Open Access Article
Sergio Romero-García
a,
Susana Ramos-Terrón†
b,
Gustavo de Miguel
b,
Per Hyldgaard
c,
Luis Camacho
b and
David López-Durán
*a
aDepartamento de Física, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Edificio Albert Einstein (C-2), Ctra. Nnal. IV-A, km. 396, Córdoba, Spain. E-mail: dlduran@uco.es
bDepartamento de Química Física y Termodinámica Aplicada, Instituto Químico para la Energía y el Medio Ambiente, IQUEMA, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Edificio Marie Curie (C-3), C, tra. Nnal. IV-A, km. 396, Córdoba, Spain
cDepartment of Microtechnology and Nanoscience, MC2, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-41296 Göteborg, Sweden
First published on 11th May 2026
Bidentate perovskites, a novel family within this class of solids, have recently attracted the attention of the scientific community. Their spacers feature a dual anchoring mechanism onto the inorganic framework, characteristic of the Dion-Jacobson phases, while the attachment occurs within the same octahedral layer, as observed in the Ruddlesden–Popper perovskites. In this work, we present a hybrid organic–inorganic bidentate perovskite that exhibits diamines as organic spacers between the inorganic layers of PbI6 octahedra, in particular, 4,4′-dithiodianiline. A geometric optimization was carried out within the Density Functional Theory framework as implemented in the Quantum Espresso code. We employed the nonempirical consistent-exchange vdW-DF-cx functional [DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.51.4014] to obtain precise geometry and electronic properties. The total density of states, band structure, valence and conduction band, and changes in the electronic clouds are analysed, finding that the band gap of this new perovskite is 2.55 eV, which reveals a semiconductor nature. In the valence band, the dominant contribution originates from the inorganic layer, whereas in the conduction band the initial contributions arise from the spacer, in particular, from the carbon and sulfur atoms. This suggests charge transport between the inorganic layers, perpendicularly and through the organic moieties. Our findings therefore contribute to the development of novel materials for optoelectronic applications, such as solar cells.
However, HOIPs exhibit several drawbacks that must be addressed to enable long-term use. The very hybrid bonding and ionic sublattice that confer facile processing and compositional tunability also introduce vulnerabilities: HOIPs devices can undergo chemical and environmental degradation pathways involving moisture and oxygen, thermal stress and photo-induced reactions.7 HOIPs also exhibit significant ion migration under electric fields and illumination, a process that can induce current–voltage hysteresis and limit operational stability in devices.8 In this context, the exploration of alternative structural motifs within the HOIPs family, including novel geometric arrangements and dimensionalities of the organic and inorganic sublattices, has emerged as a promising strategy to mitigate these limitations while preserving the favourable optoelectronic properties of the perovskite framework.
Among 2D perovskites, two main structural families are distinguished: Ruddlesden–Popper (RP) and Dion-Jacobson (DJ). The RP perovskites follow the general formula A′2An−1BnX3n+1 where A′ is a monoammonium organic spacer, A is an organic or inorganic cation, B is a divalent metal (i.e., Sn or Pb), X is a halogen anion (i.e., I or Br) and n is an integer (n = 1, 2, 3…). The general formula for the DJ phase is A″An−1BnX3n+1, where in this case A″ is a diammonium organic spacer and the rest of the symbols have the same meaning. Both RP and DJ structures are shown in Fig. 1, in which n = 1. The inorganic part of the perovskites, that is, the slab formed by BX6 octahedra, is a rigid structure due to the covalent nature of its bonds and can be considered as a layer. However, the 2D arrangement of organic molecules is no longer rigid, as these are connected by electrostatic interactions, which are weaker (e.g., ion–ion, ion–dipole and atom–atom bridges). Furthermore, the number of spacer planes is determined by their protonation state. RP perovskites require two spacer planes, as they feature only one protonated terminal group (propylammonium in Fig. 1(a)). In contrast, DJ phases achieve equivalent octahedral interlayer connectivity with a single spacer plane, owing to the protonation of both terminal groups (ethylenediammonium in Fig. 1(b)). The geometric constraints imposed by these layered structures severely restrict the types and sizes of organic spacers that can be incorporated. This poses a challenge: introducing functional groups that modulate the semiconductor properties of the material in a controlled manner while preserving the crystal structure.9
Beyond the well-established RP and DJ families, recent work has demonstrated the emergence of a distinct class of two-dimensional metal halide perovskites based on intralayer bidentate coordination,10–12 giving rise to bidentate perovskites. They exhibit a fundamentally different geometry in which a single organic ligand binds two adjacent metal sites within the same inorganic layer. In this way, rigid diammonium ligands were rationally designed to realise this intralayer bidentate motif, yielding structurally well-defined bidentate phase perovskites. They markedly enhance thermal robustness, stronger ligand–lattice binding energies, and substantially improved operational stability and photovoltaic performance compared with analogous RP and DJ systems.11 Building on this advance, the subsequent perspective12 contextualises the bidentate phase as a new structural paradigm in layered perovskites, highlighting its ability to overcome the conventional performance–stability trade-off by improved lattice matching and defect passivation, while outlining its broader implications for molecular design strategies and future extensions to higher-order multidentate architectures and lead-free compositions.
In this work, we propose a novel family of bidentate perovskites employing diamines as organic spacers, like in the DJ perovskites, but arranged in two molecular planes, as in the RP phase, with B = Pb and X = I (see Fig. 1(c)). Under this design, both ammonium groups of the diamine are oriented toward the same inorganic layer of octahedra, as illustrated in Fig. 1(c). Notably, the present approach enables the incorporation of bulkier spacers, thereby expanding the range of functionalization strategies available for tuning the optoelectronic properties of the resulting materials. The selected organic spacer is the 4,4′-dithiodianiline (DD, [C12H14N2S2]2+, Fig. 1(c)), whose peculiar geometry, particularly the C–S–S–C dihedral angle, plays a key role because it aligns both terminal amine groups in the same direction. In what follows, and for clarity, this novel perovskite, with stoichiometry PbI4DD (n = 1), will be denoted as “PbI4DD”.
Having selected the spacer, we performed a theoretical characterization of structural details as well as electronic properties for the PbI4DD perovskite within the framework of Density functional theory (DFT).13,14 We rely exclusively on robust, nonempirical, general-purpose exchange–correlation (XC) functional approximations, each with a high degree of documented transferability. This is necessary because the PbI4DD structure is new, incompletely characterized and we want our theoretical study to partly take the form of predictions that may subsequently be experimentally tested. We have obtained the geometry, the density of states (DOS), the band structure (BS), the valence and conduction bands (VB, CB), and the changes in the electronic clouds in the consistent-exchange vdW-DF-cx version15 of the vdW density functional (vdW-DF) method16–18 for truly nonlocal-correlation DFT studies.
The paper is organized as follows: Sections 2 and 3 include the physical aspects and the theoretical and numerical details of the system under study, respectively. Results and discussion are presented in Section 4, while conclusions and perspectives for future work can be found in Section 5.
Fig. 2(a) shows the different views of a RP phase with a protonated amine, where propylammonium is used as an example. Regardless of whether the perovskite is RP or DJ, the organic spacers must fit into the surface area available between the octahedra of BX6.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 2 Lateral and zenithal views of an Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite based on propylammonium, panel (a), with the available surface shown in panel (b). That area is the same even if the geometry is partially distorted, panel (c). Colour code as in Fig. 1. | ||
Two requirements, therefore, must be met by these spacers: (a) have a projected section less than or equal to the surface S, and (b) a suitable location of the ammonium group along the axis of the molecule, Fig. 2(b). The octahedra of the inorganic structure can be partially distorted to adapt to the peculiarities of the spacer's geometries, although this fact does not modify the surface area available to the spacer, Fig. 2(c). Moreover, the flexible nature of certain organic molecules could enable adequate coupling with these requisites. Numerous organic spacers have been reported in the literature that adapt to the above requirements.19–27
Structures with bulky organic spacers have been described, with a projected section greater than S and a stoichiometry of A′2MX4 or A″MX4, as for RP and DJ with n = 1, respectively. However, in these cases, the 2D structure of the inorganic lattice breaks, forming 1D structures with the same stoichiometry.20,28–31
Moreover, monoammonium or diammonium organic presenting a projected section larger than S can be anchored on the inorganic layer by electrostatic interactions, covering partially the surface of adjacent octahedra. For these structures with bulky organic anchors, the organic material does not act as a spacer between layers of inorganic material, but by coating as a protective layer of the 3D perovskite nanostructures. These structures have been designated in the literature as quasi-2D RP or DJ perovskites, although they do not have adequate RP or DJ stoichiometry.9,32–37
![]() | ||
| Fig. 3 Organic diammonium spacer in a DJ perovskite, together with the geometric requirements that must fulfil, panel (a). The particular case of a 4,4′-dithiodianiline molecule is shown in panel (b). Colour code as in Fig. 1. | ||
To build the 2D perovskite using this spacer, we have started from a previous DJ structure, provided in the literature in which 4-aminomethylpiperidine (MP) is used as the spacer.33 First, the crystal structure of this perovskite is transformed into P1 symmetry, then the four MP molecules that exist per unit cell are eliminated and a single DD molecule is introduced into the cell. The DD molecule is positioned so that its two nitrogen atoms occupy the same positions that the nitrogens of the ammonium groups of the removed MP molecules, approximately. In addition, the bisector of the torsion angle C–SS–C is located perpendicular to the inorganic layer, Fig. 3(b). The introduced DD molecule has the two nitrogens protonated and a C–SS–C torsion angle of 80.2°. In the above structure, the distance between either of the two S atoms and the plane that defines the inorganic lattice is 7.6 Å. The crystal lattice is then expanded along perpendicularly to the inorganic layer by a distance 2 × (7.6 + 1.85) = 18.9 Å, where the value of 1.85 Å represents the vdW radius of sulfur. This expansion generates enough space to accommodate the remaining 3 DD molecules, necessary to compensate for the negative charge of the inorganic lattice. The methodology for introducing these three molecules is the same as that used with the first of them. The interaction between the inorganic slabs and the organic planes is fundamentally electrostatic in nature, involving ion–ion or ion–dipole interactions between the PbI6 octahedra and the ammonium groups NH3+ (it should be remembered that the stoichiometry of the inorganic layer is actually [PbI4]2−, since 4 of the I atoms of the octahedron are shared by adjacent Pb atoms). This largely determines the relative positions of the DD molecule with respect to these slabs. Due to the relatively short distance between the sulfur atoms of two adjacent DD molecules and the strength of their interaction, S–S bridges should be considered as the next most important influence, with consequent effects on the relative positions between the spacers. Finally, N–H or N–Pb bridges would not play any relevant role, owing to the large separation between these atoms and/or the weakness of their interaction.
After this experience-based construction, a first and quick geometric optimization was carried out using the module CASTEP incorporated in the commercial software Biovia/Materials Studio.39 The functional used was PBEsol40 with TS dispersion correction.41 Electron–ion interactions were described by ultrasoft pseudopotentials and the relativistic effects are incorporated by means of the Koelling-Harmon method. The structure obtained after this optimization is shown in Fig. 4(a). PBEsol calculations on closely-bonded oxide perovskites usually give geometric arrangements and relative stabilities in approximate agreement with experimental data, and the addition of a dispersion-correction41–43 provides accuracy in structure predictions also to HOIPs.44–47
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 Geometric optimization of the perovskite form proposed here, performed with the Biovia/Materials Studio39 and Quantum Espresso48,49 codes (panels (a) and (b), respectively). Colour code as in Fig. 1. | ||
DD molecules have previously been used experimentally in the formation of a 2D perovskite, albeit in a different context, where the two amine groups of the molecule were not protonated.10 In these circumstances, the interactions between the amine groups and the inorganic layers are not electrostatic, as in our case, given the absence of positive charge in the DD molecules, but through chelates, probably formed through N–Pb bonds.
In mixed systems, for example, the novel PbI4DD 2D HOIP, one generally needs to either supplement the PBE/PBEsol by a semi-empirical dispersion correction, e.g., as in PBE + D3 or PBE + TS,41–43 or use the vdW-DF method for truly nonlocal-correlation nonempirical DFT.16–18 Here, for our DFT characterization of the suggested PbI4DD perovskite, we proceed with the vdW-DF-cx version (abbreviated CX),15 which aligns the nonlocal-correlation energy term of this vdW-DF with the screening implied in the GGA-type starting point to seek a systematic GGA extension.60–63 The CX has been documented as a general purpose functional and more versatile than PBE. At the same time, it is more accurate on the strongly-bonded bulk matter than PBE and it is able to predict both the internal structure and inter-molecular excitations in molecular crystals.60 For our goal of discussing and predicting properties, robustness on atomic-structure predictions is valuable. We face a new material and we cannot a priori know whether it is strongly bonded (in which case PBE may suffice) or whether the organic–inorganic binding requires use of the more versatile vdW-inclusive CX functional. Let us mention that as the CX functional has a GGA-type exchange its use in Kohn–Sham DFT leads to a well-understood underestimation of the predicted bandgap, like for the set of GGAs.
We have employed the Quantum Espresso (QE) suite of codes for planewave DFT and analysis48,49 using norm-conserving pseudopotentials.64 Our results, i.e., predictions of geometric and electronic properties, for this new type of HOIP, have been obtained through a three-step procedure:
1. A CX geometric optimization whose starting point is the above-summarized dispersion-corrected PBEsol characterization. This initial prediction of both unit-cell and atomic structure implements relaxations defined by calculations of both forces and stresses and was completed at a 2175 eV (160 Ry) kinetic-energy cutoff (and 640 Ry for the charge-density representation) to leverage trust in accuracy, as documented in previous CX-based soft-matter structure optimizations.62,65
2. A self-consistent (scf) calculation followed by a non-self-consistent (nscf) calculation, achieving convergence with a kinetic-energy cutoff of 680 eV (50 Ry).
3. The extraction of the electronic features that we predict for our system using the QE post-processing tools.
The system was treated as non-spin-polarized and Brillouin zone sampling was performed employing the Monkhorst–Pack method,66 with 4 × 4 × 4 k-points for the CX geometric optimization as well as for the scf step and with 8 × 8 × 8 k-points for the nscf step. The convergence thresholds in the structure optimization were 10−4 a.u. on energy differences and 10−3 a.u. on the maximum atomic-force components, respectively. The electronic energies were in all cases converged to 10−6 a.u. (atomic coordinates upon reasonable request).
The DOS can be found in Fig. 5(a), in which the intermediate value for the corresponding gap, 2.55 eV, reveals the semiconductor character of the material (EF = 1.87 eV). It is clearly seen the contribution of the iodine atom in the VB and the molecule in the CB, Fig. 5(b). This behaviour is similar to that found in ref. 33 for n = 3 and 4, but it is different from other similar systems, where the first contribution to the CB comes from the inorganic layer, in particular, the lead.67 Moreover, this is consistent with the fact that the highest levels of the VB are mainly located in the [PbI4]2− layers, while the lowest levels of the CB are placed in the DD planes, Fig. 5(e) and (f), respectively (only one state shown). For ease of comparison, the structure of the PbI4DD perovskite is included in Fig. 5(c). As a result of the highly significant role played by the DD molecule in the CB, a substantial change occurs in its electronic structure, Fig. 5(d), where the charge density minus the charge density of the isolated atomic species is plotted. It can be observed that the largest differences are located on the organic framework and it is reasonable if one takes into account that the carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and sulfur atoms have a much smaller volume than the lead and iodine atoms, being therefore more easily susceptible to changes in their electron clouds.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 5 Band structures and total density of states for the perovskite form proposed here, panels (a) and (b), shifted by EF. It is clearly seen the contribution of the iodine atom in the valence band and the 4,4′-dithiodianiline molecule in the conduction band, in which the carbon and sulfur atoms play the most important role. The partial profile of the lead is also included and a gap of 2.55 eV is found. As a reference for the rest of the panels, the PbI4DD structure is included in panel (c) and the change in the charge density with respect to the isolated atomic species can be seen in panel (d). In the highest level of the valence band, panel (e), the main contribution comes from the [PbI4]2− layers, while in the lowest level of the conduction band, panel (f), that contribution is due to the sheets of the 4,4′-dithiodianiline spacer. Colour code as in Fig. 1. | ||
Having established the main contribution of the DD molecule to the CB, the presence of the carbon atom is to be expected, Fig. 5(b), as it forms the backbone of the organic molecule. However, the appearance of the sulfur atom is noteworthy, Fig. 5(b), raising the question of whether the S atom plays an additional electronic role beyond its mechanical importance in the torsion angle. Taking into account that electrical conductivity arises from the transfer of electrons from the highest levels of the VB to the lowest levels of the CB, it can be inferred from Fig. 5(e) and (f) that, in the present case, conduction occurs from the [PbI4]2− layers to the DD planes. This suggests that electronic conduction is possible from one inorganic layer to the other through the organic framework, which can be considered as a bridge. Therefore, in this case, the spacer not only has a geometric function but also exerts an electronic influence on the energetic description, at least to the same extent as the inorganic layers. This observation opens the door to exploring species that enable charge transport not only within the inorganic layer of the perovskite, but also in the perpendicular direction, i.e., through the organic framework.
Finally, regarding the stability of the PbI4DD perovskite, we first mention that we did pursue that force- and stress-based relaxations to a very high degree of accuracy, thereby tracking changes into qualitatively different geometries using vdW-DF-cx, Fig. 4. That alone heightens the probability that we thus found a stable geometry. To support this argument, we present two material-stability tests, both of which are illustrated in Fig. 6. We note that the unit cell, shown in Fig. 6(a), forms a (2D-)layered system as we stack such unit cells on top of each other. We also note that there are no expected (or actual) covalent or ionic bonding between the top-most set of S atoms in one cell to the set of bottom-most S atoms in the next repeated image.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 6 Perovskite proposed in this work, panel (a), represented as an assembly of PbI6 octahedra layers, panel (b), and DD planes, panel (c). Colour code as in Fig. 1. | ||
First, we have used CX to compute the interlayer-binding energy, defined in the typical manner for studies of vdW heterostructures. This was done by increasing the extension of the unit cell in the direction perpendicular to the layer plane by an extra 30 Å, while also tracking what are small relaxations in the increasingly isolated 2D building blocks. We thus predict a 0.85 eV interlayer-binding energy per unit cell, or ∼6 meV Å−2, effectively set by the binding contribution (∼9 meV Å−2) from the nonlocal-correlation term, although offset by other energy terms of the CX description. For comparison, the inter-layer binding energy in graphite is ∼21 meV Å−2. Second, we computed the energy involved in DD-spacer and PbI-string assembly. That is, we view the unit-cell structure, Fig. 6(a), as arising from an imagined assembly of alternating fragments of DD spacers and [PbI4]2− layers, Fig. 6(b) and Fig. 6(c), respectively. Here we note that the individual layers (as depicted in the unit cell schematics) results upon charge transfers: the DD molecule, per se, has two sulphur-connected aromatic-ring-NH2 components, whereas the resulting spacer is formed with ''NH3'' molecular components, Fig. 6(b), pointing to nearby I atoms, Fig. 6(a) and (c). We find that separating the DD spacer and the [PbI4]2− layers, per se, costs a total of 37 eV per cell (with non-local-correlation binding at 8 eV). However, if the DD spacer were actually thus separated, the system will recover some energy when the 8 N atoms each release one hydrogen atom that, in turn, reattach themselves to surrounding matter. Formation of four H2 molecules from the DD spacer cluster, Fig. 6(b), is one plausible consequence with significant potential for energy release. We provide an assessment of the energy cost for the would-be material-breakdown path, Fig. 6, by offsetting the 37 eV per cell value by the energy gain involving H detachments and H2 formation (something we have also tracked in CX studies). The resulting estimate for the energy cost of material disassembly still remains substantial, 21 eV per cell, and we judge the new perovskite system stable.
1. The gap of this new perovskite is equal to 2.55 eV, revealing its semiconductor character.
2. In the valence band the most important contribution comes from the iodine atoms of the PbI6 octahedra, while in the conduction band the first contributions come from the spacer, specifically, from the carbon and sulfur atoms. It is explained in terms of the location of the highest levels of the VB and the lowest levels of the CB: the former in the inorganic layer, the latter in the organic plane.
3. Therefore, a charge transport in the perpendicular direction of the inorganic layer, i.e., through the spacer, which would act as bridge, is revealed.
These findings open up new possibilities for designing spacers that allow the conduction both in the inorganic layer of the perovskite and in the perpendicular direction, contributing in the quest of new and promising materials in photovoltaics and optoelectronics, for example. Future work may include the experimental validation of the PbI4DD perovskite, as well as further numerical studies on new hybrid organic–inorganic bidentate phases, following the approach adopted in this work.
P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 (39), 395502 (2009). DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502.
P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29 (46), 465901 (2017). DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/aa8f79.
The version of the code employed for this study is version 6.8.
Footnote |
| † Present address: Semiconductor Materials for Sustainability Laboratory, Institute of Materials Science of Seville and Department of Condensed Matter Physics, University of Seville – Spanish National Research Council (US–CSIC), Calle Américo Vespucio 49, Seville 41092, Spain. |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2026 |