Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

An optically controlled synaptic device based on a PdSe2/α-In2Se3 vdW heterostructure FET

Anurag Ghosh, Inbar Dahan, Bisweswar Santra, Gautham Vijayan, Michael Uzhansky and Elad Koren*
Nanoscale Electronic Materials and Devices Laboratory, Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel. E-mail: eladk@technion.ac.il

Received 8th December 2025 , Accepted 13th April 2026

First published on 14th April 2026


Abstract

Visual synaptic devices show great promise for advanced neuromorphic hardware, offering a viable solution to the von Neumann bottleneck. However, achieving bidirectional optical control remains a considerable challenge. Herein, we demonstrate an all 2D heterostructure FET consisting of few-layer PdSe2 and α-In2Se3, designed as an optically controlled synaptic device with ferroelectric assisted tunability. The device emulates multiple forms of spike-dependent plasticity, exhibiting excitatory and inhibitory synaptic responses in the 642–980 nm and 406–520 nm spectral range, respectively. Moreover, the optically induced excitatory and inhibitory synapses can be modulated by an electrical gate pulse, utilizing the spontaneous polarization of α-In2Se3. By leveraging the coupled ferroelectric and optical properties of In2Se3, the device exhibits an extended retention time of post-synaptic current (PSC) and enhanced device performance in terms of responsivity (R) and detectivity (D) compared with its PdSe2-based counterparts. Logic gate operations (OR and AND) were demonstrated using 642 nm, 785 nm and 406 nm wavelengths as optical inputs. In addition, a three-layer artificial neural network (ANN) was trained to recognize a 28 × 28 pixel handwritten MNIST dataset by a backpropagation algorithm demonstrating high recognition accuracy of 96% and 97% under wavelengths of 642 nm and 406 nm, respectively. This study provides an effective strategy for the development of versatile optically controlled neuromorphic devices as fundamental building blocks for on-chip optical communication, optoelectronic logic, and Internet of Things (IoT) applications.



New concepts

Visual synaptic devices show great promise for advanced neuromorphic hardware, offering a viable solution to the von Neumann bottleneck. However, most of the reported visual synaptic devices involve hybrid manipulation approaches, which require both optical and electrical stimuli, introducing similar challenges such as complex device architecture, computational latency and high-power consumption. In this study, we demonstrate fully optical controlled operation using a 2D heterostructure neuromorphic device consisting of few-layer PdSe2 and α-In2Se3. In particular, the device emulates multiple forms of spike-dependent plasticity, with excitatory and inhibitory synaptic responses in the 642–980 nm and 406–520 nm spectral ranges, respectively. In addition, by leveraging the coupled ferroelectric and optical properties of In2Se3, the device exhibits an extended retention time of post-synaptic current (PSC) and enhanced device performance in terms of responsivity (R) and detectivity (D) compared with its PdSe2-based counterparts.

Introduction

In recent years, substantial advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to a growing demand for high-speed, low-power computational systems. The conventional von Neuman computing architecture faces inherent limitations in fulfilling these requirements due to its segregated design of the data receiver, processor, and memory units. This separation not only introduces latency but also exacerbates power consumption, posing challenges for next generation AI, big data, and the IoT.1–3 On the other hand, functional diversification at the single device level has become essential to continue the downscaling trend in the era of ‘More than Moore’.4 In recent years, extensive research has been focused on the development of neuromorphic based devices, with particular emphasis on visual synaptic operation to emulate human visual perception, memory, and logic at the single-device level.5,6

In the human neural system, sensory stimuli comes from the external world through various inputs such as vision, hearing, and smell, with the majority of ∼80% being received through visual perception.7,8 Similarly, artificial visual synapses have the potential to play a dominant role in sensory processing such as image recognition, smart detection and adaptation in real time with minimal power consumption.3 However, most of the reported visual synaptic devices involve hybrid manipulation approaches with both optical and electrical stimuli, introducing similar challenges such as operational complexity, computational latency and high-power consumption, due to bandwidth-connection density trade-off.2,5,9–16 For example, Wang et al. demonstrated a retina-like vision sensor based on a van der Waals (vdW) heterostructure (HS) field-effect transistor (FET); in this device, a continuous gate bias was required to obtain a negative photoresponse for bipolar cell like functionality, which complicates device operation.5 Conventionally, optical stimulation is associated with potentiation, representing the learning process, while electrical stimulation is linked to depression, corresponding to the forgetting process.14,17,18 Inspired by the neural system from the human retina, a fully optical controlled synaptic device can overcome these challenges providing high bandwidth, low crosstalk, ultralow power consumption and simplified hardware design.3,18–20 Such optically modulated synapses rely on positive photoconductivity (PPC) and negative photoconductivity (NPC) for potentiation and depression, respectively.21 Recently, heterostructures composed of different non-layered materials as well as the integration of 2D materials with conventional bulk materials have been employed to realize all-optically controlled visual synapses such as IGZO/SnO/SnS, ZnAlSnO/SnO, perovskite/ZnO etc.3,18,20,22,23

Moreover, several studies have explored optically controlled visual synapses solely based on vdW materials, which can further utilize their exceptional optoelectronic properties and dangling-bond-free surfaces for advancing the downscaling trend in modern electronics.2,4,24–29 In this regard, PdSe2 has garnered significant attention due to its wavelength-dependent bidirectional photoresponse, high carrier mobility of 40[thin space (1/6-em)]000 cm−2 V−1 s−1, thickness-dependent bandgap (ranging from 1.3 eV for the monolayer to 0.03 eV for the bulk), and excellent air stability,27,30 making it particularly advantageous for low power broadband photodetection applications across the UV to IR spectrum.27,31 The reported synaptic operation in these devices primarily explained either through a charge trapping mechanism at the interface between the channel and substrate or via slow carrier recombination facilitated by oxidation-induced localized traps at the channel surface. Hence, the PSC exhibits volatile characteristics due to limited trapping strength and significant variability due to altered interfacial charactersitics.26,27,32,33 In contrast, non-volatile synaptic memristors provide an excellent platform for maintaining long-term synaptic weights.34 In particular, coupling interfacial trapped charges with ferroelectricity can significantly extend the retention time of PSC levels and enhance the functionality and performance of 2D based neuromorphic devices.32,33,35 In this regard, α-In2Se3 has emerged as a promising material for neuromorphic applications, primarily due to its unique ferroelectric properties.9,12,36–38 It exhibits room-temperature, intercoupled in plane (IP) and out of plane (OOP) ferroelectricity down to the monolayer limit alongside excellent optical properties.39,40 In particular, its remanent polarization enables non-volatile memory (NVM) characteristics without requiring a continuous applied voltage,41,42 where its direct bandgap and efficient light absorption, make it a suitable platform for multibit optical random access memory (O-RAM), in-memory sensing and logic applications utilized by streamlined read–write operations via a combination of optical and electrical pulses.2,43

Herein, we have integrated few layers of semiconducting PdSe2 and ferroelectric In2Se3 to realize a bidirectionally optical controlled 2D synaptic device with ferroelectric assisted tunability. In this heterostructure, PdSe2 serves as the FET channel, while In2Se3 acts as the virtual gate medium through dipole arrangements, modulating both the conducting state and photoresponse. In particular, the device demonstrates excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) and inhibitory postsynaptic current (IPSC) under illumination with wavelengths in the ranges of 642–980 nm and 406–520 nm, respectively. The device can effectively replicate all kinds of synaptic plasticity such as spike-duration-dependent plasticity (SDDP), spike-number-dependent plasticity (SNDP), spike-rate-dependent plasticity (SRDP), and intensity-dependent plasticity for both potentiation and inhibition. The EPSC at longer wavelengths arises from the PPC effect of both PdSe2 and In2Se3, with In2Se3 predominantly generating electron–hole pairs due to its direct bandgap nature. Conversely, the IPSC is attributed to the NPC behaviour of PdSe2, stemming from oxygen desorption and light-induced defect states under shorter wavelengths.27,44 Moreover, intense 406 nm light can be employed to use the device in a reconfigurable manner by enabling a rapid RESET process. As a result, the device can be implemented and reconfigured for basic logic gate operations such as ‘OR’ and ‘AND’ solely by using visible light as input signals. In addition, the optically induced EPSC and IPSC can be further modulated with an electrical gate pulse leveraging the ferroelectric property of In2Se3. Based on the device characteristics, a simulation-based ANN was utilized to process a 28 × 28 pixel handwritten dataset using a backpropagation algorithm demonstrating a high recognition accuracy of 96% for 642 nm and 97% for 406 nm. The presented vdW HS device enables precise modulation of synaptic response by pulse amplitude, duration, and frequency of both optical and electrical signals, showcasing a promising platform for neuromorphic and optoelectronic applications.

Results and discussion

Device structure and characterization

In biological systems, neural networks consist of a vast array of hierarchically organized interconnected neurons communicating through synapses (Fig. 1a).21 Depending on the input stimuli, the pre-synaptic membrane releases different types of neurotransmitters that results in either an EPSC or IPSC. An equivalent artificial synapse can be realized using a three-terminal FET architecture, where the channel functions as the synapse, and the channel current (ID) represents the PSC. Presynaptic signals can be applied in the form of optical or electrical pulses. In our fabricated system the gate terminal was used as a modulatory input to regulate or attenuate the EPSC and IPSC induced by optical pulses.
image file: d5mh02349a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) Schematic illustration of biological and artificial synapses. Two types of neurotransmitters determine the firing state of the post neuron being either excitatory or inhibitory. The generated EPSC or IPSC can be further controlled by the modulatory input. The equivalent artificial synapse of three terminal FET architecture where the PSC is primarily generated by the optical input and further modulated by the gate electrical input. (b) Schematic diagram of the PdSe2–In2Se3 neuromorphic device. (c) Topographic and optical image of the device. (d) Height profile of the PdSe2 and In2Se3 flakes. (e) Raman spectra of PdSe2 (black spot in (c)), In2Se3 (red spot) and the heterostructure (blue spot). (f) Temporal photoresponse under successive illumination of 642 nm and 406 nm light pulses (frequency = 1 Hz, pulse width = 0.5 s).

To realize an optically controlled synaptic behaviour with an additional degree of freedom to modulate the optical synapse by gate actuation, an artificial synaptic FET is proposed based on an In2Se3–PdSe2 heterostructure (Fig. 1b). α-In2Se3 was exfoliated using a conventional scotch tape method on a prepatterned conductive Si substrate coated with 300 nm thick SiO2. Few-layer PdSe2 was exfoliated onto a PDMS stamp and subsequently transferred onto In2Se3 using a dry transfer method (see the Methods section). To achieve an asymmetric geometry, PdSe2 was partially deposited over α-In2Se3,45,46 enabling a balance between the PPC effect of α-In2Se3 and the NPC effect of PdSe2. A comprehensive explanation of this configuration is provided in the Operation Mechanism section. In2Se3 was employed as a gate-switching medium, leveraging its ferroelectric properties, while PdSe2 served as the FET channel. A global back gate was utilized for ferroelectric polarization modulation, and light illumination served as the primary input stimulus to regulate the PSC. PdSe2 flakes with a thickness of 10–15 nm and In2Se3 flakes with a thickness of 15–20 nm were selected for device fabrication (Fig. 1c and d). Raman spectroscopy was conducted to assess the crystalline quality of the 2D flakes prior to the optoelectronic measurements (Fig. 1e). The Raman signals were collected from different regions of the device, as indicated in the optical micrograph of the device (Fig. 1c). The black spectrum represents pristine PdSe2, exhibiting four characteristic peaks at ∼147.1 cm−1, ∼210.7 cm−1, ∼226.7 cm−1, and ∼261 cm−1, which correspond to the A1g–B11g, A2g, B21g, and A3g vibrational modes, respectively.27,31 The red spectrum corresponds to pristine In2Se3, which exhibits a sharp characteristic peak at ∼106 cm−1, attributable to the A1 (LO + TO) phonon mode and two additional twin peaks, observed at ∼183.4 cm−1 and ∼199.4 cm−1 that are assigned to the A1 (LO) and A1 (TO) phonon modes, respectively. The LO–TO splitting of the A1 mode provides well established evidence of centrosymmetry breaking and the emergence of ferroelectricity in In2Se3.39,42,47 Additional direct evidence of non-volatile ferroelectric switching in α-In2Se3 using piezoelectric microscopy (PFM) measurements are shown in Fig. S1 and are in agreement with previous reports.48–53 The blue spectrum represents the Raman signal from the overlapping region, where all the characteristic peaks of both In2Se3 and PdSe2 are observed.

As discussed above, the device exhibits both potentiation (EPSC) and inhibition (IPSC) states using two characteristic wavelengths, 642 nm and 406 nm, respectively without relying on any additional electrical control. Fig. 1f illustrates the change in drain current following stimulation by multiple light pulses of 642 nm followed by 406 nm at a frequency of 1 Hz. A low read voltage of 100 mV (VD) was applied to measure the drain current through the PdSe2 channel. Closer inspection reveals that the device shows an instant PPC under 406 nm illumination, whereas ID gradually decreases as the time of illumination is prolonged (Fig. S2). Additionally, the device demonstrates IPSC under 520 nm stimulation, although the rate of achieving the depression is milder compared to at 406 nm (Fig. S3a and b). Similarly, the device demonstrates potentiation characteristics under illumination extended up to 980 nm, as PdSe2 is capable of sensing light within the infrared range as well (Fig. S3c).

Optically induced synaptic plasticity

To demonstrate that the device effectively replicates various forms of spike-dependent plasticity solely through optical stimulation for both potentiation and inhibition, two representative wavelengths of 642 nm and 406 nm were selected. To demonstrate the variation from short-term plasticity (STP) to long-term plasticity (LTP), the device was exposed to 642 nm light illumination for 10 consecutive pulses of different durations with the same time interval (Fig. 2a). As the pulse duration increases from 10 ms to 500 ms, the PSC level (following the 10th pulse) increased from ∼3.5 nA to ∼18 nA. A similar behaviour was observed by varying the number of pulses (SNDP) while maintaining the same pulse duration (0.5 s) and frequency (1 Hz) (Fig. 2b) and by varying the light intensity (Fig. 2c). Fig. 2d depicts the modulation from STP to LTP demonstrating SRDP by varying the time interval (Δt) between two consecutive pulses for a time duration of 100 s, while maintaining a constant pulse width of 1 s. In particular, the PSC level decreases from ∼26 nA to ∼10 nA, as Δt increases from 0.2 s to 25 s. To obtain further insight into the correlation between memory level and Δt, we have calculated the paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) index, which is a critical parameter used to characterize STP in biological synapses,18,27 using the following equation:
 
image file: d5mh02349a-t1.tif(1)

image file: d5mh02349a-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) STP to LTP transition under illumination by varying pulse width of light at a wavelength of 642 nm. (b) EPSC triggered by a different number of 642 nm light pulses (pulse width = 0.5 s, frequency = 1 Hz). (c) EPSC triggered by varying intensities of 642 nm light with a pulse width of 10 s. (d) EPSC triggered by different pulse intervals (Δt) of 642 nm light (pulse duration = 1 s). (e) EPSC stimulated by two consecutive 642 nm light pulses at intervals of 10 s, where A1 and A2 represent the amplitude of photocurrent achieved after the 1st and 2nd pulse respectively. (f) PPF index as a function of pulse interval. (g) STD to LTD transition by different pulse widths of 406 nm light. (h) IPSC triggered by a different number of 406 nm light pulses (pulse width = 0.5 s, frequency = 1 Hz). (i) IPSC stimulated by different intensities of 406 nm light with pulse width of 10 s. (j) STD to LTD transition with different pulse intervals of 406 nm light. (k) IPSC stimulated by two consecutive 406 nm light pulses at 10 s intervals. (l) PPF index as a function of pulse interval.

Here, A1 and A2 represent the amplitudes of the photocurrent corresponding to the first and second pulses, respectively, as illustrated in Fig. 2e. As shown in Fig. 2f, the PPF index exhibits an exponential dependence on Δt, aligning well with the principles of neurobiology.3 The calculated data were fitted using the following equation:

 
image file: d5mh02349a-t2.tif(2)
where, C1 and C2 represent the initial magnitudes, while τ1 and τ2 denote the fast and slow relaxation time constants, respectively. Based on eqn (2), the extracted values of τ1 and τ2 were found to be 0.5 s and 8.78 s, respectively. Notably, the device achieved a maximum PPF index of 138% at Δt = 0.2 s, demonstrating its decent performance compared to recently reported studies.3,18

Analogous forms of synaptic plasticity associated with inhibitory responses were successfully demonstrated, as shown in Fig. 2g–l, indicating that the transition from short term depression (STD) to long term depression (LTD) can be achieved through 406 nm excitation. Notably, Fig. 2g, that illustrates SDDP, highlights the intriguing interplay between PPC and NPC under 406 nm exposure, where for the shortest pulse durations (50 ms), the device exhibits a small potentiation trend driven by the PPC effect. However, as the pulse duration increases, the NPC effect becomes dominant, leading to a depression state. This behaviour underscores the dynamic competition between two opposing photoconductive effects governing the synaptic response. Similarly, the PPF index associated with the inhibitory process under 406 nm stimulation is presented in Fig. 2h, where τ1 and τ2 are calculated to be 1.12 s and 1.36 s, respectively. These results emphasize the device versatility in emulating complex synaptic behaviours by using two representative wavelengths. Although bidirectional synaptic plasticity can be realized without the application of an external gate voltage, the polarization state of In2Se3 can be deterministically programmed by applying a gate-voltage pulse prior to optical stimulation enabling further tunability of the synaptic response, as discussed in the following section.

Polarization dependent optical synapse

The optically induced synaptic plasticity of the PdSe2–In2Se3 device can be further modulated through electrical gate pulses, harnessed by the ferroelectric properties of In2Se3. Electric polarization dependent measurements were conducted for both 406 and 642 nm wavelengths following different gate induced poling conditions. In the first step, an electrical gate pulse of different amplitude and polarity was applied to align the dipoles in In2Se3. Following the poling process, a 2 min delay time was obtained before performing the ID-t measurements with light pulses to minimize gate-induced trapping effects (Fig. S4a and b). Subsequently, the device was subjected to a series of light pulses at an interval of 10 s with a duration of 1 s. As shown in Fig. 3a, the photocurrent for 642 nm light illumination increases with the transition of gate poling conditions from negative to positive, resulting in higher PSC levels. Fig. 3b demonstrates the progressive increase in photocurrent for the 1st and 10th light pulses, rising from 19.8 nA to 50 nA and 23 nA to 62 nA, respectively as the poling condition changes from −VG to +VG, resulting in enhanced EPSC. Additionally, the difference in photocurrent between the 1st and 10th pulse grows with positive gate voltage, corroborating the observation that under distinct poling conditions, the photocurrent requires different amounts of time to reach the saturation level. This demonstrates the capability to achieve distinct current levels for LTP, independent of pulse duration and frequency. Furthermore, the PPF function shows a clear linear dependence on the gate poling conditions for an identical input stimulus (Fig. S4c), enabling control of the potentiation level by applying an electrical gate pulse beforehand. Such linear behavior of the PPF was observed across all measured devices. The EPSC following two opposite poling conditions of ±90 V with various frequencies of light pulses is presented in Fig. S5, confirming that the variable current level for LTP can be effectively established by introducing an electrical gate pulse.
image file: d5mh02349a-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (a) Gate modulation of synaptic plasticity under 642 nm excitation (pulse duration = 1 s, frequency of 0.1 Hz). (b) Photoresponse measured (under 642 nm) after the 1st and 10th light pulses and EPSC measured after the 10th pulse with respect to gate actuation. (c) Gate modulation of synaptic plasticity under 406 nm excitation. (d) Photoresponse measured (under 406 nm) after the 1st and 10th light pulses and IPSC measured after the 10th pulse with respect to gate actuation.

Similar gate modulation was observed associated with the IPSC under 406 nm exposure (Fig. 3c and Fig. S5f). In particular, a distinct level of LTD ranging from −3 nA to −15.6 nA is obtained depending on the gate induced poling conditions. It is important to note that for the IPSC (EPSC) measurements, the PSC levels following negative (positive) gate poling are rather closely spaced in comparison with those obtained following positive (negative) gate actuation. This can be clearly seen in the representative figures showing that the adjacent profiles representing opposite gate polarities are rather closely spaced. Therefore, for better visualization, we have included few representative profiles to show the effect of modulation. Complete datasets with uniform gate intervals are provided in Fig. S6. The device exhibits the highest levels of both IPSC and EPSC under positive poling attributed to the strongest photoresponse due to the dipole-induced band alignment of the heterostructure device (see further discussion below). As mentioned above, there is competition between PPC and NPC during the inhibition process, which is clearly observable in Fig. 3d. Although the photoresponse for both the 1st and 10th light pulses increases with positive gate poling, the photoresponse of the 10th pulse is lower than that of the 1st pulse for each poling condition. This indicates that the NPC effect from PdSe2 becomes increasingly dominant with time until overcoming the PPC effect from In2Se3.

The presence of In2Se3 significantly enhances the overall photoresponse of the device and its intrinsic ferroelectric field plays a key role in sustaining the PSC levels over extended periods. This behaviour was confirmed by comparing between the ID-t measurements (Fig. S7a–c) conducted under 642 nm and 406 nm pulses for PdSe2 and the HS FET. The enhanced photoresponse behaviour (under 642 nm illumination) is further supported by the calculated responsivity (R) and detectivity (D) values of the PdSe2 and the HS FET (Fig. S7a). In particular, the responsivity is measured to be 2.11 A W−1 for the HS FET and 0.07 A W−1 for the PdSe2 FET. The nearly 30 times increase in responsivity in the HS FET is attributed to the direct bandgap nature of In2Se3, which enables superior photon absorption compared to the indirect bandgap of PdSe2.

Detectivity was found to be 0.75 × 1010 Jones for the HS FET and 0.87 × 108 Jones for the PdSe2 FET, demonstrating that the integration of In2Se3 enhances detectivity by nearly two orders of magnitude. It is also important to note that the presented current levels are device specific due to geometry variations of the FET channel area and heterojunction overlap between the In2Se3 and the PdSe2 components. All calculated parameters correspond to measurements, that were performed at a drain bias of 100 mV.

Operation mechanism

To understand the bidirectional photoresponse of the device, IDVG measurements were performed under dark and illuminated conditions. As shown in Fig. 4a, the transfer curve consists of a hysteretic loop attributed to both ferroelectric dipole switching and trapping–de-trapping process at the In2Se3–PdSe2 interface. Our discussion focuses on the photoresponse at VG = 0 V as the operational condition relevant for synaptic measurements corresponding to the shaded region in Fig. 4a (magnified in Fig. 4b). The device demonstrates an increase in conductivity under 642 nm light illumination in both sweep directions, indicative of usual positive photoconductive behaviour, in agreement with the observed synaptic response. The magnified view shown in Fig. 4b highlights that the photoresponse following negative poling (forward sweep) is slightly lower than that following positive poling (backward sweep, marked as regions I and II), consistent with the polarization dependent photoresponse results. The PPC effect observed under 642 nm illumination is attributed to both In2Se3 and PdSe2, as both materials absorb this wavelength. In particular, photogenerated charges that are absorbed in the In2Se3 can transfer to the PdSe2 channel enhancing the overall photoresponse of the device.
image file: d5mh02349a-f4.tif
Fig. 4 (a) Transfer characteristic curve under darkness and under light illumination (VD = 100 mV). (b) Enlarged figure of the circle area in (a). (c) IDVD curve of the device measured under dark, continuous and sudden 406 nm light illumination. Sudden illumination results in instant PPC but a gradual transition to NPC. (d) Schematic representation of the channel conducting state and dipole arrangement following negative (I) and positive (II) gate actuations under dark (left) and light (right) conditions for 642 nm and 406 nm. (e) Energy band diagram of the PdSe2–In2Se3 HS interface and charge transfer characteristics of photogenerated carriers following negative (top) and positive (bottom) gate actuations. Solid circles refer to electrons and hollow circles refers to holes. Photocurrent mapping of the device following (f) +90 V gate poling, and (g) −90 V gate poling. (h) Line profiles of the photocurrent along the blue dotted lines in (f) and (g) following ±90 V and ±60 V gate poling. Energy band diagrams of the PdSe2 channel following (i) +90 V gate poling, and (j) −90 V gate poling. Red lines refer to the conduction and valence bands of PdSe2. White arrows in the blue shaded box depict the OOP and IP dipole orientation in In2Se3.

The transfer characteristics were also measured under 406 nm light illumination (blue curve in Fig. 4a) to consider the IPSC, where a clear light-induced doping effect is evident, manifested by a leftward shift of the IDVG curve with respect to dark conditions. Such n-type doping effect causes an unusual NPC effect in the PdSe2 channel. Previous studies have reported that PdSe2 exhibits NPC under shorter visible wavelength illumination by light-induced defect states, resulting in oxygen desorption from its surface.27,44,54 In particular, 406 nm light illumination causes oxygen adatoms to be ejected from the surface, leaving behind electrons, resulting in an n-type doping effect (Fig. S8). Similarly, high energy photons of short wavelength create Se vacancy sites, introducing shallow electronic trapping states near the conduction band, resulting in n-type device characteristics.27,44 Recent experiment and theoretical studies validated the effect of environmental oxygen pressure on this NPC effect in PdSe2 as well as in PtSe2 and PtTe2.55–57 The degree of doping level with varying light intensity is presented in Fig. S9. IDVD measurements in Fig. 4c further reveal that 406 nm light stimulation induces an instant PPC, mainly attributed to carrier generation in the underlying In2Se3. As time progresses, the current decreases below the dark current level, indicating the dominance of the NPC effect from PdSe2. In comparison, a fully symmetric HS device in which PdSe2 is completely supported by In2Se3 presents a minor leftward shift in transfer curve under continuous 406 nm light illumination (Fig. S10a), due to the dominant PPC effect by the In2Se3. Therefore, by strategically designing a partially covered In2Se3 layer by the PdSe2 device, the two opposing photoconductive effects are jointly present, achieving both EPSC and IPSC by optical stimulation.

To interpret the polarization dependent photoresponse and the underlying charge transfer across the In2Se3–PdSe2 interface, device configurations for opposite poling conditions under dark and illuminated states are schematically presented in Fig. 4d. Following negative gate poling, the OOP electric dipoles arrange such that they point away from the PdSe2 side, leading to positive holes trapping at the interface between PdSe2 and In2Se3 and n-type channel characteristics. Conversely, following positive poling, p-type channel characteristics are introduced. The IDVG curve of the symmetric HS FET similarly confirms that PdSe2, shifts from n-type ambipolarity to p-type ambipolarity following two opposite poling conditions, due to the ferroelectric polarization within the underlying In2Se3 (Fig. S10). In addition, in the case of an asymmetric HS FET, the intercoupled IP dipoles form a hole (electron) region in PdSe2 next to the edge of In2Se3 following the negative (positive) poling (see the sections below).39,45,46 Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) was used to determine the relative energy band positions of In2Se3 and PdSe2 (Fig. S11). In particular, the Fermi level of In2Se3 lies 0.39 eV above Au, while that of PdSe2 is 0.251 eV below In2Se3. These relative Fermi level positions in the pristine state are consistent with previous reports based on UPS, KPFM, and theoretical studies.58–60

Based on the measured surface potential characteristics of the In2Se3–PdSe2 heterojunction, energy band diagrams of the In2Se3–PdSe2 interface are depicted in Fig. 4e, where blue and red shaded lines denote the band structure of In2Se3 and PdSe2, respectively following different gate-induced ferroelectric polarization. For negative poling, the energy bands of PdSe2 bend downward. As a result, the conduction band of PdSe2 shifts closer to the Fermi level as it forms an n-type channel (as evident by the IDVG profiles of the symmetric HS). Since the work function of PdSe2 is higher than that of In2Se3, the energy bands of In2Se3 bend upwards, creating a built-in potential at the interface.59 Under illumination, photogenerated electrons from the In2Se3 layer cannot efficiently transfer to the PdSe2 channel due to this potential barrier, resulting in a reduced photoresponse. In contrast, following positive gate poling, the energy bands of PdSe2 bend upward and the valence band becomes close to the Fermi level. Since the FET channel is now formed by holes, photogenerated holes can favourably move across the In2Se3–PdSe2 interface leading to a higher photoresponse compared to the negative poling condition.

Depending on the gate poling history, photogenerated charges (e or h), become confined at the interface due to the OOP of In2Se3. This attractive field stabilizes the trapped charges for an extended period acting as a virtual gate voltage resulting in a longer PSC in the HS FET. In contrast, in pristine PdSe2 FET, light-induced trapped charges at the PdSe2–SiO2 interface rapidly decay resulting in the absence of PSC due to the lack of a dipolar field. The role of dipolar field in sustaining the PSC level is further verified by measuring IDt in both the symmetric and asymmetric HS FETs (Fig. S7d).

To experimentally validate the above-mentioned device electronic configuration, scanning photocurrent microscopy (SPCM) was performed following different poling conditions (Fig. 4f–h and Fig. S12). During the measurements, the drain bias was kept at 0 V to directly probe the ferroelectrically induced lateral built-in electric fields formed across the PdSe2 channel. A 532 nm laser with an incident power of ∼0.3 mW was used to scan the device area. The device geometry is outlined by the white lines in Fig. 4f, and the corresponding optical micrograph and scanned area are presented in Fig. S13a.

Photocurrent maps following +90 V and −90 V poling are shown in Fig. 4f and g, respectively. Fig. 4h shows the corresponding line profiles along the blue dotted path drawn in Fig. 4f and g, where the red and black traces represent positive and negative poling states, respectively. Following positive poling, a positive photocurrent peak is observed next to the In2Se3 edge (region I), whereas following negative poling, the photocurrent reverses its direction in region I and an additional positive peak emerges a few microns away from the In2Se3 edge (region II). This photocurrent polarity modulation directly stems from the reversal of both IP and OOP ferroelectric dipoles within the underlying In2Se3. In particular, under positive poling, OOP dipoles induce a p-type channel within the overlapping HS region, whereas IP dipoles give rise to localized n-type doping in PdSe2 next to the In2Se3 edge (region I), forming a p–n junction (Fig. 4i). Given that the native PdSe2 is slightly n-type (Fig. S13b), the influence of IP dipoles can extend further into the PdSe2 channel. Conversely, following negative poling and dipole reversal, an n–p junction is formed and the photocurrent becomes negative (region I in Fig. 4j). Meanwhile, IP dipoles accumulate holes over a limited range, resulting in the formation of a secondary p–i junction at region II, forming a positive photocurrent peak. The observed modulations in the built-in electric fields across the PdSe2 channel confirm the reversal of ferroelectric dipole configuration following alternating gate actuations. Moreover, the evolution of photocurrent amplitude with varying gate-poling voltages (photocurrent maps for ±60 V gate poling conditions are shown in Fig. S13c and d, respectively) is consistent with the device conductive state for different gate voltage sweep ranges, as shown in Fig. S13e and f. Fig. S13b shows negligible hysteresis in the PdSe2 FET, confirming the absence of a non-volatile electrostatic gating effect at the PdSe2/SiO2 interface. Moreover, the IDt characteristics measured after opposite gate actuations (±90 V) under 642 nm illumination exhibit no significant current variations, indicating that the non-volatile electrostatic gating originates exclusively from the heterostructure region due to dipole switching within the In2Se3 (Fig. S14). It is important to note that the electrical measurements of the asymmetric heterostructure were conducted at a low drain voltage (VD) of 100 mV, where negligible non-linear junction characteristics were observed. However, at higher drain voltages, the device exhibits a mild rectifying behavior due to junctions formation (Fig. S15) indicating that the polarity of the high drain bias (+/−1 V) can affect the overall carrier modulation across the device.45 Similar electrical and optical characteristics have been observed in other devices (Fig. S16) demonstrating the reproducibility of our results.

Binary logic operation and image recognition

A primary objective of a bidirectional optical synaptic device is to enable SET/RESET operations solely through light stimulation, ensuring a reconfigurable functionality without the reliance on continuous electrical control. Furthermore, integrating Boolean logic operations into such optically controlled synaptic devices would offer significant advantages, particularly for on-chip optical communication and photonic integrated circuits.20,61 In this section, we demonstrate that the In2Se3–PdSe2 synaptic device can be rapidly RESET using high-intensity (>0.17 mW mm−2) 406 nm light, exploiting the NPC effect of PdSe2 at this wavelength, where the ferroelectric nature of In2Se3 enables the IPSC to be retained for an extended period of time after light illumination. Hence, a 642 nm light pulse can be employed for optical write operations, while 406 nm light enables the optical erase operation to be performed. Fig. 5a illustrates reconfigurable synaptic operations through optical write and optical erase cycles. Measurements were carried out using a sequence of light pulses from both wavelengths, with no prior application of any poling condition, thereby keeping In2Se3 in its natively poled state. It is evident that the transistor “on” state can be effectively switched off within 5 seconds by the application of 406 nm light, demonstrating the optical reset capability of the device. Next, two fundamental logic functions i.e., ‘OR’ and ‘AND’ are demonstrated by exploiting the bidirectional photoresponse of this device. Fig. 5b illustrates the experimental concept, where two wavelengths 642 nm and 785 nm, serve as inputs A and B, respectively. Additionally, 406 nm light is employed as a modulatory input to switch the operation from OR to AND. In the input logic scheme, the presence of light is designated as logic “1”, whereas the absence of light corresponds to logic “0”. For the output logic, a threshold current of 0.55 µA was defined, such that output currents exceeding this threshold are classified as logic “1”, while currents below the threshold are classified as logic “0”. The output current was measured under a drain bias of 100 mV. As observed in Fig. 5b, when either input A (642 nm) or input B (785 nm) are on (representing 10 or 01 state), the output current exceeds the threshold value, resulting in an output logic of “1”. Conversely, when both light inputs are off (00 state), the output current remains below the threshold, yielding an output logic of “0”. This behaviour aligns with the truth table of an OR gate. Subsequently, a 406 nm light pulse was applied to reduce the initial current level, enabling the implementation of an AND gate operation. It can be observed that while only one of the inputs, A or B, is active, the output current does not reach the threshold value, whereas when both inputs, A and B, are active (11 state), the threshold is exceeded and thus represents the functionality of an AND gate. Similarly, NOR and NAND gate logic operations can be potentially realized by increasing the initial current level (above 0.55 µA as state ‘1’) using 642 nm laser illumination and then utilizing 406 nm and 520 nm as input A and input B.
image file: d5mh02349a-f5.tif
Fig. 5 (a) Optical write & optical erase functionalities with 642 nm and 406 nm light pulses (frequency = 1 Hz) in the unpoled PdSe2–In2Se3 HS device. (b) Boolean logic gate operations (OR & AND) with 642 nm and 785 nm as the two input signals and 406 nm as the modulatory input (VD = 100 mV). (c) Schematic diagram of a three-layer artificial neural network used for simulation of MNIST handwritten digit recognition. (d) The training and test accuracies as a function of the epoch of the 28 × 28 pixel handwritten digit images with red (642 nm) and blue (406 nm) light pulses of 1 Hz frequencies. (e) and (f) The desired and predicted “5’ of the MNIST training data set and arbitrary images using a three-layer ANN, respectively.

Finally, the experimentally observed conductance variations for LTP and LTD (Fig. S17) were directly implemented using a software-based artificial neural network (ANN) to perform neuromorphic simulations. For this purpose, a three-layer ANN was constructed, consisting of an input layer (784 neurons), a hidden layer (128 neurons), and an output layer with 10 neurons representing the class of digits ‘0’–‘9’ (Fig. 5c). The hidden layer plays a key role in determining the network performance, as it contains activation functions that process the nonlinear behavior within the ANN. Rectified Linear Units (ReLU) were used as activation functions for the hidden layer, while the ‘Adam’ optimizer was employed for training the output layer. A ‘sparse categorical cross-entropy’ loss function was used as the objective function (SI).62 For neuromorphic simulation, the Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology (MNIST) handwritten digit database was utilized, containing 60[thin space (1/6-em)]000 grayscale images for training and 10[thin space (1/6-em)]000 for testing and validation. Fig. 5d presents the training and test accuracies as a function of training epochs. As shown in Fig. 5d and Table S1, the device achieves excellent classification performance for both red (642 nm, 1 Hz) and blue (406 nm, 1 Hz) light-driven device parameters, demonstrating its ability to emulate a bidirectionally optical controlled artificial synaptic system for neuromorphic hardware applications. Interestingly, blue-light-driven recognition achieves its maximum accuracy with fewer epochs than the red-light case (Table S1). This behaviour can be attributed to the experimentally observed conductance response under blue light, which exhibits smaller variations and a more linear modulation behaviour. Finally, the artificial neural network was employed for image recognition, with the desired and predicted images of the digit “5” from the MNIST dataset (Fig. 5e) and for an additional arbitrary image (Fig. 5f), exhibiting near-identical features.

Summary

In summary, we demonstrate a bidirectional optical synapse with ferroelectric assisted tunability based on a vdW HS FET, by partially overlapping PdSe2 on top of ferroelectric In2Se3. The device effectively emulates all forms of synaptic plasticity using visible light. Excitatory synaptic behaviour was achieved under illumination at 642 nm, 785 nm, and 980 nm, while inhibitory synaptic behaviour was observed for 520 nm and 406 nm wavelengths. PdSe2 primarily enables an optically induced IPSC to be achieved due to oxygen desorption from its surface under illumination with light at wavelengths of 406 nm and 520 nm. To achieve a balance between PPC and NPC under 406 nm or 520 nm light, a partially overlapping configuration was designed. For both EPSC and IPSC effects, In2Se3 plays a crucial role by facilitating photocarrier generation and by controlling interlayer charge separation and channel conductance through dipolar rearrangement. Furthermore, gate induced polarization reversal enables further electrical handle to control the optically induced PSC levels. The precise modulation of synaptic behaviours, achieved through both optical and hybrid optical–electrical inputs, underscores the device suitability for advanced neuromorphic vision systems. This was demonstrated by utilizing the bidirectional photoresponse for a reconfigurable optical-write optical-erase logic platform and image recognition functionality, showcasing its versatility for next-generation neuromorphic hardware systems, on chip optical communication and optoelectronic applications at the nanoscale level.

Experimental section

Sample preparation

In2Se3 (HQ Graphene) flakes were directly exfoliated onto a pre-patterned SiO2 surface using the conventional scotch tape exfoliation method. The first few layers of In2Se3 were removed from the bulk crystal to eliminate surface oxide layers and minimize undesirable contamination. Few layers of PdSe2 (HQ Graphene) were exfoliated onto a PDMS stamp, which was mounted onto a glass slide. An optical microscope (Olympus BX53M) equipped with a digital camera (Olympus UC90) was employed to identify suitable flakes. Using a dry transfer technique, selected PdSe2 flakes were precisely aligned and transferred onto the In2Se3 surface with the aid of an XYZ micro-manipulator stage attached to the optical microscope.

Device fabrication

A standard electron beam lithography (EBL) technique was employed to define the metal contacts for the drain and source electrodes on the PdSe2 layer using 950 K-poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) resist. After the development of the resist the sample was placed under mild oxygen plasma (Diener PCCE) of 50 W for ∼5 seconds to remove unwanted resist residuals. Subsequently, 5 nm Cr and 60 nm Au were deposited onto the sample by electron beam evaporation (Evatec BAK 501A) to serve as electrodes followed by a lift-off process. The deposition rate was set to ∼0.5 Å s−1 for Cr and to ∼1 Å s−1 for Au at the base pressure of ∼7 × 10−7 Torr.

Materials characterization

A standard optical microscope (Olympus BX53M) was used to identify suitable flakes after exfoliation. Morphological study of the device was carried out by Bruker Dimension-Icon Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) in tapping mode inside a N2 filled glovebox (H2O and O2 content <1 ppm). KPFM was conducted using frequency modulation (FM KPFM) mode. Pt–Ir-coated n+-silicon tips (PPP-EFM-50, NANOSENSORS) with 25 nm tip radius were used for surface potential mapping. The electrode on top of the sample was kept grounded during scan via a wire bonded PCB board. PFM measurements were conducted under ambient conditions using an Asylum Research/Oxford Instruments MFP-3D Infinity AFM system equipped with a conductive Pt/Ir-coated cantilever (PPP-EFM-50, NANOSENSORS™). In2Se3 flakes were mechanically exfoliated onto a conductive substrate comprising 5 nm Cr/50 nm Au deposited on a p++ Si/SiO2 wafer. The tip was operated in contact mode (resonance frequency ∼290 kHz) to scan two square regions of different sizes. During scanning, a bias voltage of +6 V and −6 V was applied to the tip while the conductive surface was grounded. The VECTOR PFM mode was used to characterize the OOP ferroelectric domains with a drive amplitude of 3 V and a 1 Hz scan rate. Spectroscopic characterization of the 2D layers and their heterostructure was carried out using a Raman spectrometer (WITec Alpha300R). The measurements were carried out in confocal mode using a 532 nm laser with a 100× objective (NA = 0.9; Δλ ≈ 360 nm, 1800 g mm−1 grating) lens. The excitation power was typically ∼1 mW to avoid any heating and material degradation. SPCM measurements were carried out with same Raman spectrometer setup. The device was scanned with an excitation power of 0.3 mW with a 50× objective (NA = 0.45) lens. An optical chopper (Thorlabs, MC1F10HP) at a frequency of 1500 Hz and a lock in amplifier (Zurich Instruments, MFLI) were used to probe the photocurrent.

Optoelectronic characterization

Electrical and optoelectronic characterization of the fabricated devices were carried out under ambient conditions using a semiconductor parameter analyzer unit (Keysight B1500A) and a probe station (Semishare, SM-4) equipped with an optical microscope. The synaptic measurements were performed using a 4-channel fiber-coupled pulse laser source (model-MCLS1, Thorlabs) focused through a multimode fiber (400 µm core, NA = 0.39, model: M74L, Thorlabs) and a series of adjustable aspheric collimators (models: CFC2-A, CFC2-b and CFC2-C; Thorlabs). Different wavelengths (406 nm, 520 nm, 642 nm, 785 nm, 980 nm) of varying intensities (Pd,406[thin space (1/6-em)]nm: 0.13–0.19 mW mm−2, Pd,520[thin space (1/6-em)]nm: 0.61 mW mm−2, Pd,642[thin space (1/6-em)]nm: 0.04–0.47 mW mm−2, Pd,785[thin space (1/6-em)]nm: 0.35 mW mm−2, Pd,980[thin space (1/6-em)]nm: 0.18 mW mm−2) and pulse width input signals were used for the synaptic measurements. The frequency of laser pulses was modulated with an externally feed-in square waveform generator (Keysight 336000A).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Data availability

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the supplementary information (SI). See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5mh02349a.

Acknowledgements

E. K. gratefully acknowledges the Israel Department of Energy, the Ministry of Innovation, Science & Technology and the “Ray and Miriam Klein” research foundation for financial support.

References

  1. G. Migliato Marega, et al., Logic-in-memory based on an atomically thin semiconductor, Nature, 2020, 587, 72–77 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. S. Mukherjee, D. Dutta, A. Ghosh and E. Koren, Graphene-In2Se3 van der Waals Heterojunction Neuristor for Optical In-Memory Bimodal Operation, ACS Nano, 2023, 17, 22287–22298 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. T. Zhang, et al., A Reconfigurable All-Optical-Controlled Synaptic Device for Neuromorphic Computing Applications, ACS Nano, 2024, 18, 16236–16247 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. S. Hadke, M.-A. Kang, V. K. Sangwan and M. C. Hersam, Two-Dimensional Materials for Brain-Inspired Computing Hardware, Chem. Rev., 2025, 125(2), 835–932 CrossRef PubMed.
  5. C.-Y. Wang, et al., Gate-tunable van der Waals heterostructure for reconfigurable neural network vision sensor, Sci. Adv., 2020, 6(26), eaba6173 CrossRef PubMed.
  6. F. Zhou, et al., Optoelectronic resistive random access memory for neuromorphic vision sensors, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2019, 14, 776–782 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. Y.-X. Hou, et al., Large-Scale and Flexible Optical Synapses for Neuromorphic Computing and Integrated Visible Information Sensing Memory Processing, ACS Nano, 2021, 15, 1497–1508 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. H. Li, et al., Fully photon modulated heterostructure for neuromorphic computing, Nano Energy, 2019, 65, 104000 CrossRef CAS.
  9. J. Zeng, et al., Multisensory Ferroelectric Semiconductor Synapse for Neuromorphic Computing, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2024, 34, 2313010 CrossRef CAS.
  10. J. Du, et al., A robust neuromorphic vision sensor with optical control of ferroelectric switching, Nano Energy, 2021, 89, 106439 CrossRef CAS.
  11. P. Feng, et al., Self-Powered Optoelectronic Synaptic Devices Based on In2Se3/MoS2 Ferroelectric Heterojunction with Boosted Performance, Adv. Mater. Technol., 2024, 9, 2301355 CrossRef CAS.
  12. X. Li, et al., Multi-Functional Platform for In-Memory Computing And Sensing Based on 2D Ferroelectric Semiconductor α-In2Se3, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2024, 34, 2306486 CrossRef CAS.
  13. L. Hu, et al., Emerging Optoelectronic Devices for Brain-Inspired Computing, Adv. Electron. Mater., 2024, 11(3), 2400482 CrossRef.
  14. J. Sun, et al., Optoelectronic Synapse Based on IGZO-Alkylated Graphene Oxide Hybrid Structure, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1804397 CrossRef.
  15. Y. Chen, et al., Bidirectional Synaptic Phototransistor Based on Two-Dimensional Ferroelectric Semiconductor for Mixed Color Pattern Recognition, ACS Nano, 2023, 17, 12499–12509 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. Y. Wang, et al., Negative Photoconductance in van der Waals Heterostructure-Based Floating Gate Phototransistor, ACS Nano, 2018, 12, 9513–9520 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. S. Seo, et al., Artificial optic-neural synapse for colored and color-mixed pattern recognition, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 5106 CrossRef PubMed.
  18. R. Yang, et al., All-Optically Controlled Artificial Synapse Based on Full Oxides for Low-Power Visible Neural Network Computing, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2024, 34, 2312444 CrossRef CAS.
  19. X. Zhu and W. D. Lu, Optogenetics-Inspired Tunable Synaptic Functions in Memristors, ACS Nano, 2018, 12, 1242–1249 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. C. M. Yang, et al., Bidirectional All-Optical Synapses Based on a 2D Bi2O2Se/Graphene Hybrid Structure for Multifunctional Optoelectronics, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 30, 2001598 CrossRef CAS.
  21. L. Wang, et al., Negative Photoconductivity Transistors for Visuomorphic Computing, Adv. Mater., 2024, 36, 2403538 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. S. Ge, et al., Bidirectional Photoresponse in Perovskite-ZnO Heterostructure for Fully Optical-Controlled Artificial Synapse, Adv. Opt. Mater., 2022, 10, 2200409 CrossRef CAS.
  23. X. Li, et al., Light-Induced Conductance Potentiation and Depression in an All-Optically Controlled Memristor, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2024, 16, 27866–27874 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. F. Zhou, J. Chen, X. Tao, X. Wang and Y. Chai, 2D Materials Based Optoelectronic Memory: Convergence of Electronic Memory and Optical Sensor, Research, 2019, 2019 DOI:10.34133/2019/9490413.
  25. H. Chen, et al., Logic gates based on neuristors made from two-dimensional materials, Nat. Electron., 2021, 4, 399–404 CrossRef CAS.
  26. T. Ahmed, et al., Fully Light-Controlled Memory and Neuromorphic Computation in Layered Black Phosphorus, Adv. Mater., 2021, 33, 2004207 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. J. Jiang, et al., Wavelength-Controlled Photoconductance Polarity Switching via Harnessing Defects in Doped PdSe2 for Artificial Synaptic Features, Small, 2024, 20, 2306068 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  28. Y. Lian, et al., Tunable Bi-directional Photoresponse in Hybrid PtSe2− Thin Films Based on Precisely Controllable Selenization Engineering, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32, 2205709 CrossRef CAS.
  29. S. Katznelson, et al., Bright excitonic multiplexing mediated by dark exciton transition in two-dimensional TMDCs at room temperature, Mater. Horiz., 2022, 9, 1089–1098 RSC.
  30. Q. Liang, Z. Chen, Q. Zhang and A. T. S. Wee, Pentagonal 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenides: PdSe2 and Beyond, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32, 2203555 CrossRef CAS.
  31. Q. Liang, et al., High-Performance, Room Temperature, Ultra-Broadband Photodetectors Based on Air-Stable PdSe2, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1807609 CrossRef PubMed.
  32. Y. Xia, et al., 2D Reconfigurable Memory Device Enabled by Defect Engineering for Multifunctional Neuromorphic Computing, Adv. Mater., 2024, 36, 2403785 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. J. Gao, et al., Multifunctional MoTe2 Fe-FET Enabled by Ferroelectric Polarization-Assisted Charge Trapping, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32, 2110415 CrossRef CAS.
  34. M. H. Pervez, et al., Recent Developments on Novel 2D Materials for Emerging Neuromorphic Computing Devices, Small Struct., 2025, 6, 2400386 CrossRef CAS.
  35. Y. Joo, E. Hwang, H. Hong, S. Cho and H. Yang, Memory and Synaptic Devices Based on Emerging 2D Ferroelectricity, Adv. Electron. Mater., 2023, 9, 2300211 CrossRef CAS.
  36. K. Liu, et al., An optoelectronic synapse based on α-In2Se3 with controllable temporal dynamics for multimode and multiscale reservoir computing, Nat. Electron., 2022, 5, 761–773 CrossRef CAS.
  37. L. Wang, et al., Exploring Ferroelectric Switching in α-In2Se3 for Neuromorphic Computing, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2020, 30, 2004609 CrossRef CAS.
  38. J. Gao, et al., Intrinsic polarization coupling in 2D α-In2Se3 toward artificial synapse with multimode operations, SmartMat, 2021, 2, 88–98 CrossRef CAS.
  39. D. Dutta, S. Mukherjee, M. Uzhansky and E. Koren, Cross-field optoelectronic modulation via inter-coupled ferroelectricity in 2D In2Se3, npj 2D Mater. Appl., 2021, 5, 81 CrossRef CAS.
  40. Y. Zhou, et al., Out-of-Plane Piezoelectricity and Ferroelectricity in Layered α-In 2 Se 3 Nanoflakes, Nano Lett., 2017, 17, 5508–5513 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. S. Mukherjee, D. Dutta, M. Uzhansky and E. Koren, Monolithic In2Se3–In2O3 heterojunction for multibit non-volatile memory and logic operations using optoelectronic inputs, npj 2D Mater. Appl., 2022, 6, 37 CrossRef CAS.
  42. S. Mukherjee, et al., Scalable Integration of Coplanar Heterojunction Monolithic Devices on Two-Dimensional In2Se3, ACS Nano, 2020, 14, 17543–17553 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  43. S. Mukherjee and E. Koren, Indium Selenide (In2Se3) – An Emerging Van-der-Waals Material for Photodetection and Non-Volatile Memory Applications, Isr. J. Chem., 2022, 62, e202100112 CrossRef CAS.
  44. M. Li, et al., Defect Engineering in Ambipolar Layered Materials for Mode-Regulable Nociceptor, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31, 2007587 CrossRef CAS.
  45. D. Dutta, et al., Edge-Based Two-Dimensional α-In2Se3–MoS2 Ferroelectric Field Effect Device, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2023, 15, 18505–18515 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  46. M. Uzhansky, S. Mukherjee, G. Vijayan and E. Koren, Non-Volatile Reconfigurable p–n Junction Utilizing In-Plane Ferroelectricity in 2D WSe2/α-In2Se3 Asymmetric Heterostructures, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2024, 34, 2306682 CrossRef CAS.
  47. M. Uzhansky, A. Rakshit, Y. Kalcheim and E. Koren, Coupled pyroelectric-photovoltaic effect in 2D ferroelectric α-In2Se3, npj 2D Mater. Appl., 2025, 9, 6 CrossRef CAS.
  48. F. Guo, et al., Achieving reinforcement learning in a three-active-terminal neuromorphic device based on a 2D vdW ferroelectric material, Mater. Horiz., 2023, 10, 3719–3728 RSC.
  49. S. Wan, et al., Room-temperature ferroelectricity and a switchable diode effect in two-dimensional α-In2Se3 thin layers, Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 14885–14892 RSC.
  50. Y. Zhou, et al., Out-of-Plane Piezoelectricity and Ferroelectricity in Layered α-In2Se3 Nanoflakes, Nano Lett., 2017, 17, 5508–5513 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  51. C. Zheng, et al., Room temperature in-plane ferroelectricity in van der Waals In2Se3, Sci. Adv., 2018, 4, eaar7720 CrossRef PubMed.
  52. F. Xue, et al., Room-Temperature Ferroelectricity in Hexagonally Layered α-In2Se3 Nanoflakes down to the Monolayer Limit, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1803738 CrossRef.
  53. W. F. Io, et al., Temperature- and thickness-dependence of robust out-of-plane ferroelectricity in CVD grown ultrathin van der Waals α-In2Se3 layers, Nano Res., 2020, 13, 1897–1902 CrossRef CAS.
  54. A. N. Hoffman, et al., Exploring the air stability of PdSe2 via electrical transport measurements and defect calculations, npj 2D Mater. Appl., 2019, 3, 50 CrossRef CAS.
  55. A. Grillo, et al., Coexistence of Negative and Positive Photoconductivity in Few-Layer PtSe2 Field-Effect Transistors, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31, 2105722 CrossRef CAS.
  56. S. S. Han, et al., Wafer-Scale Anion Exchange Conversion of Nonlayered PtS Films to van der Waals Two-Dimensional PtTe2 Layers with Negative Photoresponsiveness, Chem. Mater., 2022, 34, 6996–7005 CrossRef CAS.
  57. S. S. Han, et al., Wafer-scale flexible 2D PtSe2 layers with bi-directional wavelength tunability for fully optical synaptic operations, Nano Energy, 2025, 139, 110943 CrossRef CAS.
  58. S. M. Poh, et al., Molecular-Beam Epitaxy of Two-Dimensional In2Se3 and Its Giant Electroresistance Switching in Ferroresistive Memory Junction, Nano Lett., 2018, 18, 6340–6346 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  59. Y. Mu, et al., Homo-type α-In2Se3/PdSe2 Ferroelectric van der Waals Heterojunction Photodetectors with High-performance and Broadband, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2024, 34, 2315543 CrossRef CAS.
  60. H. Kim and H. J. Choi, Quasiparticle band structures of bulk and few-layer \mathrmPdSe_2 from first-principles GW calculations, Phys. Rev. B, 2021, 103, 165419 CrossRef CAS.
  61. M. A. Zidan, J. P. Strachan and W. D. Lu, The future of electronics based on memristive systems, Nat. Electron., 2018, 1, 22–29 CrossRef.
  62. J. J. Ryu, et al., Highly Linear and Symmetric Weight Modification in HfO2-Based Memristive Devices for High-Precision Weight Entries, Adv. Electron. Mater., 2020, 6, 2000434 CrossRef CAS.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2026
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.