructive and low-cost method that can identify both the phase and the layer number of multilayer GaTe over a large area, but such a method has not been fully established. In this work we use first-principles calculations at both the PBE and HSE06 levels to compare, in a uniform way, the structural stability, electronic structures, linear optical responses and second-harmonic generation (SHG) properties of h- and m-GaTe from the monolayer to the pentlayer. The band gaps of the two phases decrease gradually when the layer number increases, and for five layers the band gaps are already very close to the corresponding bulk values. The evolution of symmetry is however very different. All multilayer m-GaTe and all even-layer h-GaTe are centrosymmetric, therefore their SHG responses vanish. Odd-layer h-GaTe is non-centrosymmetric and gives a strong SHG signal. The monolayer h-GaTe shows a peak SHG susceptibility of 529.30 pm V−1 at 2.15 eV, the trilayer and the pentlayer still reach 114.42 pm V−1 and 69.76 pm V−1, and these values are higher than many typical bulk nonlinear crystals calculated within the same scheme. Although the band gap becomes smaller for thicker structures, the main SHG peak of odd-layer h-GaTe does not show a clear red shift. A k-resolved analysis indicates that the dominant contribution comes from interband transitions that are localized near high-symmetry k points and not from simple band-edge transitions, which explains the nearly fixed SHG peak position. Polarization- and angle-resolved SHG patterns of odd-layer h-GaTe show a pronounced sixfold feature, so the crystal orientation can be identified directly. These results confirm that SHG can serve as a robust optical fingerprint that distinguishes h-GaTe from m-GaTe and that also distinguishes odd-layer h-GaTe from even-layer h-GaTe, and the method is fast, non-destructive and suitable for large-area inspection.

Graphical abstract: Layers and phase identification of h- and m-GaTe via second harmonic generation

Supplementary files

Transparent peer review

To support increased transparency, we offer authors the option to publish the peer review history alongside their article.

View this article’s peer review history

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
17 Nov 2025
Accepted
14 Jan 2026
First published
17 Feb 2026

Nanoscale, 2026, Advance Article

Layers and phase identification of h- and m-GaTe via second harmonic generation

S. Qiu, H. Liu, J. Hou, Z. Wei, H. Jiang and J. Gao, Nanoscale, 2026, Advance Article , DOI: 10.1039/D5NR04852D

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements